Instructions for Viewers...Design controls for optimizing binding of primary antibody Tissue or...
Transcript of Instructions for Viewers...Design controls for optimizing binding of primary antibody Tissue or...
Instructions for Viewers
• To share webinar via social media:
• To see speaker biographies, click: View Bio under speaker name
• To ask a question, click the Ask A Question button under the slide window
• To share webinar via e‐mail:
Improving tissue-sample profilingThe optimization and application of immunohistochemistry
July 7, 2015
Webinar Series
Sponsored by:
Participating ExpertsBrought to you by the Science/AAAS Custom Publishing Office Nissi M. Varki, M.D.
University of California San DiegoLa Jolla, CA
Kevin D. Long, Ph.D.EMD MilliporeTemecula, CA
Webinar Series
Improving tissue-sample profilingThe optimization and application of immunohistochemistry
July 7, 2015
Sponsored by:
IMMUNOHISTOPATHOLOGYImproving tissue-sample profiling: The optimization and
application of immunohistochemistry
Nissi Varki M.D.
Professor of Pathology
Director of Histopathology and Immunohistochemistry and
Mouse Phenotyping Shared Resources
Mice
Human
Comparative pathology and models of human disease
Methods for human IHC and histopathology can be used for comparative pathology and translational studies
Influenza receptor expression on tracheal epithelium differs between species
Monica Cheriyan, Pascal Gagneux, Dan Anderson, Harold MacClure, Ajit Varki & Nissi Varki
Red arrows:apical edge of tracheal epithelium
Human Chimp
Mouse GorillaGreen arrows: goblet cells
Gagneux et al. J.Biol.Chem. 278: 48245–48250, 2003
Human Heart has more capillaries
A possible explanation as to why humans are able to sustain effort and run long distances
Heart disease is caused by different pathological processes in humans versus great apes
Evolutionary Applications2:101-112, 2009
•Athymic nude mice are used as a model for cancer research
•Balb/c mice are used for hybridoma production
•Became a “mouse pathologist”
Using mouse models to study human disease
Mouse lungs must be inflated before microscopic examination
OCT infiltrated lung
Frozen section
Good morphology
Non-OCT infiltrated lung
Frozen section
Poor morphology
Mouse lungs must be inflated before use in histopathology
Mucin secreting cells are not present in healthy mouse lung
Mouse models of
asthma induce
inflammation
Inflammation induces mucus
production in mouse
lungs
Human Spleen Mouse Spleen
Mouse organs must be properly processed
Mouse heart has high endogenous fluorescence
Use of enzyme-labeled detection systems is preferred for IHC on certain organs in mouse
models of human disease
IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY (IHC) ASSAYS
IMMUNO: use of antigen/antibody reagents
HISTO: histology sections, viewed using brightfield microscopy
CHEMISTRY: substrates used to detect bound epitopes, produce precipitates visible with brightfield microscopy
FLUORESCENCE: can be used where no substrate is needed, viewed using epi-fluorescence microscopy with appropriate
excitation and barrier filters
Section of mouse lung showing inflammation•Nonspecific binding causes background issues
•Should not be used for IHC assays
Always check tissue morphology prior to IHC
IHC assays are performed using two sample types
Cells grown, spun into a pellet, frozen or paraffin embedded and sectioned
Cells grown as a monolayerOR
Sections from tissues contain many different kinds of cells as well as extra-cellular matrix components
Control cells on slides
OR tissue sections from either frozen blocks or FFPE (paraffin blocks)
IHC example: cell pellet control and tissue sections on the same slide
Positive Control Negative Control Tissue
One slide, same antibody
Fixation can mask epitopes and interfere with detection
Paraformaldehyde fixed
Fixative effects on preserving epitopes in frozen sections
If the tissue is fixed for longer than
24 hours and paraffin embedded,
some mouse monoclonals may not
recognize the epitope, in spite of
using retrieval techniques
Acetone fixed
Third reagent: To detect primary and secondary labels • Fluorescence: FITC, CY2, CY3, PE, AMCA, or Alexa dyes• Enzymes: horseradish peroxidase or alkaline phosphatase
Secondary reagent: Can be labeled, not labeled, or conjugated with biotin or digoxygenin
Primary antibody: Can be conjugated for direct assays or not labeled for detection using other reagents
Tissue section: frozen or paraffin
Three basic steps for IHC assays
When testing a new antibody, one needs to know:
Species of origin of the primary antibody: Mouse, rabbit, rat, hamster, chicken, goat, sheep, or horse
