Innovator’s Dilemma final
-
Upload
rakshit-sinha -
Category
Documents
-
view
223 -
download
0
Transcript of Innovator’s Dilemma final
-
8/2/2019 Innovators Dilemma final
1/17
InnovatorsDilemma
By Clayton
M. Christensen
Presented By
Rutu Shah
Khushboo Kothari
-
8/2/2019 Innovators Dilemma final
2/17
InnovationThe word innovation derives from the Latin word innovatus, which is the
noun form of innovare to renew or change.
Innovation is the creation of better or more effective products, processes,
services, technologies, or ideas that are accepted by markets, governments, and
society.
Innovation differs from invention in that innovation refers to the use of a new
idea or method, whereas invention refers more directly to the creation of
the idea or method itself.
The act of introducing something new (the american heritage dictionary)
A new idea, method or device (Webster online)
Change that creates a new dimension ofperformance (Peter Drucker)
-
8/2/2019 Innovators Dilemma final
3/17
InnovationThe ability to deliver new value to a customer (Jose Campos)
Innovation is the way of transforming the resources of an enterprise through
the creativity of people into new resources and wealth (Paul Schumann)
Seminal researcher Gabriel Tarde defined the innovation-decision process as a
series of steps that includes:
First knowledge
Forming an attitude
A decision to adopt or reject
Implementation and use
Confirmation of the decision
-
8/2/2019 Innovators Dilemma final
4/17
Types of InnovationSustaining Innovation
An innovation that does not affect existing markets.
Evolutionary Innovation
An innovation that improves a product in an existing market in ways that
customers are expecting. (E.g., fuel injection)
Revolutionary Innovation - (discontinuous, radical)
An innovation that is unexpected, but nevertheless does not affect existing
markets. (E.g., the automobile)
Disruptive Innovation
An innovation that creates a new market by applying a different set of values,
which ultimately (and unexpectedly) overtakes an existing market. (E.g., the
lower priced Ford Model T)
-
8/2/2019 Innovators Dilemma final
5/17
Disruptive InnovationChristensen argues that disruptive innovations can hurt successful, well
managed companies that are responsive to their customers and have excellentresearch and development. These companies tend to ignore the markets most
susceptible to disruptive innovations, because the markets have very tight
profit margins and are too small to provide a good growth rate to and
established (sizable) firm. Thus disruptive technology provides an example of
when the common business-world advice to "focus on the customer" ("stay
close to the customer", "listen to the customer") can sometimes be strategically
counterproductive.
Christensen distinguishes between "low-end disruption" which targetscustomers who do not need the full performance valued by customers at the
high end of the market and "new-market disruption" which targets customers
who have needs that were previously unserved by existing incumbents.
-
8/2/2019 Innovators Dilemma final
6/17
Disruptive InnovationLow-End Disruption
At the low end of the market, are the customers who would want topurchase a product with less, but good enough, performance if they could
pay a lower price?
Can a business model be created which allows for attractive profits at the
price needed to win the business of these customers?
New-Market Disruption
Is there a large group of potential customers who have not historically had
the resources to do this thing for themselves and have gone without it or
have needed to pay someone else to provide it to them?
To use the current product or service, do customers need to go to aninconvenient, centralized location?
l d di i
-
8/2/2019 Innovators Dilemma final
7/17
How low end disruption occurs over
time
H l d di i
-
8/2/2019 Innovators Dilemma final
8/17
How low end disruption occurs over
time"Low-end disruption" occurs when the rate at which products improve exceeds
the rate at which customers can adopt the new performance. Therefore, atsome point the performance of the product overshoots the needs of certain
customer segments. At this point, a disruptive technology may enter the market
and provide a product which has lower performance than the incumbent but
which exceeds the requirements of certain segments, thereby gaining a
foothold in the market.
In low-end disruption, the disruptor is focused initially on serving the least
profitable customer, who is happy with a good enough product. This type of
customer is not willing to pay premium for enhancements in productfunctionality. Once the disruptor has gained foot hold in this customer
segment, it seeks to improve its profit margin. To get higher profit margins, the
disruptor needs to enter the segment where the customer is willing to pay a
little more for higher quality.
-
8/2/2019 Innovators Dilemma final
9/17
How low end disruption occurs over
time
To ensure this quality in its product, the disruptor needs to innovate. Theincumbent will not do much to retain its share in a not so profitable segment,
and will move up-market and focus on its more attractive customers. After a
number of such encounters, the incumbent is squeezed into smaller markets
than it was previously serving. And then finally the disruptive technology
meets the demands of the most profitable segment and drives the established
company out of the market.
"New market disruption" occurs when a product fits a new or emerging market
segment that is not being served by existing incumbents in the industry.
-
8/2/2019 Innovators Dilemma final
10/17
ExampleInnovation Disrupted
Market
Notes
8 inch
floppy disk
drive
5.25 inch
floppy disk
drive
3.5 inch
floppy disk
drive
CDs and
USB flash
drives
14 inch
floppy
disk drive
8 inch
floppy
disk drive
5.25 inch
floppy
disk drive
3.5 inch
floppy
disk drive
The floppy disk drive market has had unusually large
changes in market share over the past fifty years.
