International Council on Systems Engineering Introduction….. International Council on Systems...

International Council on Systems International Council on Systems

EngineeringEngineering

Introduction….. Introduction….. Susan JonesSusan Jones, INCOSE Region V , INCOSE Region V Director for Industry AffairsDirector for Industry Affairs

The Aerospace CorporationThe Aerospace CorporationChantilly, VA USAChantilly, VA USA

[email protected]@aero.org

OutlineOutlineOverviewOverview Ken KepcharKen Kepchar

Region V DirectorRegion V Director

Technical Committees and Technical Committees and John SnodderlyJohn SnodderlyWorking GroupsWorking Groups President ElectPresident Elect

Past Technical Board ChairPast Technical Board Chair

Education and Research TCEducation and Research TC Dennis BuedeDennis BuedeTechnical Committee ChairTechnical Committee Chair

Chesapeake ChapterChesapeake Chapter Jerry WoodallJerry Woodall Chapter PresidentChapter President

Washington Metro Area ChapterWashington Metro Area ChapterBruce SheltonBruce Shelton Chapter PresidentChapter President

Southern Maryland ChapterSouthern Maryland Chapter Karl GeistKarl Geist Chapter PresidentChapter President

Our Past Our Past

Started in 1990 by 35 US leaders as Started in 1990 by 35 US leaders as National Council on Systems National Council on Systems Engineering (NCOSE)Engineering (NCOSE)

First Annual Symposium held in 1991 First Annual Symposium held in 1991

Most early members from Most early members from defense/aerospace defense/aerospace

Most early activity focused on sharing Most early activity focused on sharing within the organizationwithin the organization

Became International (INCOSE) in 1996Became International (INCOSE) in 1996

Our PresentOur PresentINCOSE is an international authoritative

body promoting the application of an interdisciplinary systems approach to

enable the realization of successful systems

Our Present Our Present Steady growth in membership with Steady growth in membership with

increasing diversity increasing diversity

Non-US participation and leadership has Non-US participation and leadership has increased significantly increased significantly

Key participant in industry standards and Key participant in industry standards and modelsmodels

Increasing collaboration between Increasing collaboration between university, industry, and governmentuniversity, industry, and government

Affiliations/interactions with other Affiliations/interactions with other professionals bodies and industry professionals bodies and industry societies to produce shared outcomessocieties to produce shared outcomes

6

INCOSE GoalsINCOSE GoalsProvide a focal point for dissemination of knowledgeProvide a focal point for dissemination of knowledge

Promote collaboration in systems engineering education and researchPromote collaboration in systems engineering education and research

Establish professional standards for integrity in the practice of Establish professional standards for integrity in the practice of systems engineeringsystems engineering

Improve professional status of all people engaged in the of practice of Improve professional status of all people engaged in the of practice of systems engineeringsystems engineering

Encourage support from government and industry for research and Encourage support from government and industry for research and educational programseducational programs

7

INCOSE RegionsINCOSE Regions

IIIIII

VV VIVIII IVIVIIII

8

INCOSE Governance INCOSE Governance StructureStructure

Board of Directors Board of Directors Executive Committee (officers) Executive Committee (officers)

Corporate Advisory BoardCorporate Advisory Board

Technical Board Technical Board Technical Committees (7)Technical Committees (7)

Working Groups/ Interest Groups (30+) Working Groups/ Interest Groups (30+)

Systems Engineering Center of ExcellenceSystems Engineering Center of Excellence

Administrative Committees (5)Administrative Committees (5)Chapters, Communications, Membership, Chapters, Communications, Membership, Symposium, Ways & Means Symposium, Ways & Means

Central Office Central Office

9

Corporate Advisory BoardCorporate Advisory BoardConsists of one representative from each Consists of one representative from each

corporate sponsor (37 and growing) corporate sponsor (37 and growing)

Provides recommendations to INCOSE on Provides recommendations to INCOSE on overall direction, focus, and priorities overall direction, focus, and priorities

Acts as a conduit between INCOSE and Acts as a conduit between INCOSE and sponsoring corporations for resolving key sponsoring corporations for resolving key issuesissues

Seeks to influence the future of systems Seeks to influence the future of systems engineering standards, practices, engineering standards, practices, education, research and other key issueseducation, research and other key issues

NASA joined as a CAB Member in 1999

CAB MembersCAB Members AerojetAerojet The Aerospace CorporationThe Aerospace Corporation Astrium GmbHAstrium GmbH BAE SystemsBAE Systems The Boeing CompanyThe Boeing Company Boeing Satellite SystemsBoeing Satellite Systems Boeing - Military Aircraft & Missiles Boeing - Military Aircraft & Missiles

SystemsSystems C.S. Draper LaboratoryC.S. Draper Laboratory The Defence Evaluation and Research The Defence Evaluation and Research

AgencyAgency Delphi Automotive SystemsDelphi Automotive Systems EADS Military Aircraft DivisionEADS Military Aircraft Division Department of Energy - IdahoDepartment of Energy - Idaho General Dynamics CorporationGeneral Dynamics Corporation Honeywell InternationalHoneywell International Israel Aircraft IndustriesIsrael Aircraft Industries Jet Propulsion LaboratoryJet Propulsion Laboratory Litton/PRCLitton/PRC Litton/TASCLitton/TASC Lockheed Martin CorporationLockheed Martin Corporation The MITRE CorporationThe MITRE Corporation

MotorolaMotorola National Aeronautics and Space National Aeronautics and Space

AdministrationAdministration Naval Air Systems CommandNaval Air Systems Command Naval Surface Warfare Center - Dahlgren Naval Surface Warfare Center - Dahlgren

DivisionDivision Northrop Grumman CorporationNorthrop Grumman Corporation Raytheon Systems CompanyRaytheon Systems Company Raytheon Systems Company/TexasRaytheon Systems Company/Texas Rockwell Collins Avionics & Rockwell Collins Avionics &

CommunicationsCommunications Science Application International Science Application International

CorporationCorporation Structural Dynamics Research CorporationStructural Dynamics Research Corporation Software Productivity ConsortiumSoftware Productivity Consortium TRW Systems & Information Technology TRW Systems & Information Technology

GroupGroup Telelogic ABTelelogic AB Thomson-CSF Racal PLCThomson-CSF Racal PLC United TechnologiesUnited Technologies Vitech CorporationVitech Corporation Xerox CorporationXerox Corporation

INCOSE Membership INCOSE Membership Benefits Benefits INCOSE JournalINCOSE Journal

INSIGHT INSIGHT

Symposia, Workshops, ConferencesSymposia, Workshops, Conferences

Membership discountsMembership discounts

Early visibility into emerging standards Early visibility into emerging standards

Knowledge of engineering from a global Knowledge of engineering from a global perspectiveperspective

Means to tap expertise of industry expertsMeans to tap expertise of industry experts

Networking with colleagues from around the worldNetworking with colleagues from around the world

……..and more ..and more

INCOSEINCOSENetworkingNetworking

TechnicalTechnical

CommitteeCommittee

ProfessionalProfessional

DisciplinesDisciplines

GeographicalGeographical

RegionRegion

DomainsDomains

BranchBranch

ChaptersChapters

Working GroupsWorking Groups Joint ActivitiesJoint Activities

Interest GroupInterest Group

Our FutureOur FutureINCOSE is the world’s premier INCOSE is the world’s premier

engineering professional society engineering professional society for enabling holistic solutions to for enabling holistic solutions to

problems and needsproblems and needs

Six Strategic PrioritiesSix Strategic Priorities

(1) Provide (1) Provide high value products and high value products and servicesservices and opportunities for and opportunities for professional networkingprofessional networking

(2) Position INCOSE as (2) Position INCOSE as a unifying forcea unifying force across engineering communities and across engineering communities and related specialties related specialties

(3) Promote (3) Promote growth through growth through diversificationdiversification of stakeholder base and of stakeholder base and products/servicesproducts/services

Six Strategic PrioritiesSix Strategic Priorities

(4) Attract (4) Attract highly qualified leadershighly qualified leaders and and provide provide infrastructure and balanced infrastructure and balanced leadership organizationleadership organization to to accomplish targeted initiativesaccomplish targeted initiatives

(5) Gain further recognition of the (5) Gain further recognition of the importance of systems engineeringimportance of systems engineering

(6) Achieve wide (6) Achieve wide acceptance of INCOSE acceptance of INCOSE as the leading systems as the leading systems engineering societyengineering society

