Institutional and Organizational Designs of Natural Gas Hubs-Javier Flórez, EFET
-
Upload
orkestra -
Category
Economy & Finance
-
view
101 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Institutional and Organizational Designs of Natural Gas Hubs-Javier Flórez, EFET
Bilbao, 24th June 2014
Javier FlórezChairmanIberian Gas GroupEFET
Seminar:Institutional and organizational designs of natural gas hubs in Europe
IGG
European Federation of Energy Traders
1
IGG 2
INTRODUCING EFET
IBERIAN GAS GROUP -EFET
GAS HUB DEVELOPMENT IN EUROPE
FINAL CONCLUSIONS
Agenda
IGG 3
EFET Vision
We foresee sustainable energy markets throughout Europe,
in which traders efficiently intermediate in the value chain
on the basis of clear wholesale price signals,
thereby optimising supply and demand
and enhancing security of supply,
to the overall long-term benefit of the economy and of society.
EFET: The vision of Europe’s energy traders
IGG 4
EFET
IGG 5
EFET
IGG 6
EFET: A wide variety of EFET Member Companies ...
IGG 7
... all committed to the development of energy trad ing
IGG 8
INTRODUCING EFET
IBERIAN GAS GROUP - EFET
GAS HUB DEVELOPMENT IN EUROPE
FINAL CONCLUSIONS
Agenda
IGG 9
The Iberian Gas Group EFET
The European Federation of Energy Traders (EFET) launched t he Iberian GasGroup (IGG) in March 2011.
In line with EFET principles and mission, the new IGG’s main o bjective is topromote gas trading in the region and to improve liquidity an d transparencywithin the Iberian gas market.
The companies currently participating in the IGG are: ALPIQ , AXPO, BP, EDFTRADING, EDP, ENDESA, ENEL, ENERGYA-VM, E-ON, GALP, GAS NAT URALFENOSA, GDF-SUEZ, IBERDROLA, MORGAN STANLEY, RWE, SHELL, S TATOILand TOTAL .
IGG 10
The Iberian Gas Group EFET
From the beginning, IGG focused on those key features of whol esale gas marketsthat are fundamental for the development of trading in the Sp anish andPortuguese markets.
To this aim, IGG decided to create 4 Working Groups to analyze t he compatibilityof the current Spanish and Portuguese gas systems with the cr eation of a virtualhub.
IGG developed the Spanish Appendix to the EFET Standard Cont ract, in line withthe other Contracts, already existing in the main european g as Hubs
• The use of the AOC Appendix will increase the liqui dity of the market because it permits all counterparties to use a stan dard document, in line with other gas markets in Europe
• The Spanish Gas Appendix is available for all users as it may be downloaded for free: http://www.efet.org
IGG is now actively participating in the Working Group creat ed by the Ministry ofIndustry for the devolpment of the Iberian Organized Gas Mark et
• The Organised Gas Market is expected to be launched by Januar y 2015
IGG 11
4 Working Groups in IGG, some conclusions (1/2)
Underground storage: Promote new poducts to increase the us e of the UGS, as wellas a secondary market of capacity
LNG Terminals: Promote some measures to increase the usage o f LNG terminals,adapt the stock of limits/obligations to the present circms tances, develop storageand loading products, enhance secondary market for capacit y
Interconnections: Remove “pancaking”, promote secondary capacity market andincentivize gas transits by making interconnection costs m ore attractive
This Group decided that the main aspect to be solved is the res olution ofcongestions
The market will be based on a single market area, and not many, suppresingexisting viability regions
The market doesn’t need more infrastructures to solve conge stions in thetransportation network. For new regulated infrastructure s a cost-benefit analysisshould be developed
The final aim is to eliminate the currently existing feasibi lity process
1.Gas Market
Structure
2.Interconnections
