International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Preparing Students for the...
-
Upload
willis-peters -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of International Center for Leadership in Education Dr. Willard R. Daggett Preparing Students for the...
International Center for Leadership in Education
Dr. Willard R. Daggett
Preparing Students for the21st Century
February 27, 2009
Application ModelApplication Model1.1. Knowledge in one disciplineKnowledge in one discipline
2. Application within discipline2. Application within discipline
3. Application across disciplines3. Application across disciplines
4. Application to real-world 4. Application to real-world predictable situationspredictable situations
5. Application to real-world 5. Application to real-world unpredictable situationsunpredictable situations
Challenges
• Globalization
Wal Mart
Source: The Post-American World
• Largest Corporation
• 8 times Size of Microsoft
• 2 % of GDP
• 1.4 Million Employees
• More Employees than:
• GM, Ford, G.E. and IBM Combined
“China today exports in a single day more than exported
in all of 1978.”
Source: The Rise of India and China . . .
Savings RateSavings Rate
1.1. India -- 25%India -- 25%
2. Japan -- 28%2. Japan -- 28%
3. Korea -- 30%3. Korea -- 30%
4. China -- 50%4. China -- 50%
5. United States -- (-4%)5. United States -- (-4%)
U.S. – 2nd Half of 20th Century
• Only Superpower
• Highest per Capita Income
• 1st in Economic Growth
• 5% of Population > 24% of Consumption
Source: National Academy of Science
Challenges
• Globalization
• Technology
Information TechnologyInformation Technology
• ProcessingProcessing
• CommunicationsCommunications
1983 – A Nation at Risk
• E-mail• Web pages• Google• iPODs• Laptops• Digital cameras• Doppler radar• Cell phones
• Blogs
• Wikis
• Tagging
• Text messaging
• MySpace
• Podcasts
• PDAs
2000
Content Creation & Social Media
• MySpace
• Flickr
• YouTube
• Blogs
• Personal Web Pages
SPOTSPOT
• MicrosoftMicrosoft– CitizenCitizen– FossilFossil– SuuncoSuunco
SPOTSPOT
• Integrated ProjectionIntegrated Projection
• Projection KeyboardProjection Keyboard
Projection KeyboardProjection Keyboard
Projection Keyboard and ProjectorProjection Keyboard and Projector
Language TranslationLanguage Translation
Translation GogglesTranslation Goggles
Emotiv
• 16 embedded sensors
• Detect facial expressions and emotions
• Push, pull, lift, and drop
http://emotiv.com/INDS_3/inds_3.html
Bio TechnologyBio Technology
• Biological ScienceBiological Science
• Practical ApplicationPractical Application
Nano TechnologyNano Technology
• Atom UpAtom Up
Info TechInfo Tech
Nano TechNano Tech
Bio TechBio Tech
20002000
Info TechInfo Tech
Nano TechNano Tech
Bio TechBio Tech
20092009
Info TechInfo Tech
Nano TechNano Tech
Bio TechBio Tech
20122012
Elementary Schools6 Years Integrated Science
Biology / Chemistry Grade 7
Biology / Physics Grade 8
Physics / Chemistry Grade 9
Integrated Science Grades 10 - 12
Source: Ed Week 6/6/07
Chinese Science
Challenges
• Technology
• Globalization
• Demographics
Start WorkingEnd WorkingLongevity
1900 2000 2100
47
62
77
21
62
1418
107
Retirement
55 is not an economically sustainable policy
• 1910 3.0 / 100
Demographics / Economic
• 1946 4.6 / 100
• 2010 1.4 / 100
Population of the US (in millions)
White
Black
Hispanic
Asian
Other
68 %
5 8 %
13 %
13 % 24 %
14 %
49 %
42
2000 2050
MedicareMedicare
• 2004 9 %
• 2020 25 %
• 2040 50 %
Challenges
• Technology
• Globalization
• Demographics
• Work
Employment 1970’s Employment 1970’s High SkillHigh Skill
Low SkillLow Skill
Employment 1990’s Employment 1990’s
High SkillHigh Skill
Low SkillLow Skill
Semi SkillSemi Skill
Employment 2010Employment 2010
High SkillHigh Skill
Low SkillLow Skill
Semi SkillSemi Skill
1970’s 1990’s 2010
Industrial BaseIndustrial Base
