Inherently chiral concave molecules—from synthesis to applications
Transcript of Inherently chiral concave molecules—from synthesis to applications
4274 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 4274–4285 This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Inherently chiral concave molecules—from synthesis to applications
Agnieszka Szumna*
Received 17th March 2010
DOI: 10.1039/b919527k
This tutorial review covers the recent development in the synthesis and application of molecules
and finite assemblies that are chiral owing to their curvature. A modified definition of inherent
chirality is provided. Various classes of chiral concave molecules are presented including salphen
complexes, cyclic amides, derivatives of sumanene, trioxatricornan or subphthalocyanine,
cyclotriveratrylenes, homooxacalix[3]arenes, calixarenes, resorcinarenes, phthalocyanines,
corannulenes and cavitands. Some of these bowl shaped compounds exhibit high inversion
barriers, comparable with the stability of classical carbon chirality centres, while the others
(e.g. hydrogen bonded assemblies) can only be detected by NMR. This review is focused
on practical aspects of synthesis, resolution and applications in chiral recognition and
asymmetric synthesis.
Introduction
Chirality is the geometric property of a rigid object (or spatial
arrangement of points or atoms) of being non-superposable on
its mirror image.1 This IUPAC description is an inviolable
principle for all chiral molecules. However, with the growing
complication of molecular systems that are characterised by
chemists, it has been realised that the classical understanding
of molecular chirality is not always sufficient. For instance,
chirality elements like centre, axis or plane are not adequate
to describe the chirality of rotaxanes, catenanes, fullerenes,
cavitands or capsular assemblies.2 With the discovery of these
new molecular arrangements, new possibilities for application
in enantioselective recognition or asymmetric catalysis have
emerged.
This review covers the recent development in the synthesis
and application of molecules and finite assemblies that are
chiral owing to their curvature. Molecules that possess a
concave shape are especially suitable for the construction of
effective recognition sites. These molecules are useful by taking
advantage of their concave cavity and convergent arrangement
of binding sites. They can also be further used as building
blocks for the construction of higher assemblies with other
new types of chirality.
In 1994 the pioneering review on inherently chiral calixarenes
was published by Bohmer.3 The scope of this current review is
to present other types of compounds that can be classified as
inherently chiral and highlight the recent progress in the
chemistry of inherently chiral calixarenes. The current state of
the art in the field justifies the transition from just a curiosity to
practical applications; therefore the review will concentrate on
practical aspects of synthesis, resolution and applications.
Definition and nomenclature
The expression ‘‘inherently chiral’’ was first suggested by
Bohmer for chiral calixarenes and initially applied mainly to
that class of compounds.3 Later, due to the lack of a rigorous
definition, the term was expanded and often intuitively attributed
to compounds that do not strictly fall into definitions of
other types of chirality. The first more general definition was
formulated in 2004 by the group of Mandolini and Schiaffino.4
It states that inherent chirality derives from the ‘‘introduction
of a curvature in an ideal planar structure that is devoid of
symmetry axes in its bidimensional representation’’ (axes
positioned in the 2D plane, explanation by L. Schiaffino).
However, formally, in 2D representations the only allowed
symmetry elements are axes and planes that are positioned
Institute of Organic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences,Kasprzaka 44/52, 01-224, Warsaw, Poland.E-mail: [email protected].; Fax: +48 22 632 66 81;Tel: +48 22 343 21 10
Agnieszka Szumna
Agnieszka Szumna obtainedher MSc in crystal structureanalysis in 1997 at the WarsawUniversity, Poland. Then shejoined the group of Prof.Janusz Jurczak at the Instituteof Organic Chemistry, PolishAcademy of Sciences andcompleted her PhD in 2001working in the field of supra-molecular cation and anioncomplexes of macrocyclicpolylactams. She then wentfor a post-doc with Prof. JerryL. Atwood at the University ofMissouri, Columbia, USA. In
2003 she returned to the Institute of Organic Chemistry, PolishAcademy of Sciences as a habilitation candidate and became aproject leader. She finished habilitation in 2010 and now sheholds an independent research position. Her research focuses onvarious aspects of molecular recognition, new types of chirality,chiral recognition and separation, encapsulation, dynamics andreactivity in confined spaces. Present and future research goalsinclude development of new chiral cavitands, tubular andcapsule-type molecules as reaction vessels for asymmetric reac-tions and for controlled molecular motion.
TUTORIAL REVIEW www.rsc.org/csr | Chemical Society Reviews
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of
Suss
ex o
n 24
Feb
ruar
y 20
13Pu
blis
hed
on 3
0 Se
ptem
ber
2010
on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/B
9195
27K
View Article Online / Journal Homepage / Table of Contents for this issue
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 4274–4285 4275
perpendicular to the 2D plane. Therefore, to be in agreement
with this formalism, together with L. Schiaffino, we specified
the definition. Now the definition reads ‘‘inherent chirality
arises from the introduction of a curvature in an ideal planar
structure that is devoid of perpendicular symmetry planes in its
bidimensional representation’’ (Fig. 1). Therefore, the resulting
3D molecules have Cn (n = 1,. . .,n) symmetry (Fig. 1b).
For the description of inherent chirality two types of
notations have been suggested: (cR)/(cS),4 where c stands for
curvature and (P)/(M) notation.5 The latter approach seems to
be more justified, in analogy to axially chiral and cyclochiral
compounds, for which (P)/(M) notation is highly recommended.1
The (P)/(M) chirality description involves determination of
ring/bridging atoms/substituents priorities according to
standard stereochemistry rules (Fig. 2). The observer is situated
on the concave side of the surface (Fig. 1a) and a clockwise
priority of the sequence of groups is defined to have P chirality
while counterclockwise priority is defined as M chirality. In
the case of calix[4]arenes, the bridging carbons are labelled as
a, b, c, d according to the stereochemistry rules (Fig. 2a). In
the case of resorcinarenes the sequence of the groups that
are attached to the phenolic groups are determined (Fig. 2b).5
In the case of complexes, the observer is placed at the metal
centre and ligand priority is determined (Fig. 2c).4 For the
priority determination of hydrogen bonded assemblies, the
hydrogen bond is treated as a regular bond (Fig. 2d).6
Definition of inherent chirality underlines the crucial role of
curvature that clearly distinguishes the faces of the object.
Racemisation can, in principle, occur through inversion of the
curvature, therefore an inversion barrier is a crucial stability
parameter. In this review, examples of compounds that exhibit
high inversion barriers comparable with the stability of
classical carbon chirality centres are described. A lower limit
is set by inversion barrier for molecules that cannot be isolated
but only detected by NMR (DG Z 10 kcal mol�1).
In the chemical literature there are many terms that are used
to describe phenomena similar to inherent chirality. They
include: bowl chirality (used for fullerene fragments derived
from their three-dimensional geometry), residual enantio-
mers (applied after Mislow for sterically hindered molecular
propellers), intrinsic chirality, helicity or cyclochirality.
