Internet Addressing and the RIR system (part 2) 12 February 2004 Phnom Penh, Cambodia Paul Wilson,...

45
Internet Addressing and the RIR system (part 2) 12 February 2004 Phnom Penh, Cambodia Paul Wilson, APNIC

Transcript of Internet Addressing and the RIR system (part 2) 12 February 2004 Phnom Penh, Cambodia Paul Wilson,...

Internet Addressing andthe RIR system (part 2)

12 February 2004

Phnom Penh, Cambodia

Paul Wilson, APNIC

Overview – Part 2

• Allocation statistics – Asia Pacific Internet Resource statistics– Global Internet Resource statistics– IPv4 lifetime expectation

• More on Addressing policy– How to participate in open policy

processes

APNIC Internet Resource Allocation

Resource Allocation Statistics

• IP addresses mirror Internet growth– Represent deployed infrastructure– Distributed in consistent fashion– APNIC can provide objective, factual info

• Analysis of trends…– Allocation patterns per country over time– Comparison with other regions– Correlation of IP addresses with...

• Population, GDP, etc

IPv4 addresses allocated - annual

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

28

32

36

40

Pre-1996 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Mill

ions

Other

TW

THSG

NZ

MY

KRJP

IN

ID

HKCN

AU

IPv4 addresses allocated - total

2002: 1.60

2001: 1.7

2000: 1.24

1999: 0.54

2003: 1.96

1998: 0.27

0

16

32

48

64

80

96

112

128

144

160

Jan-96 Jan-97 Jan-98 Jan-99 Jan-00 Jan-01 Jan-02 Jan-03 Jan-04

Mill

ions 222

221220219218211210203202061060

IPv4 distribution in Asia Pacific

SG1%

NZ1%

TH1%

TW7%

ID1%

KR19%

CN28%

JP32%

Other8%

Other1%

AU3%

HK3%

IN2%

MY1%

ASNs assigned - cumulative

2003: 358

2001: 449

2000: 634

1999: 342

2002: 614

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

Jan-96 Jan-97 Jan-98 Jan-99 Jan-00 Jan-01 Jan-02 Jan-03

ASN distribution in Asia Pacific

KR20%

JP19%

AU17%

HK8%

ID3%

IN3%

SG3%

MY1%

Other13%

Other3%

TH3%

PH3%

CN6%

TW5%

NZ4%

AP1% PK

1%

Global Internet Resource Statistics

IPv4 Address Space Status: /8

Total /8 blocks available: 256

92

16

91

16

16

2

11

12

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Central Registry

Multicast

IANA Reserve

Experimental

ARIN

LACNIC

APNIC

RIPE NCC

IPv4 allocations from RIRs to LIRs/ISPs - Yearly comparison

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

APNIC

ARIN

LACNIC

RIPE NCC

1 Jan 99 – 31 Dec 03

IPv4 allocations from RIRs to LIRs/ISPs - Cumulative total

RIPE NCC6.82 31%

APNIC7.24 33%

LACNIC0.342%

ARIN7.89 34%

ASN assignments from RIRs to LIRs/ISPs - Yearly comparison

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

APNIC

ARIN

LACNIC

RIPE NCC

1 Jan 99 – 31 Dec 03

ASN assignments from RIRs to LIRs/ISPs - Cumulative total

ARIN10388 54%

RIPE NCC 563630%

LACNIC5403%

APNIC2371 13%

IPv6 allocations from RIRs to LIRs/ISPs - Yearly comparison

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

APNICARINLACNICRIPE NCC

IPv6 allocations from RIRs to LIRs/ISPs - Cumulative total

1 Jan 99 – 31 Dec 03

RIPE NCC27956%

ARIN84

16%

LACNIC143% APNIC

12825%

IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy

- Are we running out of IPv4 addresses?

Research activityconducted by Geoff Huston

and supported by APNIC

Are We Running Out of IPv4?

• Recent media reports claiming we are running out of IP addresses– Some claim we’ve already run out in some parts

of the world

• But what are the facts?– Is the IPv4 sky falling?

• Geoff Huston, chief scientist in the Internet area at Telstra, has studied the IPv4 consumption rates

http://www.potaroo.net/ispcolumn/2003-07-v4-address-lifetime/ale.pdf

Data Analysed

• Three views to make forward projections:– The rate at which IPv4 number blocks

are passed from IANA to the RIRs– The rate at which RIRs undertake

assignments of IPv4 address blocks to LIRs and end users

– The growth of the number of announced addresses in the BGP routing table

Address Management Process

RIR

ISPA

lloca

tion

ISP

BGP

Ann

ounc

emen

t

IETF

IANA

Del

egat

ion

IANA

RIR

Allo

catio

n

IETF Reserved, 20.1, 8%

Multicast, 16, 6%

IANA Pool, 89, 35%

IANA Allocated, 130.9, 51%

IANA Allocations – Current

IANA Allocations – Historical

0

32

64

96

128

Jan-91 Jan-93 Jan-95 Jan-97 Jan-99 Jan-01 Jan-03

RIR Allocations – Current Status

IETF Reserved, 20.1, 8%

Multicast, 16, 6%

IANA Pool, 89, 35%

RIR Pool, 14, 5%

Assigned, 116.9, 46%Allocated

RIR Allocations – Historical

RIR Assigned IPv4 /8 Address Blocks

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Jan-83 Jan-85 Jan-87 Jan-89 Jan-91 Jan-93 Jan-95 Jan-97 Jan-99 Jan-01 Jan-03