American Cotton Oil American Steel American Sugar Continental Tobacco Federal Steel General Electric National Lead Pacific Mail People’s Gas Tennessee Coal and Iron
1900
Industrial BaseIndustrial Base
General Motors Wal-Mart Exxon Ford General Electric IBM Citigroup AT & T Phillip Morris Boeing
1998
Industrial BaseIndustrial Base
Software Aerospace Genomics Bioinformatics Nanotechnology Photonics Micro Material Finance IT Robotics
2010
Lexile Framework® for Reading Study Summary of Text Lexile Measures
600
800
1000
1400
1600
1200
Tex
t L
exil
e M
easu
re (
L)
HighSchool
Literature
CollegeLiterature
HighSchool
Textbooks
CollegeTextbooks
Military PersonalUse
Entry-LevelOccupations
SAT 1,ACT,AP*
* Source of National Test Data: MetaMetrics
Interquartile Ranges Shown (25% - 75%)
Expectations have ChangedExpectations have Changed
20th Century21st Century
1 – 2 Jobs 10 – 15 Jobs
FlexibilityAnd
Adaptability
LifeLong
Learners
Mastery ofOne Field
SubjectMatterMastery
# ofJobs
JobRequirements
Teaching Model
U.S. % of World Scientists / EngineersU.S. % of World Scientists / Engineers
0102030405060708090
100
1990 2020
We need to do what workers abroad cannot do equally well for less
money…
Forging relationships, tackling novel challenges, synthesizing big picture.
Foreign owned companies and foreign-born inventors account for nearly half
of U.S. patents (Japan, Korea and Taiwan more than one-fourth)
“Innovate America,” Council on Competitiveness
Business Reality
Workplace TrendsWorkplace Trends UnskilledUnskilled Work to WorkerWork to Worker Large to SmallLarge to Small
16 Career Clusters16 Career ClustersDepartment of EducationDepartment of Education
Agriculture and Natural Resources Arts, Audiovisual Technology, and Communications
Business and Administration Architecture and Construction
Education and Training Finance
Health Science Hospitality and Tourism
Human Services Information Technology
Law and Public Safety Manufacturing
Government and Public Administration Retail, Wholesale, and Service
Scientific Research and Engineering Transportation, Distribution, and Logistics
Reading RequirementsReading RequirementsFindingsFindings
Entry-levelEntry-level Highest in 6/16Highest in 6/16 Second Highest in 7/16Second Highest in 7/16
Consistent Across CountryConsistent Across Country
Ad
van
ced
Lexile Reading Level Range: 850-930
Inte
rmed
iate
Lexile Reading Level Range: 940-1090
En
try
Lev
el
Lexile Reading Level Range: 1000-1140
Human ServicesHuman Services
A
dva
nce
d
Lexile Reading Level Range: 1310-1390
Inte
rmed
iate
Lexile Reading Level Range: 1250-1340
En
try
Lev
el
Lexile Reading Level Range: 1310-1350
ConstructionConstruction
Ad
van
ced
Lexile Reading Level Range: 1310-1440
Inte
rmed
iate
Lexile Reading Level Range: 1280-1310
En
try
Lev
el
Lexile Reading Level Range: 1280-1330
ManufacturingManufacturing
ProficiencyProficiencyGrade 4 ReadingGrade 4 Reading
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
Wisconsin 83 %
Texas 81 %
Iowa 77 %
Florida 71 %
Massachusetts 48 %
California 48 %
South Carolina 35 %
ProficiencyProficiencyGrade 4 ReadingGrade 4 Reading
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
Wisconsin 83 % 189
Texas 81 % 190
Iowa 77 % 197
Florida 71 % 202
Massachusetts 48 % 234
California 48 % 210
South Carolina 35 % 228
ProficiencyProficiencyGrade 8 ReadingGrade 8 Reading
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
North Carolina 88 %
Wisconsin 86 %
Iowa 72 %
Florida 44 %
California 39 %
South Carolina 30 %
ProficiencyProficiencyGrade 8 ReadingGrade 8 Reading
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
North Carolina 88 % 217
Wisconsin 86 % 229
Iowa 72 % 250
Florida 44 % 265
California 39 % 262
South Carolina 30 % 276
ProficiencyProficiencyGrade 4 MathematicsGrade 4 Mathematics
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
North Carolina 91 %
