Inquiry by: Rosemarie T. nayve 2p-bio
Transcript of Inquiry by: Rosemarie T. nayve 2p-bio
Inquiry education (sometimes known as the
inquiry method) is a student-centered
method of education focused on asking
questions. Students are encouraged to ask
questions which are meaningful to them, and
which do not necessarily have easy answers;
teachers are encouraged to avoid giving
answers when this is possible, and in any
case to avoid giving direct answers in favor
of asking more question.
• Self-confidence in their learning ability
• Pleasure in problem solving
• A keen sense of relevance
• Reliance on their own judgment over other people's or society's
• No fear of being wrong
• No haste in answering
• Flexibility in point of view
• Respect for facts, and the ability to distinguish between fact and opinion
• No need for final answers to all questions, and comfort in not knowing an answer to difficult questions rather than settling for a simplistic answer
• They avoid telling students what they "ought to know".
• They talk to students mostly by questioning, and especially by asking divergent questions.
• They do not accept short, simple answers to questions.
• They encourage students to interact directly with one another, and avoid judging what is said in student interactions.
• They do not summarize students' discussion.
• They do not plan the exact direction of their lessons in advance, and allow it to develop in response to students' interests.
• Their lessons pose problems to students.
• They gauge their success by change in students' inquiry behaviors (with the above characteristics of "good learners" as a goal).
One of the advantages of teaching
inquiry is that through the
development of their own queries
and skills, they could link their
questions to their every day lives
and in that way, they could easily
learn new things since they can
relate to whatever they have
developed asking.
advantage for students who are not
the type who loves to read long texts
on books. Because of the hands-on
development of investigations, it
would be interesting for a student who
does not have the attention span to sit
and read books for hours. Those long
unbearable hours of trying to
understand each lesson in a textbook
could be the reason why a student is
categorized as a low-achiever. Schools
that have been using inquiry teaching
have reported that this method of
teaching has created wonderful results
out of low-achiever students.
This method of teaching could also be
an advantage for the educational
system issues pertaining to the racism
and the gender inequities. Studies
showed that educators who was
trained to do inquiry teaching was
more successful in maximizing the
students potential when it comes to
learning the subjects at hand. Teaching
inquiry is the key to the problems
about not giving fair equal education
that the American system could not
offer to all of the races or in both
genders.
Teaching inquiry is a great way to
teach students who are culturally
challenged or those who are in need of
special attention. In other words,
students who do not possess the ability
to learn and understand a lesson right
away are said to have maximized their
potential through inquiry teaching.
Through the hands-on teaching,
students are more likely to relate
themselves through their own
experiences, which is why it is more
effective for them than the traditional
way of teaching
There are some disadvantages associated with the use of the inquiry method of instruction used in isolation. It has been established that in an inquiry based classroom the teacher’s role is mainly that of a facilitator. Many of them experience interactional difficulty with their students. Teachers also face lots of difficulties in channeling and maintaining the interest of students as they engage themselves in inquiry activities and try to derive appropriate conclusions about nature (Bencze, 2009).
They need to be specifically trained in
methods that will enhance their abilities to
use directives in a polite form and
strategically share authority with their
students while at the same time
maintaining their authority in the
classroom. This would call for careful
planning. Careful planning and preparation
is also required for adequate content
information to be imparted to students,
which makes it difficult for some science
topic to be taught using the inquiry method
(Robertson, 2007).
It is possible for students to forget facts
given as rote memorization which is
sometimes used as method of imparting
information. Dewey was disturbed to see
rote memorization and mechanical
routine practices in science classroom.
This method of imparting information can
be done when using the direct instruction
method of teaching
The danger with this practice is
that there is no foundation of
knowledge built which the child
can draw from in the event that
he/she forgets the memorized
knowledge. Their process skills
and abilities to make judgment
would not have been significantly
developed (Wang & Wen, 2010;
Vandervoort, 1983).
• Principle 1. The teacher understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures of the discipline(s) he or she teaches and can create learning experiences that make these aspects of subject matter meaningful for students.
• Principle 2. The teacher understands how children learn and develop and can provide learning opportunities that support their intellectual, social, and personal development (Effective Learning and How Students Learn).
• Principle 3. The teacher understands how
students differ in their approaches to learning
and creates instructional opportunities that are
adapted to diverse learners (How Students
Learn and Teaching Special Needs Students).
• Principle 4. The teacher understands and
uses a variety of instructional strategies to
encourage students' development of critical
thinking, problem-solving, and performance
skills (Lesson Methodologies and Problem
Solving).
• Principle 5. The teacher uses an understanding of individual and group motivation and behavior to create a learning environment that encourages positive social interaction, active engagement in learning, and self-motivation (What Is Cooperative Learning, and What Does It Do? and Motivating Your Students).
• Principle 6. The teacher uses knowledge of effective verbal, nonverbal, and media communication techniques to foster active inquiry, collaboration, and supportive interaction in the classroom (Lesson Methodologies and Levels of Questions).
• Principal 7. The teacher plans instruction
based on knowledge of subject matter,
students, the community, and curriculum goals
(Lesson Plans: Using Objectives and The
Question of Homework).
• Principle 8. The teacher understands and
uses formal and informal assessment strategies
to evaluate and ensure the continuous
intellectual, social, and physical development
of the learner (Categories of Evaluation).
• Principle 9. The teacher is a reflective
practitioner who continually evaluates the
effects of his or her choices and actions on
others (students, parents, and other
professionals in the learning community) and
who actively seeks out opportunities to grow
professionally.