BGP Routing Table – Current

IETF Reserved, 20.1, 8%

Multicast, 16, 6%

IANA Pool, 89, 35%

RIR Pool, 14, 5%

Assigned, 42.4, 17%

Advertised, 74.5, 29%

BGP Routing Table - AS1221

Another look at that BGP data…Linear Squares Best Fit

58

60

62

64

66

68

70

72

74

Nov-99 Feb-00 May-00 Aug-00 Nov-00 Feb-01 May-01 Aug-01 Nov-01 Feb-02 May-02 Aug-02 Nov-02 Feb-03 May-03 Aug-03

Combined Data (3 years)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Dec-99 Mar-00 Jun-00 Sep-00 Dec-00 Mar-01 Jun-01 Sep-01 Dec-01 Mar-02 Jun-02 Sep-02 Dec-02 Mar-03 Jun-03

IANARIRBGP

Projection – linear

2047

2031 2037

0

32

64

96

128

160

192

224

Jan-00 Jan-05 Jan-10 Jan-15 Jan-20 Jan-25 Jan-30 Jan-35 Jan-40 Jan-45

IANA

RIR

BGP

Projection – exponential

2020 2022

0

32

64

96

128

160

192

224

Jan-00 Jan-02 Jan-04 Jan-06 Jan-08 Jan-10 Jan-12 Jan-14 Jan-16 Jan-18 Jan-20 Jan-22 Jan-24 Jan-26 Jan-28

IANA

RIR

BGP

Observations

• Extrapolation of current allocation practices and BGP-based demand model

• Derived from 2000-2003 data• Considering

– IANA/RIR unallocated pool– Total address space including allocated but

unannounced

• Assuming exponential growth– Address space lasts until 2025, or up to 2029

• Assuming linear growth– Address space lasts until 2037 - 2047

Issues

• This is just a model - reality will be different!• Will the BGP routing table continue to

reflect allocation rates? • Is the model of the unadvertised pools and

RIR holding pools appropriate?• Externalities…

– What are the underlying growth drivers (applications) and how are these best modeled?

– What forms of disruptive events would alter this model, and to what extent?

– Should address management policies change as a result of these results?

Questions ?

Policy Development in the Asia Pacific

The APNIC Community

&

the Policy Development Process

What is the APNIC community?

Global Internet Community

APNIC Internet Community

IETF

ISOC

Individuals

APNIC Members

APAN PITA

ISP Associations

Policy Development

• Industry self-regulatory processes– Open to all interested parties– Facilitated by RIR staff and volunteers

• Policy implementation– RIR processes– ISPs and other affected parties

Participation in policy processes

• Why should I bother?– Responsibility as an APNIC member

• To be aware of the current policies for managing address space allocated to you

– Business reasons• Policies affect your business operating

environment and are constantly changing• Ensure your ‘needs’ are met

– Educational• Learn and share experiences• Stay abreast with ‘best practices’ in the

Internet

Policy development cycle

OPEN

TRANSPARENT‘BOTTOM UP’

Anyone can participate

All decisions & policies documented & freely available to anyone

Internet community proposes and approves policy

Need

DiscussEvaluate

Implement Consensus

Elements of the process

MemberMeeting

Working Groups

Birds of a Feather

Special InterestGroups

Open Policy Processes

SIGs: Formal groups which discuss broad areas of policy relevant to the APNIC internet community BOFs: Informal meetings to

exchange ideas eg. CA BOF, Network Abuse BOF, Training Need to hold at least one to form new SIG

WGs: semi formal, volunteer group tasked by a SIG to work on a particular project until completed eg. ‘Broadband’

MM: forum specific to APNIC business eg. fee structure, election of executive council & endorsement of policy decisions

Policy development in practice

New policy or amendment proposed

Endorsement by MM?

Report of consensus in SIG to MM

Consensus?

Implementation 3 months

Posted to SIG ML for discussion

Face to face discussions in public open forum (SIGs)

YES

YES

NO

NO

How to make your voice heard

• Contribute on the public mailing lists– http://www.apnic.net/community/lists

• Attend meetings– Or send a representative– Gather input at forums

• Give feedback– Training or seminar events

Come to the APNIC meeting!

Next meeting in conjunction with

APRICOT 2004Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 18-27 February 2004

• Participate in policy development• Attend workshops, tutorials & presentations• Exchange knowledge and information with peers• Stay abreast with developments in the Internet• View multicast online• Provide your input in matters important to you

http://www.apnic.net/meetings/

Questions ?

Thanks

[email protected]