Integrating Second Life into a UT Austin Freshman English Course
description
Transcript of Integrating Second Life into a UT Austin Freshman English Course
Integrating Second Life into a UT Austin Freshman English
Course
Integrating Second Life into a UT Austin Freshman English
CourseNMC Conference, November 9,
2006
Michael MayrathMichael Mayrath
• Educational Psychology Ph.D. student
The University of Texas at Austin
• Graduate Research Assistant Division of Instructional Innovation
& Assessment (DIIA)
AgendaAgenda
• Tour: DIIA, UT Austin’s Second Life Island, SL Pilot Project
• Research & Evaluation Methodology
• Results, Conclusions, Future Directions
Tour: •DIIA
•UT Austin’s Second Life island
•SL Pilot project
DIIA(Division of Instructional Innovation and Assessment)
DIIA(Division of Instructional Innovation and Assessment)• one DIIA core objective: identify,
explore, and research the technological horizon
• DIIA starts with assessment: project criteria
• games at UT Austin?
• pilot Second Life: 1 year
DIIA supportDIIA support
• Instructional Assessment Group
• Teaching and Learning Excellence Group
• Instructional Technology Group
• technical support
DIIA deliverablesDIIA deliverables
• SL island
• account setup
• training sessions
• instruction manual
• instructional consultation
Second LifeSecond Life
• Multi-User Virtual Environment (MUVE)
• 1.2 million total SL residents
• Harvard, Tennessee, Pepperdine, Ball State, and Central Missouri State
UT’s Second Life islandUT’s Second Life island
• 16-acre private island
• safe for students
• replicas of buildings on UT Austin campus
• freedom for students to build anywhere
Instructional setting for pilotInstructional setting for pilot
• English course: Composition & Reading in World Literature
• 18 Plan II freshmen
• Fall 2006 — Spring 2007
• technology-oriented professor
Instructional objectivesInstructional objectives• discovery learning
• fall goal: personal vision statement
• spring goal: leadership vision statement
• develop unity in verbal and visual rhetoric
• compare UT Austin to other universities
Instructional activities in SLInstructional activities in SL
• personal roadmap
• campus master plan
• two social hours per week
ImplementationImplementation• 8/30 - Course started
• 8/31 - Pre-surveys e-mailed
• 9/5 - 1st training
• 9/7 - 2nd training
• 9/12 - 1st SL assignment due (Roadmap)
• 11/30 - 2nd SL assignment due (Campus)
Research & Evaluation
Methodology
Research questionsResearch questions
• Are students more engaged in a course when SL is used for instructional activities?
• How does students’ motivation in the course change over the year?
• How do students’ beliefs, attitudes, and self-confidence regarding technology affect their desire to complete assignments in SL?
Evaluation questionsEvaluation questions• How much support is needed to implement
SL?
• What types of support are required?
• What do students like and dislike about SL?
• How difficult is it to learn SL?
• What is the future for using SL at UT Austin?
Mixed methods approachMixed methods approach
• Quantitative methods:– Surveys on 8/30/06 (pre),
11/22/06 (mid), and 4/13/07 (post)
• Qualitative methods:– Interviews– Observations– Student reaction essays
Mixed methods studyMixed methods study
Surveys• writing confidence• motivation while writing• confidence in using technology• feelings about technology
Response data analyzed for statistically significant gains
Quantitative methods: SurveysQuantitative methods: Surveys
Writing ConfidenceStrongly disagree ↔ Strongly agree
“I am able to …
…write using correct grammar.”…write a 20-page term paper.” …write a novel.”
Quantitative methods: SurveysQuantitative methods: Surveys
Motivation while WritingStrongly disagree ↔ Strongly agree
“When writing a paper for school …
…I have a sense of control over what I am writing.” …I always start out with a clear goal
of what I want to write.”
Quantitative methods: SurveysQuantitative methods: Surveys
Confidence in using technology Never done it ↔ Strongly disagree ↔ Strongly agree
“I feel confident …
…searching the Web using Google or Yahoo.”
…playing virtual world games such as Second Life or SIM City.”
…creating/modifying your character in a game.”
