Integrating Business and Intellectual Property Strategy Dr. Guriqbal Singh Jaiya Director Small and...
-
Upload
jackson-shepherd -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
1
Transcript of Integrating Business and Intellectual Property Strategy Dr. Guriqbal Singh Jaiya Director Small and...
Integrating Business and Intellectual Property Strategy
Dr. Guriqbal Singh JaiyaDirector
Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Division
World Intellectual Property Organization www.wipo.int/sme
Spotlight is on knowledge in today’s economy
• Knowledge, Weightless, Information, Digital or Service Economy
• Factors of production: Land, Labor, Capital, Intangibles (Knowledge)
• Knowledge as useful Information (or Service)
• Information as a “Public Good”
• Information as Property
Market-oriented Economy
• Playing Field: Unfair competition; free riding• National Legal Systems: Diversity
(bilateral/regional/ international treaties or agreements)
• Adding Value : Meeting or exceeding market needs or expectations
• Market research: Consumers’ needs, competing products or substitutes, gaps
• Technological innovation as an element of marketing
The challenge of adding value in today’s economy
• Raw materials/Inputs: Processing (Value addition) = Value added output/component; product; sale; Profit
• Value addition: Cheaper, Faster, Better: Functional/technological or aesthetic/non-technological; Rational/Emotional (More for Less)
• Price; access/availability; consistency• Individual, Enterprise (legal person), Chains, Networks;
consortia; Open Innovation (Industry-Government-Academia)
• Ownership vs. access to knowledge• Value Addition, Value Delivery and Value Extraction
Customer Expectation
Dilemma
Time
Perf
orm
an
ce
Expectation
s
Continuo
us Improv
ement
Performance Gap
Tangible and Intangible Assets
• Intangibles differ from tangibles in two ways that “change the rules of the game”, (if not the game itself):
– Value in context
– Multiple simultaneous value streams
Levels of ProductLevels of Product
BrandName
QualityLevel
Packaging
Design
Features
Delivery& Credit
Installation
Warranty
After-Sale
Service
CoreBenefit
orService
CoreBenefit
orService
ActualProduct
ActualProduct
CoreProduct
CoreProduct
AugmentedProduct
AugmentedProduct
Tangibility Spectrum
TangibleDominant
IntangibleDominant
SaltSoft Drinks
DetergentsAutomobiles
Cosmetics
AdvertisingAgencies
AirlinesInvestment
ManagementConsulting
Teaching
Fast-foodOutlets
Fast-foodOutlets
Selling Products• Customers who
care about products “on their own terms”: is this the right product for me?
• Build the “best” product– Best designed– Lowest cost– Most reliable
Selling Interconnected Systems
• Customers who care about the total system experience: will this connect with the rest of my world?
• Control the architecture
Or• Influence the architecture
and build the best products within it
The challenge
Performance
Time
Sellingproducts
Selling (parts of)interconnected
systems
Strategic Entrepreneurship and Innovation
• Entrepreneurship is concerned with:– The discovery of profitable opportunities– The exploitation of profitable opportunities
• Firms that encourage entrepreneurship are:– Risk takers– Committed to innovation– Proactive in creating opportunities rather than
waiting to respond to opportunities created by others
Pre-IPO
Expansion
Start-Up
Seed
Idea / Concept
TimeTime
$
• Bright Idea• Experimental• Research• Business Plan• Proof of Concept
• Legal Entity• Founders = Mgt Team• Minimal Revenue• Slow Growth • Support Functions
• Administration• Marketing• Revenue Growth
• High Growth• Head Count • Multiple Cycles
• Viable• Market acceptance• Heading to IPO or M&A
The Process/Steps of Innovation
Understanding the Process of Innovation
Expansion
Start-Up
SeedIdea / Concept
TimeTime
$
•Business Plan•Prototype/ POC•Project Management•Business Premises•Project Management•Management Training
•Corporate and Secretarial •Financial •Training •PR and Marketing•Networking •Business Development
•Recruitment•Business Development•A & P•Market Access
•International support and Mkt. Access •Diversification strategies and support •Recruitment•Training and Incentives
The Needs of Each Stage
IP Management Needed in all stages
Understanding the business/role of IP
ManufacturingPatent Distribution Sales Brand
• Understand the value chain of the business and industry
• Understand how profits are generated
– primary product– spare parts and related products– service and maintenance
• What are the important features of the IP? How does it add value to the business?
• What are the important features of the industry other than IP?
– other important intangible and tangible assets in the value chain– competitive structure of the industry– customer characteristics and purchasing criteria– substitute products or services
Suppliers
Established Leader
Complimentors
Customers
Other CompetitorsDisruptive
Technologies
Converging Technologies
You
IP Environment
IP Deployment Continuum
• IP risk balance favors target
• Goal: Design Freedom
Concerns OpportunityMAD
• Balanced IP risk• Goal: Confirm
MAD
• IP risk balance favors You
• Goal: Identify value generation opportunities
| | | | | | | | | | |
Sources and Conversions of Value
Sources of Value
• Innovations• Complementary Business Assets
– Purchasing– Manufacturing– Distribution– Sales
ConversionMechanisms
• Sale• Out-license• Joint Venture• Strategic Alliance• Integrate with Current Business• Create New Business• Donate• Barter/Trade
$$
Aligning Capabilities
VisionVision VisionVision
StrategiesStrategies StrategiesStrategies
InnovationInnovationStrategiesStrategies
InnovationInnovationStrategiesStrategies
Value Creation
Value Creation
Value Extraction
Value Extraction
IP Objectives/Roles:
Strategic Framework
Cash Value
Positioning Value
Where does Intellectual Property fit into this?
