International Commission on Radiological Protection › docs › icrp2015 › 02 William Morgan...

17
1 International Commission on Radiological Protection Committee 1 (C1): Radiation Effects William F. Morgan Pacific Northwest National Laboratory USA

Transcript of International Commission on Radiological Protection › docs › icrp2015 › 02 William Morgan...

  • 1

    International Commission on

    Radiological Protection

    Committee 1 (C1): Radiation Effects

    William F. Morgan

    Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

    USA

  • 22

    2

    ICRP Mission

    Advance for the public benefit the science of

    radiological protection by providing recommendations

    and guidance on all aspects of protection against

    ionizing radiation.

    ICRP Structure

    Committee 1Effects

    Committee 2Doses

    Committee 3Medicine

    Committee 4Applications

    Committee 5Environment

    Working PartiesTask Groups

    Main Commission Scientific Secretariat

  • 3

    C1 considers the risk of induction of cancer and heritable disease (stochastic effects) together with the underlying mechanisms of radiation action

    C1 also considers the risks, severity and mechanisms of induction of tissue / organ damage and developmental defects (tissue reactions; deterministic effects)

  • 4

    Fortunate to have a congenial and interactive committee

  • 5

    C1 Responsibilities & Activity

    Continue to monitor data from the atomic bomb survivors (LSS) for both stochastic and deterministic effects, particularly for incidence.

    Consider the use of biologically-based dose-response models for assessing effects at low doses (

  • 6

    C1 Responsibilities / Activity

    Follow dosimetry and exposure discussions, DREF, DDREF.

    Advances in radiation induced damage recognition, DNA repair, and impact of epigenetic effects.

    Long term inflammatory responses and non-cancer effects (CVD, CNS)

    Dialogue on heritable effects

    Keep abreast of technology

    Emphasis on low dose, low dose rate

  • 7

    CT – the biggest contributor to low dose radiation exposure

    Approximately 80 million in the USA this year

  • 8

  • 9

    TG 75: Stem Cell Radiobiology

    Chair: Ohtsura Niwa

    Established to review current state of knowledge of stem

    cell radiobiology and potential impacts on cancer risk.

    An increase in knowledge of stem cell biology but little

    new information on radiation effects on stem cells.

    Emphasis is on stem cell radiobiology in relation to

    carcinogenic radiation risk.

    Document has been reviewed and approved by the Main

    Commission. Currently in press as Publication 131.

  • 10

    TG 75: Stem Cell Radiobiology

    ICRP acknowledges the leadership of

    chair O. Niwa, and their hardworking

    committee: J.H. Hendry, M.H.Barcellos-

    Hoff, R.K. Golbus, J.D., Harrison, P. Jacob,

    M.T. Martin, T.M. Seed., J.W. Shay, M.D. Story,

    K. Suzuki and S. Yamashita, plus the numerous

    consultants, readers and reviewers who all had a

    significant impact on this document.

  • 11

    TG 64: Cancer Risk from Alpha Emitters

    Chair: Margot Tirmarche, (France).

    Originally this TG was responsible for ICRP

    Publication 115. This is now being expanded

    to report on potential risks from plutonium,

    uranium, thorotrast and radium.

    Project delayed due to closure of West Lakes

    (UK) awaiting joint analysis of Sellafield and

    Mayak workers. Now back on schedule.

    The dosimetry contributions of C2 essential

  • 12

    TG 91: Radiation Risk Inference at Low-dose

    and Low-dose Rate Exposure for Radiological

    Protection Purposes

    Chair: Werner Ruehm (Germany)Members

    Tamara Azizova, C1 (Southern Urals)

    Simon Bouffler, C1 (UK)

    Roy Shore (former C1, Japan/USA)

    Gayle Woloschak (USA)

    Corresponding members

    Bernd Grosche (Germany), Linda Walsh (Germany)

    Michiaki Kai, C4 (Japan), Kaz Sakai, C5 (Japan)

    Kotaro Ozasa (Japan), Mark Little (USA)

    Quanfu Sun, C1 (China)

    Consultant

    Abel Gonzalez (Argentina)

  • 13

    TG 91: Radiation Risk Inference at Low-dose

    and Low-dose Rate Exposure for

    Radiological Protection Purposes

    The Task Group will review the estimation of risk

    coefficients and recommend:

    1. Whether to continue to estimate risk at low doses by

    assessing the slope of the dose response at high doses

    and then applying a DDREF reduction factor.

    1.Whether such coefficients are applicable to acute,

    protracted and prolonged exposure or need correction.

    1.Separate dose (LDEF) and dose rate (DREF)

  • 14

    In conjunction with TG 91 there is the Working Group on

    Circulatory Disease Detriment

    Chair Nobuhiko Ban (Japan)

    Goal – determination of circulatory disease detriment.

    1.Detriment calculated separately for heart disease and

    stroke

    1.Analysis of the meta-analysis from the A-bomb

    survivors

    1.Focus on nominal risk estimates, then adjust for

    severity

    No formal meetings, teleconferences and conference

    meetings.

  • 15

    Task Group 92: Terminology & Definitions

    Chair: Wolfgang Doerr (Austria)

    Members

    Jai-ki Lee, Main Commission (Korea)

    Dominique Laurier, C1 (France)

    Frank Wissman, C2 (Germany)

    Pedro Ortiz Lopez, C3 (Austria)

    Anne Nisbet, C4 (UK)

    Almudena Real, C5 (Spain)

    Corresponding member

    Derek Delves (Austria), Ted Lazo (France)

    Cecile Ronckers (Netherlands), Michiya Sasaki (Japan)

    Consultant

    Abel J. Gonzalez (Argentina)

  • 16

    Task Group 92: Terminology & Definitions(under the auspices of the Main Commission)

    Over many years the terminology and definitions of specific

    terms used in ICRP publications have evolved, and in some

    instances have been used inconsistently. This Task Group

    will review the terminology and definitions from Publication

    103 onward and update/revise as required.

    1.Definition unequivocal

    2. Definition clear, but requires harmonization

    3. Definition unclear/missing

    4. Definitions conflictive.

    It is envisaged that the updated terminology and definitions

    will be a web-based resource for future use.

  • 17

    2016 C1 meeting

    Chennai, India. In conjunction with the "International

    Conference on Radiation Biology” (ICRB-2016) and “14th

    Biennial Meeting of Indian Society for Radiation Biology”.

    On or about Nov. 11-13.

    Co hosts

    Preetha Rajaraman

    Mansoor Ahmed & Pat Prassanna (NIH/NCI)