Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report · 2019-05-17 · Interpreting the Frequency...

24
Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Sample Survey Items Course Level Variable Names Count Response Categories Column Percentage (%) Response options are listed just as they appear on the instrument. This column represents the percentage of faculty responding to the particular option for each item. Course-Based Survey Option The course-based option asks faculty members to respond to questions about student engagement based on a course taught during the current academic year. This option is valuable for institutions that want to know more about faculty practices and student engagement tied to individual courses taught on campus. The Frequency Distributions report is based on information from all faculty at your institution who responded to the survey based on their experiences teaching either a lower or upper division course. Faculty who responded based on another type of course or who did not report the course level are not included in this report. The items from the FSSE course-based survey option appear in the left column in the same order and wording as they appear on the instrument. Frequency distributions are reported separately for faculty who teach lower division and upper division courses. The name of each variable appears in the first column for easy reference to your data file and the FSSE-NSSE Combined Report. The 'Count' column represents the actual number of faculty who selected a particular response option for each item.

Transcript of Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report · 2019-05-17 · Interpreting the Frequency...

Page 1: Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report · 2019-05-17 · Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Sample Survey Items Course Level Variable Names Count Response Categories

Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report

Sample

Survey Items Course Level

Variable Names Count

Response Categories Column Percentage (%)Response options are listed just as they appear on the instrument.

This column represents the percentage of faculty responding to the particular option for each item.

Course-Based Survey OptionThe course-based option asks faculty members to respond to questions about student engagement based on a course taught during the current academic year. This option is valuable for institutions that want to know more about faculty practices and student engagement tied to individual courses taught on campus.

The Frequency Distributions report is based on information from all faculty at your institution who responded to the survey based on their experiences teaching either a lower or upper division course. Faculty who responded based on another type of course or who did not report the course level are not included in this report.

The items from the FSSE course-based survey option appear in the left column in the same order and wording as they appear on the instrument.

Frequency distributions are reported separately for faculty who teach lower division and upper division courses.

The name of each variable appears in the first column for easy reference to your data file and the FSSE-NSSE Combined Report.

The 'Count' column represents the actual number of faculty who selected a particular response option for each item.

Page 2: Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report · 2019-05-17 · Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Sample Survey Items Course Level Variable Names Count Response Categories

1

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

a. FINTERN Not important 0 0% 2 2% 2 1%Somewhat important 8 16% 15 11% 23 13%Important 17 35% 41 31% 58 32%Very important 24 49% 75 56% 99 54%

Total 49 100% 133 100% 182 100%

b. FVOLUNTR Not important 5 10% 22 17% 27 15%Somewhat important 14 29% 38 29% 52 29%Important 26 53% 53 40% 79 43%Very important 4 8% 20 15% 24 13%

Total 49 100% 133 100% 182 100%

c. FLERNCOM Not important 8 17% 32 24% 40 22%Somewhat important 20 42% 49 37% 69 38%Important 15 31% 40 30% 55 30%Very important 5 10% 12 9% 17 9%

Total 48 100% 133 100% 181 100%

d. FIMPR05 Not important 2 4% 11 8% 13 7%Somewhat important 20 42% 37 27% 57 31%Important 17 35% 49 36% 66 36%Very important 9 19% 38 28% 47 26%

Total 48 100% 135 100% 183 100%

e. FFORLANG Not important 10 21% 27 20% 37 20%Somewhat important 22 46% 55 41% 77 42%Important 10 21% 40 30% 50 27%Very important 6 13% 13 10% 19 10%

Total 48 100% 135 100% 183 100%

f. FSTUDYAB Not important 12 25% 32 24% 44 24%Somewhat important 20 42% 63 47% 83 46%Important 10 21% 24 18% 34 19%Very important 6 13% 14 11% 20 11%

Total 48 100% 133 100% 181 100%

FSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

Upper DivisionLower Division Total

How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following?

Work on a research project with a facultymember outside of course or program requirements

Participation in a learning community or some other formal program where groups of students take two or more classes together

Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op experience, or clinical assignment

Community service or volunteer work

Foreign language coursework

Study abroad

Michigan Technological University

Page 3: Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report · 2019-05-17 · Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Sample Survey Items Course Level Variable Names Count Response Categories

2

FSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

Upper DivisionLower Division Total

Michigan Technological University

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

g. FINDST06 Not important 13 27% 32 24% 45 25%Somewhat important 21 44% 56 42% 77 42%Important 13 27% 29 22% 42 23%Very important 1 2% 17 13% 18 10%

Total 48 100% 134 100% 182 100%

h. FSENIOR Not important 2 4% 0 0% 2 1%Somewhat important 3 6% 10 7% 13 7%Important 20 42% 40 30% 60 33%Very important 23 48% 84 63% 107 59%

Total 48 100% 134 100% 182 100%

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

FENVSTU

0 0% 0 0% 0 0%2 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%3 2 4% 1 1% 3 2%4 6 13% 17 13% 23 13%5 15 31% 28 21% 43 24%6 18 38% 62 47% 80 44%

7 15% 25 19% 32 18%

Total 48 100% 133 100% 181 100%

FENVFAC

1 2% 1 1% 2 1%2 2 4% 2 2% 4 2%3 1 2% 3 2% 4 2%4 6 13% 15 11% 21 12%5 15 32% 43 32% 58 32%6 15 32% 44 33% 59 33%Available, Helpful, Sympathetic 7 15% 25 19% 32 18%

Total 47 100% 133 100% 180 100%

Independent study or self-designed major

Friendly, Supportive, Sense of Belonging

Student relationships with other students

Culminating senior experience (capstone course, senior project or thesis, comprehensive exam, etc.)