An Aspect of Good Management• People Management – because IP is generated by people
and used by people
• Knowledge Management – because a lot of knowledge is informal and may or may not crystallise as recognisable category of IP
• IT Strategic Planning – because a lot of IP is IT-related; someof the more complex IP issues arise in IT context
• Contract Management – because IP is often created (or improved) in context of a contract (eg, supply contract or joint venture relationship)
• Asset Management – because IP is an asset, albeit intangible; it has a value
• Risk Management – because there are risks to an organisation flowing from its actions, or failure to act, in relation to IP (including risk of lost
opportunity)
Introduction to IP Management 1
• Legal
• Technical
• Business
• Export
• Financial
• Relationships
• Accounting
• Tax
• Insurance
• Security
• Automation
• Personnel
Introduction to IP Management 2
• Trademarks (Brands)
• Geographical Indications
• Industrial Designs
• Patents and Utility Models
• Copyright and Related Rights
• Trade Secrets
• New Varieties of Plants
• Unfair Competition
Bringing it All Together Example No. 1Example No. 1
• Decades ago, Coca-Cola decided to keep its soft drink formula a secret
• The formula is only know to a few people within the company
• Kept in the vault of a bank in Atlanta
• Those who know the secret formula have signed non-disclosure agreements
• It is rumored that they are not allowed to travel together
• If it had patented its formula, the whole world would be making Coca-Cola
Bringing it All Together Example No. 2Example No. 2
• Patent for stud and tube coupling system (the way bricks hold together)
• But: Today the patents have long expired and the company tries hard to keep out competitors by using designs, trademarks and copyright
Bringing it All Together Example No. 3Example No. 3
• Patent for the fountain pen that could store ink
• Utility Model for the grip and pipette for injection of ink
• Industrial Design: smart design with the grip in the shape of an arrow
• Trademark: provided on the product and the packaging to distinguish it from other pens
Source: Japanese Patent Office
® Registered Trade Mark
‘TM’ Unregistered Registered Design
Copyright: Labels & Artwork
Patents: Several dozen!
Bringing it All Together Example No. 4Example No. 4
Basic Message 1
IP adds value at every stage of the value chain from creative/innovative idea to putting a new, better, and cheaper, product/service on the market:
Literary / artisticcreation
Invention
Financing Product Design
CommercializationMarketing
Licensing
Exporting
Patents / Utility Models/Trade secrets
Copyright/Related Rights
Patents / Utility models
Industrial Designs/
Trademarks/GIs
Trademarks/ GIsInd. Designs/Patents/Copyright
All IP Rights
All IP Rights
Basic Message 2
• IP Strategy should be an integral part of the overall business strategy of an Enterprise
• The IP strategy of an Enterprise is influenced by its creative/innovative capacity, financial resources, field of technology, competitive environment, etc.
• BUT: Ignoring the IP system altogether is in itself an IP strategy, which may eventually prove very costly or even fatal
A Key Framework: The industry life cycle
Era of Ferment/Discontinuity
“Dominant design” emerges
Maturity
IncrementalInnovation
New Ideas to ActivityStage Gated Development Process (SGDP)
• Idea, Feasibility, Proof of Concept, Prototyping, Scale-up, Market Launch.
• Milestones, Hurdles, Probabilities of Success.• How do the new ideas develop?• How are they moulded into the required solution?• How do you bring them to market?• Do you do it alone or do you need help?
• Just about every development on the face of the earth today results from a team effort!!
Developing New Technology?
Intellectual Capital
HumanCapital
IntellectualAssets
Value Creation Value Extraction
IntellectualProperty
The path from new ideas through validation to a new technology:
New . Technologies
SGDP
The Industry Life Cycle as an S curve
Performance
Time
Ferment
Takeoff
Maturity
Discontinuity
Uniqueness and Appropriability are very important:
If a particular innovation, or the knowledge on which it rests, can be completely “appropriated” then the innovating firm may be able to maintain a unique position. This is a tremendous source of bargaining power.
