Innocent K. Tumwebaze , PhD Student – University of Zürich Prof. Hans-Joachim Mosler, Eawag

12
Developing behavior change techniques targeting cleaning of shared toilets by users in Kampala’s slums, Uganda Innocent K. Tumwebaze, PhD Student – University of Zürich Prof. Hans-Joachim Mosler, Eawag Main Advisor

description

Developing behavior change techniques targeting cleaning of shared toilets by users in Kampala’s slums, Uganda. Innocent K. Tumwebaze , PhD Student – University of Zürich Prof. Hans-Joachim Mosler, Eawag Main Advisor. Kampala is the capital city of Uganda & hosts around 188 slums. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Innocent K. Tumwebaze , PhD Student – University of Zürich Prof. Hans-Joachim Mosler, Eawag

Page 1: Innocent K.  Tumwebaze ,  PhD  Student – University  of  Zürich Prof. Hans-Joachim Mosler, Eawag

Developing behavior change techniques targeting cleaning of shared toilets by users in Kampala’s slums, Uganda

Innocent K. Tumwebaze, PhD Student – University of Zürich

Prof. Hans-Joachim Mosler, EawagMain Advisor

Page 2: Innocent K.  Tumwebaze ,  PhD  Student – University  of  Zürich Prof. Hans-Joachim Mosler, Eawag

Kampala is the capital city of Uganda & hosts around 188 slums

Page 3: Innocent K.  Tumwebaze ,  PhD  Student – University  of  Zürich Prof. Hans-Joachim Mosler, Eawag

Introduction

The Good The Bad The Ugly

Why ‘cleaning’ interventions targeting users of shared toilets are important?

Page 4: Innocent K.  Tumwebaze ,  PhD  Student – University  of  Zürich Prof. Hans-Joachim Mosler, Eawag

Research question• How can we determine appropriate cleaning

behaviour interventions for users of shared toilets in urban slums?

• Change from bad to good state of shared toilets

Cleaning

Toilet etiquette

Page 5: Innocent K.  Tumwebaze ,  PhD  Student – University  of  Zürich Prof. Hans-Joachim Mosler, Eawag

Methodology • Cross-sectional survey in 50 randomly

selected slums in Kampala (N = 1500, n1019 use shared toilets ).

• Cleanliness key challenge among users.

• Linear regression to assess shared toilet users’ cleaning intentions.

Page 6: Innocent K.  Tumwebaze ,  PhD  Student – University  of  Zürich Prof. Hans-Joachim Mosler, Eawag

Cleanliness and intention results

Cleaning intention

Respondents’ perceived toilet cleanliness

     

VariablesFrequency Percentages

not at all 1 .2

a little 23 3.8

medium 44 7.2

strongly 247 40.6

very strongly 294 48.3

Total 609 100.0

Page 7: Innocent K.  Tumwebaze ,  PhD  Student – University  of  Zürich Prof. Hans-Joachim Mosler, Eawag

Mean comparison of factors influencing shared toilet users cleaning intention

Page 8: Innocent K.  Tumwebaze ,  PhD  Student – University  of  Zürich Prof. Hans-Joachim Mosler, Eawag

Standardized Coefficients

B Std. Error Beta(Constant) 2.212 .365 6.060 .000

Cleaning habit1 = Not a habit at all to 5 = Very strong habit

.221 .029 .330 7.603 .000

sharing toilet with friends outside neighbourhood

1= Yes, 2 = no -.666 .125 -.255 -5.326 .000

Importance to use clean toilet

1 = Very unimportant to 9 = very important

.147 .027 .201 5.443 .000

Cleaning toilet effortful

1 = Not effortful at all to 5 = very effortful

.108 .023 .179 4.722 .000

Talking to other toilet users to maintain cleanliness

1 = almost never to 5 = almost always

.086 .021 .149 4.143 .000

Perceived disgust to use dirty toilet

1 = Not at all to 5 = very much .146 .042 .122 3.457 .001

Ease / difficult to keep toilet clean

1 = Very difficult to 9 = very easy

.034 .011 .117 2.948 .003

Sharing toilet with relatives

1= Yes, 2 = no -.251 .092 -.117 -2.720 .007

Number of sharing households

continuous (from 2 households to 12 and above)

-.022 .009 -.082 -2.284 .023

Perceived toilet cleanliness

1 = Very dirty to 9 = very clean .066 .033 .079 1.998 .046

N = 508, R2 = 0.43 , Adjusted R2 = 0.42

Variables Scale Unstandardized Coefficientst Sig. (P<0.05)

Behavioural factors influencing cleaning intention

Page 9: Innocent K.  Tumwebaze ,  PhD  Student – University  of  Zürich Prof. Hans-Joachim Mosler, Eawag

Determining intentional factors that steer cleaning behaviour

Factors Improvement reserve (Max - Mean)

Intervention potential (IR *B)

Habit 5-3.99 = 1.01 1.01*0.33 = 0.33Importance to use clean toilet 9-8.32 = 0.68 0.68*0.20 = 0.14Cleaning toilet effortful 5-3.90 = 1.1 1.1*0.18 = 0.20Talking to other toilet users 3-3.47 = 1.53 1.53*0.15 = 0.23Disgust to use dirty toilet 5-4.69 = 0.31 0.31*0.12 = 0.04Ease to keep toilet clean 9-5.65 = 3.35 3.35*0.117 = 0.39Perceived toilet cleanliness by respondents

5-3.45 = 1.55 1.55*0.079 = 0.12

• Process (Source: Mosler et al., 2011. A guide for behaviour change), Eawag

Look at factors frequencies and means Determine intervention potential by analysing

strength of improvement reserve and impact of each factor on cleaning intention

Page 10: Innocent K.  Tumwebaze ,  PhD  Student – University  of  Zürich Prof. Hans-Joachim Mosler, Eawag

Intervention developmentBehavior change technique

Factors Measure of cleaning behaviour

Norms Normative-Personal norm (importance to use clean toilet)-Expressed demand (Talking to other toilet users)

-Anticipated regret

-Highlighting norms

Infrastructural, skill and ability

- Self-efficacy (ease to keep toilet clean) and (Cleaning effortful)

- Reattribution of past successes and failures-Guided practice towards good toilet use (children) -Facilitating resources (availability of cleaning items)

Mosler et al., 2012

Page 11: Innocent K.  Tumwebaze ,  PhD  Student – University  of  Zürich Prof. Hans-Joachim Mosler, Eawag

Way forward• Design and test interventions

• Assess / evaluate effect of the interventions

Page 12: Innocent K.  Tumwebaze ,  PhD  Student – University  of  Zürich Prof. Hans-Joachim Mosler, Eawag

Acknowledgements• NCCR North-South,• Eawag/Sandeco Prof. Dr. Hans-Joachim Mosler, Eawago Prof. Dr. Jonas Klaus, University of Zurich,o Dr. Christoph Lüthi, Eawago Dr. Niwagaba Charles, Makerere

University Email contacts: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] [email protected]