In order to:–design secondary and tertiary detecting reagents–design reagents to block non-specific binding–design which cells or tissues will be used as
positive and negative controls
Design controls for optimizing binding of primary antibody
Tissue or cells to be tested can be:–human–mouse–rat–other
If the primary antibody is POLYCLONAL rabbit anti-x or goat anti-x
If the primary antibody is MOUSE monoclonalTissue or cells to be tested can be:
–human–mouse–rat–rabbit–other
Primary antibody: maybe conjugated or not
Tissue section: frozen or paraffin If the primary antibody is
RAT monoclonalTissue or cells to be tested can be:
–human–mouse–rat–rabbit–other
Design negative and positive controls for every IHC
A. Reagent controls include:•Control slide which receives dilution buffer alone (secondary reagent control)
•Control slide which receives IgG at the same concentration as the test antibody
•Control slide which receives another antibody which will highlight specific tissue elements, such as stroma
B. Tissue/cells controls include: •Tissue or section from a cell pellet, not expected to be positive•Tissue or section from a cell pellet, not expected to be positive•Blocking agent, pre-incubated with specific antibody to remove reactivity
Block non-specific binding to collagen
Reagents to block non-specific binding
If using horse radish peroxidase detection, block endogenous peroxidases:
•Treat Frozen sections for 30 minutes with 0.03% H2O2 in buffer
•Treat Paraffin sections for 30 minutes with 0.3% H2O2 in buffer
If using biotinylated reagents, block endogenous biotin:•Always block non-specific collagen binding sites with diluting
buffer
Note: Frozen sections of small intestine, placenta etc. do contain endogenous alkaline phosphatase so these tissues should not receive alkaline phosphatase conjugated reagents
Enzyme conjugates allow visible detection and evaluation of morphologyFluorescent conjugates allow more sensitive detection methods
•Remove endogenous peroxidases•Block endogenous biotin•Block for endogenous alkaline phosphatase,
if needed•Develop with insoluble substrates•Different colors for peroxidase/alkaline phosphatase•Counterstain nuclei with contrasting colors
Enhance detection using:
•Biotin/streptavidin
•Tyramideamplification
Deparaffinize and block non-specific sites
Frozen sections
Immunohistochemistry optimization
Paraffin sections
airdry
Acetone fix
Fix in formalin after blocking
Tissue section: Frozen or deparaffinized
Tertiary reagent label may be an enzyme or fluoresceinated
fluoresceinated compounds
Remove endogenous non-specific binding sites
CY2 , FITC
AMCA
PE, CY3
Horse Radish Peroxidase
Alkaline Phosphatase
Substrates:
DAB, AEC, red , SG, VIP
Substrates
•Vector Blue
•Vector Red
Primary
Secondary
TertiaryAlexa dyes
•10 mM citrate buffer pH 6, heat induced antigen retrieval
•1 mM EDTA pH 8, heat induced antigen retrieval
•Tris buffer pH 10, heat induced antigen retrieval
•Proteinase K treat for 10 minutes at room temperature
•Trypsin treat for 10 minutes at room temperature
•Other methods
Antigen retrieval on paraffin sections facilitates detection of hidden epitopes
Biotinyl tyramide uses the HRP enzyme
to deposit many biotin molecules that “cover”
the antigen antibody complexes
already formed over the epitope on the tissue section
Further amplification can be used to detect low abundance epitopes in tissue
Tissue section: deParaffinized
enhancing detection levels by a factor of 100-1000
Using double stain methods to determine if two antibodies
recognize the same epitope on cells in a tissue section
Caveats:
•Use lower dilutions of antibodies for double staining to compensate for additive effect
•Use antibodies sequentially and detect with different fluoresceinated tags, so same epitope will be recognized with a new color
•One antibody may bind to the less abundant but similar epitope
•One antibody may bind with higher affinity or recognize a more abundant epitope
Co-localization and detection of similar epitopes on the same tissue section, using fluorescent markers
IgG control
Program of Excellence in the GlycoSciences
http://pegnac.sdsc.edu/ Glycobiology Research and Training Center
http://grtc.ucsd.edu/
Acknowledgements
UC San Diego histology cores:
http://mousepheno.ucsd.edu/overview.shtml
https://cancer.ucsd.edu/research-training/shared-resources/biorepository/Pages/histology-and-immunohistochemistry.aspx
Funding agencies: National Institutes of Health
Participating ExpertsBrought to you by the Science/AAAS Custom Publishing Office Nissi M. Varki, M.D.