AdvancementAdvancement

Develop Develop products and services to foster products and services to foster advancement of individual member’s knowledgeadvancement of individual member’s knowledge

SE Body of Knowledge SE Body of Knowledge

Examine means to Examine means to create partnerships between create partnerships between industry & universitiesindustry & universities

Academic ForumAcademic Forum

Foster Foster selected research opportunitiesselected research opportunities through through INCOSE Systems Engineering Center of INCOSE Systems Engineering Center of Excellence (SECOE)Excellence (SECOE)

Expand the Expand the circulation of the INCOSE journalcirculation of the INCOSE journal

Influence Influence

Sponsor/participate in Sponsor/participate in targeted conferences targeted conferences Many regional/chapter events, and INCOSE Many regional/chapter events, and INCOSE

track at Software Technology Conference track at Software Technology Conference

34th Engineering and Technical Management 34th Engineering and Technical Management Conference (EIA/GEIA, INCOSE, NDIA) Conference (EIA/GEIA, INCOSE, NDIA)

2nd European Systems Engineering 2nd European Systems Engineering ConferenceConference

Continue Continue participation and leadership in participation and leadership in standardsstandards

ISO, IEEE, EIA and others ISO, IEEE, EIA and others

Offer INCOSE's Offer INCOSE's expertise and participation expertise and participation in in selected industry initiatives/advisory boardsselected industry initiatives/advisory boards

BOD voted yes; opportunities being identified BOD voted yes; opportunities being identified

2001 International 2001 International SymposiumSymposium

Other Events Other Events Regional Conferences Regional Conferences

Events hosted by regions or chapters with Events hosted by regions or chapters with most of the elements of the annual most of the elements of the annual symposiumsymposium

Chapter EventsChapter Events Local events which may include chapter Local events which may include chapter

business meetings, special working business meetings, special working sessions, tutorials, speakerssessions, tutorials, speakers

Working/Interest Group Meetings Working/Interest Group Meetings Events held in one location or as virtual Events held in one location or as virtual

meetings with focus on a particular meetings with focus on a particular product or topic areaproduct or topic area

SUMMARYSUMMARY

Local Chapters Sponsor a Variety of Local Chapters Sponsor a Variety of Activities of Interest for NASA PersonnelActivities of Interest for NASA Personnel

The Mid-Atlantic Chapters Work The Mid-Atlantic Chapters Work Together to Bring Quality Programs to Together to Bring Quality Programs to their Memberstheir Members

The Chapter Meetings and Programs The Chapter Meetings and Programs Provide an AvenueProvide an Avenue– For Attendees to Exchange IdeasFor Attendees to Exchange Ideas– Learn New Concepts to Employ at WorkLearn New Concepts to Employ at Work– Develop New Resources for ResearchDevelop New Resources for Research



Advancing the State of Advancing the State of the Art in Systems the Art in Systems

Engineering Engineering John SnodderlyJohn Snodderly, INCOSE President , INCOSE President Elect and Past Technical Committee Elect and Past Technical Committee

ChairChairDefense Systems Management CollegeDefense Systems Management College

Fort Belvoir, VA USAFort Belvoir, VA [email protected]@incose.org

An international body comprised of leading An international body comprised of leading organizations and experts contributing to the body of organizations and experts contributing to the body of knowledge on systems engineering knowledge on systems engineering

An organization whose leadership and members are An organization whose leadership and members are recognized as having the highest expertise to solve recognized as having the highest expertise to solve systems problems systems problems

A contributing partner in strategic alliances with other A contributing partner in strategic alliances with other professional societies and leading universities professional societies and leading universities worldwideworldwide

A center of competence for research, theory, and A center of competence for research, theory, and practices applied to systems challenges practices applied to systems challenges

INCOSE is the world’s INCOSE is the world’s premier engineering premier engineering professional society professional society

for enabling holistic solutions for enabling holistic solutions to problems and needsto problems and needs

WHY is INCOSE Needed ?WHY is INCOSE Needed ?

Is the world of SE in trouble today?Is the world of SE in trouble today?

How would you know?How would you know?

What are some recent examples What are some recent examples

that point out a lack of SE?that point out a lack of SE?

DoD SE ProblemsDoD SE Problems ““USAF Urges F-22 Production Without Test- …ready to move into its USAF Urges F-22 Production Without Test- …ready to move into its

production phase even if production phase even if an important software milestone, which legally must an important software milestone, which legally must be reached first, is not passedbe reached first, is not passed”*”*

““Software Pushes Up JSF Price Tag to $31 Million - …Marketplace changes, Software Pushes Up JSF Price Tag to $31 Million - …Marketplace changes,

the software went straight up. the software went straight up. Turns out it was more for software than we Turns out it was more for software than we thoughtthought.”* .”*

“…“…A draft report from the GAO, a government watchdog agency here, A draft report from the GAO, a government watchdog agency here,

charges that the JSF program is rushing to the engineering manufacturing and charges that the JSF program is rushing to the engineering manufacturing and development stage development stage before critical technologies have maturedbefore critical technologies have matured.”*.”*

““Integrating JSF engine-control softwareIntegrating JSF engine-control software with avionics software has proven with avionics software has proven challenging.”*challenging.”*

*Defense news April 10, 2000*Defense news April 10, 2000

From the Mars Climate Orbiter Mishap From the Mars Climate Orbiter Mishap Investigation Board Phase I Report:Investigation Board Phase I Report:

Absence of a mission systems engineer during the operations phase to provide the bridge Absence of a mission systems engineer during the operations phase to provide the bridge between the spacecraft system, the instrument system and the ground/operations system.between the spacecraft system, the instrument system and the ground/operations system.

Lack of identification of acceptable risk by the operations team in the context of the Lack of identification of acceptable risk by the operations team in the context of the “Faster, Better, Cheaper” philosophy.“Faster, Better, Cheaper” philosophy.

Navigation requirements set at too high a management level, insufficient flowdown of Navigation requirements set at too high a management level, insufficient flowdown of requirements and inadequate validation of these requirements.requirements and inadequate validation of these requirements.

Several significant system and subsystem design and development issues, uncovered Several significant system and subsystem design and development issues, uncovered after the launch of the Mars Climate Orbiter after the launch of the Mars Climate Orbiter

Inadequate attention, within the system engineering process, to the transition from Inadequate attention, within the system engineering process, to the transition from development to operations.development to operations.

From the Wide-field Infrared Explorer Mishap From the Wide-field Infrared Explorer Mishap Investigation Board Report (Briefing by Darrell Investigation Board Report (Briefing by Darrell Branscome, Board Chair):Branscome, Board Chair): ““Detailed, independent technical peer reviews are essential. Detailed, independent technical peer reviews are essential.

Furthermore, it is essential that peer reviews be done to assess Furthermore, it is essential that peer reviews be done to assess the integrity of the system design, including an evaluation of the integrity of the system design, including an evaluation of system/mission consequences of the detailed design and system/mission consequences of the detailed design and implementation.”implementation.”

““Perform electronics power turn-on characterization tests, Perform electronics power turn-on characterization tests, particularly for applications involving irreversible events.”particularly for applications involving irreversible events.”

““Test for correct functional behavior and test for anomalous Test for correct functional behavior and test for anomalous behavior, especially during initial turn-on and power-on reset behavior, especially during initial turn-on and power-on reset conditions.”conditions.”

From Lewis Spacecraft Mission Failure From Lewis Spacecraft Mission Failure Investigation Board Report:Investigation Board Report:

Especially in “Faster, Better, Cheaper” projects, communication Especially in “Faster, Better, Cheaper” projects, communication of decisions to senior NASA and contractor management is of decisions to senior NASA and contractor management is essential to successful program implementation. essential to successful program implementation.

““Requirements changes without adequate resource Requirements changes without adequate resource adjustments” indirectly contributed to the failure.adjustments” indirectly contributed to the failure.

““Inadequate engineering discipline” indirectly contributed to the Inadequate engineering discipline” indirectly contributed to the failure.failure.

““The Government and the contractor must be clear on the The Government and the contractor must be clear on the mutual roles and responsibilities of all parties, including the level mutual roles and responsibilities of all parties, including the level of reviews and what is required of each side and each of reviews and what is required of each side and each participant in the Integrated Product Development Team.”participant in the Integrated Product Development Team.”

From the “Faster, Better, Cheaper” Study From the “Faster, Better, Cheaper” Study (Briefing by Tony Spear):(Briefing by Tony Spear):

NASA must pick capable PMs. PMs should be “certified.”NASA must pick capable PMs. PMs should be “certified.”