Student relationships with faculty members

How important is it to you that undergraduates at your institution do the following? (continued)

Unavailable, Unhelpful, Unsympathetic

Select the response that you believe best represents the quality of student relationships with people at your institution.

Unfriendly, Unsupportive, Sense of Alienation

Page 4: Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report · 2019-05-17 · Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Sample Survey Items Course Level Variable Names Count Response Categories

3

FSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

Upper DivisionLower Division Total

Michigan Technological University

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %FENVADM

1 2% 1 1% 2 1%2 1 2% 11 8% 12 7%3 6 13% 13 10% 19 11%4 11 24% 32 24% 43 24%5 13 28% 34 26% 47 26%6 10 22% 33 25% 43 24%

4 9% 9 7% 13 7%

Total 46 100% 133 100% 179 100%

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

a. FENVSCHO Very little 3 6% 8 6% 11 6%Some 11 23% 24 18% 35 19%Quite a bit 26 54% 62 46% 88 48%Very much 8 17% 40 30% 48 26%

Total 48 100% 134 100% 182 100%

b. FENVSUPR Very little 1 2% 2 1% 3 2%Some 5 11% 28 21% 33 18%Quite a bit 25 53% 61 46% 86 48%Very much 16 34% 43 32% 59 33%

Total 47 100% 134 100% 181 100%

c. FENVDIVR Very little 9 19% 29 22% 38 21%Some 23 49% 52 39% 75 41%Quite a bit 10 21% 34 25% 44 24%Very much 5 11% 19 14% 24 13%

Total 47 100% 134 100% 181 100%

Requiring students to spend significant amountsof time studying and on academic work

Providing students the support they need to helpthem succeed academically

Encouraging contact among students from different economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds

To what extent does your institution emphasize each of the following?

Select the response that you believe best represents the quality of student relationships with people at your institution. (continued)

Unhelpful, Inconsiderate, Rigid

Helpful, Considerate, Flexible

Student relationships with administrative personnel and offices

Page 5: Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report · 2019-05-17 · Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Sample Survey Items Course Level Variable Names Count Response Categories

4

FSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

Upper DivisionLower Division Total

Michigan Technological University

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

d. FENVNACA Very little 9 19% 29 22% 38 21%Some 23 48% 61 46% 84 47%Quite a bit 12 25% 32 24% 44 24%Very much 4 8% 10 8% 14 8%

Total 48 100% 132 100% 180 100%

e. FENVSOCA Very little 5 11% 13 10% 18 10%Some 24 51% 65 50% 89 50%Quite a bit 14 30% 40 31% 54 31%Very much 4 9% 12 9% 16 9%

Total 47 100% 130 100% 177 100%

f. FENVACT Very little 3 6% 4 3% 7 4%Some 15 31% 35 26% 50 27%Quite a bit 17 35% 74 55% 91 50%Very much 13 27% 21 16% 34 19%

Total 48 100% 134 100% 182 100%

g. FENVEVEN Very little 3 6% 10 8% 13 7%Some 15 32% 45 34% 60 33%Quite a bit 17 36% 56 42% 73 41%Very much 12 26% 22 17% 34 19%

Total 47 100% 133 100% 180 100%

h. FENVCOMP Very little 2 4% 1 1% 3 2%Some 4 8% 5 4% 9 5%Quite a bit 16 33% 46 34% 62 34%Very much 26 54% 82 61% 108 59%

Total 48 100% 134 100% 182 100%

Helping students cope with their non-academic responsibilities (work, family, etc.)

To what extent does your institution emphasize each of the following? (continued)

Providing students the support they needto thrive socially

Encouraging students to attend campus events and activities (special speakers, cultural performances, athletic events, etc.)

Encouraging students to use computers in their academic work

Encouraging students to participate in co-curricular activities (organizations, campus publications, student government, fraternity or sorority, intercollegiate or intramural sports, etc.)

Page 6: Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report · 2019-05-17 · Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Sample Survey Items Course Level Variable Names Count Response Categories

5

FSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

Upper DivisionLower Division Total

Michigan Technological University

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

a. UGTEACH 0 0 0% 3 2% 3 2%1-4 12 25% 40 30% 52 28%5-8 21 44% 60 44% 81 44%9-12 13 27% 19 14% 32 17%13-16 1 2% 8 6% 9 5%17-20 1 2% 1 1% 2 1%21-30 0 0% 3 2% 3 2%More than 30 0 0% 1 1% 1 1%

Total 48 100% 135 100% 183 100%

b. GRADEPAP 0 0 0% 2 1% 2 1%1-4 20 42% 63 47% 83 45%5-8 13 27% 45 33% 58 32%9-12 11 23% 23 17% 34 19%13-16 1 2% 0 0% 1 1%17-20 3 6% 0 0% 3 2%21-30 0 0% 1 1% 1 1%More than 30 0 0% 1 1% 1 1%

Total 48 100% 135 100% 183 100%

c. GRADEBCK 0 1 2% 1 1% 2 1%1-4 24 51% 83 61% 107 59%5-8 12 26% 33 24% 45 25%9-12 10 21% 12 9% 22 12%13-16 0 0% 2 1% 2 1%17-20 0 0% 1 1% 1 1%21-30 0 0% 2 1% 2 1%More than 30 0 0% 1 1% 1 1%

Total 47 100% 135 100% 182 100%

Grading papers and exams

Teaching undergraduate students in class

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following?