IUPAC defines helicity as the chirality of a helical, propeller
or screw-shaped molecular entity.1 This general definition
applies to some examples discussed in this review. However,
we think that helicity is too general and therefore ‘‘inherent
chirality’’ gives a more specific description of the pheno-
menon. The term ‘‘cyclochirality’’ was introduced in 1964 by
Prelog and Gerlach for cyclopeptides. It refers to a clockwise
or counterclockwise array of chiral building blocks in the
cyclopeptide that imply directionality of the ring (at least
6 units are required). Chirality of the building blocks is the
prerequisite. However, for chiral rotaxanes, the cyclochirality
is ensured by ring directionality and differentiation of the faces
by the asymmetric axle. In some cases the term ‘‘cyclochiral’’
can be also applied to compounds classified as ‘‘inherently
chiral’’. However, in most cases cyclochirality can be
distinguished as it comes from the directional connection array
of chiral units and the inversion of the curvature does not
cause racemisation (see discussion of cyclic amides).
In natural systems inherent chirality can be observed for
rhodopsin, the naturally occurring pigment responsible for
perception of light. Rhodopsin consists of a protein and a
photoreactive polyene chromophore—retinal 1 (Fig. 3). It was
shown that although the polyene chain contains no chirality
Fig. 1 Inherent chirality upon transformation from 2D to 3D space:
(a) for an object devoid of symmetry, (b) for an object with 4-fold axis
perpendicular to the 2D plane (partially adapted from ref. 4 with
permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) on behalf
of the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) and
the RSC).
Fig. 2 Examples of (P)/(M) notation of inherently chiral molecules: (a) calix[4]arenes, (b) resorcinarenes, (c) metal complexes, (d) hydrogen
bonded assemblies.
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of
Suss
ex o
n 24
Feb
ruar
y 20
13Pu
blis
hed
on 3
0 Se
ptem
ber
2010
on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/B
9195
27K
View Article Online
4276 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 4274–4285 This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
centres, substantial effects in the UV/Vis CD spectrum are
observed. Although the polyene chain should be planar, steric
conflict imposed by methyl group precludes a completely flat
conformation. In solution the molecules exist as racemic pairs
of non-planar inherently chiral conformers in rapid equili-
brium. The X-ray structure corroborates the view that the
protein binding site accommodates a chiral conformer of
the chromophore. The ab initio calculations indicate that the
inherently chiral conformation of the chromophore is the
dominant factor in the CD spectrum.7
Realisation of inherent chirality in synthetic systems is
dependent on the synthetic availability of scaffolds with a
permanent curvature. Concave molecules made of identical
building blocks are mostly used for these purposes: they are
available through relatively easy synthesis and their chemistry
is in most cases well established. In this review the application
of various scaffolds, their stability against inversion and
modification possibilities will be discussed.
C2-symmetric scaffolds
Salphen
Complexes of salphen-type ligands with metals are widely used
as sensors, carriers and catalysts. The salphen complexes with
the uranyl dication are forced to assume a nonplanar
U-shaped geometry to accommodate the large uranium atom
(Fig. 4). This means that once curvature inversion is blocked
and if the R3 and R4 substituents are not identical then the
structure is inherently chiral (2, 3).8 Enantiomers of 2 are in
fast equilibrium but the motion can be restricted by applica-
tion of bulky substituents at the R1, R2 positions or by a
linker of the proper length. The most stable complexes that
were obtained in this way have enantiomerisation barriers of
26–27 kcal mol�1.9 The stability limit is set by the lability of
the coordination bonds (inversion through dissociation-
reassociation). Enantiomerically pure samples can be efficiently
stored as solids and their racemisation in solution is relatively
slow when compared with usual timescales of recognition and
catalytic processes and therefore they can still be suitable for
these applications.
The recognition site in the uranyl–salphen complex is
located at the metal centre. Four coordination sites are
occupied by the ligand while the fifth site is free and can be
used for recognition of anions and neutral molecules. Inherently
chiral receptor 3 exhibits recognition abilities towards amines,
sulfoxides and quaternary ammonium cations.10 The stability
constants in CDCl3 are high while recognition of enantiomers
is moderate (de’s were in the range of 13–36%).
The conformational inherent chirality of metal-free salphen
ligands, e.g., 4 has also been detected (Fig. 5).11 The curvature
of 4 comes from the nonplanar arrangement of tetramethyl-
phenyl ring and neighbouring phenyl-substituted imine
groups. The racemisation proceeds through rotation about
the formally single Car–Nimine bond and a racemisation barrier
of 21.9 kcal mol�1 was observed. It allowed for separation of
enantiomers via HPLC at low temperatures and observation
of diastereomeric complexes by NMR using Pirkle’s reagent.
C3-symmetric scaffolds
Cyclic amides
The scaffolds based on the directionality of the amide bond
seem to be closely analogous to cyclochiral peptides. However,
cyclic aromatic amides reported by the group of Azumaya12
are actually the best examples to emphasise the difference
between cyclochirality and inherent chirality. The cyclic amide
trimers 5 and 6 have been reported to exist in enantiomeric
bowl shaped conformations (Fig. 6). Contrary to cyclochiral
peptides, no directional array of chiral building blocks is
required. Face differentiation is achieved by a curvature of
the bowl shaped molecule. In the basic structure 5 the ring
inversion is fast, but it can be efficiently blocked by cupping.
Cupping with trimesic acid leads to chiral spherical capsules
(separation by chiral HPLC).13 However, the internal volume
of the resulting capsule is very small and does not seem to be
suitable for guest encapsulation. However, one can envision
that application of other cupping groups can result in larger
capsules. The alternative strategy to prevent racemisation
involves application of bulky substituents at the nitrogen
atoms and aromatic rings. In this way configurationally stable
inherently chiral amides 7 were obtained (Fig. 6).14
Sumanene
The bowl shape of sumanene (Fig. 7a), a hydrocarbon that can
be considered as a part of a fullerene, has been recently
Fig. 3 (a) Retinal chromophore, (b) X-ray structure of its inherently
chiral conformation.
Fig. 4 (a) Inherently chiral uranyl–salphen complexes, (b) X-ray
structure of the basic skeleton. Fig. 5 Inherently chiral salphen.
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of
Suss
ex o
n 24
Feb
ruar
y 20
13Pu
blis
hed
on 3
0 Se
ptem
ber
2010
on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/B
9195
27K
View Article Online
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 4274–4285 4277
exploited for the construction of C3-symmetric inherently
chiral molecules.15 The synthesis of 9 is one of the very few
examples of direct induction of inherent chirality with
the chirality centres of the precursor 8 giving up to 90% ee
(Fig. 7b). The bowl-to-bowl inversion barrier for 9 was
estimated to be 21.6 kcal mol�1, which allowed for isolation
and analysis at low temperatures only. However, the inversion
barrier can be efficiently increased by substitution at the
dibenzylic positions. Substitution with the TMS group, which
bonds preferentially at the exo position, gives diastereomeric
derivative 10 that is resistant to bowl-to-bowl epimerisation.