University of California San DiegoLa Jolla, CA
Kevin D. Long, Ph.D.EMD MilliporeTemecula, CA
Webinar Series
Improving tissue-sample profilingThe optimization and application of immunohistochemistry
July 7, 2015
Sponsored by:
The art of IHC: Know your antibody, know your tissue, and you will always succeed Dr. Kevin Long / EMD Millipore
Science Webinar
July 7, 2015
IHC is like a battle of two opposing forces: the antibody and the tissue…
Know your own strengths and you will win half the battles
Know your enemies’ strengths and you will win half the battles
Know the nature of your target protein epitope, and your antibody design
Know the effects of tissue processing on your antibody penetration and binding
Know your strengths and those of your enemy and you will win all the battles
Antibody validation combined with tissue processing and pre-experiment optimization will yield high success in IHC!
What you will learn
Pre-experiment IHC planning:
Antibody design considerations
Target and tissue considerations
The value of pre-experiment optimization
Antibody design considerations
Antibodies have the unique ability to bind to regions of a molecule tightly and extremely specifically
These complex, mostly biologically made “probes” continue to be the most effective way to find and isolate a target, or identify cell or tissue types
Antibody specificity
Although it is true that antibody binding to a specific amino acid sequence or conformational form can be theoreticallymodeled and is predictable in theory
Decades of user experience shows that many factors may contribute to issues of cross-reactivity and nonspecific binding.
Antigenicity Uniqueness of the immunogen sequence Antibody concentration Buffers used Immunization Sample preparation techniques
Antibody specificity does not mean reliability or ease of use
Reviewer comment: The buffer chosen to dilute the antibody used in this study has detergents, which are known to affect the HRP/DAB chromogenic reaction.
Know & justify the steps in your protocol Avoid ‘one size fits all’ protocols Every antibody is different so user MUST
optimize for each antibody AND lot
Antibody choice can depend on your application
• Target considerations• Sample considerations• Sample prep considerations• Ab design considerations
Target antigen considerations affect assay designGood forethought in experimental design is fundamental to choosing the components of your immunoassay.
Considerations for the target antigen: • Internal?• External?• Transmembrane?• Secreted? • Tertiary native conformation important?• Quaternary structure subunit binding important?• Are you trying to detect, measure, localize, isolate, or a combination
of these?
Determine the type of sample being tested
Key Considerations: Nature of your target protein that may impact antibody performance and subsequently raise reviewer concerns.
• Provide sufficient data or published support to show that the target protein is consistently expressed in your cell line or tissue
• Antibody reactivity can be affected by dynamic expression changes. Cell proteins can be modified, translocated, inserted into membranes, or even degraded
Target considerationsTarget Considerations Good PracticePre or pro protein Antibody epitope must be in pre/pro
region
Latent or activated proteinPhospho-specific or other PTM specific antibody
Tertiary structure obscures target Denaturing or degrading protocols needed
Complex native conformation or multi subunits
Conformation-specific antibody
Intracellular or intramembrane localization
Membrane disruption protocols needed
Live cell External cell surface epitope needed
Surface moiety Unfixed/light fixed frozen protocols or antigen retrieval needed
Reviewer comment: Can you submit data showing the antibody used only sees the trimethyl K27 site?
State-dependent antibodies must have extensive validation
Vendor should provide all validation data Protocols and control samples are often
available User control data is essential
Antibody design can impact assay performance
Polyclonals advantages and disadvantages
Advantages Disadvantages
Reviewer comment: Repeat your experiment with a monoclonal to be confident in your polyclonal data
Not a bad practice but not essential Choose a polyclonal made from short
peptide thus minimizing clonality Multi-application validation would help to
demonstrate specificity and robustness
Monoclonals advantages and disadvantages
Advantages Disadvantages
Reviewer comment: IHC staining seems inconsistent in figures throughout the manuscript
Lock down your protocol and order all antibodies from one lot
Confirm with monoclonal antibody Increase replicates Process slides in parallel
Target and tissue considerations
THE FIVE T’s!!!!!
Thickness?: slices/vibratome (>500um-50um); fixed frozen 40-15um; paraffin embedded (<10um- 0.5um) : accessibility of target; ability to wash out; resolution of final visualization.
