Intellectual but not Thoughtful, Righteous but not Just: Trumping Hermeneutical A Prioris for the...
-
Upload
maximillian-hodge -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Intellectual but not Thoughtful, Righteous but not Just: Trumping Hermeneutical A Prioris for the...
Intellectual but not Thoughtful, Righteous but not Just:
Trumping Hermeneutical A Prioris
for the Sake of the Truth
(Introduction) – A Parable1st C Family of God Fearers
Older Son• Searched the Scriptures
even deeper than his elders
• Flaunted his freedom• Stumbled in his vulnerability
• Reacted to feeling Condemned?
Second Son• Walked in the ways of
the Lord, yet more strictly than his elders
• Paraded his righteousness
• Stumbled in his brittleness
• Reacted to feeling Devalued?
(Introduction) Battles of Ideas
Apologetics • defense of the Faith against outsiders• ajpologevtikoV / ajpologiva -
“to speak in ones own defense”• formal and reasoned justification
Polemics • battle for truth against insiders• polevmikoV / povlemoV - “battle”• strong written or verbal attack
(Introduction)Spectrum of NT Viewpoints
Unorthodox Polarities• Far Left - antinomian libertinism• Far Right - Judaistic legalism
Orthodox Authors• Paul - salvation through grace and faith alone• James - faith demonstrated through works
God’s people may hold very different views, even on things that really matter.
(Introduction)NT Disagreements &
God’s DesirePainful Disagreements
• Paul withstood Peter to his face• Paul parted company with Barnabas
Wise Resolutions• Priscilla & Aquila met with Apollos in private• James kept the 1st C church from splitting
God’s desire is for the unity of his followers - John 17:20-21.
(Introduction)Approach
1 Exegesis to Theology: NT Case Studies • Positions Taken, Presuppositions Held• The Bigger Battle, the Higher Road
2 Illustration & Application• Other Issues in the Bible
• Contemporary Issues
3 Life Application• A Christ-like Response
Case Studies #1 Meat Offered to Idols
Those who KNOW …
• The Intellectualshave a
“strong” conscience resulting in freedomCan be arrogant and
self-confident
Put down the other > for lack of understandingi.e., indict them of error
— Despise the other
Those who DON’T KNOW …
• The Conservativeshave a
“weak” conscience … lack of freedom
Can be judgmental and self-righteous
Put down the other < for their lack of righteousnessi.e., indict them sin
— Condemn the other
(Case Studies) #2 Circumcision & Salvation
Those who KNOW …
• The Intellectualsare a
“weak” minority offer freedomCan be arrogant and
self-confident
Put down the other > for theirlack of understandingi.e., indict them of error
— Despise the other
Those who DON’T KNOW …
• The Conservativesare
“strong,” hold the majority restrict freedomCan be judgmental and
self-righteous
Put down the other < for theirlack of righteousnessi.e., indict them of sin
— Condemn the other
(Case Studies) Presuppositions
IntellectualsValue: discovery and change
Goals: pursue enlightenment, progress, and freedom
Role: Seekers, Inquirers, Enlightened Ones
Style: curious, forward looking
Susceptibilities: permissiveness, imprudence, liberality, pride
• Intellectual but not thoughtful
ConservativesValue: tradition and security
Goals: preserve the past, perpetuate the status quo
Role: Guardians, Defenders, Protectors
Style: caution, fear the future
Susceptible to being: narrow-minded, inflexible, exclusive, judgmental
• Righteous but not just
(Case Studies)Trumping the Presuppositions
IntellectualsValue: discovery and change
Goals: pursue enlightenment, progress, and freedom
Role: Seekers, Inquirers, Enlightened Ones
Style: curious, forward looking
Susceptibilities: permissiveness, imprudence, liberality, pride
• Intellectual but not thoughtful
ConservativesValue: tradition and security
Goals: preserve the past, perpetuate the status quo
Role: Guardians, Defenders, Protectors
Style: caution, fear the future
Susceptible to being: narrow-minded, inflexible, exclusive, judgmental
• Righteous but not justTrumping a prioris for the sake of the Truth.
The Bigger Battle
Faith(working through
Love)
The Higher Road
Love
Case Studies Revisited #1 Meat Offered to Idols
Those who KNOW …
• The Intellectualshave a
“strong” conscience resulting in freedomCan be arrogant and
self-confident
Put down the other > for lack of understandingi.e., indict them of error
— Despise the other
Those who DON’T KNOW …
• The Conservativeshave a
“weak” conscience … lack of freedom
Can be judgmental and self-righteous
Put down the other < for their lack of righteousnessi.e., indict them sin
— Condemn the otherX X
Respect Accept
Case Studies Revisited #2 Circumcision & Salvation
Those who KNOW …
• The Intellectualsare a
“weak” minority offer freedomCan be arrogant and
self-confident
Put down the other > for theirlack of understandingi.e., indict them of error
— Despise the other
Those who DON’T KNOW …
• The Conservativesare
“strong,” hold the majority restrict freedomCan be judgmental and
self-righteous
Put down the other < for theirlack of righteousnessi.e., indict them of sin
— Condemn the otherX X
Respect Accept
Illustration & Application: Other Issues in the Bible
Old Testament• Moses’ Being Forbidden to Enter the Promised Land• David’s Being Permitted to Lead After Moral Failure• To Eat or Not to Eat the King’s Meat in Exile? • Israel’s Poor Performance at Proselytizing Pagans• Ezra’s Command to Put Away Foreign Wives
New Testament• Contact with Samaritans (the unclean, the dead)• “Adultery of the Eye”• Equal Pay for All-Day Workers• Reinstating the Prodigal
God’s people may hold very different views,
even on things that really matter.
Illustration & Application:Contemporary Issues
Slavery, Sabbath, War, and WomenOrdination for Divorced and RemarriedHuman Rights for HomosexualsChina: should we support the government-sanctioned
Three-Self churches or the un-registered Home Church Movement?
What does it mean to be Pentecostal?What about Holiness?Interpretation of Tongues: 2nd or 3rd PersonAre there Apostles today? God’s people may hold very different views,
even on things that really matter.
Life Application:Christ-Like Response
Non-Negotiable Principles COGNITIVE-ATTITUDINAL PRINCIPLE
1. Christ’s example is HUMILITY.
THEOLOGICAL - IDEOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE2. God’s call is to UNITY.
BEHAVIORAL PRINCIPLE
3. God’s way is through LOVE.
Life Application:Christ-Like Response
An Invitation to:
Stop making room for the devil:admit, apologize, forgive, refuse.
Grant greater grace; draw a “larger circle.”
Watch your words; guard your tongue; mind your mouth.
U