Tricornan
Derivatives of triangulene with one or more sp2-atoms
replaced by sp3-carbons or heteroatoms form concave struc-
tures with a bowl depth dependent on the central atom type
(Fig. 8). The concave structure of trioxatricornan is blocked
against bowl inversion and once dissymetrically substituted it
produces inherently chiral structures (11).16 The inherently
chiral pattern can be also generated for diazaoxatricornan
structures using two different amines, e.g. 12.17
Regioselective formation of the C3-symmetric substitution
pattern is challenging due to the statistical tendency to form
C1-symmetric structures. However, it was shown that by
application of proper chelation, triacid 11 can be obtained in
55% yield.16 The enantiomers of 11 were resolved using amino
acid or menthol auxiliaries and absolute configurations were
deduced based on comparison of experimental and calculated
VCD/ECD spectra. The diastereomeric amino acid derivatives
of 11 are postulated to adopt considerably different conforma-
tions in terms of cavity depth. The structures are stabilised by
intramolecular hydrogen bonding and are highly dynamic and
therefore both can be potentially useful for further recognition
studies.
Subphthalocyanines
Subphthalocyanines are 14 p-electron aromatic boron macro-
cycles that consist of three N-fused iso-indole units arranged in
a permanently non-planar cone-shaped structure (Fig. 9). The
synthesis involves cyclotrimerisation of phthalonitrile in the
presence of boron derivatives. While the precursor phthalo-
nitrile lacks C2v symmetry, it yields a mixture of two sub-
phthalocyanine regioisomers with C1 and C3 symmetries, each
as a mixture of enantiomers. The statistical product distribution
(C3 :C1 = 1 : 3) can be influenced by electronic (in favor of C3
isomer) or steric factors (in favor of C1 isomer). Only very
recently, the enantiomers of the C1 and C3 isomers of 13 were
separated by Torres and co-workers on an analytical scale by
chiral HPLC.18 Interestingly, it was shown that inherent bowl
chirality can cause asymmetric induction in the formation of
chirality centres positioned in the side chains. Side chains
containing thioether groups were oxidised to give chiral
Fig. 6 Inherently chiral cyclic amides and their X-ray structures.
Fig. 7 (a) X-ray structure of the basic skeleton of sumanene,
(b) diastereoselective synthesis of inherently chiral sumanene.
Fig. 8 (a) Inherently chiral tricornan derivatives, (b) X-ray structure
of the basic skeleton of trioxatricornan.
Fig. 9 (a) Subphthalocyanine derivatives, (b) X-ray structure of the
fluorinated basic skeleton (fluorine atoms-light blue).
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of
Suss
ex o
n 24
Feb
ruar
y 20
13Pu
blis
hed
on 3
0 Se
ptem
ber
2010
on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/B
9195
27K
View Article Online
4278 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 4274–4285 This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
sulfoxides as a 95 : 5 mixture of diastereoisomers.19 The
main problem encountered in the functionalisation of these
molecules is their chemical instability, which usually leads to
decomposition via ring-opening. In addition, the harsh con-
ditions required for their synthesis limit to a great extent
the kind of functional groups that can be introduced in the
precursor phthalonitriles.
Cyclotriveratrylene
The cyclotriveratrylene molecule (CTV, Fig. 10) is a
convenient concave scaffold due to its easy availability
(one step synthesis from simple and cheap substrates), stability
and straightforward modifications. The bowl inversion barrier
(DG E 26.2–27.4 kcal mol�1) is sufficient to allow the separa-
tion of the two enantiomers at room temperature. In the
dominant crown conformation inherent chirality is realised
when each aromatic ring bears two different substituents. The
simplest inherently chiral C3-symmetric CTV analogue, cyclo-
triguaiacylene 14, can be easily obtained as a racemic mixture
by a one step synthesis and enantiomers were separated by
chromatography of the respective diastereomeric esters.20
Another simple C3-symmetric derivative, nonamethoxy-CTV 15,
was also obtained in a one step synthesis in 54% yield21 and
resolved by chiral phase HPLC.22 Optically pure CTVs have
not been reported for chiral recognition, probably due to their
relatively shallow and wide cavities. However, they have been
effectively used as platforms to prepare chiral cryptophanes of
D3 symmetry. Such modifications enhance their binding abilities
and also prevent racemisation.23 Chiral cryptophane-C
forms complexes with one of the smallest chiral molecules,
CHFClBr. Although enantiomeric discrimination is not high
(DDG = 1.1 kJ mol�1) cryptophane-C enabled the first resolu-
tion and assisted with configuration assignment of CHFClBr.
Other chiral cryptophanes also formed diastereomeric
complexes with CHFClBr under slow exchange condition at
the NMR timescale allowing for detection of enantiomers. The
association constants of up to 100 M�1 were determined by
NMR for different host–guest systems, although with almost no
enantioselective preference.
Homooxacalix[3]arenes
Homooxacalix[3]arenes are more flexible than the previously
reported scaffolds and in their basic forms rotation of the
subunits is almost unrestricted (Fig. 11). Ring inversion can be
blocked by appropriate O-substitution. It was shown that by
di-O-alkylation the pseudo-C2 symmetric inherently chiral
molecule 16 can be obtained (with enantiomers separated by
chiral HPLC).24 Although the third aromatic ring can still pass
though the macrocyclic ring, the molecule retains its chirality
since the resulting structure is identical due to C2 symmetry
(Fig. 11b). With that design the authors reported an impressive
de of 72% for complexation of amino acid esters (as picrate
salts). The complexation is driven by the high affinity of the
homooxacalix[3]arene bowl towards alkylammonium ions
while inherent chirality, based only on different alkyl chains,
is responsible for enantiomer discrimination.
Once the ring inversion is blocked by complete O-alkylation
homooxacalix[3]arenes with an ABC substitution pattern at
the upper rim are inherently chiral. For example, homooxacalix-
[3]arene 17, with three different aliphatic substituents at the
upper rim, was synthesised by stepwise condensation and
resolved by chiral phase HPLC.25 Macrocycle 17 was shown
to distinguish enantiomers of amino acid esters by differences
in NMR shifts.
C4-symmetric scaffolds
Calix[4]arenes
Calix[4]arenes were the first scaffolds for which the term
‘‘inherent chirality’’ was applied and still are very popular
for this use. Their versatility is caused by their stability,
relatively easy synthesis and various available modification
procedures. Calixarenes are cyclic oligomers made up of
phenolic units connected by methylene bridges (Fig. 12). The
tetramer, the most widely used calixarene, undergoes through-
annulus inversion that can be blocked by proper O-substitution
of at least n-Pr in size. The parent calix[4]arene can exist in
different non-planar conformations: cone, partial cone, 1,2-
alternate and 1,3-alternate. Each of these conformations can
produce inherently chiral structures with proper substitution.