Sources of Appropriability
Intellectual property protection– Patents
• Finite length
• The right to prohibit “producing”
– Copyrights• The right to prohibit “copying”
Secrecy– Trade secrets & non compete clauses– “Tacit” vs. codified knowledge
Speed – lead time– learning-curve advantages
Intellectual Property – An Untapped Asset
• IP is the most underutilized asset in business– Unrecognized on most balance sheets
– Typically, an “afterthought” in business
• IP is one of the single largest opportunities for companies to increase strategic business value – Create new business opportunities
– Create barrier to entry for competitors
• IP represents a significant, untapped opportunity for revenue generation– Patent Royalties in 2002 estimated at $100 Billion
– Qualcomm – 27% of revenues from patent licensing in FY 2004
Intellectual Property – An Unrealized Threat
• IP represents a significant business risk – Over 2 Million effective patents today
– Patents filed increased from 175K in 1992 to 366K in 2004
• The rush to monetize IP is on – Royalties increased from $500M to $100B in the 90’s
– Number of lawsuits doubled, cost tripled from 1992 to 2002
• Many businesses are starting to act– Boeing, IBM, Lucent, Adobe, Microsoft, P&G, TI
– Infrastructure companies are forming
Typical Responses1. Integrated, Active IP Strategy
– Active patent filing strategy– Use IP to achieve business objectives – Active effort to identify and mitigate IP Risks
2. Have An Active Patent Filing Strategy– Do actively capture ideas– Still don’t coordinate filing objectives with business objectives
3. Have A Strategy, But Passive Versus Active – View IP as event driven rather than business process – Wait for submissions vs. engineering development of IP
4. No Defined IP Strategy– Do not have an IP Strategy– Do not link their IP Strategy to their business strategy
Definitions
• Intellectual Capital: Knowledge that can be used to create value.
• Intellectual Assets: Codified knowledge that can be used to create
value.• Intellectual Property: Legally protected
intellectual capital.
Definitions• Knowledge Management/ Intellectual Capital
Management: the process by which an organisation or society generates wealth from its knowledge or intellectual capital.
• Intellectual Asset Management: the above process for codified assets.
• Intellectual Property Management: the above process for legally protected assets.
A View of Intellectual Capital
Intellectual Property
Intellectual Assets
Knowledge & Know-How
INTELLECTUALCAPITAL
When legally protected these are Intellectual PropertyWhen codified these are Intellectual Assets
Most
Tangible
Least
The Components of Intellectual Capital: A Spectrum of Knowledge Assets
Patents
Trademarks
Publishing Rights
Brand logosdesigns
Copyrights
InformationDatabases
IndustrialDesign
SoftwarePlatforms
TradeSecrets
ConfidentialInformation
Technology
Structural Capital
Know-How
Customer Capital
UnpatentedResearch
Knowledge Providing
Value
Human Capital
Culture
Source: PricewaterhouseCoopers
© Frank Lynn & Associates, IDC
What are They Buying?
Source: IDC, High Performance Partnering Workshops
Whole Product Offering
Post-Sales
Support
Transactional Support
Pre-Sales Support
Integration
Services
Softw
are
Consulting
Hardware
TheProduct
Elements of the whole product
• Consulting services • System hardware• System software• Development tools • Server applications• Application development/
modification services• PC/client hardware• Desktop applications
• LAN products• WAN connectivity
products• Systems integration
services• Training services• Maintenance/support
services– Server hardware– Client hardware– Software– Network
© IDC
Source: IDC, High Performance Partnering Workshops
Focus on Policy Formulation:
BusinessManagement
EnterpriseGovernance
Policy
Performance
Strategy
OperationsManagement
Board / CEO
Functional Managers
General Managers
Vision-directed and Values-driven:
The management of a business enterprise requires the strategic navigation of the macro-economic environment of the business. It demands that all executives understand the performance levels, trends, risks, opportunities, and threats that define the external context of business operations. It also demands that executives know how external change will influence the direction of their past business choices and what flexibility they have in decision-making to make choices that drive the business toward its agreed-upon vision and exercises the desired values for cultural behavior.
World ofFacts
ScenarioOptions
World ofPossibilities
Values VisionBusinessCase
PoliticsRegulationsEconomicsTechnologyEnvironment
Market ResearchTechnology Assessment
Competitive AnalysisStrategic Benchmarking
Customer AnalysisBusiness Performance Critical Assumption Evaluation
Discontinuity Analysis
Strength-Weakness-Opportunity-Threat Analysis
EnterpriseIn search of
potential strategic inflection points
How will technology advances drive your business?
“Strategy doesn’t come from a calendar-driven process; it isn’t the product of a systematic search for ways of earning above average profits; strategy comes from viewing the world in new ways. Strategy starts with an ability to think in new and unconventional ways.”
Gary Hamelconsultant, academic and author
Why have a strategy?
1. To make choices
Reasons to have a strategy:
2. To be able to change it
What is a “strategy” anyway?
What is it?• A defining statement containing the intent and direction of the
corporation, & delineating the strategic plans to achieve its objective.
• A living guideline, that focuses and directs efforts of the corporation.
• Constantly tested and modified as required.• Not to be circumvented without deliberate modification.
Balances and integrates the following elements:• Vision of strategic direction for long-term strength• Market direction and needs• Competitive effects• Technology strategy • Product strategy• Core competency• Resource alignment
Corporate Strategy:
Articulates the ways in which the opportunities created by the firm’s capabilities can be exploited.
Basic Strategic Considerations: Key Inputs to Strategy:• Customer inputs – what is working and not working.• Market place analysis – growing needs, emerging applications
and significant trends.• Competitive influences and barriers to entry.• Internal competency assessment regarding skills and ability.• Corporate business process benchmarking.• Business strategic inflection point analysis.• Resources available for commitment.
Key Outputs of Strategic Dialog:• Business strategy – goals and objectives of the organization.• Technology strategy – technologies to acquire or develop.• Marketing strategy – Why, where and how to focus on
customers?• Product strategy – features and functions to be developed.• Intellectual property strategy – How will IPR contribute to
strategy?