and gas storage
infrastructures
Gas
virt
ual H
UB
IGG 12
4 Working Groups in IGG, some conclusions (2/2)
In order for TSOs to ensure that the system is kept within safe operational limits,they need to be able to buy and sell gas (as last resource suppl y)
Renomination within gas day (D) is very important for shippe rs to adjust their ownbalance positions: continuosly (starting 7 hours before th e end of D-1 and finishing3 hours before the end of D), with no feasibility analysis, wi th no lead time in orderto minimize the response time
In order to increase the hub liquidity, TSO need to provide wi th-in day balanceinformation to shippers. TSO’s variable incomes could be de termined according tothe quality of the information provided
Financial settlement for imbalancing shall be levied. The i mbalance charges shallbe reflective of the costs incurred by the TSO in buying gas (o r the revenuesreceived by the TSO in selling gas), with some intermediate s teps until enough hubliquidity is achieved and the shippers have accurate inform ation of their balance
Spain complies with most of the liquidity parameters of the G as Target Model, butthey will significantly improve if Portugal is added, creat ing the Iberian Gas Market.“Market Area” seems the best final model to achieve an Iberia n Gas Market
CAM, CMP, Balancing NC should be harmonized between countri es in the region
3.Daily
operationsin the gas
system
4.MIBGAS-SGRI
Gas
virt
ual H
UB
IGG 13
2. Gas Target Model“Enabling functioning wholesale markets”
Spain comply with most of the liquidity parameters,
but they will significantly improve if Portugal is added
1. HHI < 2000
2. > 3 supply sources
3. Demand ≥ 20 bcm
4. Churn rate ≥ 8
5. RSI > 110% > 95 days per year
HHI
FR ES PT
IberiaFR ES PT
2000
FR PTES
20 bcm
Demand
⌧⌧⌧⌧⌧⌧⌧⌧ ����
�������� ����
⌧⌧⌧⌧���� ����
⌧⌧⌧⌧⌧⌧⌧⌧ ⌧⌧⌧⌧
⌧⌧⌧⌧⌧⌧⌧⌧ ?
33
6
47
4.000
1.900
5.200
1.600
NEW
IGG 14
INTRODUCING EFET
IBERIAN GAS GROUP -EFET
GAS HUB DEVELOPMENT IN EUROPE
FINAL CONCLUSIONS
Agenda
15IGG
Virtual hub in entry-exit system-
Physical hub
Mature, liquid hub with price transparencyLess mature or less liquid hub, with growing price transparencyFuture hub
Active exchange trading
Strong price linkWeaker or expected future price link
NBP
ZEE
TTF
NCG
Gaspool
AVTP
PSV
PEG-N-
PEG-SW
AOC
NordpoolGas
PEG-S-
European Gas Hub Development
Rationale for study
Each new hub tries to reinvent services to market, incurring unnecessary costs for them and for traders
1. Develop best practice model for creating a successful virtual trading point
2. Benchmark Europe’s existing hubs and recommend improvements
3. Work with local EFET Task Forces to apply best practice model at evolving
VTPs
EFET Hub Development Group Project
We are here
SpainTurkey(Greece)Poland
Local balancing markets also required but not all are shown
16IGG
Scoring mechanism
Responsible party What should be done Scoring mechanism
NRA Establish a consultation mechanism 1 if group set up and English language
TSO Entry-exit system established ½ for Entry Exit; 1 if a single VTP
TSO Title Transfer
TSO Cashout rules
TSO Accessible to non-physical traders 1 if trade without signup to physical rules
TSO Firmness of hub 0 if not firm; ½ if firmness “managed” by TSO; 1 if BUBD; 2 if fully market-based
TSO Credit arrangements non-punitive
NRA Resolve market structural issues (defined role for historical player) ½ for release etc; 1 if market maker
NRA Role of Hub operator 1 – role defined; 2 – gov’nce addressed
NRA Agree regulatory jurisdiction if cross border 0 if cross border and no agreement; 1 if not cross border or does have agreement
Market Establish a reference price at the hub for contract settlement 1 if price always available; ½ if deemed