Giving other forms of written and oral feedbackto students

Page 7: Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report · 2019-05-17 · Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Sample Survey Items Course Level Variable Names Count Response Categories

6

FSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

Upper DivisionLower Division Total

Michigan Technological University

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

d. CLASSPRP 0 0 0% 1 1% 1 1%1-4 4 8% 21 16% 25 14%5-8 20 42% 57 42% 77 42%9-12 13 27% 30 22% 43 23%13-16 6 13% 12 9% 18 10%17-20 4 8% 9 7% 13 7%21-30 0 0% 3 2% 3 2%More than 30 1 2% 2 1% 3 2%

Total 48 100% 135 100% 183 100%

e. REFLECT 0 0 0% 1 1% 1 1%1-4 36 75% 92 69% 128 71%5-8 8 17% 29 22% 37 20%9-12 3 6% 4 3% 7 4%13-16 1 2% 3 2% 4 2%17-20 0 0% 2 2% 2 1%21-30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%More than 30 0 0% 2 2% 2 1%

Total 48 100% 133 100% 181 100%

f. SCHOLAR 0 2 4% 3 2% 5 3%1-4 11 23% 9 7% 20 11%5-8 8 17% 17 13% 25 14%9-12 9 19% 20 15% 29 16%13-16 9 19% 18 14% 27 15%17-20 4 8% 21 16% 25 14%21-30 4 8% 21 16% 25 14%More than 30 1 2% 23 17% 24 13%

Total 48 100% 132 100% 180 100%

Reflecting on ways to improve my teaching

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? (continued)

Research and scholarly activities

Preparing for class

Page 8: Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report · 2019-05-17 · Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Sample Survey Items Course Level Variable Names Count Response Categories

7

FSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

Upper DivisionLower Division Total

Michigan Technological University

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

g. FRESEARC 0 17 35% 35 26% 52 29%1-4 22 46% 53 40% 75 41%5-8 5 10% 19 14% 24 13%9-12 2 4% 13 10% 15 8%13-16 1 2% 4 3% 5 3%17-20 1 2% 4 3% 5 3%21-30 0 0% 1 1% 1 1%More than 30 0 0% 4 3% 4 2%

Total 48 100% 133 100% 181 100%

h. ADVISE 0 14 29% 25 19% 39 22%1-4 23 48% 74 56% 97 54%5-8 9 19% 18 14% 27 15%9-12 1 2% 8 6% 9 5%13-16 1 2% 4 3% 5 3%17-20 0 0% 2 2% 2 1%21-30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%More than 30 0 0% 2 2% 2 1%

Total 48 100% 133 100% 181 100%

i. FIELDEXP 0 39 81% 77 59% 116 65%1-4 8 17% 41 32% 49 28%5-8 1 2% 7 5% 8 4%9-12 0 0% 5 4% 5 3%13-16 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%17-20 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%21-30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%More than 30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Total 48 100% 130 100% 178 100%

Advising undergraduate students

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? (continued)

Working with undergraduates on research

Supervising internships or other field experiences

Page 9: Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report · 2019-05-17 · Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Sample Survey Items Course Level Variable Names Count Response Categories

8

FSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

Upper DivisionLower Division Total

Michigan Technological University

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

j. FFACOTHR 0 20 42% 48 36% 68 38%1-4 27 56% 65 49% 92 51%5-8 0 0% 11 8% 11 6%9-12 1 2% 8 6% 9 5%13-16 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%17-20 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%21-30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%More than 30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Total 48 100% 132 100% 180 100%

k. FINTERAC 0 10 21% 19 14% 29 16%1-4 35 73% 85 64% 120 67%5-8 2 4% 18 14% 20 11%9-12 1 2% 8 6% 9 5%13-16 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%17-20 0 0% 1 1% 1 1%21-30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%More than 30 0 0% 1 1% 1 1%

Total 48 100% 132 100% 180 100%

l. SERVICE 0 10 21% 23 17% 33 18%1-4 24 50% 62 47% 86 48%5-8 9 19% 30 23% 39 22%9-12 2 4% 10 8% 12 7%13-16 2 4% 3 2% 5 3%17-20 1 2% 3 2% 4 2%21-30 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%More than 30 0 0% 1 1% 1 1%

Total 48 100% 132 100% 180 100%

About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following? (continued)

Other interactions with students outside of the classroom

Working with students on activities other than course work (committees, orientation, student life activities, etc.)

Conducting service activities

Page 10: Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report · 2019-05-17 · Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Sample Survey Items Course Level Variable Names Count Response Categories

9

FSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

Upper DivisionLower Division Total

Michigan Technological University

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

TEACFORM Classroom, on-campus 47 98% 131 97% 178 97%Classroom, auxiliary location 0 0% 3 2% 3 2%Distance education 1 2% 1 1% 2 1%

Total 48 100% 135 100% 183 100%

GENEDREQ No 20 42% 86 64% 106 58%Yes 28 58% 49 36% 77 42%

Total 48 100% 135 100% 183 100%

CS05 9 or less 1 2% 6 4% 7 4%10 to 19 7 15% 32 24% 39 21%20 to 29 7 15% 26 19% 33 18%30 to 49 8 17% 38 28% 46 25%50 to 99 20 42% 29 22% 49 27%100 or more 5 10% 3 2% 8 4%

Total 48 100% 134 100% 182 100%

CT05 0 7 15% 16 12% 23 13%1 to 2 6 13% 27 20% 33 18%3 to 9 21 45% 53 40% 74 41%10 to 19 8 17% 21 16% 29 16%20 or more 5 11% 17 13% 22 12%

Total 47 100% 134 100% 181 100%

In what format do you teach your selected course section?

