Insights from the Industry’s Energy Efficiency Barometer · Insights from the Industry’s Energy...

Insights from the Industry’s Energy Efficiency BarometerStefan M. Buettner

Institute for Energy Efficiency in Production / EEPThursday, 01 October 2015

2

A HUB FOR INDUSTRIAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY

EEP - The Institute for Energy Efficiency in Production

3

aware-ness

topics/challenges

measures/solutions

implementation

3

4

International partnership for Energy Efficiency Cooperation Indicators and Data International Best Practice (Industry) EE in Industry and EE Finance

G20 Energy Efficiency Action Plan (through ipeec) Industrial Energy Management Finance Electricity Generation

Sustainable Energy for AllAccelerator for Energy Efficiency in

Industry

Energy Efficiency Index/Barometer of the Industry informing legislators on instruments advising companies informing financial institutions measuring impact

Energy Efficiency Financial Institutions Group

Drivers for Investment into Energy Efficiency in Buildings and Industry

4

Energy-Policy, -Strategyand -Finance

National Stakeholder

Platform Energy Efficiency (PfEE)

5

Driving Energy Productivity, securing energy supply & energy security

Objectives Topics

Clean Air/ Emissions Climate Change Energy Productivity Energy security Structural Change

Energy Management Data Gap Skills Finance Policy Systems & Scale Innovation Risks Shocks Culture, Geography

5

6

Increasingenergy

efficiency

Reducingspecific net

energy demand

Use of beneficialenergy sources

Avoidingunnecessaryconsumption

Energy recovery

Increasing theefficiency of

energyconverters

Sauer & Losert, 2013

7

Current efforts will just induce savings of 51 PJ each electrical and thermal energy

Overall possible saving potential which can be economically tapped has a value of 160 PJ (electric) and 111 PJ (thermal)

[BMWi 2010 c; Schlomann et al. 2011]

51.0 51.0

109.060.3

100.8

265.0

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

electricity saving objectivesGerman government

thermal energy saving objectivesGerman government

Ener

gy s

avin

g po

tent

ial [

PJ]

business as usual potential economic potential

Energy saving potential of German industry-majority of efficiency potential is left unexploited

5

8

20

67

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

2020

2030

billion €cumulated cost savingst (2009) capital investment

An investment of 5 billion € would return 20 billion € by 2020, adding another 3 billion € by 2030 would yield total savings of 67 billion €

Other studies suggest that investments of 24 billion € could induce a return of 100 billion € by 2050

[BMWi 2010]

Energy saving potentials could lead to high monetarysavings

9

Unleashing action towards increasing energy efficiency in industry

requires: comparable, objective information to reduce unknowns

and to reduce risks

To inform companies where they are and what they can do

To inform legislators if their instruments are effective and what type of

instruments are required

To enable financial institutions to assess risk & potential better and to

show up what financial instruments are lacking

To asses effect of implementation programs & pilot schemes

The Energy Efficiency Barometer of the IndustryUnderstanding the demand side of energy efficiency

10

http://centaurigw.ipa.fraunhofer.de/teei/questionnaire.php

11Source: EEP – Energy Efficiency Index 2. Survey 2014

Allocation


Allocation

27.4%

36.1% 37.0%

56.7%

72.6%

63.9% 63.0%

43.3%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

microenterprises small enterprises medium enterprises big enterprises

Energy efficiency is

the main driver forinvestments

a side effect of otherinvestments

13

Allocation of enterprise size : 17 % micro enterprises, 23 % small enterprises, 29 % medium enterprises, 31 % large enterprises

Source: EEP – Energy Efficiency Index 1. Survey 2015

34%

27%24%

17%

7%9%

14%12%

27%

37%

40%39%

6%

9% 10%13%

14% 14%

10%

18%

3% 2% 2% 2%

10%

2%

0% 0%0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

micro enterprises small enterprises medium enterprises large enterprises

The main drivers for energy efficiency in your company are: (multiple choice possible: n=367, answers=611)

buildings

infrastructure

production processes

organisation

overlapping

other

none

14



48%

31%

9%19%

16%

24%

26%

56%

16%

7%

35%

19%20%

38%30%

6%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


What average percentage increase in energy efficiency do you plan over the next 12 months [%]? (n=160)

> 10%

5% - 10%

> 0% - < 5%

0%


Allocation of enterprise size : 21% micro enterprises, 24% small enterprises, 27 % medium enterprises, 28% large enterprises

5%14%

40%

77%

3%

3%

9%

4%

0%

0%

3%

3%

0%

5%

6%

5%

2%

3%

2%

0%

3%

5%

7%

2%

83%

66%

21%

6%5% 5%

11%

2%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%


Which approach improving energy efficiency in your company do you apply?(n=322)

none

other

SpaEfV(Spitzenausgleich-Effizienzverordnung)Energieeffizienz-Netzwerk

Energieaudits nachDIN EN 16247

EMAS

ISO14001 plusEnergieanteil

ISO 50001

16

38.2%36.6%

21.9%

27.0%28.5%

26.8%

37.5% 37.8%

17.9%

23.2%

28.1%

21.6%

15.4%13.4% 12.5% 13.5%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

microenterprises small enterprises medium enterprises big enterprises

Did your achieve your efficiency targets in the past?

