Intellectual oilfield SAP UFAM optimization and …...*) RC - reserve calculation, FS–feasibility...
Transcript of Intellectual oilfield SAP UFAM optimization and …...*) RC - reserve calculation, FS–feasibility...
PUBLIC
Sergey Frolov, SAP
April 26, 2018
Intellectual oilfield SAP UFAM – optimization and actualization of operative plans of oilfield activities
2PUBLIC© 2018 SAP SE or an SAP affiliate company. All rights reserved. ǀ
“A goal without a plan is just a wish”Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
3PUBLIC© 2018 SAP SE or an SAP affiliate company. All rights reserved. ǀ
GOALSHORIZONS OF
PLANNINGPERIOD DOCUMENT
Strategic horizon 1 – 100 years(till the FS* targets will be achieved)
RC FS FDP*
Medium-term horizon 2 - 5 years FDP
Yearly horizon 1 year
Month horizon 1 month
Operational level 1 day - hours
Excel files
*) RC - reserve calculation, FS– feasibility study of oil recovery factor, FDP - field development plan
Horizons of planning for oil and gas fields
4PUBLIC© 2018 SAP SE or an SAP affiliate company. All rights reserved. ǀ
Several iterations
normallyWithout accounting of
interferences and
influences of activities
on each other
Individually by
different departments
Functional plan AS IS
Initiation by
departments
Integrated
Planner
MT approval
Manual daily
update
Initiation and approval
with in department of
all types of operational
activities with proposed
execution day/duration
and required well
shutdowns
Arrange activities and
calculate deferments
and production profile
Monthly Integrated
Plan approval by
Management Team
As result of new input
(unscheduled activities,
execution delay,
extension, overdue, etc.)
Drawbacks of AS IS process:
1) Significant man power resources involved in the process
2) A lot of iterations
3) Time consuming process with low value added time
4) Forecast does not account interferences
5) Activities distribution is NOT optimal
5PUBLIC© 2018 SAP SE or an SAP affiliate company. All rights reserved. ǀ
Monthly operational plan on the first day of a month
Object Month
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Well1
PL1
PSS1
WMU
MPPS1
0
5
10
15
Scheduled deferment Unscheduled deferment
6PUBLIC© 2018 SAP SE or an SAP affiliate company. All rights reserved. ǀ
Monthly operational plan vs. fact on the last day of a month
Object Month
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Well1
PL1
PSS1
WMU
MPPS1
0
5
10
15
Scheduled deferment Unscheduled defermentFact
7PUBLIC© 2018 SAP SE or an SAP affiliate company. All rights reserved. ǀ
SAP UFAM Intelligent OilfieldIntegrated Operations Center
Collaboration
Real-time collaboration between
specialists in different functional areas.
Upstream Integrated PlanningCreation of a Integrated Operational Plan
for workovers, maintenance and repairs
including reservoirs, wells and field
gathering system.
Upstream Integrated Models
Use of integrated model to forecast operations
(production, downtime, etc.) given the
Integrated Operational Plan.
Upstream Integrated Analysis
Rapid Decision Making
Efficient management and coordination of
work during emergencies.
Comprehensive analysis of field
development and operations to identify
potential well and field optimization options.
8PUBLIC© 2018 SAP SE or an SAP affiliate company. All rights reserved. ǀ
✓ Fast Reservoir model
✓ Wellbore model
✓ Gathering system model
✓ Artificial lift performance analysis
✓ System recommended activities
based on performance analysis
✓ Self-learning automated schedule
generation based on models
SAP UFAM is a result of partnership between SAP and NV-ASUproject (OIS)
Upstream
Field
Activity
Management
✓ Investment
✓ Costs
✓ NPV
✓ Hydrocarbon Accounting
✓ Plant Maintenance program
✓ Asset Failure Statistics
✓ Economical model
9PUBLIC© 2018 SAP SE or an SAP affiliate company. All rights reserved. ǀ
Management Cycle
• Identification of workover / repair activities by reservoir, well and pipeline section.
• Forecasting of equipment failure and deterioration.
• Analysis of potential and limitations of oilfield infrastructure.
• Full Engineering Model – fast calculations.
• Accounts for production limitations due to:
‒ field gathering system capabilities;
‒ interference between wells.
• Automatic generation of optimal plan considering:
‒ system potential, interference between wells and other
constraints / limitations;
‒ management priorities (production levels or profit).
• Optimization of costs.
Real Time
• Performance tracking.
• Tracking of plan deviations and critical events.
• Critical (unplanned) event response plan.
• Learning and knowledge accumulation
• Plan optimization (compares planned results to actuals and adjusts)
• Improved modeling over the life of the field.