According to Clayton M. Christensen's research, the
cause of this instability was a repeating pattern of
disruptive innovations. For example, in 1981, the old
8 inch drives (used in mini computers) were "vastly
superior" to the new 5.25 inch drives (used in desktop
computers).However, 8 inch drives were not affordable
for the new desktop machines. The simple 5.25 inch
drive, assembled from technologically inferior "off-the-
shelf" components, was an "innovation" only in the sensethat it was new. However, as this market grew and the
drives improved, the companies that manufactured them
eventually triumphed while many of the existing
manufacturers of eight inch drives fell behind.
i i h l h h
-
8/2/2019 Innovators Dilemma final
11/17
A Disruptive Technology Change : The
5.25 inch Winchester Disk Drive
(1981)Attribute 8Inch Drives
(Minicomputer Market)
5.25Inch Drives
(Desktop Computer
Market)
Capacity (Megabytes) 60 10
Physical Volume (cubic
inches)
566 150
Weight (pounds) 21 6
Access Time
(milliseconds)
30 160
Cost per megabyte $50 $200
Unit Cost $3000 $2000
-
8/2/2019 Innovators Dilemma final
12/17
ExamplesEstablished Technology Disruptive Technology
Wireline Telephony Mobile Telephony
Standard textbooks Custom-assembled, modular digital
textbooks
Open Surgery Arthroscopic and endoscopic surgery
Cardiac surgery Angioplasty
Offset printing Digital PRINTING
Printed greeting cards Free greeting cards, downloadable over
the internet
Graduate school of management Corporate universities and in-house
management training programs
Classroom and campus-based
instruction
Distance education, typically enabled by
the internet
-
8/2/2019 Innovators Dilemma final
13/17
Examples
Established Technology Disruptive Technology
Analogue Radio Transistor Radio
Desktop Calculators Pocket Calculators
Cathod Ray Tube (CRT) LCD TV
Integrated Steel Mills Minimills
(The minimill technology used scrap,put it in a furnace and made new steel.
This was cheap and low quality steel.
The integrated steel companies were
more than happy to get rid of this low
margin business and instead focus on
high end. So they did, but slowly and
steadily, the minimill technology
offered better steel quality and captured
segment after segment. Eventually
integrated steel mills started to suffer
badly.)
-
8/2/2019 Innovators Dilemma final
14/17
Principles of Disruptive TechnologyCompanies depend on customers and investors for resources
In order to survive, companies must provide customers and investors with the
products, services and the profit that require. The highest performing
companies, therefore, have well-developed systems for killing ideas that their
customers dont want. As a result, these companies find it very difficult to
invest adequate resources in disruptive technologieslower margin
opportunities that their customers dont wantuntil their customers want
them. And by then it is too late.
Markets that dont exist cant be analyzed
Sound market research and good planning followed by execution according toplan are the hallmarks of good management. But companies whose investment
processes demand quantification of market size and financial returns before
they can enter a market get paralyzed when faced with disruptive technologies
because they demand data on markets that dont yet exist
-
8/2/2019 Innovators Dilemma final
15/17
Principles of Disruptive TechnologyTechnology supply may not equal market demand
Although disruptive technologies can initially be used only in small markets,
they eventually become competitive in mainstream markets. This is because
the pace of technological progress often exceeds the rate of improvement that
mainstream customers want or can absorb. As a result the products that are
currently in the mainstream eventually will overshoot the performance that
mainstream markets demand, while the disruptive technologies that
underperform relative to customer expectations in the mainstream market
today may become directly competitive tomorrow. Once two or more products
are offering adequate performance, customers will find another criteria for
choosing. There criteria tend to move toward reliability, convenience, andprice, all of which are areas in which the newer technologies often have
advantages.
-
8/2/2019 Innovators Dilemma final
16/17
Principles of Disruptive TechnologySmall markets dont solve the growth needs of large companies
To maintain share prices and create internal opportunities for their employees,
successful companies need to grow. It isnt necessary that they increase their
growth rates, but they must maintain them. And as they get larger, they need
increasing amounts of new revenue just to maintain the same growth rate.
Therefore, it becomes progressively more difficult for them to enter the newer,
smaller markets that are destined to become the large markets of the future. To
maintain their growth rates, they must focus on large markets.
Ad i t f d ith
-
8/2/2019 Innovators Dilemma final
17/17
Advice to managers faced with
disruptive technologiesGive responsibility for disruptive technologies to organizations whose
customers need them so that resources flow with them.
Set up a separate organization small enough to get excited by small gains.
Plan for failure. Dont bet all your resources on being right the first time.Think of your initial efforts at commercializing disruptive technology as
learning opportunities. Make revisions as you gather data.
Dont count on breakthroughs. Move ahead early and find the market for the
current attributes of the technology. You will find it outside the current
mainstream market. You will also find that the attributes that make disruptive
technologies unattractive to mainstream markets are the attributes on which the
new markets will be built