yes, completely

for the most part

partly

no


Allocation

17

15.5%

16.1%

8.6%

12.2%

24.6%

20.7%

37.1%

26.8%

16.2%

29.9%

34.3%

26.8%

43.7%

33.3%

20.0%

34.1%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

microenterprises

small enterprises

medium enterprises

big enterprises

We do not have any or enough skilled staff for planning and execution

fully applies applies does rather not apply does not apply


Allocation


Allocation

5.6%

0.0%

2.7%

2.5%

7.6%

10.6%

21.6%

17.5%

21.5%

20.0%

27.0%

32.5%

65.3%

69.4%

48.6%

47.5%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

microenterprises

small enterprises

medium enterprises

big enterprises

Concerns regarding production downtimes and product quality


19

11.7%

13.1%

16.7%

12.8%

23.4%

19.0%

25.0%

46.2%

23.4%

23.8%

33.3%

28.2%

41.6%

44.0%

25.0%

12.8%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

microenterprises

small enterprises

medium enterprises

big enterprises

The payback period is too long



Allocation

20

Companies that use the total cost of ownership (TCO) as evaluationcriterion implement significantly more efficiency measures

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

control concept for machinery shut-…

electric motors with variable speed…

use of high efficiency pumps

low-heat joining

Recovery of process- or motion heat

Combined heat, cold and powerFrequency of implemented measures in companies

companies using TCO approach companies not using TCO approachDiffusion Kostenmodelle [vgl. Schröter et al. 2009]

Industry – life cycle calculation as an alternative

21

11.3%

7.8%

6.1%

10.5%

18.8%

19.5%

18.2%

42.1%

18.8%

26.0%

45.5%

21.1%

51.1%

46.8%

30.3%

26.3%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

microenterprises

small enterprises

medium enterprises

big enterprises

Lacking subsidy programmes



Allocation

22

22.9%

22.9%

6.1%

10.3%

21.4%

26.5%

24.2%

35.9%

13.6%

10.8%

33.3%

25.6%

42.1%

39.8%

36.4%

28.2%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

microenterprises

small enterprises

medium enterprises

big enterprises

Application process for subsidies is too complicated and time consuming



Allocation

23



36%

41%

46%

53%

5% 5%8%

6%8%

16%

12%9%8%

5%3%

1%

8%7%

8%

5%

10%12%

11%

14%

23%

14%

8%

11%

1% 2%

5%

2%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%


Which type of incentive could motivate you most likely to invest in energy efficiency measures? (max. 2) (multiple choice possible: n=319, n'=454)

investmentgrant/investmentpremium

investment allowance

anticipated/degressivedepreciation

deduction of specialexpenses for singlecompanies

reduced VAT rate onenergy efficient goodssales

relief of approvalprocedures /deregulation

other

none

24

Describing the ways forwards to drive industrial energy efficiency: Describing actual energy efficiency potentials and lifting them through

policy, entrepreneurial and financial interventions more and more accurately

Comparing performance of sectors across geographies rather than accumulated country data.

Reducing unknowns, risks & uncertainty in relation to energy efficiency interventions enabling sector-specific cross-country analyses

Equipping companies and legislators with insights on how and where to act

Making financial institutions & service providers aware of feasible projects and required funding mechanisms and services

25

Thank you very much for your attention!

Dipl.-Volksw. Stefan M. BuettnerHead of International Affairs & Strategy

EEP – Institute for Energy Efficiency in Production

+49 711 970 1156

+49 174 187 9120

+33 14057 66 99

[email protected]

[email protected]

www.eep.uni-stuttgart.de

Contact details

26

Backup

27

A HUB FOR INDUSTRIAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY

EEP - The Institute for Energy Efficiency in Production

28

Positioning of the InstituteEnergy Efficiency in Production

Educating the society and politics on the basis of numbers, facts and

figures

Development of technologies for

implementation of energy efficiency

measures in industry

Promote the implementation of

technologies to increase energy efficiency

MISSIONDevelopment, Optimization and Evaluation of Technologies for the Implementation of

Energy Efficiency Measures in Production, in Elementary Research and in the Industrial Application

SERVICE TO SOCIETY

EEP was established and is supported by

29

EEP – The Hub for Energy Efficiency in Industry

Efficiency Technologies

Industrial Smart Grids


Urban Production

CHP-integrated technologies Storage technologies DSM-able technologies

Energy efficient and energy flexible systems Integration of controls, generation, distribution,

storage and use

Energetic interconnection of production and districts Energy concepts & strategies for industry estates

Energy efficiency index/barometer of Industry Financing EE / Business models for EE National & International Engagement

30

Policy- and strategy advice (local, regional, international): Optimization of supply- and regulation: evaluation and suggestion of

precisely fitting policy-, financing- and risk heding measures to enhanceenergy efficiency in the industry

Optimzation of demand: impact analysis of energy efficiencyenhancement programmes in the industrial context in order to developfeasible business- and financing models

Providing and objective as well as comparable transnational and crosssectoral decision base for governments, NGO´s, companies, etc.

Accompanying of stakeholder processes of energy efficiency

Assessing impact of pilot and implementation schemes


Insights from the Industry’s Energy Efficiency Barometer · Insights from the Industry’s Energy...

Documents

Transcript of Insights from the Industry’s Energy Efficiency Barometer · Insights from the Industry’s Energy...