Important to communicate project risks to project team, senior Important to communicate project risks to project team, senior management, and to the public. PMs should project a “risk profile” or “risk management, and to the public. PMs should project a “risk profile” or “risk signature” at start of project, monitor for changes over life of project and signature” at start of project, monitor for changes over life of project and explain them.explain them.

Peer reviews must include the “right” people.Peer reviews must include the “right” people.

For a lander mission, it’s important to have telemetry on spacecraft For a lander mission, it’s important to have telemetry on spacecraft descent.descent.

PMs must pick capable project teams. Certification of project team PMs must pick capable project teams. Certification of project team members should be considered.members should be considered.

Orlando Figueroa's 5 Orlando Figueroa's 5 major pointsmajor points

Engineering Excellence in NASAEngineering Excellence in NASA– Advance Engineering excellence in NASA & Strengthen Advance Engineering excellence in NASA & Strengthen

Systems EngineeringSystems Engineering Process DocumentationProcess Documentation

– PAPAC (Agency -wide process) Policy 7120PAPAC (Agency -wide process) Policy 7120 Promote infrastructure to move to a collaborative Promote infrastructure to move to a collaborative

environmentenvironment– Advanced Engineering EnvironmentsAdvanced Engineering Environments

NASA Collaboration with National & International NASA Collaboration with National & International bodies(i.e. INCOSE)bodies(i.e. INCOSE)

Stimulate NASA Engineering participation in Stimulate NASA Engineering participation in National Academy of EngineeringNational Academy of Engineering

How does INCOSE Advance How does INCOSE Advance the SE State of the Art?the SE State of the Art? Through innovative INCOSE Through innovative INCOSE

Technical Board Products & Technical Board Products & ServicesServices

Provide Products and services by Provide Products and services by INCOSE Working Groups & INCOSE Working Groups & Interests GroupsInterests Groups

ExamplesExamples

Technical CommitteesTechnical CommitteesHierarchy DiagramHierarchy Diagram

TechnicalBoard

TechnicalBoard

MeasurementMeasurementTechnical CommitteeTechnical Committee

MeasurementMeasurementTechnical CommitteeTechnical Committee

TechnicalTechnicalCommitteesCommitteesTechnicalTechnical

CommitteesCommittees

Process & MethodsProcess & MethodsTechnical CommitteeTechnical CommitteeProcess & MethodsProcess & Methods

Technical CommitteeTechnical CommitteeStandardsStandards

Technical CommitteeTechnical CommitteeStandardsStandards

Technical CommitteeTechnical Committee

Modeling & ToolsModeling & ToolsTechnical CommitteeTechnical Committee

Modeling & ToolsModeling & ToolsTechnical CommitteeTechnical Committee

SE ManagementSE ManagementTechnical CommitteeTechnical Committee

SE ManagementSE ManagementTechnical CommitteeTechnical Committee

Education & ResearchEducation & ResearchTechnical CommitteeTechnical Committee

Education & ResearchEducation & ResearchTechnical CommitteeTechnical Committee

SE ApplicationsSE ApplicationsTechnical CommitteeTechnical Committee

SE ApplicationsSE ApplicationsTechnical CommitteeTechnical Committee

Education DevelopmentWorking Group

Education DevelopmentWorking Group

Concepts & TermsWorking Group

Concepts & TermsWorking Group

Education MeasurementsWorking Group

Education MeasurementsWorking Group

Capability AssessmentWorking Group

Capability AssessmentWorking Group

MeasurementWorking GroupMeasurement

Working Group

Comm & Public InternetWorking Group

Comm & Public InternetWorking Group

Space SystemsWorking GroupSpace Systems

Working Group

Resource Mgmt.Working GroupResource Mgmt.Working Group

Telecommunications.Working Group

Telecommunications.Working Group

Joint Comm. AircraftWorking Group

Joint Comm. AircraftWorking Group

Health CareInterest GroupHealth Care

Interest Group

Motor Vehicles.Interest Group

Motor Vehicles.Interest Group

Railway TransportationInterest Group

Railway TransportationInterest Group

PrinciplesWorking Group

PrinciplesWorking Group

Systems ArchitectureWorking Group

Systems ArchitectureWorking Group

SE and the InternetInterest Group

SE and the InternetInterest Group

Tools DatabaseWorking GroupTools DatabaseWorking Group

Tools IntegrationWorking Group

Tools IntegrationWorking Group

Soft SystemsInterest GroupSoft Systems

Interest Group

Model-Driven System Design Working GroupModel-Driven System Design Working Group

RequirementsWorking GroupRequirements

Working Group

Risk ManagementWorking Group

Risk ManagementWorking Group

SE Mgmt MethodologyWorking Group

SE Mgmt MethodologyWorking Group

Verification & ValidationInterest Group

Verification & ValidationInterest Group

Systems & SupportabilityInterface Research

Working Group (SECOE)

Systems & SupportabilityInterface Research

Working Group (SECOE)

1.2

Systems EngineeringBody of Knowledge

(SE BOK) Working Group

Systems EngineeringBody of Knowledge

(SE BOK) Working GroupEnvironmental Systems

Working GroupEnvironmental Systems

Working Group

Infrastructure SystemsWorking Group

Infrastructure SystemsWorking Group

Human SystemsWorking GroupHuman SystemsWorking Group

SE HandbookWorking GroupSE Handbook

Working Group

Configuration Mgmt.Interest Group

Configuration Mgmt.Interest Group

Information Model & Process Working GroupInformation Model &

Process Working Group

Systems Engineering Applications Systems Engineering Applications Technical Committee (SEATC)Technical Committee (SEATC)

Excerpts from:Excerpts from:International Workshop Summary PresentationInternational Workshop Summary Presentation

Mesa, AZMesa, AZ

January 2001January 2001

Dr. William Mackey, ChairDr. William Mackey, ChairRalph Godau, Co-Chair Ralph Godau, Co-Chair Scott Jackson, Co-ChairScott Jackson, Co-ChairPat Sweeney, Co-ChairPat Sweeney, Co-Chair

Systems Engineering Applications Systems Engineering Applications Technical Committee CharterTechnical Committee Charter

Foster formation and operation of working groups Foster formation and operation of working groups and interest groupsand interest groups

– Specific application domainsSpecific application domains– Across domainsAcross domains

Examine systems engineering tools, techniques, and Examine systems engineering tools, techniques, and processes within specific application domainsprocesses within specific application domains

WG/IGs grow from a core WG (the CPIWG) into specific WG/IGs grow from a core WG (the CPIWG) into specific application domain WG/IGsapplication domain WG/IGs

Interfaces With Other Technical Interfaces With Other Technical Committees and Working GroupsCommittees and Working Groups

Cross Applications

Education

and

Research SE

Management

Modeling and

ToolsPro

cesses

and Meth

ods

Measurem

ent

Standard

s

UMUCProfiles

UNLVSeminar

U. BirmingRail Activity

AircraftGuidelines

Commercial and Public Interest

Commercial Aircraft

Environmental Systems

Infrastructure Systems Engineering

Resource Management

Space Systems

Telecommunications

Health Care

Motor Vehicles

Railway Transportation

Specific Applications

Comm

unications

INSIGHTV1-I3-1998

INSIGHTV2-I2-1999

INSIGHTV3-I3-2000

Joint Symposium

Panel

Where We Are TodayWhere We Are Today Transportation Sector—Ashok JainTransportation Sector—Ashok Jain

– Joint Commercial Aircraft Working Group (JCAWG)— Joint Commercial Aircraft Working Group (JCAWG)— Greg Mathers, and Erwin DuurlandGreg Mathers, and Erwin Duurland

– Motor Vehicles Interest Group (MVIG)—Paul BerryMotor Vehicles Interest Group (MVIG)—Paul Berry– Railway Transportation Interest Group (RWTIG)—Railway Transportation Interest Group (RWTIG)—

John Williams and Jeff AllanJohn Williams and Jeff Allan

Resources Sector—Ralph GodauResources Sector—Ralph Godau

– Infrastructure Systems Engineering Working Group (ISEWG)—Pat Infrastructure Systems Engineering Working Group (ISEWG)—Pat Sweeney and Ralph GodauSweeney and Ralph Godau

– Resource Management Working Group (RMWG)— Resource Management Working Group (RMWG)— Ted Dolton and Bill CutlerTed Dolton and Bill Cutler