How many students are enrolled in your selected course section?

Prior to this semester, how many times have you taught your selected course?

Please respond to the following questions based on one particular undergraduate course section you are teaching or have taught during this academic year.

Does your selected course section fulfill a general education requirement on your campus?

Page 11: Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report · 2019-05-17 · Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Sample Survey Items Course Level Variable Names Count Response Categories

10

FSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

Upper DivisionLower Division Total

Michigan Technological University

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

a. FCLQUEST None 1 2% 1 1% 2 1%1-24% 25 53% 68 51% 93 51%25-49% 14 30% 38 28% 52 29%50-74% 4 9% 23 17% 27 15%75% or higher 3 6% 4 3% 7 4%

Total 47 100% 134 100% 181 100%

b. FCLUNPRE None 1 2% 11 8% 12 7%1-24% 21 47% 55 41% 76 43%25-49% 6 13% 27 20% 33 19%50-74% 11 24% 26 20% 37 21%75% or higher 6 13% 14 11% 20 11%

Total 45 100% 133 100% 178 100%

c. FWORKHRD None 2 4% 6 5% 8 5%1-24% 20 44% 48 36% 68 38%25-49% 13 29% 40 30% 53 30%50-74% 7 16% 28 21% 35 20%75% or higher 3 7% 10 8% 13 7%

Total 45 100% 132 100% 177 100%

d. FEMAIL None 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%1-24% 21 45% 48 36% 69 38%25-49% 15 32% 39 29% 54 30%50-74% 6 13% 33 25% 39 22%75% or higher 5 11% 14 10% 19 10%

Total 47 100% 134 100% 181 100%

e. FGRADE None 0 0% 2 2% 2 1%1-24% 32 68% 67 50% 99 55%25-49% 12 26% 43 32% 55 31%50-74% 2 4% 14 11% 16 9%75% or higher 1 2% 7 5% 8 4%

Total 47 100% 133 100% 180 100%

Frequently come to class without completing readings or assignments

Occasionally discuss grades or assignmentswith you

Frequently work harder than they usually do to meet your standards

Frequently ask questions in class or contribute to class discussions

Occasionally use e-mail to communicatewith you

About what percent of students in your selected course section do the following?

Page 12: Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report · 2019-05-17 · Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Sample Survey Items Course Level Variable Names Count Response Categories

11

FSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

Upper DivisionLower Division Total

Michigan Technological University

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

f. FPLANS None 5 11% 8 6% 13 7%1-24% 33 72% 81 61% 114 64%25-49% 4 9% 27 20% 31 17%50-74% 3 7% 16 12% 19 11%75% or higher 1 2% 1 1% 2 1%

Total 46 100% 133 100% 179 100%

g. FIDEAS None 5 11% 8 6% 13 7%1-24% 32 68% 83 62% 115 64%25-49% 7 15% 32 24% 39 22%50-74% 2 4% 10 7% 12 7%75% or higher 1 2% 1 1% 2 1%

Total 47 100% 134 100% 181 100%

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

a. FDIVCLAS Never 25 53% 58 44% 83 46%Sometimes 11 23% 42 32% 53 30%Often 6 13% 17 13% 23 13%Very often 5 11% 15 11% 20 11%

Total 47 100% 132 100% 179 100%

b. FCLASSGR Never 5 11% 21 16% 26 15%Sometimes 21 46% 40 31% 61 35%Often 5 11% 30 23% 35 20%Very often 15 33% 38 29% 53 30%

Total 46 100% 129 100% 175 100%

c. FCOMMPRO Never 40 85% 100 76% 140 79%Sometimes 6 13% 19 15% 25 14%Often 1 2% 5 4% 6 3%Very often 0 0% 7 5% 7 4%

Total 47 100% 131 100% 178 100%

At least once, talk about career planswith you

At least once, discuss ideas from readings or classes with you outside of class

About what percent of students in your selected course section do the following? (continued)

How often do students in your selected course section engage in the following?

Have class discussions or writing assignments that include diverse perspectives (different races, religions, genders, political beliefs, etc.)

Work with other students on projectsduring class

Participate in a community-based project (e.g., service learning) as part of your course

Page 13: Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report · 2019-05-17 · Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Sample Survey Items Course Level Variable Names Count Response Categories

12

FSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

Upper DivisionLower Division Total

Michigan Technological University

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

d. FITICADE Never 11 23% 36 27% 47 26%Sometimes 14 30% 37 28% 51 28%Often 9 19% 18 14% 27 15%Very often 13 28% 41 31% 54 30%

Total 47 100% 132 100% 179 100%

e. FFEED Never 1 2% 1 1% 2 1%Sometimes 4 9% 27 20% 31 17%Often 15 32% 46 35% 61 34%Very often 27 57% 59 44% 86 48%

Total 47 100% 133 100% 180 100%

f. FDIVRSTU Never 22 48% 65 49% 87 49%Sometimes 20 43% 49 37% 69 39%Often 3 7% 11 8% 14 8%Very often 1 2% 7 5% 8 4%

Total 46 100% 132 100% 178 100%

g. FDIFFSTU Never 22 48% 55 42% 77 44%Sometimes 17 37% 57 44% 74 42%Often 5 11% 9 7% 14 8%Very often 2 4% 9 7% 11 6%

Total 46 100% 130 100% 176 100%

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

a. FREADASG None 0 0% 9 7% 9 5%1 26 60% 76 61% 102 61%2-3 13 30% 30 24% 43 26%4-6 2 5% 2 2% 4 2%More than 6 2 5% 7 6% 9 5%

Total 43 100% 124 100% 167 100%

How often do students in your selected course section engage in the following? (continued)

In your selected course section, about how much reading and writing do you assign students?

