Innovative practice

34
Peter Ree 22 nd March, 201 novative Practice C TL HE

description

This Innovative Practice session introduces learners on the PGCert at Edge Hill to notions of technology enhanced learning, and encourages participants to reflect and action plan to enhance their future practice.

Transcript of Innovative practice

Page 1: Innovative practice

Peter Reed22nd March, 2011

Innovative PracticePGC TL HE

Page 2: Innovative practice

Learning Outcomes

This session is aligned to all 5 learning outcomes for the module, but particularly LO2:

2. Critical reflection upon and justification of the selection and

deployment of technology to support learning in their specialist area/s

Reflections will feed into Action Plan

Page 3: Innovative practice

What we’re going to cover…

Technology Enhanced Learning

(TEL)

Introduction TEL & EHU

Student Expectations

ePedagogy

Online Discussion

Page 4: Innovative practice

What is elearning or TEL to you?

Page 5: Innovative practice

“Any online facility or system that directly supports learning and teaching. This may include a formal VLE, an institutional intranet that has a learning and teaching component, a system that has

been developed in-house or a particular suite of specific individual tools”

UCISA 2010 Survey

What is eLearning/TEL

Page 6: Innovative practice

“E-learning comprises all forms of electronically supported learning and teaching”

Wikipedia

What is eLearning/TEL

Page 7: Innovative practice

Benefits of TEL

Affords learners decisions around time, place and pace.

Cost

Recruitment/Retention

Skills & Employability

Student Achievement

Inclusion

Widening Participation

Page 8: Innovative practice

TEL at Edge Hill

eAdministration(Baseline)

Online Learning

Blended Learning

Page 9: Innovative practice

Do you have any experience of online learning and/or online teaching?

What tools/technologies? How was it used? Positives/Negatives?Can you see its potential?How many people on Facebook/Twitter?

Page 10: Innovative practice

Student Expectations of HE

As part of a Digital Ethnography course, over 200 students at Kansas

State University collaborated to summarise some of the most important characteristics of

students today – how they learn, what they need to learn, their goals, hopes, dreams, what their lives will be like, and what kinds of changes

they will experience in their lifetime.

Watch their video on YouTube

Page 11: Innovative practice

Student Expectations of HE - Activity

Use a 2x2 grid:• In groups, consider YOUR expectations of when you were a student, and compare against OUR STUDENTS’ expectations….

• What about the comparison in use of technology between us and our students…..

Your Expectations of HE & Tech Student Expectations of HE & Tech

Students Tech UseYour actual Tech Use

Page 12: Innovative practice

Student Expectations of HE - Activity

So what does this tell us? Is there a disconnect?

JISC Student Expectations Study - suggests technology should:

• Support established methods of teaching and administration;• Act as an additional resource for research and communication;• Be a core part of social engagement and facilitate f2f friendships at University

Page 13: Innovative practice

A Closer Look at Our Students

Edge Hill University Students eLearning Survey (Lindsey Martin, eLearning Strategy & Development Manager)

Nearly 75% - Bb at least 3 days a week

750 responses

80% access ‘a lot’ and find Bb ‘very important’

47% think Facebook could be used

Who here is on Facebook? And your Students?

Page 14: Innovative practice

A Closer Look at Our Students

But are they all tech savvy? – Prensky thinks so…

How many people can relate to this cartoon?

Marc Prensky (2001) introduced the concept of Digital Immigrants' and Digital Natives

http://www.doseofdigital.com/2009/04/healthcare-marketing-needs-some-digital-natives/

CIBER Report is on a similar wavelength

Page 15: Innovative practice

A Closer Look at Our Students

http://www.edgehill.ac.uk/solstice/Conference2009/Keynotes.htm

Page 16: Innovative practice

What we’re going to cover…

Technology Enhanced Learning

(TEL)

Introduction TEL & EHU

Student Expectations

ePedagogy

Online Discussion

Page 17: Innovative practice

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2Qg80MVvYs

Online Education and ePedagogy…

Watch this video of Bill Gates discussing in person education vs online education

In response to the shift towards online education, as well as more recent pressures of ‘Internationalising the Curriculum’ a number of ‘models’ have emerged to provide a framework for the development of online curricula…

Page 18: Innovative practice

Online Education and ePedagogy…

Distance education is changing from paper based methods.New models largely influenced by Social Learning theories: Social Constructivism & Communities of Practice

Page 19: Innovative practice

Online Education and ePedagogy…

1. The SOLSTICE Model

…blends theoretical and practical solutions to the development and use of technology within curriculum. It is based around three elements:

Concept: Purpose + Audience = Form

People: New Academic Teams

Place: Flexible Learning Spaces

Page 20: Innovative practice

Online Education and ePedagogy…

2. The Conceptualisation Cycle - Mayes & Fowler

Based on Social Learning Theories, Mayes & Fowler argue that TEL involves a cycle of Conceptualisation, Construction and Dialogue.

Conceptualisation: "refers to the users' initial contact with other peoples' concepts".

Construction: "refers to the process of building and combining concepts through their use in the performance of meaningful tasks."

Application: "the testing and tuning of conceptualisations through use in applied contexts".

Primary

Secondary

Tertiary

Page 21: Innovative practice

Online Education and ePedagogy…

3. The Conversational Model - Laurillard

A combination of conversation theory, constructivism and reflective practice

Involves Teacher – Student exchange of ideas/conceptsExperiential level – practice, test

Page 22: Innovative practice

Pedagogical Problems… Activity

Pedagogy should drive the implementation of any technological implementation – it should be fit-for-purpose.