The inherent chirality is observed for calix[4]arenes containing
at least three different subunits, i.e., ABCC or ABCD patterns.
The subunit differentiation may be achieved by different
substituents (positioned either at the lower or upper rim or a
combination of both) or by different spatial arrange-
ment (different conformations), making a large number ofFig. 10 (a) Inherently chiral cyclotriveratrylene derivatives, (b) X-ray
structure of the basic skeleton.
Fig. 11 (a) Inherently chiral homooxacalix[3]arenes, (b) schematic
representation of the hydrogen atom passing through the ring of 16,
producing superposable structures.
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of
Suss
ex o
n 24
Feb
ruar
y 20
13Pu
blis
hed
on 3
0 Se
ptem
ber
2010
on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/B
9195
27K
View Article Online
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 4274–4285 4279
possibilities and factors to control.26 Another strategy
to introduce directionality to the calixarene ring involves
meta-substitution of the phenolic ring that differentiates
the edges. Calixarenes consisting of a single or multiple
meta-substituted aromatic rings are inherently chiral. A few
examples of calixarenes with chirality induced by asymmetrical
bridges are also known.
The early synthetic procedures for producing inherently
chiral calixarenes, based on stepwise fragment condensations,
were reviewed in 1994 and 1997 by Bohmer.3,27 This approach
is strenuous and rarely used now. Instead, modern synthetic
procedures utilize selective functionalisations. Effective synthesis
of inherently chiral calix[4]arenes via selective modifications
became feasible with the discovery of procedures that lead to
mono-O-substituted or proximal 1,2-di-O-substituted derivatives
and cation templated conformational control.
The synthetically simplest route to obtain inherently chiral
calixarenes of ABCC type is to introduce two different
substituents at the neighbouring hydroxyl groups at the
lower rim. In the group of Kalchenko 1,2-di-O-substituted
inherently chiral calix[4]arene 18 was synthesised by mono-
alkylation and subsequent regioselective proximal substitution
(Scheme 1).28 The asymmetric induction by chiral auxiliary
was low (de up to 15%), but resolution of diastereoisomers
was complete and experimentally practical.29 In order to get
purely inherently chiral derivatives, diastereoisomers of 18
were modified at the upper rim of the remaining rings (acti-
vated due to the presence of free OH groups) and the chiral
auxiliary was removed to give 19. Higher inherent chirality
inductions (up to de 60%) were obtained by lower rim 1,3-
substitution using chiral auxiliary and subsequent proximal
modification under mild reaction conditions.30
The design based on proximal bridging using crown ether
linkers and additional O-substitution to introduce chirality
was used by the group of Pappalardo.31 The derivative with a
crown[6] type ring at the lower rim (20, as racemate) has been
used for recognition of (R) and (S)-1-phenyl-ethylammonium
picrates. Although doubling of the signals occurred suggesting
that a diastereomeric complex was formed, no chiral discrimi-
nation was observed.
A similar design was used in the group of Chen and Huang
to obtain a series of inherently chiral acid derivatives in
cone and partial cone conformations (21, separated using
(S)-BINOL as a chiral auxiliary) (Fig. 13).32 The presence of
an additional acid group, as in 22 (partial-cone conformation)
assures formation of diastereomeric salts with leucinol with
considerably different association constants for enantiomers
(Ka = 50 M�1 and 143 M�1 in CD2Cl2, de 48%).32,33 The
interaction pattern employs electrostatic interactions and
hydrogen bonding between the ether oxygen atoms on the
host and amino/ammonium groups of the guest.
The ABCC pattern can also be realised with different spatial
positions of identical substituents. A proximally di-O-alkylated
calixarene with two identical substituents can be chiral
provided that the substituents have an anti relationship,
i.e. the skeleton is locked in the partial cone conformation
(Fig. 14). The through-annulus rotation of the remaining two
hydroxyl groups does not have to be restricted since it does not
change the structure (dynamically averaged C2 symmetry).
Proximal dialkylation to produce an anti relationship between
alkyl groups was accomplished by proximal protection and
templated dialkylation to give 23.34 Optical resolution was
achieved by derivatisation to diastereomeric esters and flash
chromatography.35
Another approach for differentiation of substituents at the
lower rim involves directional bridging. Directional linkages
composed of carboxamide36 or ester37 moieties can be introduced
by a cyclisation reaction to give inherently chiral calixarenes,
e.g. 24.
Lower rim modifications are synthetically relatively easy;
however, the products do not take advantage of the unique
inclusion properties of the calixarene hydrophobic cavity and
Fig. 12 (a) Calix[4]arene in cone conformation, (b) X-ray structure of
the basic skeleton.
Scheme 1
Fig. 13 Inherently chiral calixarenes with polyetheral bridges.
Fig. 14 Inherently chiral calixarenes by: (a) conformational,
(b) directional linking.
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of
Suss
ex o
n 24
Feb
ruar
y 20
13Pu
blis
hed
on 3
0 Se
ptem
ber
2010
on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/B
9195
27K
View Article Online
4280 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 4274–4285 This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
binding sites are limited to the ones that were introduced with
substituents. Binding sites and chiral groups positioned
at the upper rim can take full advantage of the calixarene
bowl. Modification of the upper rim usually starts with func-
tionalisation of the lower rim to prevent structure inversion
(racemisation) and to differentiate upper rim reactivity. The
most common synthetic strategy involves selective alkylation
of the debutylated calixarene and subsequent electrophilic
aromatic substitution of the remaining rings.
This approach has been used by the groups of Shimizu to
obtain amino phenol 25, amino acid 26 and amino alcohol 27
presenting inherent chirality based on upper rim functionali-
sation (Fig. 15). Amino phenol 25 is able to recognise enantio-
mers of mandelic acid through formation of diastereomeric
salts (de 37.5%).38 Both polar groups and the hydrophobic
calixarene cavity are involved in the recognition pattern as can
be deduced from NMR. Although the de value is moderate it is
sufficient to facilitate effective resolution of enantiomers of
amino phenol 25 by crystallisation. Dual functions that are
present in the structures of the amino alcohol derivatives can
be utilised in catalysis: the basic moiety is believed to activate
nucleophiles, while, at the same time, the hydrogen donor
group can activate the electrophiles through hydrogen bonding.