– Environment Systems Working Group (ESWG)—Ralph HillEnvironment Systems Working Group (ESWG)—Ralph Hill

Where We Are Today (Cont’d) Where We Are Today (Cont’d)

Public Services Sector—Pat SweeneyPublic Services Sector—Pat Sweeney

– Commercial and Public Interest Working Group—Commercial and Public Interest Working Group—Jerry Bauknight and William MackeyJerry Bauknight and William Mackey

– Space Systems Working Group (SSWG)—Space Systems Working Group (SSWG)—David Durham and Ray GranataDavid Durham and Ray Granata

– Telecommunications Working Group (TELWG)—Telecommunications Working Group (TELWG)—Martin Warner and Ruediger KaffenbergerMartin Warner and Ruediger Kaffenberger

– Health Care Interest Group (HCIG)—John Zaleski and Orlando IlliHealth Care Interest Group (HCIG)—John Zaleski and Orlando Illi

SEATC AccomplishmentsSEATC Accomplishments

Approximately 242 SE applications papers have been Approximately 242 SE applications papers have been presented in 20 commercial and public interest domains at presented in 20 commercial and public interest domains at the Symposia from 1992 to 2000 the Symposia from 1992 to 2000

The SEATC has offered application specific sessions at the The SEATC has offered application specific sessions at the symposia since 1996symposia since 1996

Nine symposia panels and five regional seminars in Nine symposia panels and five regional seminars in commercial and public interest domains have been presentedcommercial and public interest domains have been presented

SEATC Accomplishments (Cont’d) SEATC Accomplishments (Cont’d) Key products include:Key products include:

– SE Applications Profiles Document (Version 3.0 on WEB)SE Applications Profiles Document (Version 3.0 on WEB)– SE Applications Organization Document (Version 1.0 on SE Applications Organization Document (Version 1.0 on

WEB)WEB)– Edited three commercial themed issues of Edited three commercial themed issues of INSIGHTINSIGHT (1998. (1998.

1999, 2000)1999, 2000)– Framework for the Application of SE in the Commercial Framework for the Application of SE in the Commercial

Aircraft Domain (Version 1.2 Released in July 2000)Aircraft Domain (Version 1.2 Released in July 2000)

– Telecommunications Industry Application Guidebook (TBD)Telecommunications Industry Application Guidebook (TBD)– Space Systems Application Guidebook (TBD)Space Systems Application Guidebook (TBD)

44 professional papers and 5 SE Applications Panels 44 professional papers and 5 SE Applications Panels were conducted at the Minneapolis, MN Symposiumwere conducted at the Minneapolis, MN Symposium

Several volunteer SE projects are underway in San Several volunteer SE projects are underway in San Francisco Bay Area Chapter and other local chaptersFrancisco Bay Area Chapter and other local chapters

Systems Engineering Applications Systems Engineering Applications DomainsDomains

*Applications domains currently represented in document

1.1. AgricultureAgriculture 14.14. Housing and Building SystemsHousing and Building Systems

2.2. Commercial AircraftCommercial Aircraft 15.15. Information SystemsInformation Systems

3.3. Commercial AvionicsCommercial Avionics 16.16. ManufacturingManufacturing

4.4. Criminal Justice and LegalCriminal Justice and Legal 17.17. Medical DevicesMedical Devices

SystemsSystems 18.18. Motor VehiclesMotor Vehicles

5.5. Drug Abuse PreventionDrug Abuse Prevention 19.19. Natural Resource ManagementNatural Resource Management

6.6. Emergency SystemsEmergency Systems 20.20. Political and Public InterestPolitical and Public Interest

7.7. EnergyEnergy SystemsSystems

8.8. Environment RestorationEnvironment Restoration 21.21. Service IndustriesService Industries

9.9. Facilities Systems EngineeringFacilities Systems Engineering 22.22. Space SystemsSpace Systems

10.10. Food ServiceFood Service 23.23. TelecommunicationsTelecommunications

11.11. Geographic Information SystemsGeographic Information Systems 24.24. TransportationTransportation

12.12. Health CareHealth Care 25.25. Urban PlanningUrban Planning

13.13. Highway Transportation SystemsHighway Transportation Systems 26.26. Waste Management and Waste Management and DisposalDisposal

**

**

*

*

***

*

*

*

**

**

*

*

Standards Technical Standards Technical CommitteeCommittee

1.1

January 2001January 2001

James Martin, ChairJames Martin, ChairJohn Velman, Co-Chair John Velman, Co-Chair

Alain Faisandier, Co-ChairAlain Faisandier, Co-Chair

Current SE StandardsCurrent SE Standards

ANSI/EIA-632ANSI/EIA-632– Processes for Engineering a System, Dec 1998Processes for Engineering a System, Dec 1998– www.geia.org/eoc/G47/main.htmlwww.geia.org/eoc/G47/main.html

EIA/IS-731EIA/IS-731– Systems Engineering Capability Model, Dec 1998Systems Engineering Capability Model, Dec 1998– www.geia.org/eoc/G47/main.htmlwww.geia.org/eoc/G47/main.html

IEEE 1220IEEE 1220– Application and Management of the Systems Engineering Application and Management of the Systems Engineering

Process, 1998Process, 1998 ECSS-E-10AECSS-E-10A

– System Engineering, Apr 1996System Engineering, Apr 1996– European Cooperation for Space StandardizationEuropean Cooperation for Space Standardization– www.estec.esa.nl/ecss/standard/status.html www.estec.esa.nl/ecss/standard/status.html

Co-developed Co-developed by INCOSEby INCOSE

International StandardsInternational Standards(under development)(under development) System Life Cycle Processes, ISO/IEC 15288System Life Cycle Processes, ISO/IEC 15288

– JTC1/SC7/WG7JTC1/SC7/WG7 SE Capability Maturity, ISO/IEC 15504 SE Capability Maturity, ISO/IEC 15504

(SPICE)(SPICE)– JTC1/SC7/WG10JTC1/SC7/WG10

SE Data Exchange, ISO 10303-AP233SE Data Exchange, ISO 10303-AP233 – TC184/SC4/WG3/T8TC184/SC4/WG3/T8

Systems Engineering (Space Systems)Systems Engineering (Space Systems)– TC20/SC14 TC20/SC14 – To adopt ECSS-E-10 as ISO standardTo adopt ECSS-E-10 as ISO standard

Other Standards Other Standards (under development)(under development) Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI)

– National Defense Industry Alliance (NDIA)National Defense Industry Alliance (NDIA)

– Electronic Industries Alliance (EIA)Electronic Industries Alliance (EIA)

System Architecture, IEEE P1471System Architecture, IEEE P1471– INCOSE Architecture WG working this taskINCOSE Architecture WG working this task

Engineering Management Book of Knowledge Engineering Management Book of Knowledge

(EMBOK)(EMBOK)– IEEE Engineering Mgmt SocietyIEEE Engineering Mgmt Society

Project Management Book of Knowledge (PMBOK)Project Management Book of Knowledge (PMBOK)– Project Management Institute (PMI)Project Management Institute (PMI)

– Currently available, but upgrades are plannedCurrently available, but upgrades are planned

Liaison ActivitiesLiaison ActivitiesINTERNATIONALINTERNATIONAL

ISO JTC1/SC7ISO JTC1/SC7, Technical Liaison, Technical Liaison– Robert Halligan appointed by Robert Halligan appointed by

BODBOD– Standards 15288/15504 under Standards 15288/15504 under

authority of SC7 working groupsauthority of SC7 working groups ISO 15288ISO 15288, System Life Cycle , System Life Cycle

ProcessesProcesses– SC7 Liaison, Robert HalliganSC7 Liaison, Robert Halligan

ISO 15504ISO 15504, Systems Engrg , Systems Engrg Capability ModelCapability Model– SC7 Liaison, Robert HalliganSC7 Liaison, Robert Halligan

ISO 10303-AP233ISO 10303-AP233, STEP Systems , STEP Systems Engrg Data ExchangeEngrg Data Exchange– POC is Sylvain BarbeauPOC is Sylvain Barbeau– David Oliver, INCOSE LiaisonDavid Oliver, INCOSE Liaison

UNITED STATESUNITED STATES EIA G47EIA G47, Systems , Systems

Engineering CommitteeEngineering Committee– TBD, primary TBD, primary – Richard Harwell, alternateRichard Harwell, alternate

AIAAAIAA, Systems Engineering , Systems Engineering Technical CommitteeTechnical Committee– Informal POC is Richard Informal POC is Richard

