International Housing Partnership International Housing Partnership Annual Conference 2012 – Vancouver Annual Conference 2012 – Vancouver

Rob Young, Chief Executive, Helena Partnerships, UK

Rob Webber, Acting Chief Executive, Spectrum, UK

Deb Allen, Compass, Australia

Jo-anne Poirier, Ottawa Community Housing Group, Canada

?, ?, US

Quantifying Impact Quantifying Impact Social Return on Investment (SROI)Social Return on Investment (SROI)

Outline Outline

• Purpose of session • Session agenda/running order • Introduction

Agenda/Running OrderAgenda/Running Order

8.30am Introduction Rob Young (Helena Partnerships, UK)

8.35am A perspective from the 4 countries, Panel

Deb Allen (Compass, Australia)Jo-Anne Poirier (Ottawa Community Housing, Canada)? (?, USA)Rob Webber (Spectrum, UK)

8.55am Where are we at? Rob Young (Helena Partnerships, UK)

9.00am Where are we going? Round the table discussions by conference participants

9.30am Open discussion and questions to the panel based on priorities raised in round table discussions

 

9.55am Round up and conclusions Rob Young (Helena Partnerships, UK)

10.00am Close  

Introduction Introduction

• Relevance of SROI?

• Crowded market place!

• No standard methods/metrics!!!

Creating Value in Outcomes:Creating Value in Outcomes:The Compass JourneyThe Compass Journey

Case Studies for

Social Return on Investment (SROI)

Deb Allen, Compass, Australia

IntroductionIntroduction

• Compass – more than a housing service provider• GROW program• Status of SROI & Australian Community Housing Sector• Desire to track $value across all levels of service and

impact areas

Identifying the ProjectsIdentifying the Projects

• Smaller, targeted projects = clear baseline and measurement of outcomes

• 2 different ‘products’ allow for comparison on effectiveness of $spend

• Compare inputs/outputs/outcomes• Qualitative and quantitative data available• Evaluation retrospective : based on actual outcomes

2 Projects2 Projects

• This Way HomeObjective of the Project:

– To establish a new collaborative supported service model that seeks to address the needs of homeless and at risk of homelessness people within Newcastle

• KBT HubObjective of the Project:

– To facilitate greater resident ownership, participation and community engagement and develop a sustainable resident volunteer program to support residents in the KBT Neighbourhood

Helena Partnerships gathered feedback from members of IHP on the use of SROI analysis within their organisations.

SROI SurveySROI Survey

RespondentsRespondents

Key findingsKey findings

SROI: Breakdown by CountrySROI: Breakdown by Country

Observations (positive)Observations (positive)

• Corporate social responsibility vs project evaluation?• Triple bottom line• Proxies and social value• KISS!• Communication/conversation tool• Manage reputation

Observations (negative)Observations (negative)

• Resource intensive• Lack of consistency• 20% feel SROI unimportant• 40% not planning to use in near future

Although majority were not using SROI analysis, feedback showed that it remains a key priority for housing providers.

Those currently using SROI felt it had led to a positive business transformation within their organisation.

70% interested in sharing experiences/information.

80% keen on a standard model for IHP use.

ConclusionsConclusions

Prompt QuestionsPrompt Questions

1. Priority:

Is SROI felt to have merit? Will it achieve business transformation? Is it a priority for IHP?

2. Understanding:

What should we do to make the concept understood within IHP?

What are the lessons learned? The successes? The negatives? How has it helped prioritisation of projects and resources?

3. Application:

At what level should SROI be pitched? Post evaluation of individual projects? Pre forecasting at high level corporate objective level? Focus on local economic benefits?

 

4. Role of IHP:

What support do members of IHP require? Do you feel you have the right skills? How can IHP provide this? What role can the website, webinar etc. play?