Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

41
Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007

Transcript of Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

Page 1: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

Innovation in the U.S.

Anita JonesUniversity of Virginia

September, 2007

Page 2: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

2

Outline

How do we know if there is a problem?

Gathering Storm recommendationsAmerica Competes Act implementation

The energy challenge

Page 3: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

3

Assessing the Nation’s Future Competitiveness

Preserving and enhancing the quality of life for our children depends upon continued increases in productivity

Prowess in engineering & science is a major underpinning for the innovation that leads to productivity

Compete effectively or decline!

Page 4: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

4

U.S. Innovation – How Do We Know if There is a Problem?

Capability evolves – over years, decades

No single determinant

Hard to predict

Constant changes

Page 5: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

5

What matters?

Globalization increases the interdependence of economies competition

Educated engineers, scientists, & managers available

A nation can establish a leadFor example, the Celtic Tiger, Ireland

Page 6: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

6

U.S. Innovation – Telltales

Ribbon on line of sailboat

Hint or indication

Measure of “now”

Page 7: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

7

Telltale Sources:

Gathering Storm reportTestimony of Norm AugustineVarious news articles

Page 8: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

8

Telltale

U.S. trade balance: in 1990 – plus $54 billion in 2001 – negative $50 billion

Page 9: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

9

Telltale

New jobs created recently: low wage – 44% high wage – 29%

Page 10: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

10

Telltale

Cost of healthcare exceeds: Starbucks – exceeds cost of coffee General Motors – exceeds cost of steel

Page 11: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

11

Telltale

Transfer of business: US airlines outsource aircraft

maintenance to China & El Salvador IBM sold its personal computer unit

to Lenovo in China

Page 12: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

12

Telltale

Ford & GM both have junk bond ratingsToyota has 8 times the market capitalization

of Ford & GM combinedDaimler (German) bought Chrysler; now

they don’t want it

Page 13: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

13

Telltale

U.S. investors put more new money into foreign stock funds than inU.S. funds

Page 14: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

14

Telltale

77% of the new research & developmentlaboratories to be built will be in India and China

Page 15: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

15

Telltale

Gathering Storm recommendations “cost”$9 billion (over some years)

U. S. citizens gambled $7 billion on the last Super Bowl

Page 16: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

16

Telltale

U. S. firms spent more on litigation thanon research & development

Page 17: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

17

Telltale

Cost of a factory worker in America isnine times that in Mexico

Cost of a young professional engineer inAmerica is eight times that in India

Page 18: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

18

Telltale

U.S. ranks 12th among OECD countries innumber of broadband connectionsper 100 inhabitants

Broadband service in Japan is eight to 30 times faster than in the U.S. & much less expensive

Page 19: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

19

Telltale

In 2004, China overtook the U.S. to become the leading exporter of information technology products

Page 20: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

20

Telltale

Standardized tests of U. S. children showedmoderate improvement in lower grades& further deterioration in the 12th grade

Page 21: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

21

Telltale

U. S. children spend more time watchingtelevision than in the classroom

Page 22: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

22

Telltale

U. S. university engineering enrollment remains flat

Page 23: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

23

Telltale

Measure of “now”, not of the future

Sources of “telltales”:Gathering Storm reportTestimony of Norm AugustineVarious news articles

Page 24: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

Gathering Storm Report

4 recommendations20 implementation actions21 months later

Page 25: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

25

Gathering Storm report

National Academies – informed debate Much congressional applause Much political talk Still 21 months later Authorization bill through conference

COMPETES – America Creating Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology, Education and Science Act

Appropriation still in the future

Page 26: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

26

Ten Thousand Teachers, Ten Million Minds

Recruit 10,000 teachers, educate 10 million minds: Attract bright students through competitive 4-yr. merit-based scholarships for BS in sciences, engineering, or math with concurrent K-12 science & math teacher certification in exchange for 5 years public service teaching in K-12 public schools

Strengthen 250,000 current teachers’ skills: Summer institutes, Master’s program, AP/IB (Advanced Placement/International Baccalaureate) training

Enlarge the Pipeline: Create opportunities and financial incentives for pre-AP/IB and AP/IB science & math courses