In line with this catalytic mechanism enantiomerically pure
inherently chiral amino phenol 2538 and amino alcohol 2739
were applied as catalysts in a Michael addition of thiophenol
and 2-cyclohexen-1-one giving products with 15% ee. The
efficiency of the catalyst was improved up to 31% ee (1 mol%
catalyst loading) by functionalisation of the third phenolic
ring with a voluminous group producing a deeper cavity.40
Amino alcohol 27 was further modified to give an inherently
chiral ammonium salt that was applied as an asymmetric
phase-transfer catalysts in various Michael additions giving
products in excellent yield with low enantioselectivities.39
Inspired by the very successful amino acid catalysis of the
aldol reaction, amino acid 26 was tested as an organocatalyst
in the direct aldol reaction of acetone.39 However, no catalytic
activity of 26 was observed which was attributed to the low
nucleophilicity of the nitrogen atom. However, it seems that
likely explanations can also be based on too long a distance
between amino and acid functions which lowers effectiveness
of primary amino functions.
The alternative approach to upper rim inherently chiral
calix[4]arenes involves differentiation of the edges of a single
phenolic ring that can potentially give products with more
compact chiral binding sites (Fig. 16). The synthetic strategies
involve initial selective activation of one of the phenolic rings
and subsequent meta substitution. This way various inherently
chiral derivatives were obtained in the group of Chen and
Huang, involving calix[4]quinoline,41 salphen42 or proline
derivatives, as for example 28.43 The resolution of inherently
chiral enantiomers was achieved during reaction with
Boc-L-proline that was kinetically controlled.44 The asymmetric
synthesis approach has also been used for meta substitution.45
Initial introduction of the chiral auxiliary at the upper rim and
the subsequent ortholithiation reaction gave inherently chiral
calix[4]arenes with high de (93%).
The efficiency of 28, a calixarene that combines inherent and
classical chirality, has been tested in the enantioselective aldol
reaction between 4-nitroaldehyde and cyclohexanone.43 High
yields and ee values up to 66% were obtained. Comparison
with the monomeric catalyst (no calixarene ring, no inherent
chirality) indicated that the monomeric catalyst at room
temperature exhibited lower reactivity but with slightly higher
enantioselectivity than both diastereoisomers of 28. At lower
temperatures one of the diastereoisomers of 28 gave higher
enantioselectivity. The other diastereoisomer gave lower enantio-
selectivity than the monomeric catalyst, suggesting that inherent
chirality can be matched or mismatched with proline chirality.
Heterocalixarenes
The bridging methylene groups of calixarenes can be replaced
by other linkers. Thiacalix[4]arenes are most widely used due
to their easy preparation and many chemical similarities to the
parent calix[4]arene. In most cases thiacalixarenes can be
modified in analogous ways to calixarenes, e.g., for preparation
of 29.46 Chiral recognition properties of 29 towards amines
and amino acid esters were assessed. Diastereomeric salts,
stable at the NMR timescale, were formed in most cases
allowing for effective enantiomer discrimination by chemical
shifts.
An interesting possibility, typical only for thiacalixarenes, is
modification of the bridging sulfur atoms. Oxidation of the
adjacent sulfide functional groups in an anti relationship
leads to inherently chiral structure 30 (Fig. 17), analogous to
1,2-anti-disubstituted calixarenes.47 It should be noted however,
that the inherent chirality in this case is inextricably bound to
chirality centres at the sulfur atoms.
Fig. 15 Inherent chirality introduced by upper rim substitution.
Fig. 16 Inherent chirality by edge substitution.
Fig. 17 Chiral thiacalixarenes.
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of
Suss
ex o
n 24
Feb
ruar
y 20
13Pu
blis
hed
on 3
0 Se
ptem
ber
2010
on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/B
9195
27K
View Article Online
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 4274–4285 4281
Resorcinarenes
The substitution pattern that is used to generate inherent
chirality of calix[4]arene can be also placed on the structurally
similar scaffold, resorcin[4]arene (Fig. 18). Resorcin[4]arenes
have several advantages over calix[4]arenes: (a) their synthesis
is easier and more efficient; (b) presence of aliphatic chains at
the bridging atoms permanently blocks bowl inversion; and
(c) the upper rim modifications are easier due to available
reactive 2-position of the resorcinol rings. The disadvantage of
resorcinarenes is that they are practically available only as
tetramers (no higher isomers). It should be also noted that an
inherently chiral substitution pattern while positioned on the
resorcinarene skeleton induces the presence of chirality centres
at the bridging atoms. Therefore resorcinarenes, closely
analogous to the respective calixarenes, possess a classical type
of chirality. However, the distinction of those two types of
compounds seems to be formal only. Reviews on the synthetic
strategies to produce various types of chiral resorcinarenes48
and Cn-symmetric calixarenes and resorcinarenes49 have just
recently been published.
Resorcinarenes in their cone conformation are stabilised by
a system of hydrogen bonds at the upper rim. This has a
beneficial influence on the regioselectivity of their reactions. In
many cases, preferential formation of C4-symmetric products
is observed due to stabilisation of their structures by the
maximum number of intramolecular hydrogen bonds.
One of the simplest C4-symmetric inherently chiral resorcin-
[4]arenes is obtained by regioselective substitution of one of
the hydroxyl groups at each ring in a C4-symmetric manner.
Resorcinarene 31 (Fig. 19), with four methoxy groups, was
synthesised with high regioselectivity by simple Lewis acid
catalysed condensation of 3-methoxyphenol with aldehydes
(80% yield).50 Separation of enantiomers was accomplished by
conversion into diastereomeric amides51 or camphorosulfonates.52
The absolute configuration, originally erroneously ascribed,51 has
been established.52
In 1992 it was shown that theMannich reaction of resorcinarene
with primary amines and formaldehyde gives tetrabenzoxazines
32.53,54 The unambiguous proof of the regioselective forma-
tion of a C4-symmetric isomer (among four possible) and its
chirality due to directional closing of the benzoxazine rings
was discovered by further analyses.55 The regioselectivity of
the ring closing reaction is attributed to the stabilisation
effect of four intramolecular hydrogen bonds. Using chiral
amines, diastereoselective tetrabenzoxazine syntheses were
accomplished.56–58 Even with simple aliphatic amines, stereo-
selectivity can reach high values (up to >97%) but it is rather
unpredictable since it is often driven by precipitation of one of
the diastereoisomers.59 The Mannich reaction can be also
performed with amino acids as amine partners, giving up to
>98% ee (e.g., L-phenylglycine methyl ester gives (P)-34,
Fig. 20).60 Although the products have potential recognition
groups they adopt very crowded conformations that are not
suitable for complexation.
Tetrabenzoxazines are quite stable as solids but in solution
they undergo epimerisation due to chemical instability of the
N,O-acetal bridge, this instability is considerably enhanced by
traces of acids. For the benzylamine derivative the enantio-
merisation barrier is 22 kcal mol�1 in n-hexane/2-propanol
(9 : 1),61 but it reaches higher values with bulkier substituents
and a less polar medium.