Technologies
Markets
How will we create value?
How will we capture value in the face of
Competition?
How will we build the organizational
capabilitiesnecessary to
deliver it?
Effective Business Strategies address three key challenges:
Effective strategies answer three key questions:
How will we Create value?
How will weCapture value?
How will weDeliver value?
• How will we create value?– How will the technology evolve?– How will the market change?
• How will we capture value?– How should we design the business model? – Where should we compete in the value chain? – How should we compete if standards are important?
• How will we deliver value?– How do we manage the core business and growth
simultaneously?– How do we use our strategy to drive real resource
allocation?
And answer seven critical questions:
Creating Value:• Understand how technologies will
evolve
– (Both your own and those on which you rely)
• Understand how customer needs will evolve
• Develop world class products and services that meet customer needs
Factors Driving IP Value
• Time Savings (know how)
• Cost Savings (formula)
• Risk
• Profits Advantage (patent)
Intellectual Property Profit Sources
Premium Sales Price
Cost Savings
Volume Synergy
New Revenue Streams
IP Requires Old Economy Assets
IP commercialization and the realization of value is not possible without complementary assets.
The Interaction of Intangible and Tangible Assets to Create Earnings
$$
Structural Capital (generic)Structural Capital (generic)
Complementary BusinessAssets (differentiated)
Intellectual Capital (unique)
Value Creation Value Extraction
Sal
es F
orce
Sal
es F
orce
Dis
trib
utio
n C
apab
ilitie
sD
istr
ibut
ion
Cap
abili
ties
Man
ufac
turin
g F
acili
ties
Man
ufac
turin
g F
acili
ties
HumanCapitalHumanCapital
IntellectualIntellectualAssetsAssets
IntellectualIntellectualAssetsAssets
IntellectualProperty
Structural Capital (Generic Assets)
Intellectual Assets
$
Complementary Business Assets (Differentiated Assets)
Dis
trib
uti
on
Cap
ab
ilit
ies
Sale
s F
orc
e
Man
ufa
ctu
rin
g F
acilit
ies
Intellectual Capital(Unique Assets)
Value Creation Value Extraction
HumanCapital
(Lead Time)
1. IP Value Is Created When Leveraged Through Complementary Assets
2. When Companies Have Different Complementary Asset Strengths They Will Need Different Intellectual Property (Materials, Process, Use)
Intellectual Property Tuned To A Company’s Business
Kn
ow
-How
Intellectual Property
Tra
de S
ecre
ts
Cop
yri
gh
ts
Tra
dem
ark
s
Pate
nts
?%
Structural Capital (Generic Assets)
Intellectual Assets
$
Complementary Business Assets (Differentiated Assets)
Dis
trib
uti
on
Cap
ab
ilit
ies
Sale
s F
orc
e
Man
ufa
ctu
rin
g F
acilit
ies
Intellectual Capital(Unique Assets)
Value Creation Value Extraction
HumanCapital
(Lead Time)
•Line Shows the Percentage of Company Value (Market Capitalization) That is Protected By This Asset
•Most value is in Trademark, Trade Secret, Distribution and Sales
Intellectual Property Tuned To A Company’s Business Beverage Companies
Kn
ow
-How
Intellectual Property
Tra
de S
ecre
ts
Cop
yri
gh
ts
Tra
dem
ark
s
Pate
nts
Structural Capital (Generic Assets)
Intellectual Assets
$
Complementary Business Assets (Differentiated Assets)
Dis
trib
uti
on
Cap
ab
ilit
ies
Sale
s F
orc
e
Man
ufa
ctu
rin
g F
acilit
ies
Intellectual Capital(Unique Assets)
Value Creation Value Extraction
HumanCapital
(Lead Time)
•Most value is in Trademark, Know-How, Manufacturing and Sales•Some value in Patents
Intellectual Property Tuned To A Company’s Business Paper Companies
Kn
ow
-How
Intellectual Property
Tra
de S
ecre
ts
Cop
yri
gh
ts
Tra
dem
ark
s
Pate
nts
Structural Capital (Generic Assets)
Intellectual Assets
$
Complementary Business Assets (Differentiated Assets)
Dis
trib
uti
on
Cap
ab
ilit
ies
Sale
s F
orc
e
Man
ufa
ctu
rin
g F
acilit
ies
Intellectual Capital(Unique Assets)
Value Creation Value Extraction
HumanCapital
(Lead Time)
•Most value is in Human Creativity, Trademark, Copyright, and Distribution
Intellectual Property Tuned To A Company’s Business Software Companies
Kn
ow
-How
Intellectual Property
Tra
de S
ecre
ts
Cop
yri
gh
ts
Tra
dem
ark
s
Pate
nts
Structural Capital (Generic Assets)
Intellectual Assets
$
Complementary Business Assets (Differentiated Assets)
Dis
trib
uti
on
Cap
ab
ilit
ies
Sale
s F
orc
e
Man
ufa
ctu
rin
g F
acilit
ies
Intellectual Capital(Unique Assets)
Value Creation Value Extraction
HumanCapital
(Lead Time)
•Most value is in Human Creativity, Patents, and Trademarks•Some value in Know-How, and Sales
Intellectual Property Tuned To A Company’s Business Pharmaceutical Companies
Kn
ow
-How
Intellectual Property
Tra
de S
ecre
ts
Cop
yri
gh
ts
Tra
dem
ark
s
Pate
nts
How shall we capture value?