HarwellHarwell– Formal liaison being Formal liaison being

consideredconsidered IEEIEEEE, Systems Engineering , Systems Engineering

Standards CommitteeStandards Committee– Liaison being worked with Liaison being worked with

Paul CrollPaul Croll

Chapters - Technical Board Chapters - Technical Board Combined Efforts Combined Efforts

Positive Steps taken for cooperative Positive Steps taken for cooperative effortsefforts

Potential Funding of Special Projects By Potential Funding of Special Projects By ChaptersChapters– EIA AP233 UML Effort EIA AP233 UML Effort – GEIA G-47GEIA G-47

INSIGHT Magazine for JulyINSIGHT Magazine for July

Reports from INCOSE’sTechnical Board,Technical Committees andWorking Groups

INCOSE Technical Journal INCOSE Technical Journal

Quarterly PublicationRefereed JournalAndy Sage GMU Editor

Commercial Aircraft Commercial Aircraft GuidebookGuidebook

DRAFT

Framework for the Application of Systems Engineering

in theCommercial Aircraft Domain

Version 1.1

Jun 15, 2000

Draft Circulated forcomment July 00

Establishment of Liaisons for Establishment of Liaisons for StandardsStandards

Definition of Liaison - “A linking up or Definition of Liaison - “A linking up or connecting of the parts of a whole, as connecting of the parts of a whole, as of military units, in order to bring of military units, in order to bring about proper coordination of about proper coordination of activities*”activities*”

Robert Halligan SC-7 Liaison for 15288Robert Halligan SC-7 Liaison for 15288 David Oliver AP-233 LiaisonDavid Oliver AP-233 Liaison Richard Harwell EIA/G-47 LiaisonRichard Harwell EIA/G-47 Liaison

* Webster New World Dictionary* Webster New World Dictionary

SE Handbook UpdateSE Handbook Update

AcquisitionProcess

SupplyProcess

Acquisition& Supply

Technical Evaluation

SystemsAnalysisProcess

SystemVerificationProcess

RequirementsValidationProcess

End ProductsValidationProcess

Technical Management

PlanningProcess

AssessmentProcess

ControlProcess

SystemDesign

RequirementsDefinition Process

Solution DefinitionProcess

ProductRealization

ImplementationProcess

Transition to UseProcess

Plans,Directives& Status

Outcomes&

Feedback

Requirements

Designs

Products

AcquisitionRequest

SystemProducts

How ToDo It

Methodologies& Tools

Examples

MetricsReferences

Steps

SYSTEMS ENGINEERINGHANDBOOK

A “HOW TO” GUIDEFor All Engineers

Version 2.0

January 2000

Handbook currently being reviewed.

Advantage Advantage – Format widely acceptedFormat widely accepted– Significant similarity and overlap with PMI and ISO modelsSignificant similarity and overlap with PMI and ISO models– Integration with other disciplines is simplifiedIntegration with other disciplines is simplified– Broad perspective is useful for manyBroad perspective is useful for many– Simplified update over a comprehensive documentSimplified update over a comprehensive document

DisadvantagesDisadvantages– Not comprehensive in the near to intermediate term thus Not comprehensive in the near to intermediate term thus

requiring multiple referencesrequiring multiple references– Format May reduce likelihood of SE BoK becoming a Format May reduce likelihood of SE BoK becoming a

standardstandard– Requires constant monitoring of referencesRequires constant monitoring of references

Proposed INCOSE SE BoK similar to Proposed INCOSE SE BoK similar to PMI-PM BoK and ISO-SE BoKPMI-PM BoK and ISO-SE BoK

We need NASA’s help!We need NASA’s help!

Provide their SE technical expertise to Provide their SE technical expertise to INCOSE WG’s (especially Space WG)INCOSE WG’s (especially Space WG)

Provide technical input to special Provide technical input to special projects (I.e. SEBOK)projects (I.e. SEBOK)

Become members of our (Corporate Become members of our (Corporate Advisory Board - Advisory Board - Orlando isOrlando is NASA HQ CAB NASA HQ CAB membermember), ), David Durham is JPL CAB memberDavid Durham is JPL CAB member

Attend and participate in local chapters Attend and participate in local chapters activities and working groups.activities and working groups.



Education and Education and Research in Systems Research in Systems

Engineering Engineering Dennis BuedeDennis Buede, Education and , Education and Research Technical CommitteeResearch Technical Committee

George Mason UniversityGeorge Mason UniversityFairfax, VA USAFairfax, VA USA

[email protected]@gmu.edu

Status of SE Status of SE Research & EducationResearch & Education

TopicsTopics

Activities in the Education & Activities in the Education &

Research TCResearch TC

– Charter and Working GroupsCharter and Working Groups

– Education development WGEducation development WG

– SE Body of Knowledge WGSE Body of Knowledge WG

Research in SE Center of ExcellenceResearch in SE Center of Excellence

Education and Research Education and Research Technical CommitteeTechnical Committee

To make Systems Engineering education a proven, value-adding, activity To make Systems Engineering education a proven, value-adding, activity that matures in a systemic mannerthat matures in a systemic manner to the satisfaction of the key to the satisfaction of the key stakeholder groups - Industry, Systems Engineers and Educatorsstakeholder groups - Industry, Systems Engineers and Educators

Chair - Dennis Buede, +1 703-993-1727, [email protected] - Dennis Buede, +1 703-993-1727, [email protected] CoChairsCoChairs

– Phil Brown, +1 972-262-0530, [email protected] Brown, +1 972-262-0530, [email protected]– Stephen Cook, +61 8 8302 3818, [email protected] Cook, +61 8 8302 3818, [email protected]

Education Development Working Group Education Development Working Group – Define and develop databases that describe educational opportunities at the undergraduate Define and develop databases that describe educational opportunities at the undergraduate

and graduate level of systems engineering that can be used as a guide for formal academic and graduate level of systems engineering that can be used as a guide for formal academic programs at all levels.programs at all levels.

Concepts and Terms Working Group Concepts and Terms Working Group – Define and document the conceptual foundations of SE within the framework of a common set Define and document the conceptual foundations of SE within the framework of a common set

of terms (with definitions) to support more effective communication of SE.of terms (with definitions) to support more effective communication of SE. Educational Measurements Working Group Educational Measurements Working Group

– To assist and make Systems Engineering education a proven, value-added, activity that To assist and make Systems Engineering education a proven, value-added, activity that matures in a systemic manner.matures in a systemic manner.

Systems and Supportability Interface Research Working GroupSystems and Supportability Interface Research Working Group – To research cause-and-effect relationships that link system architectural and design decisions To research cause-and-effect relationships that link system architectural and design decisions

to impacts on system operational effectiveness and life-cycle cost in an increasingly to impacts on system operational effectiveness and life-cycle cost in an increasingly competitive and resource constrained environment.competitive and resource constrained environment.

SE Body of Knowledge Working GroupSE Body of Knowledge Working Group– To create a Guide to the SE Body of Knowledge.To create a Guide to the SE Body of Knowledge.

Education Development Education Development WGWG

SE BibliographiesSE Bibliographies

SE Education and Training SE Education and Training

ResourcesResources

SE BibliographiesSE Bibliographies

Overall BibliographyOverall Bibliography– Started with SEFT Bibliography (53 pages)Started with SEFT Bibliography (53 pages)– Updated with Annotations by GMU M.S. Updated with Annotations by GMU M.S.