The 5 “T”s of tissue prep for IHCTarget?: (epitope: protein, lipid, amino acid, chemical, integrin, growth factor, big, small, inside, outside, nuclear, mitochondrial, cytoplasmic?
Tissue? (expression of target? type of tissue? Brain, Liver, Skin, Cornea, Kidney, Bone?)
Time? : incubation times of: fixation, post-fix, Ab, washes, detection all make a difference and are interconnected. Fixes, influence penetration, epitope exposure, washing times, etc.
Temperature?: Kinetic energy of binding and interaction: hotter faster, colder slower –influences every step
Fixation shapes the epitope-antibody battleground
Light
Epitope distortion
Low
Fixation
Heavy High
TechniqueICC & Fresh frozen
Frozen sections
Paraffin
Plastic
Fixating on fixes: Procedures
Procedure Typical fix for ImmunohistochemistryIC (cells and cultures) 1-4% PFA, 50/50Ac/Meth coldSulfatides/glycoproteins (surface)e.g. O1, O4
No fix; Light PFA; no Ac/Me because they solubilize
IHC - frozen 50/50Ac/Meth, 2-4% PFAIntegrin adhesion molecules Bouins or light PFA fix; Perfusions Carnoy’s, 4% PFA, Bouin’s
IHC- whole mount 4% PFA, 10% Form, Carnoys
IHC - Paraffin 4% PFA, 10% Form, optional 2%Glut
IHC- EM 4-6% PFA w/ 2-4% Glut
• Dehydation and protein coagulation (air-drying; acetone, methanol, picric acid
• Formation of reversible cross-linkages (formalin, paraformaldehyde)
• Formation of strong, irreversible, fine scale cross-linkages (glutaraldehyde)
Will you be doing additional procedures? (PCR, ChIP, ISH/FISH, etc.)
The value of pre-experiment optimization and parallel processing
3 Cases:
• Titering• Parallel Controls• Multi-slide processing
The “5Ts” of tissue processing dramatically affect primary antibody concentration. Titering is critical despite the common practice of just using 1:1000 “unless the staining looks bad”
Antibody titering
EMD Millipore Antibody Optimization Project
OxyIHC™ labeled oxidative protein damagein the cerebellar cortex of an Alzheimer’sdisease transgenic APP mouse. Detection by anti-DNPH /HRP/DAB
Lapp, et al. 2010
Parallel controlsOptimizing tissue processing and key IHC steps together allows:
• Better controls• Assessment of signal/background • Staining comparisons• Identification of artifacts
Medium throughput multi-slide stainers are useful for these optimizations
WT control; no DNPH control APP hi exp; no DNPH control
WT control; DNPH+ DAB APP hi exp; DNPH+ DAB
Controlling variation among sample blocks and sections:Standardize tissue fixation/handling
NP-12676-3
NP-11761-32 NP-15395-3 NP-11714-1
NP-11572-1 NP-14181-1
Multi-slide processing
Yang, et al. 2015 Characterization of ERa phosphorylation sites as a marker for Tamoxifen resistant breast cancer, AACR
IHC of pER(Ser305) on ductal carcinoma
pER-S305 pER-S305
pER-S118ER
pER-Y537
pER-S106
pER-S167
pER-S102
Controlling variation among antibodies: Preoptimize each antibody used and then process in parallel.
Yang, et al. 2015, AACR
Multi-slide processing
Medium throughput Multi-slide stainers (e.g. SNAP i.d.® 2.0 system for IHC) can reduce sample variation
Single block IHC validation on ductal carcinoma tissue block NP14181-1
Some useful digital/analog resources
Humason’s Animal Tissue Techniques
Dako IHC Guidebook
EMD Millipore Introduction to Antibodies
Springer Practical IHC
IHCWorld
Histosearch
Histonet
Antibody design
Target and tissue
Pre-experiment optimization & parallel processing
In closing
Appendix 1: Fixatives in detail
56
In a fix: Acetone/Methanol50/50 Acetone/Methanol:
Acetone 100 ml
Methanol 100 ml
Mix well; use fresh at –20°C
• Uses- A light fix with minimal crosslinking- Fast penetration but gentle to cell structures- Excellent for cells and cultures
Light fix
In a fix: Carnoy’s
• Carnoy’s Fixative: glacial acetic acid 10 mLchloroform 30 mL100% EtOH 60 mL
• Uses- Made fresh, a light fix with minimal cross-linking- Fast penetration but gentle to cell structures- Excellent for light perfusion, frozen sections- Important for glycogen and Nissl body fixation- Good non-aldehyde fixation alternative- Chemically unreactive so minimal blocking of epitopes- Post-fixes in PFA give good long term preservation- Wonderful for integrins and adhesion molecules can be paraffin
embedded too for high resolution slices.