Texas 82 %
Wisconsin 74 %
Michigan 73 %
Florida 63 %
California 51 %
South Carolina 39 %
Massachusetts 39 %
ProficiencyProficiencyGrade 4 MathematicsGrade 4 Mathematics
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
North Carolina 91 % 203
Texas 82 % 219
Wisconsin 74 % 225
Michigan 73 % 222
Florida 63 % 230
California 51 % 231
South Carolina 39 % 246
Massachusetts 39 % 255
ProficiencyProficiencyGrade 8 MathematicsGrade 8 Mathematics
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
North Carolina 84 %
Iowa 76 %
Wisconsin 75 %
Michigan 61 %
Florida 58 %
Massachusetts 42 %
South Carolina 24 %
ProficiencyProficiencyGrade 8 MathematicsGrade 8 Mathematics
ProficientRequired
NAEP Score
North Carolina 84 % 247
Iowa 76 % 262
Wisconsin 75 % 263
Michigan 61 % 269
Florida 58 % 269
Massachusetts 42 % 301
South Carolina 24 % 305
Improving Student Performancein
Times of Declining Resources
Bases of ICLE Position
• International Center with Nation’s most Successful Schools
• Funding Student Learning – Report
• States– Florida– New Jersey
Framework Vs. Index
Efficient and Effective Framework
High High CostCost
Low Low CostCost
Efficient and Effective Framework
High High CostCost
Low Low CostCost
High Student PerformanceHigh Student Performance
Low Student PerformanceLow Student Performance
EEffffeeccttiivveenneessss
Efficient and Effective Framework
High High CostCost
Low Low CostCost
High Student PerformanceHigh Student Performance
Low Student PerformanceLow Student Performance
CC DD
AA BB
EEffffeeccttiivveenneessss
Efficient and Effective Framework
High High CostCost
Low Low CostCost
High Student PerformanceHigh Student Performance
Low Student PerformanceLow Student Performance
CC DD
AA BB
High CostHigh CostHigh PerformanceHigh Performance
Low CostLow CostHigh PerformanceHigh Performance
Low CostLow CostLow PerformanceLow Performance
High CostHigh CostLow PerformanceLow Performance
Example
• Class Size– 25 to 24
– 4 % increase
– Payroll Equals 80 %
– Total Cost = 3.2 % of Budget
• Professional Development
Ohio English Language ArtsLearning Standards Tested
High Medium Low Grade 3 16 5 70 Grade 4 36 10 38 Grade 5 7 16 62 Grade 6 22 6 54 Grade 7 18 41 22 Grade 8 14 7 58 Grade 9 28 17 31 Grade 10 34 18 24
LevelsLevels
CC DD
AA BB 1 2 3 4 5
456
321
Bloom’sBloom’s
ApplicationApplication
Gold Seal Lessons
Efficient and Effective Framework
High High CostCost
Low Low CostCost
High Student PerformanceHigh Student Performance
Low Student PerformanceLow Student Performance
Focused Professional Focused Professional DevelopmentDevelopment
Reduce Reduce Class SizeClass Size
Empower StaffEmpower Staff
Empower StaffEmpower Staff
1.1. Team of teachers Team of teachers
Empower StaffEmpower Staff
1.1. Team of teachers Team of teachers
2.2. Given group of students Given group of students
Empower StaffEmpower Staff
1.1. Team of teachers Team of teachers
2.2. Given group of students Given group of students
3.3. Agree to their present performanceAgree to their present performance
Empower StaffEmpower Staff
1.1. Team of teachers Team of teachers
2.2. Given group of students Given group of students
3.3. Agree to their present performanceAgree to their present performance
4. Give total budget (fixed and 4. Give total budget (fixed and variable)variable)
Empower StaffEmpower Staff
1.1. Team of teachers Team of teachers
2.2. Given group of students Given group of students 3.3. Agree to their present performanceAgree to their present performance4. Give total budget (fixed and 4. Give total budget (fixed and
variable)variable)5. Give % of savings if student 5. Give % of savings if student
performance improvesperformance improves
Successful Examples
1. Teachers in teams with a group of students --- They get 50% of reduced cost if students maintain student performance. If they dramatically improve student performance they get 80% of reduced cost