Facile epimerisation of tetrabenzoxazines limits their
practical applications. However, they can still be used as regio-
and diastereoselectively protected intermediates for further
modifications.62 A combination of the Mannich reaction and
O-alkylation resulted in a number of derivatives synthesised,
that were applied as catalysts to the addition of dialkylzinc to
benzaldehyde.5 When ligand 33 was used (possessing purely an
inherent type of chirality, Fig. 19), 42% ee was obtained.
Enantioselectivity can be enhanced by formation of matched
systems with a chiral amine. With this approach, for deriva-
tives with additional chiral amines, a 95% conversion with an
83% ee was obtained. It has been shown that the resorcinarene
skeleton is crucially important as evidenced by the reduced acti-
vity and low enantioselectivity when a monomeric benzoxazine
was applied.
The alternative to the ring closing Mannich reaction
involves coordination to boron atoms (Fig. 21). In this way
L-prolinol and L-proline derivatives of resorcin[4]arenes were
transformed into inherently chiral bora-derivatives 35 and 36
Fig. 18 Resorcinarene and the schematic representation of its
C4-symmetric structure.
Fig. 19 Inherently chiral C4-symmetric resorcinarenes.
Fig. 20 (a) Amino acid substituted tetrabenzoxazine, (b) X-ray
structure (H atoms removed for clarity).
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of
Suss
ex o
n 24
Feb
ruar
y 20
13Pu
blis
hed
on 3
0 Se
ptem
ber
2010
on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/B
9195
27K
View Article Online
4282 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 4274–4285 This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
with moderate to high de (60% and >98% for 35 and 36,
respectively).63,64 The dominant diastereoisomers were found
in open conformations (Fig. 21b).
Formation of the tweezers-like structures based on
resorcinarenes is realised by selective tosylation of four out
of the eight hydroxy groups of resorcinarene and further
transformation into Mannich products (Fig. 22). Interestingly,
among two possible regioisomers of this type only chiral
C2-symmetric structures are formed.65 By application of
chiral amines (e.g. 1-cyclohexylethylamine) two diastereomeric
dibenzoxazines 37 were obtained as a 60 : 40 mixture. Dia-
stereomeric excess can be much higher (>97% ee) and the
products more stable with application of amino acid derivatives
as the amine partners, e.g., for 38.66 Intramolecular hydrogen
bonding that is formed between amino acid arms of 38
assures high diastereoselectivity but it locks 38 into the
boat conformation and makes the molecule incapable of
complexation.
Phthalocyanines
Metal complexes of phthalocyanines are essentially planar.
However, deformation of their skeleton by unsymmetrical
complexation leads to optically active derivatives (Fig. 23).
This approach was used to construct inherently chiral
phthalocyanine-VO complexes like 39. Its unusual circular
dichroism observed for Q bands was used to study factors
that can influence CD spectra of inherently chiral structures.67
It turned out that the signs of the CD bands are much more
sensitive to small conformational changes (e.g. rotation of a
methyl group) than is usually observed for other types of
chiral compounds.
Higher symmetries
Calixarenes
For calix[n]arenes with higher number of subunits (n > 4)
selective derivatisation is more difficult. The only inherently
chiral calix[5],68 calix[6] and calix[8]arenes69 were formed by
polyether linkages at their lower rims and no applications have
been reported.
Corannulenes
Corannulenes are bowl shaped molecules with a unique
C5 symmetry (Fig. 24). The barrier for bowl inversion of
unsubstituted corannulenes is 11.5 kcal mol�1. An inherently
chiral pattern was generated in the structure of annelated
corannulene 40 by rim substitution that also resulted in a
deeper bowl more resistant to racemisation (experimental
inversion barrier >25 kcal mol�1, ab initio calculations predict
29.8 kcal mol�1).70 However, no separation or applications
were reported.
Inherent chirality by hydrogen bonding
Inherent chirality discussed thus far is based on asymmetric/
dissymmetric covalent substitution of non-planar compounds.
The chiral arrangement can be also achieved using directional
non-covalent interactions, e.g., hydrogen bonds mounted on a
non-planar skeleton. Hydrogen bond networks are considerably
less stable and separation of inherently chiral enantiomers is
not possible. However, the introduction of additional chiral
auxiliaries can bias the equilibrium and increase the popula-
tion of one of the diastereomeric inherently chiral conformers.
Since the cooperative system of many hydrogen bonds
Fig. 21 (a) Inherently chiral bora-derivatives, (b) X-ray structure of
the main diastereoisomer 35.
Fig. 22 C2-symmetric dibenzoxazines.
Fig. 23 Inherently chiral phthalocyanine complex.
Fig. 24 Corannulenes.
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of
Suss
ex o
n 24
Feb
ruar
y 20
13Pu
blis
hed
on 3
0 Se
ptem
ber
2010
on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/B
9195
27K
View Article Online
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 4274–4285 4283
contributes significantly to the overall stability of the systems,
induced inherent chirality can substantially modulate
properties. Therefore, one can envision that inherent chirality
can greatly support (or hamper) efficiency and selectivity in
chiral recognition.
The first examples of inherently chiral hydrogen bonded
compounds were reported by the group of Rebek. They created
deep cavitands with ‘‘doors’’ at the upper rim that were
controlled by a unidirectional cooperative belt of hydrogen
bonds, formed by either the amide (41, Fig. 25)71 or hydroxyl
groups.72 The ‘‘doors’’ can close clockwise or counterclock-
wise and in the presence of additional chirality centres one of
the directions is preferred (de 50%).71 The chiral vessels
exhibit preferential binding of enantiomers of various small
molecules, e.g., trans-cyclohexanediol (60% de).72 The great
advantage of cavitand-type molecules is their ability, as a rule,
to form kinetically stable complexes on the NMR timescale. It
often allows for easy determination of enantiomeric composi-
tion by chemical shifts even without preferences toward one of
enantiomers.
Other cavitands with inherently chiral conformations were
reported by Schmidt et al.,73 during the accidental synthesis of
the N-acetyl derivative of resorcin[4]arene, and in our group.6
Our group has shown that amide substituted resorcin[4]arenes
like 42 (Fig. 26a) exist in inherently chiral kite conformations
that are stabilised by a unidirectional system of eight hydrogen
bonds (in solid state and in solution, Fig. 26b). This dynamic
system of hydrogen bonding undergoes inversion characterised
by a relatively high energy barrier (14.6–18.5 kcal mol�1)
consistent with simultaneous rupture of all eight hydrogen
bonds. This is quite a surprising result, considering that the
hydrogen bond system is not strictly cooperative. However,
rotation of just one unit creates an unfavourable pattern in the
adjacent hydrogen bonds, which is responsible for apparent
cooperativity. For the analogous resorcinarenes substituted
with amino acid derivatives, inherently chiral conformations
are stabilised by twelve hydrogen bonds and therefore are even
more stable.74 The presence of additional stereogenic centres
causes formation of two diastereomeric inherently chiral con-
formations M and P in unequal amounts (de in the range of
72% up to >95%).6,74 The relatively slow exchange and high
de allowed for the determination of the directions of the
hydrogen bonding seam and their correlation with CD spectra.
