Innovation_Audit_-_First_Feedback_from_SMEs_V3
-
Upload
linas-eriksonas -
Category
Documents
-
view
9 -
download
0
Transcript of Innovation_Audit_-_First_Feedback_from_SMEs_V3
Innovation Audit – First Feedback from SMEs: Analysis of Potential Innovation Index
Linas Eriksonas, Julius Pauzolis (LITEK)
1st Photonics Cluster Meeting
International Congress Expo “Micro photonics” 2016
Trade Show Berlin, Hall 7
12/10/2016
Task
• To assess and analyse the innovation potential of their SMEs
• To provide the following:• An insight about the innovation potential of the company – how innovative is
my company?
• A clear overview about the innovation processes on-going at all company levels – do the innovation processes take place properly at all company levels, or are there some discrepancies?
• Awareness about the Strengths and Weaknesses of the company – SWOT-Analysis
• A definition of new strategic objectives for further business development –How can the company optimize its businesses by defining new objectives?
• Concrete recommendations for actions – what are the next steps to optimize my business? / Which measures should my company implement?
Audited companies by LITEKCase 3Case 1 Case 2
Designer and
manufacturer of
highly
customized
micromaching
workstations with
advanced laser
beam
steering and control
Key facts:
Number of staff: 11
Turnover: 0.75 MEUR
Established: 2010
A manufacturer and
global supplier of
precision optical
components, opto-
mechanics, nonlinear and
laser crystals, electro-
optical Pockels
Key facts:
Number of staff: 44
Turnover: 8.5 MEur
Established: 2006
Developer of custom
laser micro-machining
workstations and
optical modules for
laser micro-machining
Key facts:
Number of staff: 18
Turnover: 1,5 MEUR
Established: 2007
Case 1 – Solution developer/provider
PII index score (current): 0,59116
PII index score (projected): 0,95714
RECOMMENDATIONS
To create incentives for staff, involving
them in generation of ideas leading to IP
To train managers project management
skills and team management
To develop internal procedures for
information storage and pre-treatment
Case 2 – Equipment developer/manufacturer
RECOMMENDATIONS
To create incentives for staff, involving
them in generation of ideas leading to IP
To organize the technology intelligence
gathering involving the supply chain and
staff
To develop a strategy for intellectual
propertyPII index score (current): 0,5209
PII index score (projected): 0,7571
Case 3 – Component developer/manufacturer
PII index score (current): 0,78189
PII index score (projected): 0,89796
RECOMMENDATIONS
To create incentives for staff, involving
them in generation of ideas leading to IP
To create the system for
tracking/following up existing and new
ideas
Competitive positioning
• PII score - a 50% weight of the total score
• A turnover – 20%
• A company age – 10% a
• A number of patents and/or patent
applications - 20%.
Competitive positioning
Key:
Leaders execute well against their current vision and are
well positioned for tomorrow.
Visionaries understand where the market is going or have
a vision for changing market rules, but do not yet execute
well.
Niche Players focus successfully on a small segment, or
are unfocused and do not out-innovate or outperform
others.
• Challengers execute well today or may dominate a large
segment, but do not demonstrate an understanding of
market direction
Case 1
Case 2
Case 3
Audit reports: a sample