Number of assigned textbooks, books, or book-length packs of course readings

Have serious conversations in your course with students who are very different from them in terms of their religious beliefs, political opinions, or personal values

Use an electronic medium (listserv, chat group, Internet, instant messaging, etc.) to discuss or complete an assignment

Receive prompt written or oral feedback from you on their academic performance

Have serious conversations in your course with students of a different race or ethnicity than their own

Page 14: Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report · 2019-05-17 · Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Sample Survey Items Course Level Variable Names Count Response Categories

13

FSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

Upper DivisionLower Division Total

Michigan Technological University

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

b. FWRTMR05 None 41 89% 92 73% 133 77%1 5 11% 15 12% 20 12%2-3 0 0% 11 9% 11 6%4-6 0 0% 5 4% 5 3%More than 6 0 0% 3 2% 3 2%

Total 46 100% 126 100% 172 100%

c. FWRTMD05 None 26 58% 44 34% 70 40%1 10 22% 29 22% 39 22%2-3 7 16% 29 22% 36 21%4-6 2 4% 14 11% 16 9%More than 6 0 0% 14 11% 14 8%

Total 45 100% 130 100% 175 100%

d. FWRITSML None 17 37% 30 23% 47 27%1 4 9% 16 12% 20 11%2-3 5 11% 37 29% 42 24%4-6 9 20% 15 12% 24 14%More than 6 11 24% 31 24% 42 24%

Total 46 100% 129 100% 175 100%

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

a. FPROBSTA None 9 19% 27 21% 36 21%1-2 15 32% 46 36% 61 35%3-4 5 11% 24 19% 29 17%5-6 5 11% 4 3% 9 5%More than 6 13 28% 26 20% 39 22%

Total 47 100% 127 100% 174 100%

b. FPROBSTB None 21 47% 62 48% 83 48%1-2 8 18% 33 26% 41 24%3-4 4 9% 14 11% 18 10%5-6 3 7% 5 4% 8 5%More than 6 9 20% 14 11% 23 13%

Total 45 100% 128 100% 173 100%

Number of problem sets that take your students less than one hour to complete

Number of problem sets that take your students more than one hour to complete

Number of written papers or reports of 20 pages or more

In your selected course section, about how much reading and writing do you assign students? (continued)

Number of written papers or reports of fewer than 5 pages

In a typical week, how many homework problem sets do you require students in your selected course section to complete?

Number of written papers or reports between 5 and 19 pages

Page 15: Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report · 2019-05-17 · Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Sample Survey Items Course Level Variable Names Count Response Categories

14

FSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

Upper DivisionLower Division Total

Michigan Technological University

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

a. FEXPREP 0 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%1-2 0 0% 2 2% 2 1%3-4 11 23% 37 28% 48 27%5-6 11 23% 36 27% 47 26%7-8 16 34% 25 19% 41 23%9-10 4 9% 21 16% 25 14%11-12 4 9% 5 4% 9 5%More than 12 1 2% 6 5% 7 4%

Total 47 100% 132 100% 179 100%

b. FACTPREP 0 1 2% 4 3% 5 3%1-2 14 30% 48 36% 62 35%3-4 16 35% 39 30% 55 31%5-6 10 22% 21 16% 31 17%7-8 4 9% 10 8% 14 8%9-10 0 0% 6 5% 6 3%11-12 0 0% 2 2% 2 1%More than 12 1 2% 2 2% 3 2%

Total 46 100% 132 100% 178 100%

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

a. FREWROPA Not important 16 34% 43 33% 59 34%Somewhat important 8 17% 23 18% 31 18%Important 13 28% 39 30% 52 30%Very important 10 21% 24 19% 34 19%

Total 47 100% 129 100% 176 100%

In your selected course section, how important to you is it that your students do the following?

In a typical 7-day week, about how many hoursdo you think your students actually spendpreparing for your class (studying, reading,writing, doing homework or lab work,analyzing data, rehearsing, and other academic activities)

Prepare two or more drafts of a paper or assignment before turning it in

Time students spend preparing for your selected course section:

In a typical 7-day week, about how many hoursdo you expect your students to spend preparingfor your class (studying, reading, writing, doinghomework or lab work, analyzing data,rehearsing, and other academic activities)

Page 16: Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report · 2019-05-17 · Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Sample Survey Items Course Level Variable Names Count Response Categories

15

FSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

Upper DivisionLower Division Total

Michigan Technological University

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

b. FINTEGRA Not important 12 26% 18 14% 30 17%Somewhat important 10 21% 16 12% 26 15%Important 10 21% 39 30% 49 28%Very important 15 32% 57 44% 72 41%