•Uniqueness•Complementary Assets•Structure of the Value Chain
Three key ideas:• Uniqueness
– Controlling the knowledge generated by an innovation
• Complementary assets– Controlling the assets that maximize the profits
from innovating• Understanding the dynamics of the value
chain– Should we buy our suppliers? Distributors?– Should we outsource our manufacturing…
distribution… sales… capability?
What are Complementary Assets?
• Those assets that allow a firm to make money, even if the innovation is not unique:
• The answer to the question:– If our innovations were instantly
available to our competitors, would we still make money? Why?
In the best case, complementary assets should be tightly held
Complementary assets that are tightly held are not easily available to entrants or to most competitors
Types of Complementary Assets
Competitive manufacturing
Sales and
service
expertise
Brand name
Distribution channels
Customer relationships
Complementary technologies
COMPETENCIES
Things you can do
Things you ownRESOURCES
Core technological know-how in innovation
Other
Other
Types of Complementary Assets
Complementary assets can be:
Generic
there is adequate and competitive supply
Specialized
sourcing will create unilateral dependence
Co-specializedboth supplier and innovator are dependent
Types of Complementary Assets
• Things you can do– Manufacturing capabilities– Sales and service expertise
• Things you own– Brand name– Distribution channels– Customer relationships
COMPETENCIES
RESOURCES
Complementary AssetsComplementary Assets
Bargaining power of owners of complementary resources depends upon whether complementary resources are generic or specialized.
Manufacturing Distribution
Service
Complementarytechnologies
OtherOther
Marketing
FinanceCore
technological know-how
Uniqueness & Complementary Assets
over the Life Cycle
Ferment
Takeoff
Maturity
UniquenessComplementary
Assets
Uniqueness & Complementary Assets over the Life Cycle:
Ferment
Takeoff
Maturity
UniquenessComplementary
Assets
Managing discontinuities means managing complementary assets:
Performance
Time
Ferment
Takeoff
Maturity
Discontinuity
Which of my complementary assets are useful?
Key Questions:• When should an entrepreneurial firm develop it’s
own:– Manufacturing – Distribution– Sales– ….. capabilities?
• When should a mature firm outsource it’s:– Manufacturing – Distribution– Sales– ….. capabilities?
Waysof... designing
supplying producing marketing delivering
Know-how transfercontract
Source: S. Urban, S. Vendemini, CESAG, Strasbourg
The eleven modes of cooperation agreements: illustration of their anchor points
Researchcontract
CommonResearch
CommonpurchaseSubcontracting
Engineeringcontract
Patentlicence
Commonproduction
Trademarklicence
Consortium(common
marketing)
Distributionagreements
Services•After sale
•Lobbying
•Relations
Source: S. Urban, S. Vendemini, CESAG, Strasbourg
Cooperations modes and value chainCooperations modes and value chain
Distri-bution
•Reciprocal distribution agreements (access to existing distribution networks)
Marke-ting
•Trademark licence
•Consortium (common marketing)
•Joint advertising
Produc-tion
•Subcontracting agreements
•Common manufacturing agreements
•Implementation of engineering contracts
•Patent license
•Production consortium
Logistic
supply•Common purchases
•Access to the specific resources of the country (raw materials, subventions, capital cost, compared advantages)
Link of the chain
Coope-rationmodes
R&D
•Exchanges of existing knowledge
•Organisation of a common research
•Setting up of a common project (design, engineering)
New Business Models EmergeThen…
One Integrated Company
Now…
Many Distributed Companies
Product Development
Cycle
Product Developmen
t
Tool Compani
es
Testing Services
CRO’s CRM’s
New Regional Model EmergeThen…
Manufacturing
Research
Development
Trials/Testing
Services
Self-contained regional clusters
Region A
Region E
Region B
Region F
Region D
Region C
Region G
Now…
Specialized, networked regions
Build, Buy, Partner: Benefits and Tradeoffs
BuildBuild
BuyBuy
PartnerPartner
Time to Market & Control & Profit
Cos
t &
Ris
k
Most product controlOwn the IPMost profit opportunity
Longest time to marketRisk in market shiftsHigh development costsHighest switching costs
Pros Cons
Shorten time to marketOwn the IP
Acquisition costsIntegration costs
Least ControlIntegration CostsShared gross margins -Least Profit Opportunity
Shortest Time to Market Conserves ResourcesTry before you BuyLowest Switching CostsCredibility and access
Why Build: Technology Leadership
• Pioneer in the field• Patentable technology• Need to own the
intellectual property
• Core business• Have time or can build
in increments• Have in-house
expertise
Why Buy: Core to business
• Core to business• Need intellectual
property• Time critical
• Shortage of in-house expertise
• Acquire market leadership
Why Partner: Speed• Fastest Time to Market• Reduce Risk • Leap Frog Competition
• Customize for Specific Markets
• Customers buy best of breed
Which horse to pick?
