Inspection Findings and PI Summary

Through 4QO0

..:EI:

Topics

"* PI Results/Trends

"* Findings Results

"* Cross Cutting Issues Results

"- Summary Observations

I

Industry Average

Unplanned Scrams per 7000 Critical Hours

3Q99 4Q99 1Q00 2Q00 3Q00

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

-- Percent of Green-White Threshold

1Q99 2Q99 4Q00

1 . :4!:"mo m "01• .•• !

Industry Average

Unplanned Power Changes per 7000 Critical Hours

2Q99 3Q99 4Q99 1Q00 2Q00 3Q00

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

-O-Percent of Green-White Threshold

NEI

IQ99 4Q00

Industry Average

Safety System Unavailability - Emerg. Power

1Q99 2Q99 3Q99 4Q99 1Q00 2Q00 3Q00 4Q00

../............................... ...........

2o%/ 0..... ................. .... . .~ . . . . . .*. .... ~ . .******

. ........ .. ... .......

60%

80%

100z

-- Percent of Green-White Threshold

gil

Industry Average

Safety System Unavailability - High Pressure Injection

2Q99 3Q99 4Q99 1Q00 2Q00 3Q00

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

-e--Percent of Green-White Threshold

?�II

1Q99 4Q00

Industry Average

Safety System Unavailability - Heat Removal

2Q99 3Q99 4Q99 1 Q00 2Q00 3Q00

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

-- Percent of Green-White Threshold

...::."Iýý

1Q99 4Q00

Industry Average

Safety System Unavailability - RHR

1Q99 2Q99 3Q99 4Q99 1Q00 2Q00 3Q00 4Q00

0%

20%

40%

60%

8 0 % .................

100%

-O--Percent of Green-White Threshold

M..l

Industry Average

Safety System Functional Failures

3Q99 4Q99 1Q00 2Q00

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

-e- Percent of Green-White Threshold

.JII:

.0

1Q99 2Q99 3Q00 4Q00

Emergency Preparedness Performance Indicators

Percent of Green-White Threshold

2Q99 3Q99 4Q99 1Q00 2Q00 3Q00

-- i-Drill-Exercise Performance --O-ERO Participation

--O-Aiert Notification System

N•..i•.Il

1Q99 4Q00

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

PIOqSOJY.L 0;!qM-u98J9JO;w3Jed-.-O

%OOIt

%08,

%09

000C O000 0001' 660V~ 660C 660Z

xOPul e03ueWJOIJGd Iuawdinb3 Aliin:)aS uajV Pa1301o~

OI3EIGAV Aulsnpul

O000V 6613

... ...............

Non-Green P1 Results

30

25

20

15

10

5-

/

/

Region I Region 2 Region 3 Region 4 Industry

I

PI Conclusions

"* Data can be reported timely and accurately

"- Apparent correlation with cross-cutting issues

"- Has resulted in performance improvements by focusing on problem areas (Scrams w/ LONHR, Unplanned Power Changes, EP and Security)

Green Findings Per Unit

Region 1 Region 2 Region 3 Region 4 Industry

I 0 9 8 7

6 5

4 3 2 1 0

Green Findings Distribution

60

50

40

30

20

10

0 --- F-~

0-5 5-10 10-15 15-20 >20

Significant Inspection Findings Totals

25

20

15

10

5-

/

[/

L/

l/

/

Region I Region 2 Region 3 Region 4 IndustryN E:::"I.

Summary By Action Matrix Outcomes

801

70-

60

50

40

30

20

10

0-Lic.

Resp.Reg. Resp.

Degr. Corn.

Mdegr. Corn.

E % Units

* %Green FIN I %>Green FIN E %>Green PI

. ........

No Color Findings Per Unit

3.5

3

2.5

2

01 0.5 ~

0 ,: ; ;, /4

Region I Region 2 Region 3 Region 4 Industry

I

Cross-Cutting Green Findings 30-1

Region 1

Region 2

Region Region3 4

25

20

15

10-

5

0-

SHuman Perf

0 Procedures

El Corr. Action

Cross-Cutting No-Color Findings 30

25

20

15- 1 Hum=

M Proc 10 *.

10 D Corr. vm7 .

5.,,.

Region Region Region Region 1 2 3 4

~I..IJEI

an Perf

edures

Action

Cross-Cutting Issues By Action Matrix

70

60

50

40

30

20

10-

0-Lic.

Resp.Reg.

Resp.Degr. Corn.

IMdegr. Corn.

m % Units

E % CAP FIN D% HP FIN

Inspection Conclusions"* Inspection procedures are more objective

and risk-informed

"* Scope of inspections not much different but outcomes are more risk-informed

"* Less licensee time spent responding to low value issues (Level IV violations)

"* Dialogue between licensee and NRC focused on safety

..EI::::!'..

Summary of Observations

"* Combination of PIs and Inspection Findings able to discern performance differences

"* Findings in Corrective Action area correlate with Action Matrix results

"* Findings in Human Performance DO NOT correlate with Action Matrix results

.-El