Efficient and Effective Framework
High High CostCost
Low Low CostCost
High Student PerformanceHigh Student Performance
Low Student PerformanceLow Student Performance
Teacher-Designed Teacher-Designed ProgramProgram
X
XExisting Existing ProgramProgram
ExamplesExamples
1.1. Department ChairsDepartment Chairs
Efficient and Effective Framework
High High CostCost
Low Low CostCost
High Student PerformanceHigh Student Performance
Low Student PerformanceLow Student Performance
Interdisciplinary Interdisciplinary ChairsChairs
ExamplesExamples
1.1. Department ChairsDepartment Chairs
2.2. Looping Looping
Efficient and Effective Framework
High High CostCost
Low Low CostCost
High Student PerformanceHigh Student Performance
Low Student PerformanceLow Student Performance
LoopingLooping
ExamplesExamples
1.1. Department ChairsDepartment Chairs
2.2. Looping Looping
3.3. Electives to 9Electives to 9thth Grade Grade
Efficient and Effective Framework
High High CostCost
Low Low CostCost
High Student PerformanceHigh Student Performance
Low Student PerformanceLow Student Performance
Electives to Electives to 99thth Grade Grade
Technology
Efficient and Effective Framework
High High CostCost
Low Low CostCost
High Student PerformanceHigh Student Performance
Low Student PerformanceLow Student Performance
I CAN LearnI CAN Learn
Efficient and Effective Framework
High High CostCost
Low Low CostCost
High Student PerformanceHigh Student Performance
Low Student PerformanceLow Student Performance
READ 180READ 180
ExamplesExamples
Coordinate Professional Development Coordinate Professional Development with Graduate Degrees with Graduate Degrees
Online and Best Practices
• 3 credit hours = 45 contact hours
• 6 hour days = 7.5 days (45 contact hours)
Cost of Graduate Programs
1. Temple University
-$573 per credit hour ($837 out of state)
2. State University of New York at Albany
-$338 per credit hour ($573 out of state)
3. RPI
- $1,285 per credit hour
Online and Best Practices
• course 3 credit hours = 45 contact hours• 6 hour days = 7.5 days (45 contact hours)• Cost of $450 = $60 per daycompared to:
- $1,014 - $3,855 per course for Graduate Credit
- Cost of Professional Development Day $36,000 per year/180 days = $200 per day
Online and Best Practices
• 3 credit hours = 45 contact hours• 6 hour days = 7.5 days (45 contact hours)• Cost of course $450 = $60 per day• Tied to nation’s most successful schools
and their practices
Online and Best Practices
• 3 credit hours = 45 contact hours• 6 hour days = 7.5 days (45 contact hours)• Cost of course $450 = $60 per day• Tied to nation’s most successful schools and their
practices• Based on district priorities
Online and Best Practices
• 3 credit hours = 45 contact hours• 6 hour days = 7.5 days (45 contact hours)• Cost of course $450 = $60 per day• Tied to nation’s most successful schools and their
practices• Based on district priorities• No travel
Online and Best Practices
• 3 credit hours = 45 contact hours• 6 hour days = 7.5 days (45 contact hours)• Cost of course $450 = $60 per day• Tied to nation’s most successful schools and their
practices• Based on district priorities• No travel • Cost savings to teachers and district PLUS best
practices tied to district priorities
Relevant and Cost Effective for Teachers
Relevant and Cost Effective for District
Efficient and Effective Framework
High High CostCost
Low Low CostCost
High Student PerformanceHigh Student Performance
Low Student PerformanceLow Student Performance
Online Graduate Online Graduate CourseCourse
X
XTraditional Traditional Professional Professional DevelopmentDevelopment
WHY - WHAT - HOW
1587 Route 146
Rexford, NY 12148
Phone (518) 399-2776
Fax (518) 399-7607
E-mail - [email protected]
www.LeaderEd.com
International Center for Leadership in Education, Inc.