Build Buy Partner
Leadership Core Business
Time to Market
Reduce Risk
Familiarity Matrix: Optimum Strategies forTechnological Innovation: Finding others who
know more about the markets or the technology
Decreasing knowledge of the technologyDe
cre
asin
g k
no
wle
dg
e o
f th
e m
ark
et
Internal Development, Acquisition, or Joint Venture
Joint Venture
Internal Development
Venture Capital or Educational Acquisition
Internal Venture or Acquisition or License
Internal project, or Acquisition, or License
Venture capital, or Educational Acquisition, or University Relationship
Venture Capital or Educational Acquisition
Joint Venture, Strategic Alliance or University Relationship
New developments in innovation raises new issues and problems
• Greater emphasis on commercializing scientific discoveries, particularly in IT and the bio-sciences
• Speed and potential value of scientific progress leads to emphasis on solid and well-designed portfolios of research projects
• Universites as active drivers of innovation: Academic entrepreneurship and the entrepreneurial university
• University-industry partnerships• Increased search for radical innovation and top-line
growth.
Commercialization Model• Strategic Investment is the Foundation of a
Successful Commercialization Model
‘Opening up’ of industrial research process
R&D Lab of company XFirm X
Developing technological core competences within the company X
University-industry
cooperation
Firm’s
own
research
lab
Public-private partnership
High-tech
SMEs
Pre-competitive R&D with
competitors
Value creation: products, processes etc
Worldwide search and evaluation of technology and knowledge
New firms, s
pin-offs
Firm X itself
Joint ventures
Licensing technologies
‘Open innovation’ Research Campus, with•Venturing
•‘Incubator’
•Technology transfer and support, …
“Exploring wider range of knowledge areas”
Creating more value faster“More focus and resources for firm’s own competences”
NothingIn the
past
Addenbrooke’s Hospital
Cambridge Biotechnology
Northern Venture Managers Cambridge
University
Pfizer
Lorantis
Cambridge Antibody Technology
Domantis
Abbott
Eli Lilly
Astex
Daniolabs
Neurodegeneration Consortium
Gateway Fund
Biotica
Babraham Bioincubator
Babraham Technix
Babraham Bioscience Inst Technologies Ltd Wellcome Trust
Wyeth Amgen AstraZeneca
Cambridge Crytallographic Data Centre
GlaxoSmithKline
Gilead Sciences
(joint venture)
(Cambridge University administered)
Institute for Medical Research
Challenge Fund
Founders came out of Pfizermacrolide
templates
Vistide out-license
Hepsera out-license
virtual screening collaboration
(Cambridge University)
(funding)
partnership
arthritis collaboration
(funding)
licensing
licensing
Genzyme
antibodies license
validation
(funding)
The New Paradigm for Innovation
“Open innovation…assumes that firms can and should use external ideas as well as internal ideas, and internal and external paths to market, as they look to advance their technology.”
Henry Chesbrough, Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm
The Key is Collaboration
“Few if any companies today can hold all the pieces of their own product technology…they simply must collaborate with others if they want to survive and prosper…IP has become much more of a bridge to collaboration”
Marshall Phelps, Microsoft
Open Innovation – buying in ideas or products to add to your model
Revenues
Costs
Market
RevenuesMarket
Revenues
Market
Revenues
Internal
Development Internal
Development
Internal &
External
Shared
Development
Sell Divest
Spin off
License
Shorter ProductLife Cycle
Increasingcosts Decreasing
costs
New RevenueSources
Golden Past Past Present Present Future
‘Closed innovation single track’
“Ideas & “Current Market Place”
Research Development Commercialisation
Investigations”
Based upon ‘Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm’ (2006) Henry Chesbrough, Wim Vanhaverbeke & Joel West
1
2
3
4
5
‘Open innovation three lane highway’
“Ideas & “Current Market Place”
Research Development Commercialisation
Investigations”“New Market Place”
“Other firm’s Market Place”
“External Ideas &
Investigations”
licensing
“External Technologies
Technology spin-offs
Insourcing gate
Outsourcing gate
Based upon ‘Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm’ (2006) Henry Chesbrough, Wim Vanhaverbeke & Joel West
1
2
3
4
5
IP model enabling “Open Innovation”• R&D on generic technologies• Industry value chains brought together• Partners collaborate and contribute ideas
A Network View of Innovation
Depending on a firm’s strengths, different firms play different roles in open innovation value chain
• Some firms generate innovations• Some integrate the innovations of others• Some have a fully integrated model
An open innovation system is a networked system
From a network IN an organization …. To the network IS the organization
Hierarchy
Matrix
Network
TYPES OF NETWORKS
• Task Networks: involve the exchange of specific job-related resources including information, expertise, professional advice, political access, and material resources.
• Social Networks: involve relationships characterized by higher levels of closeness and trust than those that are exclusively task-related. They usually consist of people who share a common background or interest. Since people have more leeway in choosing their friends than their co-workers, these networks tend to be less closely determined by formal organizational arrangements and work assignments. Social networks, however, often play a critical role in mobilizing resources, transmitting information, and providing peer coaching.
Innovation Networks must combine both!