Market Standardised contract 1 if specialised contract – EFET or equivalent (or standard is sufficient)
Market Price Reporting Agencies at the hub 1 if several’ ½ if only one PRA
Market Commercial / Voluntary market makers
Market Brokers 1 if voice or few ; 2 if systems and many
NRA Establishment of exchange 1 if exchange appointed and hub is liquid; ½ if exchange appointed and hub illiquid
Market Index becomes reliable and used as benchmark 1 if Market parties frequently requested
17IGG
Hub development scores (2014 Q1)
0
5
10
15
20
25
NB
PT
TF
Zee
-bea
chZ
TP
Gas
pool
PE
Gs
NC
GA
ustr
ian
VT
PP
SV
GT
F (
DK
)C
ZA
OC
UD
N (
TU
)G
RH
VP
(H
U)
Pol
and
SK
RO
Mib
gas
BU
Are
a D
Major
Illiquid
Future
Other
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Major
Illiquid
Future
Other
02468
101214161820
Con
sulta
tion
Ent
ry-e
xit
Titl
e T
rans
fer
Cas
hout
rul
es
Pur
e tr
ader
s
Firm
ness
Cre
dit
Rol
e fo
r hi
stor
ic
Hub
Ope
rato
r
Cro
ss-b
orde
r
Ref
eren
ce p
rice
Sta
ndar
dise
d…
PR
As
Mar
ket m
aker
s
Bro
kers
Exc
hang
e
Inde
x
NRA
TSO
Market
Measures split between in sequence / out of sequence
0
5
10
15
20
25
EFET
ICIS
Source: ICIS for Tradability Index and maturity definitionsRaw scores by trading hub
Measures completed across all hubs
18IGG
-
NBP
ZEE
TTF
NCG
Gaspool
AVTP
PSV
PEG-N-
PEG-SW
AOC
NordpoolGas
PEG-S-
Regional Hubs and pricing zones
Suggestions for emergence of regional markets
a) Build on NC BAL implementation, which implies that every MS needs to have a local balancing market.
b) Make sure that capacity rights for Entry/Exit systems give fully firm access from one VTP to the next.
c) Promote the other conditions that will allow some forward trading to take place, even if liquidity is low.
d) Help market areas to merge where that is supported by market participants and/or TSOs
Facilitate hubs and allow prices to converge according to market demand
Possible areas of price convergence ?
IGG 19
INTRODUCING EFET
IBERIAN GAS GROUP -EFET
GAS HUB DEVELOPMENT IN EUROPE
FINAL CONCLUSIONS
Agenda
IGG 20
FINAL CONCLUSIONS FOR THE IBERIAN HUB
A change of model is needed. This new model needs t o be in line with the European markets harmonization process.
IGG offers its help on the market design process� It’s necessary to create a transition or evolution in the current gas system, in
order to create market reliability: Improving Infor mation> Reliability> Increased liquidity
� Such transition can be achieved through a range of options and transitional arrangements
� All actors must be involved in this process: market participants, TSOs and Regulators
We should all strive for the shared goal of: � A unique balance zone, with no feasibility analysis� Within a single Iberian "market area“.
A fair and efficiently organized market is key for a successful process
IGG 21
European Federation of Energy Traders
Tel: +31 (0)20 5207970Email: [email protected]
www.efet.org
22IGG
Annex
� annex
23IGG
Next steps
� Study is known to be incomplete – must decide what criteria to refine (e.g.
information transparency?) and how often to update
� Draw up recommendations for markets in the order of interest to market
participants
� Offer support to EFET national / regional task forces and open consultation
programmes
� Most common “next steps” for illiquid hubs�Establish a consultation process accessible in English language
� Implement Entry-Exit regimes with a (preferably) single virtual trading point
�Ensure the VTP is firm – through market based rules, with a transparent reference cashout price
�Make sure the roles of TSO, hub operator, exchange etc are clearly defined with appropriate
governance arrangements
� Continue to work on other market-opening measures in addition to hub
design
24IGG