Total 47 100% 130 100% 177 100%

c. FOCCGRP Not important 6 13% 21 16% 27 15%Somewhat important 15 32% 37 29% 52 30%Important 13 28% 38 29% 51 29%Very important 13 28% 33 26% 46 26%

Total 47 100% 129 100% 176 100%

d. FINTIDEA Not important 14 30% 11 8% 25 14%Somewhat important 12 26% 33 25% 45 25%Important 14 30% 51 39% 65 37%Very important 7 15% 36 27% 43 24%

Total 47 100% 131 100% 178 100%

e. FOOCID05 Not important 16 34% 31 24% 47 27%Somewhat important 9 19% 40 31% 49 28%Important 18 38% 43 33% 61 35%Very important 4 9% 15 12% 19 11%

Total 47 100% 129 100% 176 100%

f. FTUTOR Not important 16 34% 53 42% 69 40%Somewhat important 15 32% 37 29% 52 30%Important 13 28% 28 22% 41 24%Very important 3 6% 9 7% 12 7%

Total 47 100% 127 100% 174 100%

g. FOWNVIEW Not important 14 30% 31 24% 45 26%Somewhat important 6 13% 22 17% 28 16%Important 18 38% 40 31% 58 33%Very important 9 19% 36 28% 45 26%

Total 47 100% 129 100% 176 100%

Tutor or teach other students (paid or voluntary)

Examine the strengths and weaknesses of their views on a topic or issue

Work with classmates outside of class to prepare class assignments

Discuss ideas from your readings or classes with others outside of class (other students, family members, co-workers, etc.)

In your selected course section, how important to you is it that your students do the following? (continued)

Put together ideas or concepts from different courses when completing assignments or during class discussions

Work on a paper or project that requires integrating ideas or information from various sources

Page 17: Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report · 2019-05-17 · Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Sample Survey Items Course Level Variable Names Count Response Categories

16

FSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

Upper DivisionLower Division Total

Michigan Technological University

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

h. FOTHRVW Not important 14 30% 34 27% 48 28%Somewhat important 11 24% 34 27% 45 26%Important 11 24% 31 24% 42 24%Very important 10 22% 28 22% 38 22%

Total 46 100% 127 100% 173 100%

i. FCHNGVW Not important 1 2% 10 8% 11 6%Somewhat important 5 11% 15 12% 20 11%Important 18 39% 43 33% 61 35%Very important 22 48% 61 47% 83 47%

Total 46 100% 129 100% 175 100%

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

a. Lecture LECTURE 0% 1 2% 5 4% 6 3%1-9% 2 4% 2 2% 4 2%10-19% 4 9% 12 9% 16 9%20-29% 5 11% 10 8% 15 8%30-39% 3 6% 11 8% 14 8%40-49% 6 13% 15 12% 21 12%50-74% 17 36% 38 29% 55 31%75% or more 9 19% 37 28% 46 26%

Total 47 100% 130 100% 177 100%

b. Teacher-led discussion TEACHLED 0% 3 6% 10 8% 13 7%1-9% 12 26% 28 22% 40 23%10-19% 13 28% 38 29% 51 29%20-29% 10 21% 30 23% 40 23%30-39% 4 9% 6 5% 10 6%40-49% 0 0% 5 4% 5 3%50-74% 3 6% 7 5% 10 6%75% or more 2 4% 5 4% 7 4%

Total 47 100% 129 100% 176 100%

In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on the following?

Try to better understand someone else's views by imagining how an issue looks from that person's perspective

Learn something that changes the way they understand an issue or concept

In your selected course section, how important to you is it that your students do the following? (continued)

Page 18: Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report · 2019-05-17 · Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Sample Survey Items Course Level Variable Names Count Response Categories

17

FSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

Upper DivisionLower Division Total

Michigan Technological University

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

c. TEACHSTU 0% 18 41% 43 34% 61 36%1-9% 11 25% 32 25% 43 25%10-19% 7 16% 17 13% 24 14%20-29% 4 9% 14 11% 18 11%30-39% 2 5% 12 9% 14 8%40-49% 1 2% 4 3% 5 3%50-74% 1 2% 1 1% 2 1%75% or more 0 0% 4 3% 4 2%

Total 44 100% 127 100% 171 100%

d. Student computer use COMPMED 0% 18 39% 80 63% 98 57%1-9% 9 20% 13 10% 22 13%10-19% 3 7% 12 10% 15 9%20-29% 9 20% 8 6% 17 10%30-39% 3 7% 2 2% 5 3%40-49% 2 4% 2 2% 4 2%50-74% 1 2% 1 1% 2 1%75% or more 1 2% 8 6% 9 5%

Total 46 100% 126 100% 172 100%

e. Small group activities GROUPSML 0% 7 15% 38 30% 45 26%1-9% 12 26% 28 22% 40 23%10-19% 6 13% 27 21% 33 19%20-29% 10 21% 19 15% 29 17%30-39% 3 6% 7 5% 10 6%40-49% 6 13% 4 3% 10 6%50-74% 3 6% 2 2% 5 3%75% or more 0 0% 3 2% 3 2%

Total 47 100% 128 100% 175 100%

Teacher-student shared responsibility (seminar, discussion, etc.)