Students (79 pages)Students (79 pages)– Updated by Jack Fisher’s Bibliography (98 Updated by Jack Fisher’s Bibliography (98

pages)pages)– (To be) Updated by Don Clausing’s (To be) Updated by Don Clausing’s

BibliographyBibliography

Bibliography of SE BooksBibliography of SE Books Bibliography of Books about Bibliography of Books about

SystemsSystemsGoal: Update once each yearPublish on INCOSE web siteAdvertise in INSIGHT

Books on Systems Books on Systems EngineeringEngineering

Ackoff, R.L. and Emery, F.E. (1972). On Purposeful Systems.Akao, Y.A. (1990). QFD: Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design .Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the Synthesis of Form.Andriole, S.J. (1996). Managing Systems Requirements: Methods, Tools, and Cases .Asimow, M. (1962). Introduction to Design.Athey, T.H. (1982). Systematic Systems Approach: An Integrated Method for Solving Systems Problems.Baumgartner, J.S. (1979). Systems Management.Baylin, E.N. (1990). Functional Modeling of Systems.Beam, W.R. (1990). Systems Engineering: Architecture and Design.Beam, W.R. (1989). Command, Control, and Communications Systems Engineering .Beer, S. (1985). Diagnosing the System for Organizations.Belcher, R. and Aslaksen, E. (1992). Systems Engineering.Bellamy, L.J. (1985). The Safety Management Factor: An Analysis of the Human Error Aspects of the Bhopal Disaster.Blair, R.N. and Whitston, C.W. (1971). Elements of Industrial Systems Engineering.Blanchard, B.S. (1991). System Engineering Management.Blanchard, B.S., and Fabrycky, W.J. (1998). Systems Engineering and Analysis.Boardman, J. (1990). Systems Engineering: An Introduction.Bowen, J.P. and Hinchey, M.G. (1999). High-Integrity System Specifications and Design . Buede, D.M. (2000). The Engineering Design of Systems: Models and Methods .Card, S.K., Moran, T.P., and Newell, A. (1983). The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction .Carroll, J.M. (ed.). (1995). Scenario-Based Design.Carter, D.E. and Baker, B.S. (1992). Concurrent Engineering: The Product Development Environment for the 1990’s.Chapanis, A. (1996). Human Factors in Systems Engineering.Chapman, W.L., Bahill, A.T., and Wymore, A.W. (1992). Engineering Modeling and Design.Chase, W.P. (1974). Management of System Engineering.Checkland, P.B. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice.Chestnut, H. (1967). Systems Engineering Methods.Chestnut, H. (1965). Systems Engineering Tools.Chorafas, D.N. (1989). Systems Architecture and Systems Design.Churchman, C.W. (1971). The Design of Inquiring Systems.Churchman, C.W. (1968). The Systems Approach.Cochin, I. And Plass, H.J. (1997). Analysis and Design of Dynamic Systems.Cooper, D. and Chapman, C. (1987). Risk Analysis for Large Projects: Models, Methods and Cases .Corbett, J., Dooner, M., Meleka, J., and Pym, C. (1991) Design for Manufacture: Strategies, Principles, and Techniques.Coulouris, G., Dollimore, J., and Kindberg, T. (1994). Distributed Systems Concepts and Design.Cross, N. (1989). Engineering Design Methods.Daenzer, W.F. (ed.) (1976). Systems Engineering.Dandy, G.C. and Warner, R.F. (1989). Planning and Design of Engineering Systems.Defense Systems Management College. (1989). Risk management: Concepts and guidance.DeMarco, T. (1978). Structured Analysis and System Specification .de Neufville, R. and Stafford. J.H. (1971). Systems Analysis for Engineers and Managers.Dept. Of Army, (1969). A Guide to Systems Engineering.Dhillon, B.S. (1989). Life Cycle Costing: Techniques, Models, and Applications .Dhillon, B.S. (1982). Reliability Engineering in Systems Design and Operation .Dickinson, B.W. (1991). Systems: Analysis, Design, and Computation.Dix, A.J. (1991). Formal Methods for Interactive Systems.Dixon, J.R. (1966). Design Engineering – Inventiveness, Analysis, and Decision-Making .Dommasch, D.O. and Landeman, C.W. (1962) Principles Underlying Systems Engineering.Dorny, C.N. (1993). Understanding Dynamic Systems: Approaches to Modeling, Analysis and Design.Eisner, H. (1988). Computer-Aided Systems Engineering.Eisner, H. (1996). Essentials of Project and Systems Engineering Management .Fabrycky, W.J., Thuesen, G.J., and Verma, D. (1997). Economic Decision Analysis.Fabrycky, W.J. and Blanchard, B.S. (1991). Life-Cycle Cost and Economic Analysis.Faurre, P. and Depeyrot, M. (1977). Elements of System Theory.Flagle, C.D., Huggins, W.H. and Roy, R.H. (eds.) (1960). Operations Research and Systems Engineering.Flood, R.L. and Carson, E.R. (1988). Dealing with Complexity, an Introduction to the Theory and Application of Systems Science.Forrestor, J.W., (1968). Principles of Systems.F ortune, J. (1995). Learning from Failure: The Systems Approach.

Ostwald, P.F. and Munoz, J. (1997). Manufacturing Processes and Systems.Padulo, L. and Arbib, M. (1974). System Theory: A Unified State-Space Approach to Continuous and Discrete Systems. Pages, A. and Gondran, M. (1986). System Reliability: Evaluation and Prediction in Engineering.Perrow, C. (1984). Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies .Perry, W.E. (1988). A Structured Approach to Systems Testing.Phadke, M. (1989). Quality Engineering Using Robust Design.Prasad, B. (1996). Concurrent Engineering Fundamentals: Integrated Product and Process Organization.Proctor, R.W., Van Zandt, T., and Ehrenstein, A. (1993). Human Factors in Simple and Complex Systems.Pugh, S. (1990). Total Design.Purdy, D.C. (1991). A Guide for Writing Successful Engineering Specifications .Rasmussan, J. (1986). Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction .Rasmussan, J. et al. (1994). Cognitive Systems Engineering.Rea, K.P. and Lientz, B.P. (1998). Breakthrough Technology Project Management .Rechtin, E. and Maier, M.W. (1996). The Art of Systems Architecting.Rechtin, E. (1991). Systems Architecting: Creating and Building Complex Systems .Reilly, N.B. (1993). Successful Systems Engineering for Engineers and Managers .Revelle, C.S., et al. (1997). Civil and Environmental Systems Engineering .Roland, H.E. and Moriarty, B. (1990). System Safety Engineering and Management .Rouse, W.B. (1991). Design for Success: A Human-Centered Approach to Designing Successful Products and Systems.Rouse, W.B. and Boff, K.R. (1987). System Design: Behavioral Perspectives on Designers, Tools, and OrganizationsRyschkewitsch, M.G. (1992). The NASA Mission Design Process: An Engineering Guide to the Conceptual Design, Mission Analysis, and Definition Phases. Sage, A.P. (ed.) (1999). Handbook of Systems Engineering.Sage, A.P. (1995). Systems Management for Information Technology and Software Engineering .Sage, A.P. (1992). Systems Engineering.Sage, A.P. (1991). Decision Support Systems Engineering.Sage, A.P. (1977). Methodology for Large-scale Systems.Savas, E.S. (1965). Computer Control of Industrial Processes.Schuman, S. et al. (1994). Systems, Models, and Measures: Formal Approaches to Computing and Information Technology.Shearer, J.L. et al. (1997). Dynamic Modeling and Control of Engineering Systems .Shina, S.G. (ed.). (1994). Successful Implementation of Concurrent Engineering Products and Processes.Shinners, S.M. (1976). A Guide to Systems Engineering and Management .Shuey, R.L., Spooner, D.L., and Frieder, O. (1997). The Architecture of Distributed Computer Systems. Sommerville, I. (1997). Requirements Engineering: A Good Practice Guide .Stevens, R., et al. (1998). Systems Engineering: Coping with Complexity .Suh, N.P. (1990). The Principles of Design.Taguchi, G. (1989). Introduction to Quality Engineering.Taguchi, G., Elsayed, E.A., and Hsiang, T.C. (1989). Quality Engineering in Production Systems.Thayer, R.H. and Dorfman, M. (eds.) (1990) System and Software Requirements Engineering.Thome, B. (ed.) (1993). Systems Engineering: Principles and Practice of Computer-Based Systems Engineering.Truxal, J.G. (1972). Introductory System Engineering.Turbide, D.A. (1996). Why Systems Fail: And How to Make Sure Yours Doesn’t .Turner, W.C., Mize, J.J., Case, K.E., Nazemetz, J.W., Mize, J.H. (1992). Introduction to Industrial and Systems Engineering.Van Gigch, J.P. (1978). Applied General Systems Theory.Vickers, G. (1983). Human Systems Are Different.Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). Gerneral Systems Theory.Wallace, I. (1995). Developing Effective Safety Systems.Wallace, R., Stockenberg, J. and Charrette, R. (1987). A Unified Methodology for Developing Systems.Warfield, J.N. (1990). A Science of Generic Design: Managing Complexity through Systems Design. (Vol. 1 and 2). Warfield, J.N. (1976). Societal Systems: Planning, Policy, and Complexity .Warfield, J.N. and Hill, J.D. (1972). A Unified Systems Engineering Concept.Williams, T.J. (1961). Systems Engineering in the Process Industries.Wilson, B. (1984). Systems: Concepts, Methodologies, and Applications .Wright, R.T. (1990). Manufacturing Systems.Wymore, A.W. (1993). Model-based Systems Engineering.Wymore, A.W. (1977). A Mathematical Theory of Systems Engineering: The Elements .Wymore, A.W. (1976). Systems Engineering Methodology for Interdisciplinary Teams .