Although the stability is impressive, the open kite conforma-
tion was not suitable for guest complexation.
In the group of Badjic, the C3-symmetric basket molecule 43
was constructed which is sealed at the top by a seam of three
hydrogen bonds (Fig. 27).75 Directionality of the seam is
responsible for the existence of two inherently chiral enantio-
meric conformers that were detected at low temperatures. The
activation energy for racemisation was found to be in the
order of 10.8 kcal mol�1. Although this barrier is rather small,
the open/close mechanism is claimed to be responsible for
modulating guest uptake/release mechanisms.76
Fig. 25 Cavitand 41 with an inherently chiral system of hydrogen
bonds: (a) X-ray structure, (b) schematic view of the H-bond array.
Fig. 26 (a) Inherently chiral hydrogen bonded resorcinarenes, (b)
X-ray structure, top view with hydrogen bonds (green-MeCN
molecules).
Fig. 27 Calculated structure of the basket molecule 43 sealed by
hydrogen bonds: (a) side view, (b) top view, (c) schematic view of the
hydrogen bond array.
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of
Suss
ex o
n 24
Feb
ruar
y 20
13Pu
blis
hed
on 3
0 Se
ptem
ber
2010
on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/B
9195
27K
View Article Online
4284 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 4274–4285 This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Conclusions and outlook
A wide array of inherently chiral molecules based on various
building blocks and noncovalent interactions has been synthesised
in the past few decades. In some cases, spectacular examples of
very simple synthetic approaches have been developed that
can be credited with the high symmetry of the products or
favourable intramolecular interactions. In other cases synthetic
procedures are longer; however, the synthetic effort does not
seem to be harder than syntheses of other target molecules of
this size. However, obtaining inherently chiral molecules in an
optically pure form remains a challenging task. In many
cases it can be accomplished using chiral phase HPLC, which
is suitable for analytical purposes and simple screening of
properties. For applications or further modifications this
technique is not sufficient. Therefore other methods of synthesis
and separation have to be developed. Diastereoselective syntheses
are currently considered the most cost-effective. Although the first
examples of diastereoselective syntheses of inherently chiral
compounds have been reported, development of more effective
routes is still required in this field.
The pyramidal shape and convergent binding modes of
inherently chiral compounds make them excellent receptor
candidates. Examples of first applications, mostly towards
simple model guests, have been presented in this review.
However, it can be envisioned that molecules with relatively
large binding pockets and multiple binding sites are not a good
fit for small molecules and therefore inherently chiral receptors
can demonstrate their full potential towards recognition of
larger guests. The internal space constricted by the walls often
allows for encapsulation of more than one guest molecule
and imposes specific conformations. These features create
further possibilities for application of inherently chiral
concave molecules as scaffolds for the construction of nano-
reactors—potential chiral reaction vessels with catalytic func-
tions. This area is developing rapidly and for capsular assemblies
promising results with rate enhancements comparable to those
observed for enzymes were reported (recent results from the
group of K. N. Raymond). However, the creation of a chiral
internal environment in capsules has proved to be difficult.
Therefore inherently chiral concave molecules may turn out to
be invaluable for these purposes.
The growing interest in nanotechnology propels the bottom-
up fabrication of molecular machines. Chiral parts, like for
example ratchets that are able to produce directional motion
are of great interest. It can be envisioned that inherently chiral
molecules, with their cavities and pinwheel-like shapes can
also serve as parts in the construction of molecular machines.
Although the research in the field of advanced applications of
inherently chiral concave molecules is still in its infancy, the future
development should demonstrate their potential advantages.
Notes and references
1 IUPAC Gold Book, Basic Terminology of Stereochemistry, 1994.2 ‘‘Supramolecular Chirality’’, Top. Curr. Chem., ed. M. Crego-Calama, D. N. Reinhoudt, Wiley, 2006, vol. 265.
3 V. Bohmer, D. Kraft and M. Tabatabai, J. Inclusion Phenom. Mol.Recognit. Chem., 1994, 19, 17.
4 A. Dalla Cort, L. Mandolini, C. Pasquini and L. Schiaffino, New J.Chem., 2004, 28, 1198.
5 B. R. Buckley, J. Y. Boxhall, P. C. B. Page, Y. H. Chan, M. R. J.Elsegood, H. Heaney, K. E. Holmes, M. J. McIldowie, V. McKee,M. J. McGrath, M. Mocerino, A. M. Poulton, E. P. Sampler,B. W. Skelton and A. H. White, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2006, 5117.
6 A. Szumna, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2007, 5, 1358, for stereochemicalnomenclature see corrections.
7 G. Pescitelli, N. Sreerama, P. Salvadori, K. Nakanishi, N. Berovaand R. W. Woody, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 6170, andreferences therein.
8 A. Dalla Cort, L. Mandolini, G. Palmieri, C. Pasquini andL. Schiaffino, Chem. Commun., 2003, 2178.
9 A. Ciogli, A. Dalla Cort, F. Gasparrini, L. Lunazzi, L. Mandolini,A. Mazzanti, C. Pasquini, M. Pierini, L. Schiaffino andF. Y. Mihan, J. Org. Chem., 2008, 73, 6108, and references therein.
10 A. Dalla Cort, J. I. M. Murua, C. Pasquini, M. Pons andL. Schiaffino, Chem.–Eur. J., 2004, 10, 3301.
11 A. Dalla Cort, F. Gasparrini, L. Lunazzi, L. Mandolini,A. Mazzanti, C. Pasquini, M. Pierini, R. Rompietti andL. Schiaffino, J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70, 8877.
12 F. Imabeppu, K. Katagiri, H. Masu, T. Kato, M. Tominaga,B. Therrien, H. Takayanagi, E. Kaji, K. Yamaguchi,H. Kagechika and I. Azumaya, Tetrahedron Lett., 2006, 47, 413.
13 H. Masu, K. Katagiri, T. Kato, H. Kagechika, M. Tominaga andI. Azumaya, J. Org. Chem., 2008, 73, 5143.
14 K. Katagiri, T. Ikeda, A. Muranaka, M. Uchiyama, M. Tominagaand I. Azumaya, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2009, 20, 2646.
15 S. Higashibayashi and H. Sakurai, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130,8592.
16 S. K. Narasimhan, D. J. Kerwood, L. Wu, J. Li, R. Lombardi,T. B. Freedman and Y. Y. Luk, J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74, 7023.
17 P. Mobian, C. Nicolas, E. Francotte, T. Burgi and J. Lacour,J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 6507.