SAP UFAM INCLUDES 4 BLOCKS
Pool of Assets-Candidates for Treatment
Integrated Planning
Integrated Analysis
Integrated Modelling
Monitoring1
Integrated AnalysisComprehensive analysis of field development and operations to identify potential well and
field optimization options
• Analysis of Geology, Technology, Operational Performance, Equipment, Economical Efficiency
• Recommended pool of field Activities
• Forecasting of potential production after the activity
• Bottleneck analysis
SAP UFAM INCLUDES 4 BLOCKS
Integrated Schedule of Activities
Pool of Assets-Candidates for Treatment
Integrated Planning
Integrated Analysis
Integrated Modelling
Monitoring
2
Integrated PlanningGeneration of integrated action schedules for assets with the specified goals, criteria and limitations
• Automated Generation of Activity schedule
• Deep learning algorithms to constantly create better plans and schedules based on multiple factors
• Multiple versions and What-If capability
SAP UFAM INCLUDES 4 BLOCKS
Integrated Schedule of Activities
Pool of Assets-Candidates for Treatment
Planned Production based on Models of:
Reservoir / Well/ Infrastructure / Fluid
Integrated Planning
Integrated Analysis
Integrated Modelling
Monitoring
Actual Status of Assets and Activities
3
Integrated Modelling Enables modelling of fluid flow processes for a formation, bottom-hole area, well, gathering
system, and injection system
• Fast formation model for fast automatic re-calculations
• Economical model based on what-if scenarios
• All models are seamlessly integrated
• Mutual impact
SAP UFAM INCLUDES 4 BLOCKS
Integrated Schedule of Activities
Pool of Assets-Candidates for Treatment
Planned Production based on Models of:
Reservoir / Well/ Infrastructure / Fluid
Integrated Planning
Integrated Analysis
Integrated Modelling
Monitoring
Actual Status of Assets and Activities4
MonitoringMonitoring asset events that lead to changes in production
• Visual graphics of the oil field with actual data
• Monitoring of all assets under treatment
• Gathering system performance
• Team progress against the schedule, display planned and actual performance
SAP UFAM
Production and
Operational Systems
• Hydrocarbon Accounting and Production Monitoring
• Well Activity Planning & Reporting
• Well Surveillance Activity Planning & Reporting
• Field Asset Management (incl. well / downhole
equipment) and performance monitoring
• Energy asset management and monitoring
• Pipeline asset management and monitoring
SAP UFAM – EXPERT SYSTEM AND OPERATES
WITH OTHER SOURCES OF DATA
Well Data Historians• Well Logging data
• Well Construction and Drilling data
• GIS coordinates of objects (well head, perforation,
formation, etc)
• Formation and fluid data
• Well data historian
SCADA and real-time data
• Well performance
• Artificial lift equipment performance data
• Pipeline data
• Gathering system objects data
• Commercial and technical meters
Investment program
Systems
• Budget
• Limits
Accounting systems• Financial accounting
• Controlling
• Contracts
• NPV
19PUBLIC© 2018 SAP SE or an SAP affiliate company. All rights reserved. ǀ
SAP UFAM applies different models depending on data availibilityR
equir
ed d
ata
Data used for analysis
▪ Field development history
▪ Current production data
▪ Cumulated production data
▪ Injection data
▪ Operating time data
▪ Well inclination, HUD
▪ Well Intervention history
▪ Perforation data
▪ DFL, FBHP, Reservoir pressure data
▪ Geology
▪ Productive layers data
▪ Top of the layers
▪ Bottom of the layers
▪ PVT
▪ Well history
▪ Initial reservoir pressure
Desir
ed d
ata
▪ Well Interventions cost
▪ Downtime data
▪ Contours and faults data
▪ Well construction
▪ Artificial lift data
▪ Layer intersection data
▪ Inclination
▪ Well head coordinated
▪ Initial reservoir pressure
▪ Geological reserves
▪ Recovery factor (for each prod. layer)
▪ OWC and GOC levels
▪ Reservoir temperature
▪Well Test
▪PI
▪Skin-factor
▪Reservoir Pressure
▪Connectivity (interference test)
▪Logging
▪Casing leak
▪Emergencies
▪Logging - lithology
▪Porosity
▪Permeability
▪Saturation
▪Indicator surveys
▪Layers connectivity
▪Core analysis
▪Permeability curves
▪Laboratory analysis
▪Fluid density
▪Relaxation time
▪Shear index
▪Six components
analysis
Additio
nal data
based o
n W
ell
Tests
results
20PUBLIC© 2018 SAP SE or an SAP affiliate company. All rights reserved. ǀ
Well intervention justification
Analysis of the well № *** / 2Б10 Field «*******», ООО «***********» on 01.08.2017
Artificial lift: ESP-250-50, setting depth 3250 m, Runlife 70%, Probability of failure = 34%Liquid flowrate, m3/day / Oil flowrate, tn/day / BSW, %: 7.2 | 4.1 | 56,2Gross reservoir interval / Perforated, m: 15.1 (terrigenious) | 2.2 (performed on 05.10.2016)FBHP / Drawdown, bar, skin-factor: 145.1 | 25.2 | +5Last Well Intervention: Frac on 05.10.2016Last well surveillance: FBU on 02.11.2017