Fowlkes, W.Y. and Creveling, C.M. (1995). Engineering Methods for Robust Product Design.Frankel, E.G. (1988). Systems Reliability and Risk Analysis.Gane, C. and Sarson, T. (1979). Structured Systems Analysis: Tools and Techniques.Gasparski, W. (1984). Understanding Design: The Praxiological-Systemic Perspective .Gheorghe, A. (1982). Applied Systems Engineering.Gibson, J.E. (1968). Introduction to Engineering Design.Glegg, G.L. (1981). The Development of Design.Glegg, G.L. (1969). The Design of Design.Goode, H.H. and Machol, R.E. (1957). System Engineering – An Introduction to the Design of Large-Scale Systems.Gosling, W. (1962). The Design of Engineering Systems.Grady, J.O. (1995). System Engineering Planning and Enterprise Identity .Grady, J.O. (1993). System Requirements Analysis.Grady, J.O. (1994). Systems Integration.Grady, J.O. (1997). System Validation and Verification.Hajek, V.J. (1984). Management of Engineering Projects.Hall, A. (1962). A Methodology for Systems Engineering.Hall, A. (1989). Metasystems Methodology.Hartley, J.R. (1990). Concurrent Engineering.Hatley, D.J. and Pirbhai, I.A. (1988). Strategies for Real-Time System Specification .Hazelrigg, G.A. (1996). Systems Engineering: An Approach to Information-Based Design .Hill, P.H. (1968). The Science of Engineering Design.Hitchins, D.K. (1992). Putting Systems to Work.Hollnagel, E., Mancini, G., and Woods, D. (1988). Cognitive Engineering in Complex Dynamic Worlds .Hubka, V. and Eder, W.E. (1988). Theory of Technical Systems: A Total Concept Theory for Engineering Design.Hunger, J.W. (1995). Engineering the System Solution.Jalote, P. (1994). Fault Tolerance in Distributed Systems.Jenkins, G.M. and Youle, P.V. (1971). Systems Engineering: a Unifying Approach in Industry and Society .Jerger, J.L. (1960). Systems Preliminary Design, Principles of Guided Missile Design.Johnson, R.A., Kast, F.E., and Rosenzweig, J.E. (1963) The Theory and Management of Systems.Karayanakis, N.M. (1995). Advanced System Modeling and Simulation with Block Diagram Languauges . Katzan, H. (1976). Systems Design and Documentation.Kavi, K.M. (ed.) (1992). Real-Time Systems: Abstractions, Languages, and Design Methodologies .Kerzner, H. (1995). Program Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling .Klir, G. (1985). Architecture of Systems Problem Solving.Kusiak, A. (ed.) (1992). Intelligent Design and Manufacturing.Kusiak, A. (1992). Concurrent Engineering: Automation, Tools, and Techniques .Lacy, J.A. (1992). Systems Engineering Management: Achieving Total Quality .Laplante, P.A. (1997). Real-Time Systems Design and Analysis: An Engineer’s Handbook . Larson, W.J. and Wertz, J.R. (eds.) (1992). Space Mission Analysis and Design.Lee, A.M. (1970). Systems Analysis Frameworks.Levi, S. and Agrawala, A.K. (1994). Fault Tolerant System Design.Lin, Y. (1999). General Systems Theory: A Mathematical Approach .Lucas, H.C. (1974). Towards Creative System Design.MacAulay, L.A. (1996). Requirements Engineering.Machol, R.E. (1965). Systems Engineering Handbook.Martin, J.N. (1996). Systems Engineering Guidebook: A Process for Developing Systems and Products .McClamroch, N.H. (1980). State Models of Dynamical Systems.McLeod, R. Jr. (1994). Systems Analysis and Design: An Organizational Approach .McMenamin, S.M. and Palmer, J.F. (1984). Essential Systems Analysis.Meredith, D.D. and Wong, K.W. (1973). Design and Planning of Engineering Systems.Mesarovic, M.D. and Takahara, Y. General Systems Theory: Mathematical Foundations.Michaels, J.V. and Wood, W.P. (1989). Design to Cost.Miles, R.F. (ed.) (1971). Systems Concepts.Miller, J.G. (1978). Living Systems.Moody, J.A. et al. (eds) (1997). Metrics and Case Studies for Evaluating Engineering Designs .Nadler, G. (1967). Work Systems Design: The IDEALS Concept.Norman, D.A. (1988). The Design of Everyday Things. Norman, D.A. and Draper, S.W. (1986). User Centered System Design.Oliver, D.W., Kelliher, T.P., and Keegan, J.G., Jr. (1997). Engineering Complex Systems with Models and Objects.Optner, S.L. (ed.) (1973). Systems Analysis.

Histogram of SE Books

0

20

40

60

80

60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 0

Year (5 yr increments)

Number of Books

SE Education Resources SE Education Resources World-wideWorld-wide U.S. ProgramsU.S. Programs

– 32 M.S. and Ph.D. Programs32 M.S. and Ph.D. Programs– 21 B.S. Programs21 B.S. Programs

U.K. ProgramsU.K. Programs– 5 Graduate Programs5 Graduate Programs– 2 Undergrad Programs2 Undergrad Programs

Europe – Programs embedded in other Europe – Programs embedded in other disciplinesdisciplines

Australia – 2 Graduate ProgramsAustralia – 2 Graduate Programs Remaining World – 3 Graduate Programs Remaining World – 3 Graduate Programs

(Israel, South Korea, Viet Nam) (Israel, South Korea, Viet Nam)

98 - University of Virginia

21 - Hampton University

14 - George Mason University

09 - University of Houston

08 - George Washington University

06 - Virginia Tech

05 - University of Maryland

05 - Texas A & M University

04 - University of Alabama

04 - University of South Florida

04 - Georgia Tech University

03 - Old Dominion University

02 - University of Texas

02 - Texas Tech University

55 - University of Arizona

11 - MIT

11 - US Naval Postgraduate School

09 - University of California

06 - University of Colorado

05 - University of Washington

05 - University of Missouri Rolla

04 - University of Southern California

04 - University of Idaho

04 - Stanford University

02 - United States Military Academy

02 - University of Kansas

02 - University of Michigan

17 - 5 international universitiesBased on November 2000 INCOSE Membership Roles

Region V Other Regions

INCOSE Members from INCOSE Members from UniversitiesUniversities

Guide to the SE Body of Guide to the SE Body of KnowledgeKnowledge

Goal and ObjectiveGoal and Objective

Structure for the Guide to the Structure for the Guide to the

SE BoKSE BoK

Implementation of Guide to SE Implementation of Guide to SE

BoKBoK

Goal and ObjectiveGoal and Objective Short-term goal is to identify and “connect” Short-term goal is to identify and “connect”

existing sources of knowledge through a existing sources of knowledge through a common framework using document common framework using document automation techniques such as links, tiering automation techniques such as links, tiering or outlining, hot points, etc.or outlining, hot points, etc.

Intermediate-term is to discover or produce Intermediate-term is to discover or produce missing knowledge as indicated by the missing knowledge as indicated by the framework framework

Long-term objective is to win standards Long-term objective is to win standards bodies recognition of the SEBOK and INCOSE bodies recognition of the SEBOK and INCOSE as as thethe producer of the SEBOK Guide. producer of the SEBOK Guide.

Long-term goal is to create an auto-evolvable Long-term goal is to create an auto-evolvable KM system for SEBOK.KM system for SEBOK.