Light fix
In a fix: Bouin’s
Bouin’s Fluid:
Picric acid (saturated aqueous) 85 ml
Formalin (40% aqueous formaldehyde) 10 ml
Glacial Acetic Acid 5 ml
• Uses- A ‘hybrid’ fix with gentle crosslinking- Does not harden tissue- Good explosive when dehydrated
Light fix
In a fix: PLP - Aldehydes
Periodate-lysine-paraformaldehyde fixative
lysine-phosphate buffer 375mL
20% Formaldehyde 100mL
dH20 25mL
Sodium periodate 1.06g
• Uses- Mixed fresh, a moderate fix for cryostat sections - Excellent morphology but poor immunostaining.- Immunostaining greatly enhanced by brief prefix in acetone. - Paraffin embedding also maintains better antigenicity- Superior to acetone for fixation of membrane antigens, popular
in some hospitals; good for adhesion and epitope sensitive targets.
Moderate fix
In a fix: Aldehydes Buffered Formaldehyde (Formalin):
32.5g Na2HP04 and 20 g NaH2PO4 in water 4.5L
40% Formaldehyde 500mL
Adjust pH to 7.0-7.4
• Uses- A cheap strong fix with moderate crosslinking (particularly
between lysine residues)- Good but slow penetration but relatively gentle to protein
structure except when embedding.- Decent maintenance of antigenicity- Often used in archival and paraffin sections
Moderate fix
• Paraformaldehyde (PFA) 4%: Phosphate buffer 500mL granular PFA 20g >adjust to above pH12 to dissolve or use heat (toxic)
Adjust pH to 7.0-7.4 with NaOH MAKE FRESH; shelf-life 15 days
• Uses- Prepared fresh, an excellent easily made fix with moderate cross-linking (particularly between lysine residues)- Moderate penetration but gentle to protein structure- Faster fixation than formalin- Good maintenance of antigenicity- The closest to a ‘universal’ fix for Immuno and cell biology
In a fix: Aldehydes
Moderate fix
• Zenker’s stock solutionMercuric chloride 50g Potassium dichromate 25gSodium sulfate 10gDistilled water to 1 liter
Dilute 1:20 in glacial acetic acid for working solution
• Uses- Improves cytological preservation and minimize distortion associated with
formaldehyde-based fixatives (Often used as post fix to formalin)
- Coagulative crosslinking stabilizes many internal epitopes
- Good penetration of tissue but use sparingly as coagulative properties are
additive and can mask epitopes
In a fix: Mercuric Chloride based
heavy fix
• Paraformaldehyde (PFA) 4% & 2% Gluteraldehyde:
Phosphate buffer 500mL granular PFA 20ggluteraldeyde 10gAdjust pH to 7.0-7.4
• Uses- Prepared fresh, a fix with strong, irreversible cross-linking of many sites
on various macromolecules- Very fast fixation, moderate penetration- Deforms alpha helix structure in proteins so may significantly reduce
antigenicity- Gives excellent cytoplasmic and nuclear detail- Great for immuno of small molecules and Electron Microscopy
In a fix: Aldehydes
Heavier fix
Participating ExpertsBrought to you by the Science/AAAS Custom Publishing Office To submit your
questions, click theAsk a Question
button
Webinar Series
Improving tissue-sample profilingThe optimization and application of immunohistochemistry
July 7, 2015
Sponsored by:
Nissi M. Varki, M.D.University of California San DiegoLa Jolla, CA
Kevin D. Long, Ph.D.EMD MilliporeTemecula, CA
For related information on this webinar topic, go to:
Look out for more webinars in the series at:
webinar.sciencemag.org
To provide feedback on this webinar, please e‐mailyour comments to [email protected]
Brought to you by the Science/AAAS Custom Publishing Office
Webinar Series
www.emdmillipore.com/snapihc
Improving tissue-sample profilingThe optimization and application of immunohistochemistry
July 7, 2015
Sponsored by: