Paul D. Ronney Dept. of Aerospace & Mechanical Engineering University of Southern California
Integrated Micropower Generator Combustion, heat transfer, fluid flow Lead: Paul Ronney Postdoc:...
-
Upload
vance-prow -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Integrated Micropower Generator Combustion, heat transfer, fluid flow Lead: Paul Ronney Postdoc:...
Integrated Micropower Generator
Combustion, heat transfer, fluid flow
Lead: Paul Ronney
Postdoc: Craig EastwoodGraduate student: Jeongmin Ahn (experiments)
Graduate student: James Kuo (modeling)University of Southern California
Collaborator: Prof. Kaoru Maruta (Tohoku Univ., Sendai, Japan) (catalytic combustion modeling)
Integrated MicroPower Generator Inter-group pow-wow, June 24, 2002
Integrated Micropower Generator
Objectives
• Thermal / chemical management for SCFC– Deliver proper
temperature, composition, residence time to SCFC
– Oxidize SCFC products
Task progress
• “Swiss roll” heat exchanger / combustor development
• Catalytic afterburner
• Micro-aspirator
Products out
Air inAir/fuel in
- out+ out
Products
air/fuel reactants
catalyticcombustor
SCFCstack
Integrated MicroPower Generator Inter-group pow-wow, June 24, 2002
Combustor development• Prior results in Swiss-roll burners show surprising effects of
– Flow velocity or Reynolds number (dual limits)– Catalyst vs. non-catalyst (reversal of limits)– Lean limits richer than stoichiometric (!) (catalytic only)– Wall material
0.2
0.4
0.60.8
1
3
10 100 1000
Ceramic (no cat)Ceramic (cat)Inconel (no cat)Inconel (cat)Weinberg 4.5 turn CH4
Reynolds number
Conventionallean limit
Propane
Integrated MicroPower Generator Inter-group pow-wow, June 24, 2002
Combustor development• Limit temperatures much lower with catalyst
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
10 100 1000
Inconel (no cat)Inconel (cat)Ceramic (no cat)Ceramic (cat)
Reynolds number
Propane
Integrated MicroPower Generator Inter-group pow-wow, June 24, 2002
Combustor development
• Temperature measurements confirm that catalyst can inhibit gas-phase reaction
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7
Center (cat)
1 turn out (cat)
2 turns out (cat)
Center (no cat)
1 turn out (no cat)
2 turns out (no cat)
Equivalence ratio
Centered reactionNo effect of catalyst
C3H
8-air
Re = 45
Catalyst inhibits reaction in center
Centered reactionCatalyst retards
reaction
No stable non-catalytic reactionStable non-catalytic reaction
Integrated MicroPower Generator Inter-group pow-wow, June 24, 2002
Mesoscale experiments• Steady combustion obtained even at < 100˚C with Pt catalyst• Sharp transition to lower T at low or high fuel conc., low or high flow velocity - transition from gas-phase to surface reaction?• Can’t reach as low Re as macroscale burner!• Wall thick and has high thermal conductivity - loss mechanism?
0
200
400
600
800
1000
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
T (Re = 500)T (Re = 458)T (Re = 328)T (Re = 229)T (Re = 199)T (Re = 159)T (Re = 113)
Mole percent propane in air
Integrated MicroPower Generator Inter-group pow-wow, June 24, 2002
Mesoscale experiments
• Next generation mesoscale burner - ceramic rapid prototyping using colloidal inks (Prof. Jennifer Lewis, UIUC)
1.5 cm tall 2-turn alumina Swiss-roll combustor
Integrated MicroPower Generator Inter-group pow-wow, June 24, 2002
Combustor development• 4-step chemical model (Hauptmann et al.) integrated into FLUENT
(1) C3H8(3/2)C2H4 + H2
(2) C2H4 + O2 2CO + 2H2
(3) CO + (1/2)O2 CO2
(4) H2 + (1/2)O2 H2O• Typical results (V = 20 cm/s, Re = 70, lean propane-air)
Temperature Heat release rate
Integrated MicroPower Generator Inter-group pow-wow, June 24, 2002
Combustor development
• Model predicts intermediates H2 and CO used in electrochemical cell
H2 CO
Integrated MicroPower Generator Inter-group pow-wow, June 24, 2002
Combustor development• Individual reactions occur at different locations within Swiss roll
- possibility for in-situ reforming of C3H8 and O2 to CO and H2 without a catalyst
1 2
3 4
Integrated MicroPower Generator Inter-group pow-wow, June 24, 2002
Heat exchanger / combustor modeling
• Simple quasi-1D analytical model of counterflow heat-recirculating burners developed including: (1) heat transfer; (2) chemical reaction in WSR; (3) heat loss to ambient; (4) streamwise thermal conduction along wall
Reactants
T = Ti
(0)
Products
T = Te
(0)
Adiabatic
end walls
Well-stirred
reactor
T = Te
(1)
Area = AR
x = 0 x = 1
Wall temperature = Tw
(x) = ( Tw,e
(x) + Tw
(x))/2
Surface temperature = Tw,e
(x)
Surface temperature = Tw,i
(x)
Heat transfer coefficient to wall = h1
Gas temperature = Te
(x)
Gas temperature = Te
(x)
Heat transfer coefficient to wall = h1
Heat loss coefficient to ambient = h2
Heat loss coefficient to ambient = h2
Wall thickness τ
Channel height d
Channel height d
Integrated MicroPower Generator Inter-group pow-wow, June 24, 2002
Heat exchanger / combustor modeling• Results show low-velocity limit requires heat loss (H > 0)
and wall heat conduction (B < ∞)• Very different from burners without heat recirculation!