In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on the following? (continued)

Page 19: Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report · 2019-05-17 · Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Sample Survey Items Course Level Variable Names Count Response Categories

18

FSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

Upper DivisionLower Division Total

Michigan Technological University

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

f. Student presentations STUPRES 0% 21 46% 45 36% 66 38%1-9% 18 39% 37 29% 55 32%10-19% 4 9% 30 24% 34 20%20-29% 2 4% 8 6% 10 6%30-39% 0 0% 3 2% 3 2%40-49% 0 0% 1 1% 1 1%50-74% 1 2% 1 1% 2 1%75% or more 0 0% 1 1% 1 1%

Total 46 100% 126 100% 172 100%

g. In-class writing CLSWRITE 0% 25 53% 85 68% 110 64%1-9% 16 34% 21 17% 37 22%10-19% 2 4% 11 9% 13 8%20-29% 2 4% 5 4% 7 4%30-39% 1 2% 2 2% 3 2%40-49% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%50-74% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%75% or more 1 2% 1 1% 2 1%

Total 47 100% 125 100% 172 100%

h. Testing and evaluation TESTEVAL 0% 4 9% 12 10% 16 9%1-9% 25 53% 72 57% 97 56%10-19% 14 30% 27 21% 41 24%20-29% 3 6% 10 8% 13 8%30-39% 0 0% 1 1% 1 1%40-49% 0 0% 2 2% 2 1%50-74% 1 2% 1 1% 2 1%75% or more 0 0% 1 1% 1 1%

Total 47 100% 126 100% 173 100%

In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on the following? (continued)

Page 20: Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report · 2019-05-17 · Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Sample Survey Items Course Level Variable Names Count Response Categories

19

FSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

Upper DivisionLower Division Total

Michigan Technological University

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

i. PERFORM 0% 45 96% 117 94% 162 95%1-9% 1 2% 1 1% 2 1%10-19% 0 0% 1 1% 1 1%20-29% 0 0% 2 2% 2 1%30-39% 0 0% 2 2% 2 1%40-49% 1 2% 0 0% 1 1%50-74% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%75% or more 0 0% 1 1% 1 1%

Total 47 100% 124 100% 171 100%

j. Experiential (labs, field work, art exhibits, etc.) EXPERIEN 0% 23 49% 59 47% 82 47%1-9% 7 15% 16 13% 23 13%10-19% 4 9% 18 14% 22 13%20-29% 4 9% 10 8% 14 8%30-39% 2 4% 4 3% 6 3%40-49% 5 11% 10 8% 15 9%50-74% 2 4% 4 3% 6 3%75% or more 0 0% 5 4% 5 3%

Total 47 100% 126 100% 173 100%

FEXAMS Very Little 0 0% 1 1% 1 1%2 0 0% 3 2% 3 2%3 1 2% 1 1% 2 1%4 4 9% 16 12% 20 11%5 21 45% 46 35% 67 38%6 16 34% 37 28% 53 30%Very much 5 11% 26 20% 31 18%

Total 47 100% 130 100% 177 100%

Performances in applied and fine arts(e.g., dance, drama, music)

Select the response that represents the extent to which your evaluations of student performance (e.g., examinations, portfolio) challenge students in your selected course section to do their best work?

In your selected course section, on average, what percent of class time is spent on the following? (continued)

Page 21: Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report · 2019-05-17 · Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Sample Survey Items Course Level Variable Names Count Response Categories

20

FSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

Upper DivisionLower Division Total

Michigan Technological University

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

a. FMEMORIZ Very little 14 33% 47 37% 61 36%Some 21 49% 53 42% 74 44%Quite a bit 6 14% 19 15% 25 15%Very much 2 5% 8 6% 10 6%

Total 43 100% 127 100% 170 100%

b. FANALYZE Very little 1 2% 0 0% 1 1%Some 8 19% 8 6% 16 9%Quite a bit 18 42% 48 38% 66 39%Very much 16 37% 71 56% 87 51%

Total 43 100% 127 100% 170 100%

c. FSYNTHES Very little 0 0% 3 2% 3 2%Some 6 14% 12 9% 18 11%Quite a bit 24 56% 56 44% 80 47%Very much 13 30% 56 44% 69 41%

Total 43 100% 127 100% 170 100%

d. FEVALUAT Very little 4 9% 5 4% 9 5%Some 17 40% 27 22% 44 26%Quite a bit 11 26% 49 39% 60 36%Very much 11 26% 44 35% 55 33%

Total 43 100% 125 100% 168 100%

e. FAPPLYIN Very little 1 2% 3 2% 4 2%Some 6 14% 9 7% 15 9%Quite a bit 17 40% 46 36% 63 37%Very much 18 43% 69 54% 87 51%

Total 42 100% 127 100% 169 100%

In your selected course section, how much emphasis do you place on engaging students in each of these mental activities?

Memorizing facts, ideas, or methods from your course and readings so students can repeat them pretty much in the same form

Analyzing the basic elements of an idea, experience, or theory, such as examining a particular case or situation in depth, and considering its components

Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information,or experiences into new, more complex interpretations and relationships

Applying theories or concepts to practical problems or in new situations

Making judgments about the value of information, arguments, or methods such as examining how others gathered and interpreted data and assessing the soundness of their conclusions

Page 22: Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report · 2019-05-17 · Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Sample Survey Items Course Level Variable Names Count Response Categories

21

FSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

Upper DivisionLower Division Total

Michigan Technological University

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

a. FGNWRITE Very little 11 26% 18 14% 29 17%Some 14 33% 40 32% 54 32%Quite a bit 11 26% 32 25% 43 25%Very much 7 16% 36 29% 43 25%