•Read through the handout (pedagogical problems and technological solutions).

•Identify some pedagogical problems you think might be solved (or helped) by introducing some form of technology in your own practice.

Page 23: Innovative practice

Online Discussion

Who has experience (student or tutor) of online discussion?

Positive or negative? Why?

What has and has not worked for you?

Page 24: Innovative practice

Online Discussion

Subscription to Social Constructivism?

•What do we want to achieve? • Fit-for-purpose?• Meaningful Discourse?

•Gilbert & Dabbagh (2005) define ‘Meaningful Discourse’ as

Before we look at some good practice guidelines, let’s review the PGCert discussion boards….What Strategies could have been implemented?

“the ability of learners to demonstrate critical thinking skills by (a) relating course content to prior knowledge and experience, (b) interpreting content through the analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of others’ understanding, and (c) making inferences.”

Page 25: Innovative practice

Online Discussion – Good Practice

Check List for Good Practice:

•Welcome, develop ownership and an online learning community (of practice)

•Stress importance of discussion in learning

•Introduce reflection for learning activities

•Differentiation – must do, should do, could do (Atherton) or ‘Spark’ (Salmon)

•Embed discussion forums within/amongst content

•Structure activities to clearly ‘instruct’ learners to read, reflect, apply prior

knowledge and experience, and post! You could also instruct participant to

reply to posts.

Page 26: Innovative practice

Online Discussion – Good Practice - Reflection

Description - what happened?Feelings - What were you thinking and feeling?Evaluation? - What was good and bad about the experience?Analysis - What sense can you make out of the situation?Conclusion - What else could you have done?

Action plan - If it arose again what would you do?

Gibbs (1988) cyclical model of reflection cited in Ghaye and Lillyman (1997:26)

Page 27: Innovative practice

Online Behaviour – that 5 Stage Model thing…

Salmon’s 5 Stage Model relates to the incremental and progressive use of online discussion.

Model can be translated into different contexts, not just online discussion.

http://www.atimod.com/e-moderating/5stage.shtml

Page 28: Innovative practice

Online Behaviour – Contingency

Contingency in Tutoring (Wood and Wood, 1996)

Based on the premise:

“if the child succeeds, offer less help; if s/he gets into trouble, offer more help”

Align with ideas of ‘Weaving’ which involves summarising and synthesising the content of multiple responses, opposed to responding to individual posts.

Page 29: Innovative practice

Online Discussion

If we returned back to the PGCert discussion boards, what would you do to influence the discussion?

Page 30: Innovative practice

Conclusion…

Technology Enhanced Learning

(TEL)

Introduction TEL & EHU

Student Expectations

ePedagogy

Online Discussion

Page 31: Innovative practice

Action Plan

Assignment requires

‘critical review/reflection’

to

‘improve the activity you focused on’

and include

‘PD needs’

Take this opportunity to:•Reflect on your teaching episode•Begin an action plan relating to the use of technology in your practice (see handout for plan).

Page 32: Innovative practice

Activity

Online Discussion

Read the blog post & comments

‘Is it okay to be a technologically illiterate teacher’http://thefischbowl.blogspot.com/2007/09/is-it-okay-to-be-technologically.html

•Post your thoughts about the authors ideas. •Do you agree or disagree? And why?•Have you been ‘pushed’ into using technology? How did it feel?

Page 33: Innovative practice

References

Brown. T, et.al (2010) 2010 Survey of Technology Enhanced Learning for Higher Education in the UK. UCISA

CIBER Information Behaviour of the Research of the Future - http://www.ucl.ac.uk/infostudies/research/ciber/downloads/

JISC Exploring Tangible Benefits of eLearning - http://www.jiscinfonet.ac.uk/publications/info/tangible-benefits-publication

JISC Student Expectations Study - http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/research/2007/studentexpectations.aspx

Laurillard, D. (2002) Rethinking university teaching: a conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies (2nd ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer

Mayes, J.T. & Fowler, C.J.H. ‘Learning Technology and Usability: A Framework for Understanding Courseware’. Interacting With Computers 11, 485-497, 1999

Prensky. M (2001) Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon. 9 (5)

Wikipedia (eLearning definition) - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-learning

Page 34: Innovative practice

References for online discussion

Atherton, J. S (2009) Learning and Teaching; Must/should/could learn [On-line] UK: Available: Accessed: 29 July 2009 - http://www.learningandteaching.info/teaching/must_should_could.htm

Beaudoin, M (2002) Learning or lurking? Tracking the ‘invisible’ online student. Internet and higher Education 5 (2002) 147-155. Berge (1995) The Role of the Online Instructor/Facilitator - http://pre2005.flexiblelearning.net.au/guides/facilitation.html Gilbert, P & Dabbagh. N (2005) How to Structure Online Discussion for Meaningful Discourse: a case study. British Journal of Educational Technology Vol 36, No 1, 2005.

Salmon, G. (2000). E-Moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online. London: Kogan Page.

Salmon, G. (2002). E-Tivities: The key to active online learning. Oxford: RoutledgeFalmer.

Wood, D. & Wood, H. (1996) Vygotsky, Tutoring and Learning, Oxford Review of Education, 22(1), 5-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0305498960220101