Page 27: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

27

Sowing the Seeds

Increase federal investment in basic research—10%/year over next 7 years focusing on physical sciences, engineering, mathematics & information sciences. Double budget at NIST, NSF and DoE Office of Science (7-10 years)

Provide early-career researcher grants—200 grants at $100,000/year over 5 years to best researchers

Institute National Coordination Office for Research Infrastructure—$500 million/year over 5 years

Catalyze high-risk, high-payoff research—technical program managers allocate 8% federal research agency budgets for discretionary spending

Institute Presidential Innovation Award—identify and recognize persons who develop unique scientific and engineering innovations at the time they occur

Page 28: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

28

Best and Brightest Increase number of US citizens earning science,

engineering, and math degrees: 25,000 new 4-year undergraduate scholarships per year 5,000 new portable graduate fellowships per year

Encourage continuing education of current scientists and engineers: Federal tax credits to employers

International students and scholars Less complex visa processing and extensions New PhDs in S&E: 1-year automatic extension and (if

find job) automatic work permit and expedited residency status

Skills-based, preferential immigration points system to prioritize US citizenship; Increase H1B visas by 10,000

Reform "deemed exports" policy: Allow access to information and research equipment except those under national security regulations

Page 29: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

29

Incentives for Innovation

Enhance Intellectual Property protection, while allowing research Sufficient resources for Patent & Trademark Off. Institute “first-inventor-to-file" system and

administrative review after patent granted Shield research uses of patented inventions

from infringement liability Change IP laws that impact industries differently

Increase Research & Experimentation tax credit from 20 to 40% of qualifying increase

Incentivize long-term investment in innovation by industry

Provide affordable broadband access -broadly

Page 30: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

30

ARPA-E

Focus on creative out-of-the-box transformational energy research that industry by itself cannot or will not support

High risk, but potentially dramatic benefits to nation Address environment, energy, and security Based on DARPA Model—lean, agile, independent with

ability to start and stop programs based on performance Research not performed by agency, but universities, start-

ups, established firms, labs Staff turn over every 4 years; performance assessments Spin-off benefits expected include education of next

generation of researchers Report to DOE Undersecretary of Science

Page 31: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

Energy Challenge

Make the U.S. self-sufficient in energy

Page 32: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

Energy Challenge

UrgentBig business – affects the economyPolitical

Page 33: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

Wish/want

… a family term

A lot of political “wish/want”s

Page 34: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

Wish/want

Political wish/wants: hydrogen economy – White House ethanol economy – corn farmers nuclear economy – nobody

(except maybe you?)

Page 35: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

35

Critical to national choices

What is technologically possible?

What makes economic sense – to industry – for deployment?

What is consistent with the Second Law of Thermodynamics?

Page 36: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

36

Supply104

Quads

U.S. Energy Flow, 2005 (Quads - BTUs)U.S. Energy Flow, 2005 (Quads - BTUs)

Domestic67%

Imports33%

Residential

Commerical

Industrial

Transportation

Consume100

Quads

Nuclear 8%Renewable 6%

Fossil86%

Page 37: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

37

Electricity Flow, 2005 (Quads)Electricity Flow, 2005 (Quads)

Coal

Gas

ConversionLosses

Nuclear

Renewable

EnergyConsumedToGenerateElectricity

NetGeneration

Page 38: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

38

Construction Permits for Construction Permits for U.S. Power Nuclear ReactorsU.S. Power Nuclear Reactors

8.23 Quads produced by 104 U.S. nuclear power plants8.23 Quads produced by 104 U.S. nuclear power plants

Units Ordered

Construction Permits Issued

Full-power Operating Licenses

Operable Units

Shutdowns

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Num

ber o

f Uni

ts

1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000

Year

Page 39: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

39

Source of Graphs

Page 40: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

40

Innovation in Energy

Determined by confluence ofWhat is technically feasibleWhat is reduced to practiceWise regulation

• Including wise taxationInfrastructure that industry deploys

Mostly by, enlightened citizens!

Page 41: Innovation in the U.S. Anita Jones University of Virginia September, 2007.

41

The end