Interpreting and Applying the First Amendment. What is Speech: Defamation Defamation: intentional,...
-
Upload
norah-bailey -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Interpreting and Applying the First Amendment. What is Speech: Defamation Defamation: intentional,...
![Page 1: Interpreting and Applying the First Amendment. What is Speech: Defamation Defamation: intentional, false statements Libel: written statement defaming.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082711/56649f0e5503460f94c224af/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Interpreting and Applying the First Amendment
![Page 2: Interpreting and Applying the First Amendment. What is Speech: Defamation Defamation: intentional, false statements Libel: written statement defaming.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082711/56649f0e5503460f94c224af/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
What is Speech: Defamation• Defamation: intentional, false statements • Libel: written statement defaming another person• Slander: defamatory oral statement• Variable jury awards—hard to collect
• Public figures must also show the words were written with “actual malice”◦ New York Times v. Sullivan◦New York Times article defended MLK and inaccurately
portrayed some issues in Montgomery, AL. L.B. Sullivan (Public Safety Commissioner) sued the Times
◦Results: First Amendment protects publication of all statements (even false) except when statements are made with “actual malice”
![Page 3: Interpreting and Applying the First Amendment. What is Speech: Defamation Defamation: intentional, false statements Libel: written statement defaming.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082711/56649f0e5503460f94c224af/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
What is Speech: ObscenityObscenity :First Amendment protects anything with
political, artistic, or literary merit • No enduring and comprehensive definition, but generally nudity
and sex are not, by definition, obscene; -First Amendment protects anything with political, literary, or artistic merit; -government only punishes “hard-core pornography”
• Balancing competing claims remains a problem: freedom v. democracy
• Localities decide whether to tolerate pornography but must comply with strict constitutional tests if they decide to regulate it
• Protection is extended to almost all forms of communication
![Page 4: Interpreting and Applying the First Amendment. What is Speech: Defamation Defamation: intentional, false statements Libel: written statement defaming.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082711/56649f0e5503460f94c224af/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
What is Speech: Obscenity Cont.• Miller v. California• Indianapolis statute: Court ruled the legislature cannot
show preference for one form of expression over another (women in positions of equality vs. women in positions of subordination)
• Zoning ordinances for adult theaters and bookstores have been upheld; regulates use of property rather than expression
• Internet regulation rules unconstitutional by the Supreme Court
Decency v. liberty
![Page 5: Interpreting and Applying the First Amendment. What is Speech: Defamation Defamation: intentional, false statements Libel: written statement defaming.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082711/56649f0e5503460f94c224af/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
What is Speech: Symbolic SpeechSymbolic Speech :Actions that convey a political
message (these are protected)• Cannot claim protection for an otherwise illegal act on the
grounds that it conveys a political message (ex.- burning a draft card)
• But statutes cannot make certain types of symbolic speech illegal
◦ Tinker v. Des Moines- Students wore black arm bands to protest war
◦ Texas v. Johnson- Burning U.S. flag protected by 1st Amendment
◦ Virginia v. Black – cross burning as symbolic speech?
![Page 6: Interpreting and Applying the First Amendment. What is Speech: Defamation Defamation: intentional, false statements Libel: written statement defaming.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082711/56649f0e5503460f94c224af/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Who is a Person?
• Corporations and organizations usually have the same rights as individuals -Corporations and interest groups have First Amendment rights
-Businesses that cater to “vice” also have First Amendment rights
• Restrictions can be placed on commercial speech
![Page 7: Interpreting and Applying the First Amendment. What is Speech: Defamation Defamation: intentional, false statements Libel: written statement defaming.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082711/56649f0e5503460f94c224af/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Who is a Person?
• McCain-Feingold Act: campaign finance reform changed the parameters of acceptable political speech for corporations and other organizations
Organizations could not pay for “electioneering communications” that “refer” to a specific candidate on radio or television 60 days before and election
Supreme Court upheld this law, saying ads that only mentioned, but did not “expressly advocate” a candidate were ways of influencing the election
• Campaign finance laws changed what is “acceptable” speech
![Page 8: Interpreting and Applying the First Amendment. What is Speech: Defamation Defamation: intentional, false statements Libel: written statement defaming.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082711/56649f0e5503460f94c224af/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Who is a Person?
• Minors have less freedom of expression than adults Hazelwood v. KuhlmeierHazelwood (1988) allowed that a school newspaper can be
restricted School-sponsored activities can be controlled if controls
are related to pedagogical concerns
![Page 9: Interpreting and Applying the First Amendment. What is Speech: Defamation Defamation: intentional, false statements Libel: written statement defaming.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082711/56649f0e5503460f94c224af/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Morse v. Frederick
• Let’s discuss…