• Principle 10. The teacher fosters
relationships with school colleagues, parents,
and agencies in the larger community to support
students' learning and well-being (Special
Projects, Special Events).
There are many options for using historic places in methods instruction and a broad array of possible lessons/lectures professors might incorporate into their courses (see "'The Place of Place'" and a Sample Methods Course Outline). But thinking of historic places as 3-dimensional primary sources suggests the value of using places to prepare novice teachers to teach inquiry, also referred to as problem solving. The following sample lesson focuses most particularly on the inquiry process in history – a perennial methods topic across grade levels in U.S. methods courses (see Session Four in the Methods Course Outline).
1. To introduce a model of history/social science inquiry
2. To examine the role of evidence and the nature and use of primary sources in inquiry
3. To discuss historic places as sources of two-dimensional and three-dimensional primary sources
4. To consider what different primary sources contribute to building inferences and testing hypotheses in the inquiry process
5. To demonstrate the use of a historic place to carry out an inquiry exercise
6. To catalogue what a teacher needs to know and do to prepare for the use of places in historical inquiry
Introduce Steps in the Inquiry Method
A standard model for inquiry in history/social science is as follows:
A. Describe the Problem (What needs to be explained; the problem is often a puzzling question or other kind of
discrepant situation that must be resolved.
B. Generate Hypotheses (Educated guesses that provide possible explanations)
C. Test the Hypotheses (Use evidence to confirm or refute hypotheses and to generate new hypotheses)
D. Formulate a Tentative Conclusion (What is our tentative explanation or resolution of the problem, based on the
available evidence?)
A. Key to the inquiry process is the search and analysis of evidence and the making of inferences based
on the evidence.
B. Historians and other social scientists draw evidence from primary sources.
C. Primary sources (“original sources”) are materials (documents, artifacts, buildings, and the like) that were
produced during the historical time period being examined and provide first-hand descriptions of places
and events; secondary sources provide commentary or interpretation of primary sources and are derived from
original sources. Provide a couple of examples of each.
D. Historic places offer a range of primary sources with which students can make inferences and draw
conclusions about historical events and times.
Traditional primary documents
1. Letters, diaries, maps, newspapers,
public records, artifacts
2. Analyzing traditional primary
documents: see
http://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/
worksheets/ for worksheets used to analyze
documents
A. Use an existing TWHP lesson plan to demonstrate how a variety of evidence types presented (2-D documents,
maps, architectural drawings, and visuals of the place) work together to allow students to formulate and test
inferences and draw tentative conclusions about a historical question. (List of all TwHP Lesson Plans)
1. Present a photograph, map, or other piece of evidence from the historic place that generates a problem to be
solved or a circumstance to be explained.
2. Based on what students see/read, generate several hypotheses.
3. Provide additional pieces of evidence from that historic place that allow students to test the plausibility of
these hypotheses.
4. Allow students to construct a tentative conclusion that solves the problem or provides a valid explanation
based on the evidence.
A. Here are questions that a teacher must ask in advance of an inquiry lesson:
1. What is the problem to be solved, the situation to be explained, or the puzzle to be unraveled? For example,
what explains the different street patterns in different parts of our city? Why were the earliest mills in America
built where they were? What was daily life like in colonial New England village? How did towns and aspiring
cities in the Midwest and Great Plains attract settlers and businesses?
2. Based on current scholarship, what are reasonable conclusions one can reach with respect to the inquiry
problem? What are competing conclusions about which historians disagree?
3. On what evidence are these conclusions based?
4. How can I make this evidence accessible to my students, in the form of 2-D and 3-D primary documents –
accessible in the multiple senses of “proximity” (is it a place that can be visited), “retrievable” (is it a document
or an artifact that is available for examination/use) and “understandable” (for example, is the language of the
document comprehensible to my students)?
5. Is there an initial document, artifact, model, photograph, map, or physical setting can I present to students that:
a. will generate an awareness of the problem,
b. will spark interest in constructing an explanation that resolves the problem, and
c. will prompt students to propose several testable hypotheses for which additional evidence can
be brought to bear?
6. How shall I make that additional evidence available to students in a way that will help them analyze the
evidence, make inferences from the evidence, and test hypotheses leading to a well-reasoned tentative
conclusion?
7. In short, the teacher works backwards from the tentative conclusions to the evidence that is accessible to students. The teacher makes that evidence available to students, who can use it to test hypotheses and develop tentative conclusions (and perhaps also generate additional questions worthy of further
investigation).
A. Have students search the National Register online database for local places on the National Register.
B. Students can search for TWHP lesson plans that might be appropriate to use or adapt for their final unit plans.
C. With a partner, identify a place in the community that may be historically significant (even if not listed in the
National Register of Historic Places) and conduct a small research project on its history and significance.
Include the kinds of evidence you examined and how they supported your conclusions.
D. Using the resources described above, and others, plan for a field study in your local area that demonstrates the
kinds of evidence that place can provide in historical inquiry. This will allow your students to apply what they’ve
learned about using place in the inquiry process.
A. Provide students with two or three hypotheses about a given historic place and have students
1. identify a variety of primary sources (both 2-D and 3-D) that could be used to test the hypotheses and
2. explain how these sources could be used to support or refute each hypothesis.
B. Have students select a historic place, either locally or from the National Register database and construct an
inquiry lesson that uses sources from that place to make inferences and test hypotheses.
C. Have students select a lesson plan from the TWHP lesson database and identify the steps of the inquiry
process that are implicit in the lesson.