Org. Structure for the Org. Structure for the Guide to the SE BoKGuide to the SE BoK

I - Systems Engineering FundamentalsI - Systems Engineering FundamentalsPurpose, What is a system?, What is SE?, …Purpose, What is a system?, What is SE?, …

II - SE ProcessesII - SE ProcessesLibrarian description of process views (e.g., Librarian description of process views (e.g., DoD, Comm’l A/C, Automotive, Int’l Aerospace)DoD, Comm’l A/C, Automotive, Int’l Aerospace)

III - Career Development of SE PractitionersIII - Career Development of SE PractitionersEducation & Training suppliers, standards Education & Training suppliers, standards bodies, professional societies, OJTbodies, professional societies, OJT

IV - SE Process Capability/AssessmentIV - SE Process Capability/AssessmentCMM modelsCMM models

Implementation of Implementation of Guide to SE BoKGuide to SE BoK

----------------- Guide Section ----------------I II III IV

1. Manage development of Guide[Rob Leibrandt, ?]

2. Produce sections of guide P. Brown B. Tufts J. Ring ? CAWG?J. Clymer J. Fisher W. Wymore

3. Design / Select Usage Arch[Jack Ring, ?]

4. Develop references

5. Review / Test[Rob Leibrandt, ?](Academic, Prof. Soc.,Stds. Bodies, Ed./TngSuppliers)

Research in the SE Center of Research in the SE Center of ExcellenceExcellence

Research InitiativesResearch Initiatives– Value of SE and Value of SE and

Elements of SE Elements of SE

– Human Productivity in Human Productivity in SE Activities SE Activities

– SE Processes and SE Processes and Process Improvement Process Improvement

– SE Methods SE Methods Design Techniques Design Techniques Cost Issues Cost Issues Risk and Trade Risk and Trade

Techniques Techniques

– SE Automation SE Automation

– Formal Methods for SEFormal Methods for SE

Decision-based Design via Decision-based Design via Life-Cycle Modeling and Life-Cycle Modeling and SimulationSimulation – Create a decision architecture Create a decision architecture

for design decision makingfor design decision making– Create a process for Create a process for

developing an interconnected developing an interconnected set of variable-resolution set of variable-resolution simulation modelssimulation models

– Create a modeling structure Create a modeling structure for the development system for the development system and operational system with and operational system with their key modes of interaction their key modes of interaction so as so as

to examine effective and to examine effective and ineffective development ineffective development system structuressystem structures

to examine trade offs between to examine trade offs between testing and modeling testing and modeling



Chesapeake Chapter Chesapeake Chapter Jerry WoodallJerry Woodall, Chesapeake Chapter , Chesapeake Chapter

PresidentPresidentZyan CorporationZyan Corporation

[email protected]@zyan.com

70

• Chartered – January 1994 with Constitution, Operating Plan, etc., prior to Chartering

• Key Mission - Providing a forum and communications channel to exchange systems engineering information, questions, concepts, etc. on a local level, complementing the international level organization

Chesapeake Chapter Area Served

BWP

95

95

83

50

70

270

State College

York

Fredrick

Rockville

DC

Baltimore

PA

MD

VA

Membership

Organizations

Annapolis

495

97 Members in 2001 Representing > 43 Organizations

Chesapeake Chapter Area Served

BWP

95

95

83

50

70

270

State College

York

Fredrick

Rockville

DC

Baltimore

PA

MD

VA

Membership

Organizations

Annapolis

495

Dr. Eric W. Young NASA/GSFCDr. Eric W. Young NASA/GSFC

Chesapeake Chapter Accomplishments in 2000

• Technical Meetings – Focus on Systems Engineering Tools, with presentations by seven tool vendors

• Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference – Participated with leader WMA in very successful technical conference in DC

• Hosted Object Oriented SE (OOSE) Seminar – At JHU/APL based on earlier WMA sponsored event

• Contributed – To review of 15288 International Standard

• Baltimore Engineering Society – Joined as associate member organization: Interaction with non-aerospace, commercial organizations and members plus gaining access to excellent facilities of the Society

• Initiated – OOSE Interest Group formation

Chesapeake Chapter Plans for 2001

• Technical Meetings – Every other month (March) focusing on OOSE IG/WG progress + new topics

• Members Meetings – On alternate months w/topics of general interest (at GSFC on 21 Feb) + expansion outside aerospace

• Chartered OOSE Interest Group – Chairman Jim Chism, IG is underway and meets at APL on designated Saturdays

• Second Review of 15288 – Committee being formed

• Update of Chesapeake Chapter (CSPK) Website – To improve communications using available tools more effectively http://www.incose.org/chesapek



Washington Washington Metropolitan Area Metropolitan Area

Chapter Chapter Bruce SheltonBruce Shelton, WMA Chapter , WMA Chapter PresidentPresident

ANSER Inc.ANSER Inc.Washington, DC USAWashington, DC [email protected]@anser.org

Washington Metropolitan Washington Metropolitan Area Chapter (WMA)Area Chapter (WMA) Largest Chapter within INCOSE - 450+ Largest Chapter within INCOSE - 450+

members members Will Host the INCOSE 2003 Will Host the INCOSE 2003

International Symposium in Concert International Symposium in Concert with the other Mid-Atlantic Chapterswith the other Mid-Atlantic Chapters

Hosted INCOSE Mid-Atlantic Regional Hosted INCOSE Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference 2000Conference 2000– 200+ attendees, 10 Patrons, 19 Exhibitors200+ attendees, 10 Patrons, 19 Exhibitors– 60 technical papers-3 tracks, 2 panels, 4 60 technical papers-3 tracks, 2 panels, 4

tutorials, 3 featured speakerstutorials, 3 featured speakers

Chapter ActivitiesChapter Activities

Regular Monthly Meetings with a Regular Monthly Meetings with a Special Guest SpeakerSpecial Guest Speaker– Second Tuesday of each MonthSecond Tuesday of each Month– Tysons Corner AreaTysons Corner Area

4-6 Tutorials per Year 4-6 Tutorials per Year Special Programs Addressing Special Programs Addressing

Unique TopicsUnique Topics INCOSE on the Mall - Brown Bag INCOSE on the Mall - Brown Bag

Lunch Meetings DowntownLunch Meetings Downtown

WMA ProgramsWMA Programs TutorialsTutorials

– Systems Engineering, Architecting, and Business Systems Engineering, Architecting, and Business Process ReengineeringProcess Reengineering

– Planning and Controlling Collaborative TeamsPlanning and Controlling Collaborative Teams– Object Oriented Systems Engineering MethodObject Oriented Systems Engineering Method– Humans and Systems: The Rest of the StoryHumans and Systems: The Rest of the Story– Using Standard Processes in Systems EngineeringUsing Standard Processes in Systems Engineering

Special ProgramsSpecial Programs– Systems Engineering Education Open HouseSystems Engineering Education Open House– Panel Discussion - Requirements Management Tools Panel Discussion - Requirements Management Tools – Joint Program Management Institute (PMI)-WMA Joint Program Management Institute (PMI)-WMA

MeetingMeeting



Southern Maryland Southern Maryland Chapter Chapter Karl Geist, Karl Geist, Southern Maryland Southern Maryland Chapter PresidentChapter President

US Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft DivisionUS Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft DivisionPatuxent River, MD USAPatuxent River, MD [email protected]@navair.navy.mil



Summary Summary Susan JonesSusan Jones, INCOSE Region V , INCOSE Region V Director for Industry AffairsDirector for Industry Affairs

The Aerospace CorporationThe Aerospace CorporationChantilly, VA USAChantilly, VA USA

[email protected]@aero.org

INCOSE Membership INCOSE Membership Benefits Benefits INCOSE JournalINCOSE Journal

INSIGHT INSIGHT

Symposia, Workshops, ConferencesSymposia, Workshops, Conferences

Membership discountsMembership discounts

Early visibility into emerging standards Early visibility into emerging standards

Knowledge of engineering from a global Knowledge of engineering from a global perspectiveperspective

Means to tap expertise of industry expertsMeans to tap expertise of industry experts

Networking with colleagues from around the worldNetworking with colleagues from around the world

……..and more ..and more

Cost of MembershipCost of Membership

Dues are $80 per yearDues are $80 per year– Dues year begins in JuneDues year begins in June– Prorated over rest of yearProrated over rest of year– Cost to join now is $40Cost to join now is $40

Time and effortTime and effort– Participate in local chapter eventsParticipate in local chapter events– Participate in Technical Participate in Technical

Committee Working GroupsCommittee Working Groups

Upcoming Local EventsUpcoming Local Events

Tutorials and SeminarsTutorials and Seminars– May 9-10,May 9-10, Risk Management Seminar, ,

Hampton Roads, VA– March 24,March 24, C4ISR Architectures and Their

Implementation Challenges Chapter MeetingsChapter Meetings

– Feb 13, Feb 13, Systems Engineering Old and New Perspectives, WMA Chapter

– Feb 20Feb 20, Monthly meeting, Chesapeake Chapter

International Council on Systems Engineering Introduction….. International Council on Systems...

Documents

Transcript of International Council on Systems Engineering Introduction….. International Council on Systems...