H = dimensionless heat loss
B-1 = dimensionless wall conduction effect
Da = dimensionless reaction rate
3
4
5
6
7
0.01 0.1 1M (mass flux)
Da = ∞H = 0B = ∞
H = 0.05B = 1000
H = 0B = ∞
H = 0.05B = 100
H = 0.05B = ∞
Da = 107
Integrated MicroPower Generator Inter-group pow-wow, June 24, 2002
Heat exchanger / combustor modeling
• High-velocity limit almost unaffected by wall heat conduction, but low-velocity limit dominated by wall conduction
• Thin wall, low thermal conductivity material (ceramic vs. steel) will maximize performance
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
0.001 0.01 0.1
Temperature rise (
Δ
T
)
M (mass flux)
B = 100
B = 1000
B = 10000
B = ∞
Integrated MicroPower Generator Inter-group pow-wow, June 24, 2002
Heat exchanger / combustor modeling
• Much worse performance found with conductive-tube burner
1.8
2
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3
0.001 0.01 0.1 1
Temperature rise (
Δ
T
)
M (mass flux)
B = 0
B = 10
B = 100
B = ∞
B = 1000
Integrated MicroPower Generator Inter-group pow-wow, June 24, 2002
Catalytic combustion modeling
• Detailed catalytic combustion model integrated into FLUENT computational fluid dynamics package
• Interactions of chemical reaction, heat loss, fluid flow modeled in simple geometry at microscales– Cylindrical tube reactor, 1 mm dia. x 10 mm length– Platinum catalyst, CH4-air and CH4-O2-N2 mixtures
• Effects studied– Heat loss coefficient (H)– Flow velocity or Reynolds number (2.4 - 60)– Fuel/air AND fuel/O2 ratio
Wall boundary condition H = 0, 5 or10 W/m2˚C
1 mmnon-catalytic wall
9 mmcatalytic wall
Fuel/airinlet
1 mmdiameter
Integrated MicroPower Generator Inter-group pow-wow, June 24, 2002
Catalytic combustion modeling
• “Dual-limit” behavior similar to experiments observed when heat loss is present
Integrated MicroPower Generator Inter-group pow-wow, June 24, 2002
Catalytic combustion modeling
• Surface temperature profiles show effects of heat loss at low flow velocities
Integrated MicroPower Generator Inter-group pow-wow, June 24, 2002
Catalytic combustion modeling
• Heat release inhibited by high O(s) coverage (slow O(s) desorption) at low temperatures - need Pt(s) sites for fuel adsorption / oxidation
a
b
Heat release rates and gas-phase CH4 mole fraction Surface coverage
Integrated MicroPower Generator Inter-group pow-wow, June 24, 2002
Catalytic combustion modeling
• Computations with fuel:O2 fixed, N2 (not air) dilution
• Minimum fuel concentration and flame temperatures needed to sustain combustion much lower for even slightly rich mixtures!
• Typical strategy to reduce flame temperature: dilute with excess air, but slightly rich mixtures with exhaust gas dilution is a much better operating strategy! (and consistent with SCFC operation)
Integrated MicroPower Generator Inter-group pow-wow, June 24, 2002
Catalytic combustion modeling
• Behavior due to transition from O(s) coverage for lean mixtures (excess O2) to CO(s) coverage for rich mixtures (excess fuel)
Lean
Rich
Integrated MicroPower Generator Inter-group pow-wow, June 24, 2002
Catalytic combustion modeling
• Predictions consistent with experiments (C3H8-O2-N2) in 2D Swiss roll at similar Re
• Opposite (conventional) fuel:O2 ratio effect seen in gas-phase combustion
400
500
600
700
800
900
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
Equivalence ratio
Tmax
(non-cat)
Tmax
(cat)
Fuel % (cat)Fuel % (non-cat)
Integrated MicroPower Generator Inter-group pow-wow, June 24, 2002
600
620
640
660
680
700
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
Equivalence ratio
Tmax
(cat)
Fuel % (cat)
Re = 35
Catalytic combustion modeling
• Similar behavior at other Re
Integrated MicroPower Generator Inter-group pow-wow, June 24, 2002
750
800
850
900
950
1000
1050
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
Equivalence ratio
Tmax
(cat)
Fuel % (cat)
Re = 35CH
4-O
2-N
2 mixtures
Catalytic combustion modeling
• Also seen with methane - surprisingly low T
Integrated MicroPower Generator Inter-group pow-wow, June 24, 2002
Micro-aspirator
• FLUENT modeling being used to design propane/butane micro-aspirator
• Goal: maximize exit pressure for given fuel/air ratio
• Unlike macroscale devices, design dominated by viscous losses
Fuel from supply tank
P = Psat
, V ≈ 0
Air
P = ambient, V ≈ 0 Exit to burner
Fuel/air mixture
P > ambient
V > 0
Propane mass fraction fields for varying inner nozzle diameters (outside dia. 2 mm)
Integrated MicroPower Generator Inter-group pow-wow, June 24, 2002
Future plans
• Build/test macroscale titanium “Swiss Roll” burner (2x lower conductivity & thermal expansion coefficient)
• Test macroscale Ti Swiss Roll IMG– H2, CO, H2/CO mixtures– Hydrocarbons
• Meso/microscale "Swiss Roll”– Optimized for SCFC use using FLUENT - determine the
conditions required for stable 2D combustor at target operating temperature & composition
• Number of turns• Wall thickness• Catalyst type & surface area• Reactant flow velocity and composition (fuel, air, exhaust gas,
bypass ratio)– Build/test stand-alone Swiss roll, verify design– Build/test IMG
• Design micro-aspirator