Internet and Society: Politics And Democracy 2009
-
Upload
james-stewart -
Category
Education
-
view
1.220 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Internet and Society: Politics And Democracy 2009
Politics and
Dem
ocracy
Internet and
Society 2008
Outline
Smart mobs, Organisation through ICTs Popular revolution, emergent behaviour
People power and TXT revolutionsSocial MovementsProblem of democracy
“E-democracy” Internet and democracy
Social capital, embeddedness and public sphere Blogging
Bottom up participation - empowered citizen?
Common ideasAppropriation and social shaping of technologyImportance of existing context and identityUnanticipated consequencesTechnology amplifies actions and social tensions in
and between institutionsTechnology appropriated by/and amplifying existing
changes and trendsMany2many communicationNetwork society: active wiredEmergent social organisation from ubiquitous useSocial networks, social capital, weak ties,
communities of internet and personalised community..
Power and JusticeCitizens control of power of entrenched political institutionsHow will the internet be appropriated in/by political
processes?Can the Internet and ICTs provide a platform for holding to
account, and provide alternatives to established political order? Empower individual citizens Provide information transparency Set alternative agendas Coalesce and mobilise mass into political activity Open up new forms of Governance PluralismIn an age of managerial government, a few mainstream ideologiesHow will end-to-end, mass access, many-to many, 2 way
communications make a difference?
Smart MobsMany to many technologies and power to the peopleNetworks, word of mouth and collective actionNetwar
Philippines, Indonesia revolutions Petrol strike, WTO Terrorists, Criminals, Activists.
Smart Crowds Reclaiming public spaces by collective action
Mobile Adhoc networking experimentsSwarming, emergence, social coordination
Threshold levels for cooperation Coordination problem Coordination knowledge - examples in Internet Autonomous agents closely connected can produce collective
action - this action is not controlled or design - it emerges
Popular revolutions
Challenge totalitarianism or major failure of government and democracy institutions/mechanisms.
Technology in hands of massesMany to manyone-to-one and 6 degree effect
Failure of democracyZapatistas - external influencePhilippines - Church and TXT (more recently “hello Garci”) IndonesiaSpainKoreaUkraine etc etc
Challenge to Nation-StatePower - violence reserved for the stateNation state fosters/protects economic activityTraditional realist accounts : nation-states acting as
independent agentsNew cross-boundary challengesEconomic activity increasingly international - ignores
borders - challenges state’s existence Environment, culture, technology Idealist accounts: nation-state undermined
Weakened from above - has to bend to international institutions (commercial and governmental)
New international institutions un-democratic Undermines national welfare state
Internet in global social movementsWTO - MAI Battle of SeattleEnvironmentalismCoordination mechanisms in planning,
and actionReinforce the very problem they
challenge.Extra-state people power - just as
unaccountable
Internet and Social Movements
Outside established political mechanism (v. interest groups)
Politics by unconventional meansHeterogenousLoosely structured, fluidNew movements (environment,justice, women)
not firmly fixed in social milieuxDiversity, grassroots, decentralisation,
informalityInternet would appear to be just the thing!
Social Movements1 Coordination of resources
E.g. Time, money, Managerial interpretation2 Connection to political system3 Ideology and beliefs
How one should actFraming ideas and debates v.established media.
Many different response to Internet and ICTsBig, established orgs. V. global informal networks.Marketing, professionalisationReturn to grassrootsMedia campaignsGlobal coordination Inter-group coordination Increased fragmentation
DemocracyFailure of western democracy?
Low turnoutLow party membership (&trade unions etc)Support of single interest groupsEnd of mainstream ideological partiesMass marketing and mangerialism in politics
Disconnection with voters/politicians=low participationRetreat to the domestic/private - reduction in
social capital(Putnam) Privatised social networks (Wellman, Castells
etc)
Internet/IT fixAthenean modelHabermas - Public Sphere
Historical analysis Rational discourse Internet: create new ‘public spheres’
E-democracy experiments Tools for rational deliberation Desire to increase participation Networks, place-centred experiments Unconvincing except in a few cases.
E-government: Consultation Managerialism (efficiency, service delivery)
Agre: Internet and the Political ProcessAppropriation perspectiveAmplification model Institutional and social network approachesApproaches to Internet and Democracy
Online discussion fora Unmediated political community Intermediaries redundant/changed Information use of Internet Voting Process Decentralised power Global market decentralisation Centralisation Social equality via anonymity Open/transparent information
Institutions of politics (Agre)
Rules, identities, roles, strategies
LegislatorsLaws and Legal systemPartiesForms of DebateNews Management (Spin)Organisation of interest groups
Internet/Technology amplifies existing forces, institutions in short -medium term.
Intensify conflict
Agre 3Reinforcement model - failure to produce change, just
reinforcement of existing institutions - therefore conservative
Amplification model: Internet appropriated by many change elements. Amplification effects not only conservative. Amplification of trends and emerging insitutions
Stand alone projects not the way , need to understand ‘Digital Embedding’
Agre 4
Need to reconceptualise the category of person by political and other institutions of society.
Internet mediated communities of interest anchored in institutional structures.
Reduced costs allow emergence of collective cognition.
No line between political and non-political communication.
But problem of being too connected - bad ideas can diffuse as quickly as good ones.
Agre 5Effect of ‘Spacing’ : we are in institutional
networks as well as individual onesICTs map and amplify those institutional spaces,
make them clearer.Political process based around individual voter -
can be targeted though datamining Everyone separated into individual human-data
political subject by political intermediaries -> Political surveillance
Increasing number of intermediaries linked to individuals: private media and political spheres
Agre 6
Internet allows strengthening of established and new institutions and organisations
But strengthens “steady background hum of information sharing within communities of practice”
Not a straightforward relationship. The stresses and tensions lead to social
change.
Political Parties
How do they use the Internet?
Old and New Media: Political Blog
Media: set agendas, filter news.Why Blogs have such high impact?Very few popular political blogsLow readershipLog distribution of links to blogs
A Few blogs concentrate, filter information from blogsphere These blogs have credibility with established media
Polarised Information outside mainstream Reading a political act by politically engaged
Platform for political mobilisation
Bottom up participation
Social capital and social network approachRecreate public spheresProblem or benefit of anonymityWhat do people do in/with civic networks?Existing political institutions don’t connect
well with civic networkingMove to co-governance or network
governanceMob rule or better democracy?
ConclusionsFew people politically activeTools for engaging mass participationTools for coordinating distant like-minded peopleUnforeseen emergent behaviour - faster than without
technology due to network effect and ubiquitous useEmerge from everyday civic engagement and
communities of internet, facilitated by Internet use.Existing governance structures not attuned to new ways
of political communication and action.Can the internet reinvigorate democracy or is it just
reinforcement?Change depends particular a society’s and culture’s
ability to cope and adapt. Internet too new - all to happen.
Next WeekSurveillance and PrivacyRead recommended papersAssignments
Read news reports on Info Commissioners reportThink about Surveillance - what sorts are thereYour own personal data: what is personal data?Privacy and consent to use: what do you accept?How you might be classified?