Thanks to H. Ibarra
TYPES OF RELATIONSHIPS
• It is important to cultivate a broad range of network relationships!• Long-term, high reciprocity (Strong) ties: Close bonds and reciprocal
relationships ensure reliability under conditions of uncertainty. These include peer alliances that function by exchange of favors, ties of trust and loyalty between superiors and subordinates, and career development ties between mentors and proteges.
• Short-term, instrumental ties: Many important ties such as highly circumscribed job-related connections, are often dissolved when the relationship has served its purpose. Some are with individuals the manager may not even like, but must interact with to get things done.
• Distant Acquaintances (Weak ties): These types of relationships are important because they function as bridges between the manager and distant social or organizational groups. As a result, they are often sources of unique or novel pieces of information. A networking strategy that does not take these into account leaves a manager open to the risk of developing an inbred network that will not provide information on external opportunities or threats.
Raufoss – Light Metal Industry
• From an integrated and closed corporation to dynamic cluster– RA (Raufoss Ammunition Company) 1897– Gradual growth of civil production in light metal– Gradual growth of global customers (automotive)
• From national customers to global customer• From closed innovation to open innovation• Challenges for relations and communications
From RA via Industrial Park to a Dynamic Cluster ?
RA
Phase 11896-1997
Raufoss
HARA
Phase 21997-2003
Nammo
Fission
Phase 32004-
HARA
Nammo
Integrated company
Reintegration ?
Fragmentation Dynamic cluster?
Technology - Aircraft• Boeing Co - The first mass
jetliner - the 707.• 98% made in the US 1950’s -
60’s. 20th c.• The 787 - Dreamliner - 21st c.• 70% outsourced to 900
contractors• Half made by contractors outside
the US - primarily Japan and Italy but also China (rudder).
• Boeing does the final assembly.• Boeing maintains the overall IP –
it’s their innovation. – Without Open Innovation and
strong IP the above process could not happen.
Boeing Co.
Boeing - the platform Co.
Some cross-sector ‘platform’ candidate innovation biographies in firms & regions arising from WP3 Food Biotechnology ICT New Media KIBS Automotive Tourism
Branding
Culinary Tourism
Wine Tourism
DANFORS
Revitalise Food-River Tourism (e.g. Douro)
Oenotechnology Guidance Systems
Knowledge Intermediaries
Food Biocluster
Functional Foods
Vehicle Processing Systems
Biofuels
Bioengineering
Bio-imaging
Firm Level Innovation BiographiesEURODITE, Toulouse Targets for Innovation Investigation Research in Aquitaine, France integrates the wine industry and biotechnology
to develop the new field of Oenotechnology In Emilia-Romagna, Italy meat industry the Food and ICT industries have
collaborated to produce Biosensors for testing the maturity of Parma ham The German automotive industry is actively engaged in innovative activity
with a number of farms and agricultural research institutes in Brandenburg to develop Biofuels
In Bavaria, bioscientific knowledge on milk-based Lactobacteria are the subject of research collaborations with the brewing and fermentation industries
In Bornholm and North Jutland, Denmark the Agro-Food and Tourism industries are collaborating on innovatory Culinary Tourism activities also involving the delineation of Food Cultures involving anthropological research
Innovation research in Midi-Pyrénées, France focuses on specialised tourism-based vehicle guidance systems integrating knowledge from Aerospace, Automotives and ICT with that from Tourism, Agro-food and Bioscience
In Hordaland (Bergen), Norway Tourism demand to experience Aquaculture processes in organic fish farms has led to interactions between the Agro-Food industry, New Media, ICT and Knowledge-Intensive Services to realise a network facility
In Jura, Switzerland the traditional Watch-making industry is being transformed into a Tourism asset by formation of Agro-Food, Tourism, ICT, New Media and traditional fine-mechanics ‘experience economy’ networks
Protecting Inventions
Manage Competition
Hierarchy of IP Value
Design Freedom
Build Markets and Relationships
Deliver Revenue
Pote
nti
al R
etu
rn
Biz Strategy Driver
Building an IP Strategy
Build Your Portfolio– Strategic Patenting– Purchase Patents
Deploy Your Portfolio– Design Freedom– Manage Competition– Enter new Markets– Deliver RevenueProtecting Inventions/Recognition
Manage Competition
Design Freedom
Markets Development
Deliver Revenue
Biz Strategy
A Hierarchy of IP/IC Management
Cost Control (Control Costs, Improve Productivity)
Profit Center (Manage for Profitability)
Integrated (Manage for Growth)
Visionary (Drive Growth)
Defensive (Build Portfolio, Protect Markets and Technology)
IP Culture - Levels of companies
Ground Floor
Second Floor
Third Floor
Penthouse
Basement
TotalIntegration
Profit Generation
Cost Savings
Defensive
Unprotected
PenthouseIntegration
Third floorProfit
Second floorSavings
Ground floorDefensive
BasementUnprotected
0 - Unprotected level
They rely on confidentiality, access to complementary assets and lead time advantages
PenthouseIntegration
ThirdProfit
SecondSavings
GroundDefensive
BasementUnprotected
How businesses behave at the various levels ?