Total 43 100% 126 100% 169 100%

b. FGNSPEAK Very little 16 37% 29 23% 45 27%Some 14 33% 46 37% 60 36%Quite a bit 9 21% 25 20% 34 20%Very much 4 9% 26 21% 30 18%

Total 43 100% 126 100% 169 100%

c. FGNANALY Very little 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%Some 2 5% 9 7% 11 7%Quite a bit 18 44% 51 40% 69 41%Very much 21 51% 66 52% 87 52%

Total 41 100% 126 100% 167 100%

d. FGNQUANT Very little 4 10% 17 13% 21 13%Some 4 10% 17 13% 21 13%Quite a bit 20 48% 36 29% 56 33%Very much 14 33% 56 44% 70 42%

Total 42 100% 126 100% 168 100%

e. FGNCMPTS Very little 8 19% 26 21% 34 20%Some 12 28% 34 27% 46 27%Quite a bit 9 21% 34 27% 43 25%Very much 14 33% 32 25% 46 27%

Total 43 100% 126 100% 169 100%

Writing clearly and effectively

Speaking clearly and effectively

To what extent do you structure your selected course section so that students learn and develop in the following areas?

Analyzing quantitative problems

Using computing and information technology

Thinking critically and analytically

Page 23: Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report · 2019-05-17 · Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Sample Survey Items Course Level Variable Names Count Response Categories

22

FSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

Upper DivisionLower Division Total

Michigan Technological University

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

f. FGNOTHER Very little 4 9% 21 17% 25 15%Some 17 40% 37 29% 54 32%Quite a bit 11 26% 40 32% 51 30%Very much 11 26% 28 22% 39 23%

Total 43 100% 126 100% 169 100%

g. FGNINQ Very little 1 2% 1 1% 2 1%Some 10 24% 16 13% 26 16%Quite a bit 17 40% 56 45% 73 44%Very much 14 33% 51 41% 65 39%

Total 42 100% 124 100% 166 100%

h. FGNSELF Very little 14 36% 43 35% 57 35%Some 14 36% 31 25% 45 28%Quite a bit 7 18% 21 17% 28 17%Very much 4 10% 29 23% 33 20%

Total 39 100% 124 100% 163 100%

i. FGNDIVER Very little 26 65% 72 58% 98 60%Some 6 15% 28 23% 34 21%Quite a bit 4 10% 12 10% 16 10%Very much 4 10% 12 10% 16 10%

Total 40 100% 124 100% 164 100%

j. FGNPROBS Very little 2 5% 10 8% 12 7%Some 14 34% 28 22% 42 25%Quite a bit 19 46% 46 37% 65 39%Very much 6 15% 41 33% 47 28%

Total 41 100% 125 100% 166 100%

Solving complex real-world problems

Learning effectively on their own

Understanding people of other racial and ethnic backgrounds

To what extent do you structure your selected course section so that students learn and develop in the following areas? (continued)

Understanding themselves

Working effectively with others

Page 24: Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report · 2019-05-17 · Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report Sample Survey Items Course Level Variable Names Count Response Categories

23

FSSE 2012 Frequency Distributions

Upper DivisionLower Division Total

Michigan Technological University

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

k. FVALUES Very little 14 33% 39 32% 53 32%Some 18 43% 46 37% 64 39%Quite a bit 6 14% 23 19% 29 18%Very much 4 10% 15 12% 19 12%

Total 42 100% 123 100% 165 100%

l. FSPIRIT Very little 37 88% 100 81% 137 83%Some 3 7% 10 8% 13 8%Quite a bit 2 5% 8 6% 10 6%Very much 0 0% 6 5% 6 4%

Total 42 100% 124 100% 166 100%

m. Acquiring a broad general education FGNGENLE Very little 13 32% 38 31% 51 31%Some 14 34% 37 30% 51 31%Quite a bit 10 24% 32 26% 42 26%Very much 4 10% 16 13% 20 12%

Total 41 100% 123 100% 164 100%

n. FGNWORK Very little 3 7% 3 2% 6 4%Some 9 22% 16 13% 25 15%Quite a bit 12 29% 47 38% 59 36%Very much 17 41% 58 47% 75 45%

Total 41 100% 124 100% 165 100%

Variable Response Options Count Col % Count Col % Count Col %

DISCAREA Arts and Humanities 2 5% 11 9% 13 8%Biological Sciences 1 2% 10 8% 11 6%Business 4 9% 9 7% 13 8%Education 0 0% 2 2% 2 1%Engineering 15 34% 43 33% 58 34%Physical Sciences 11 25% 19 15% 30 17%Professional (other) 1 2% 1 1% 2 1%Social Sciences 4 9% 10 8% 14 8%Other 6 14% 24 19% 30 17%

Total 44 100% 129 100% 173 100%

IPEDS: 171128

Disciplinary Area: Respondents identified the field/discipline in which they teach their courses. These responses were first coded into 84 specific fields/disciplines. Institutions had the option to customize how these were collapsed into as many as eight disciplinary areas. Institutions choosing not to customize receive FSSE’s eight categories. All uncategorized fields go into "Other" or "Unassigned fields/disciplines." In instances of missing responses, the disciplinary area of one's academic appointment is substituted. See the FSSE codebook for the breakdown of disciplinary areas.

To what extent do you structure your selected course section so that students learn and develop in the following areas? (continued)

Developing a personal code of values and ethics

Developing a deepened sense of spirituality

Acquiring job or work-related knowledge and skills