…creating 3-D images.”
Quantitative methods: SurveysQuantitative methods: Surveys
Feelings about technologyStrongly disagree ↔ Strongly agree
•I would rather use Word to write than paper.
•I like it when my instructor uses PowerPoint in class.
•I like playing video games.
Qualitative methods: InterviewsQualitative methods: Interviews
• five students: high/low random selection
• November 2006 & April 2007
• interviews recorded, transcribed, and analyzed
• 34 questions
Qualitative methods: InterviewsQualitative methods: Interviews
Questions• How has SL affected your interest in
the course? • Do you feel like you have control over
what you do in SL?• What frustrations have you
experienced working in SL?• What do you like about working in SL?
Qualitative methodsQualitative methods
Observations• on-going throughout the year
Student reaction essays• SL & writing
PreliminaryResults,
Conclusions, Future Directions
ResultsResults
Writing confidence survey•Students were very confident in
their writing ability.
Motivation while writing survey•Students believed they had skills to
match challenges.•Students reported they had to work
to concentrate on writing.
ResultsResults
Confidence in using technology survey
•Students were very confident in using e-mail, the Internet, Word, Excel, and PowerPoint.
•Students were not confident in using graphics programs, creating Web pages, and programming.
ResultsResults
Feelings about technology survey
•Students liked using technology in the classroom and in their work.
•Students expressed mixed feelings about gaming.
•48% of the students reported not playing computer games.
ResultsResults
Interviews
•“[The] most frustrating thing is not having a Control-Z key to undo what you just did.”
•“I think the competition is a good thing. It pushes a person can do.”
•“Our class is super competitive.”
ResultsResults
Observations
•competition for extra credit •student anxiety and frustration•training necessary for specific
activities•hand-outs with step-by-step
instructions
ResultsResults
Student Reaction Essays
• “Just as a SL building’s tiny details and elements must all add up to a unified impression, a piece of writing must be composed from support and linked components.”
• “Having little to no experience in gaming or computer programming, SL proved to be a real challenge for me. To be completely honest, I found the SL project to be more of a nuisance than an integral part of my project.”
ConclusionsConclusions• Research questions addressed
– students’ engagement in course– students’ motivation in course– role of students’ attitudes on their use of SL
• Evaluation questions addressed– extent of support needed– type of support needed– students’ frustrations with SL– students’ likes concerning SL– difficulty of learning SL– future of SL at UT Austin
ConclusionsConclusions
Research question: Are students more engaged in a course when SL is used for instructional activities?
Students’ engagement aided by• anchoring activities in learning context• training and support for SL activities• avoiding too much competition
ConclusionsConclusions
Research question: How does students’ motivation toward the course change over the year?
• SL frustration may arise• extra credit competition worrisome• competition may grow too heated
ConclusionsConclusions
Research question: How do students’ beliefs, attitudes, and self-confidence toward technology affect their motivation to participate in SL?
• like technology in the classroom• high confidence in their tech skills• motivation drops if SL gets frustrating
ConclusionsConclusions
Evaluation question: How much support is needed to implement SL in a course?
Dependent upon …
• instructional activity• students’ proficiency in SL skills• professor’s proficiency in SL skills
ConclusionsConclusions
Evaluation question: What types of support are required?
Dependent upon …
• students• faculty• independent evaluation
ConclusionsConclusions
Evaluation question: What frustrations do students experience using SL?
• ownership and group issues• building• activities not anchored in class context
ConclusionsConclusions
Evaluation question: What do students like about SL?
• customizing their avatar• socializing in SL• reflecting on what they have created
ConclusionsConclusions
Evaluation question: How difficult is it for students to learn how to use SL?
• steep learning curve (for our pilot)• training • step-by-step handouts
Future of SL at UT AustinFuture of SL at UT Austin
• expand SL applications at UT
• year-long course provides an advantage
• community building takes time
• continued assessment
• problem-based learning
Future of SL at UT AustinFuture of SL at UT Austin• student programming in spring 2007
• continue data collection
• design other UT Austin SL opportunities
• extend literature on educational gaming
Michael [email protected]
Questions?