1 - Defensive level
Activities of the company focus on:
- Creating awareness of the role of intellectual property - Obtaining intellectual property
- Maintaining IP rights
- Respecting IP rights (esp. Patents) of others (Freedom to Operate)
- Willingness to enforce patents, when necessary
PenthouseIntegration
ThirdProfit
SecondSavings
GroundDefensive
BasementUnprotected
2 - Cost Savings Level
The activities of the company :
Focus on how to reduce costs of filing/maintaining intellectual property portfolio
PenthouseIntegration
ThirdProfit
SecondSavings
GroundDefensive
BasementUnprotected
3 - Profit Generation Level
The activities of the company focus on:
- Making intellectual property a profit center
- Utilizing the intellectual property portfolio as a corporate asset
- Extracting value directly from intellectual property portfolio
- Non-core, non-strategic IP having tactical
value
PenthouseIntegration
ThirdProfit
SecondSavings
GroundDefensive
BasementUnprotected
3 - IP for Profit Level
Company activities:
- Considers intellectual property at all levels of organization
- Organises high profile campaign against infringers
- Develops active patent/trademark licensing program
- Makes more good sense oriented R&D efforts
- begins/improves active screening/watches for patent infringement
PenthouseIntegration
ThirdProfit
SecondSavings
GroundDefensive
BasementUnprotected
3 - IP for Profit Level
- Establishes an enforcement program, it ensures that no one infringes your patents
- Requires constant policing and monitoring of the market in order to challenge infringing products
- Enforcement function includes method of negotiation so company can suppress infringement without having to engage in litigation
- In tough cases, is prepared to litigate against infringers
PenthouseIntegration
ThirdProfit
SecondSavings
GroundDefensive
BasementUnprotected
3 - IP for Profit Level
Licensing
- Starts/increases proactive licensing program
- Finds opportunities to generate revenue without sacrificing competitive advantage
- Begins by licensing non-core technologies or technologies outside current field of products
- Finds appropriate licensees (potential infringers)
PenthouseIntegration
ThirdProfit
SecondSavings
GroundDefensive
BasementUnprotected
4 - IP Integration level
The company:
- Sets long term patent strategy
- Aligns IP strategy with itscorporate strategy
- Makes competitive assessment
- Focuses on strategic value extraction
- Develops a performance measurement and reporting system
- Ensures that patent strategy drives research
PenthouseIntegration
ThirdProfit
SecondSavings
GroundDefensive
BasementUnprotected
Organization of IP Department
Other factors that affect the decision:
• Objectives set for the IP Department
• Importance of the IP Dept in the company
• Strategic placement inside the organigram
• Competitive Strategy of the Company
• Type of Technology (Mature or Radical)
• Type of Market served by the Company
TOP MANAGEMENT
CEO
technicaldpt
marketing dpt
commercialdpt
legaldpt
Intellectual property
TOP MANAGEMENT
CEO
TOP MANAGEMENT
CEO
TOP MANAGEMENT
CEO
TOP MANAGEMENT
CEO
TOP MANAGEMENT
CEO
commercialdpt
TOP MANAGEMENT
CEO
commercialdpt
TOP MANAGEMENT
CEO
Organization of an IP Department
It is a company having a defensive stance
IP department takes
•No autonomous decisions
•No autonomous strategy
It receives guidelines from the department to which it is attached
Organization of an IP Department
TOP MANAGEMENT
CEO
Technicaldpt
marketing dpt
legaldpt
TOP MANAGEMENT
CEO
TOP MANAGEMENT
CEO
TOP MANAGEMENT
CEO
TOP MANAGEMENT
CEO
TOP MANAGEMENT
CEO
commercialDpt
technical dpt
Intellectual Property
Dept
Other Departments
Organization of an IP Department
It is a company of the multinational type,
•leading on the market
•having large dimensions
The IP department has autonomous decisional power and defines strategies
There exists a Director for IP , sometimes at Vice- President level
Organization of IP Department
Organization of IP Department
Directorate IP Secretariat
strategies
documentation
patents trade marks
professional
administrative
professional
administrative
Licensing +litigation
Internal structure of IP dept
Use of patents
Is it coreBusiness?
Obligation to licence?
Licence at market conditions
Licence at disadvantageous
conditions
Use of patents
Is it coreBusiness?
Use of patentsUse of patents
Obligation to licence?
Use of patentsUse of patentsUse of patentsUse of patents
Obligation to licence?
Use of patents
Offensive attitude
yes
no
no
Coop. agreements
compulsory licences at
favorable conditions
Organization of IP Department
yes
Decision process in large companies
Obligation to licence?yes
Obligation to licence?yes
Obligation to licence?yes
compulsory licences at
favorable conditions
Obligation to licence?yes
compulsory licences at
favorable conditions
Obligation to licence?yes Coop. agreements
compulsory licences at
favorable conditions
Obligation to licence?yes Coop. agreements
compulsory licences at
favorable conditions
Obligation to licence?yes Coop. agreements
compulsory licences at
favorable conditions
Obligation to licence?yes Coop. agreements
compulsory licences at
favorable conditions
Obligation to licence?yes Coop. agreements
compulsory licences at
favorable conditions
Obligation to licence?yes
Licence at disadvantageous
conditions
yes
Licence at conditions
below market
yes
Organization of IP Department
Use of patents
Obligation to licence?yes
compulsory licences at
favorable conditions
Coop. agreements
Offensive attitude
Licence at conditions below
market
Decision process in a small company