Well surrounding is represented by 5 wells with average flowrate of 5tn/day (min: 3 tn/day, max: 8 tn/day), typical water cut for the patent is 56,2%.Current oil flowrate is 4 tn/day, that is 70% of well potential (6 tn/day). The 56% water cut level deviate from one 56% calculated on the model by 3%.Geological reserves calculated by volumetric method and related to the well is equal to 356 ths. tn, residual reserves 15,3 ths. tn. Cumulative oil production is 245.2 ths. tn.Calculated target FBHP above current FBHP. Optimization is switched off in calculation parameters. Target FBHP is equal to current FBHP.Based on the existing data the well is not emergency. The absence of actual logging data – risk is +1200. During last 3 years of filed development there are no new water breakthrough or they were eliminated by executed RIJ – the well water cut is in alignment with model.Productive interval is fully perforated - there are no necessity for addtitional perforation.There are no constraints for Frac execution. Forecast flowrate is 8 tn/day (+2 tn/day) at 60% (+4%) water cut. Frac seems economically viable with NPV (2 875 ths. RUR) > 0 and PI (2,7) > 1 and sustainable within the interval of ±10%. Additional risk (+5000) in case of Frac execution is relative proximity (450m) of water front. Formation treatment is not recommended as soon as there are no critical calmatation of the near wellbore zone and well productivity is within acceptable deviation. There is no necessity for reperforation (the perforation of the productive interval was performed less than 5 years ago).Remaining reserves are 15,3 ths. tn., that is less than threshold for potential review of Sidetrack on the well. Maximum NPV (forecast flowrate and reserves) are expected in case of sidetrack drilling in the direction of the well №237.The analysis of DFL behavior does not show significant degradation of artificial lift performance. The probability of the ESP failure (34%) is less than threshold level of (35%), run life is (28 ths. hours) is less than threshold (30 ths. hours), thus, Artificial lift change out is not recommended.Among all recommendation the maximum NPV has Frac.Base risk which is based on the data quality and availability is 1800, additional risks for different activities: Frac +5000, FT +600, ST +7200.Recommendation is FracOil gain +2 tn/day, risk 6800, NPV 2875 ths. RUR. Technological effect 17.2 ths. tn, duration 18 months.
Explanation of the recommended by Integrated Analysis activity
21PUBLIC© 2018 SAP SE or an SAP affiliate company. All rights reserved. ǀ
SAP UFAM supports complex approval processes for each type of activities
22PUBLIC© 2018 SAP SE or an SAP affiliate company. All rights reserved. ǀ
SAP UFAM is NOT system for
Strategic field development planning
Planning of new wells and sidetracking drilling
Interpretation of well logs and seismic data
23PUBLIC© 2018 SAP SE or an SAP affiliate company. All rights reserved. ǀ
SAP UFAM is the system for:
Creation of optimized short term Integrated Planning (daily, monthly and annual basis)
Bottlenecking prediction based on «Choke model»
Integration of different department in one virtual collaboration working environment
Making operational activities more transparent and effective
Contact information:
Sergey Frolov
Head of SAP Center of Excellence in Oil and Gas Industry,
SAP CIS LLC
Email: [email protected]
Thank you!
© 2018 SAP SE or an SAP affiliate company. All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose without the express permission of
SAP SE or an SAP affiliate company.
The information contained herein may be changed without prior notice. Some software products marketed by SAP SE and its
distributors contain proprietary software components of other software vendors. National product specifications may vary.
These materials are provided by SAP SE or an SAP affiliate company for informational purposes only, without representation or
warranty of any kind, and SAP or its affiliated companies shall not be liable for errors or omissions with respect to the materials.
The only warranties for SAP or SAP affiliate company products and services are those that are set forth in the express warranty
statements accompanying such products and services, if any. Nothing herein should be construed as constituting an additional
warranty.
In particular, SAP SE or its affiliated companies have no obligation to pursue any course of business outlined in this document or
any related presentation, or to develop or release any functionality mentioned therein. This document, or any related presentation,
and SAP SE’s or its affiliated companies’ strategy and possible future developments, products, and/or platforms, directions, and
functionality are all subject to change and may be changed by SAP SE or its affiliated companies at any time for any reason
without notice. The information in this document is not a commitment, promise, or legal obligation to deliver any material, code, or
functionality. All forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from expectations. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, and they
should not be relied upon in making purchasing decisions.
SAP and other SAP products and services mentioned herein as well as their respective logos are trademarks or registered
trademarks of SAP SE (or an SAP affiliate company) in Germany and other countries. All other product and service names
mentioned are the trademarks of their respective companies.
See www.sap.com/corporate-en/legal/copyright/index.epx for additional trademark information and notices.
www.sap.com/contactsap
Follow all of SAP