18 C. G. Claessens and T. Torres, Tetrahedron Lett., 2000, 41, 6361.19 D. Gonzalez-Rodriguez and T. Torres, Tetrahedron Lett., 2009, 50,
860.20 J. Canceill, A. Collet, J. Gabard, G. Gottarelli and G. P. Spada,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1985, 107, 1299.21 Y. Ding, B. Li and G. Zhang, Arkivoc, 2007, 322.22 Z. Luz, R. Poupko, E. J. Wachtel, H. L. Zheng, N. Friedman,
X. L. Cao, T. B. Freedman, L. A. Nafie and H. Zimmermann,J. Phys. Chem. A, 2007, 111, 10507.
23 T. Brotin and J. P. Dutasta, Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 88, andreferences therein.
24 K. Araki, K. Inada and S. Shinkai, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.,1996, 35, 72.
25 K. Tsubaki, T. Otsubo, T. Kinoshita, M. Kawada and K. Fuji,Chem. Pharm. Bull., 2001, 49, 507.
26 T. Otsuka and S. Shinkai, Supramol. Sci., 1996, 189.27 V. Bohmer, Liebigs Ann./Recl., 1997, 2019.28 V. I. Boyko, A. V. Yakovenko, Y. I. Matvieiev, O. I. Kalchenko,
O. V. Shishkin, S. V. Shishkina and V. I. Kalchenko, Tetrahedron,2008, 64, 7567.
29 A. V. Yakovenko, V. I. Boyko, O. Danylyuk, K. Suwinska,J. Lipkowski and V. I. Kalchenko, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 1183.
30 V. I. Boyko, A. Shivanyuk, V. V. Pyrozhenko, R. I. Zubatyuk,O. V. Shishkin and V. I. Kalchenko, Tetrahedron Lett., 2006, 47,7775.
31 F. ArnaudNeu, S. Caccamese, S. Fuangswasdi, S. Pappalardo,M. F. Parisi, A. Petringa and G. Principato, J. Org. Chem., 1997,62, 8041.
32 J. Luo, Q. Y. Zheng, C. F. Chen and Z. T. Huang, Chem.–Eur. J.,2005, 11, 5917.
33 J. Luo, Q. Y. Zheng, C. F. Chen and Z. T. Huang, Tetrahedron,2005, 61, 8517.
34 F. Narumi, T. Hattori, N. Morohashi, N. Matsumura,W. Yamabuki, H. Kameyama and S. Miyano,Org. Biomol. Chem.,2004, 2, 890.
35 F. Narumi, T. Hattori, W. Yamabuki, C. Kabuto andH. Kameyama, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2005, 16, 793.
36 I. Bitter, A. Grun, G. Toth, B. Balazs, G. Horvath and L. Toke,Tetrahedron, 1998, 54, 3857.
37 P. Lhotak, M. Dudicc, I. Stibor, H. Petrickova, J. Sykora andJ. Hodacova, Chem. Commun., 2001, 731.
38 S. Shirakawa, A. Moriyama and S. Shimizu, Org. Lett., 2007, 9,3117.
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of
Suss
ex o
n 24
Feb
ruar
y 20
13Pu
blis
hed
on 3
0 Se
ptem
ber
2010
on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/B
9195
27K
View Article Online
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010 Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 4274–4285 4285
39 S. Shirakawa and S. Shimizu, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2009, 1916.40 S. Shirakawa, T. Kimura, S. Murata and S. Shimizu, J. Org.
Chem., 2009, 74, 1288.41 R. Miao, Q. Y. Zheng, C. F. Chen and Z. T. Huang, J. Org. Chem.,
2005, 70, 7662.42 Z. X. Xu, Z. T. Huang and C. F. Chen, Tetrahedron Lett., 2009, 50,
5430.43 Z. X. Xu, G. K. Li, C. F. Chen and Z. T. Huang, Tetrahedron,
2008, 64, 8668, and references therein.44 Z. X. Xu, C. Zhang, Y. Yang, C. F. Chen and Z. T. Huang, Org.
Lett., 2008, 10, 477.45 S. A. Herbert and G. E. Arnott, Org. Lett., 2009, 11, 4986.46 F. Narumi, T. Hattori, N. Matsumura, T. Onodera, H. Katagiri,
C. Kabuto, H. Kameyama and S. Miyano, Tetrahedron, 2004, 60,7827.
47 N. Morohashi, N. Iki, T. Onodera, C. Kabuto and S. Miyano,Tetrahedron Lett., 2000, 41, 5093.
48 W. Iwanek and A. Wzorek, Mini-Rev. Org. Chem., 2009, 6, 398.49 M. J. McIldowie, M. Mocerino and M. I. Ogden, Supramol.
Chem., 2010, 22, 13.50 M. J. McIldowie, M. Mocerino, B. W. Skelton and A. H. White,
Org. Lett., 2000, 2, 3869.51 M. Klaes, B. Neumann, H. G. Stammler and J. Mattay, Eur. J.
Org. Chem., 2005, 864.52 B. R. Buckley, P. C. B. Page, Y. Chan, H. Heaney, M. Klaes,
M. J. McIldowie, V. McKee, J. Mattay, M. Mocerino, E. Moreno,B. W. Skelton and A. H. White, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2006,5135.
53 Y. Matsushita and T. Matsui, Tetrahedron Lett., 1993, 46,7433.
54 H. J. Schneider and U. Schneider, J. Inclusion Phenom. Mol.Recognit. Chem., 1994, 19, 67.
55 R. Arnecke, V. Bohmer, E. F. Paulus and W. Vogt, J. Am. Chem.Soc., 1995, 117, 3286.
56 W. Iwanek and J. Mattay, Liebigs Ann. Chem., 1995, 1463.57 R. Arnecke, V. S. Friebe, S. Bohmer, Gebauer, G. J. Krauss,
I. Thondorf and W. Vogt, Tetrahedron Lett., 1995, 36, 6221.
58 M. T. El Gihani, H. Heaney and A. M. Z. Slawin, TetrahedronLett., 1995, 36, 4905.
59 C. Schmidt, E. F. Paulus, V. Bohmer and W. Vogt, New J. Chem.,2001, 25, 374, and references therein.
60 A. Szumna, unpublished results.61 O. Trapp, S. Caccamese, C. Schmidt, V. Bohmer and V. Schurig,
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2001, 12, 1395.62 P. C. B. Page, H. Heaney and E. P. Sampler, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1999, 121, 6751.63 W. Iwanek, M. Urbaniak, B. Gawdzik and V. Schurig, Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry, 2003, 14, 2787.64 W. Iwanek, R. Frohlich, P. Schwab and V. Schurig, Chem.
Commun., 2002, 2516.65 A. Shivanyuk, C. Schmidt, V. Bohmer, E. F. Paulus, O. Lukin and
W. Vogt, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 4319.66 A. Szumna, M. Gorski and O. Lukin, Tetrahedron Lett., 2005, 46,
7423.67 N. Kobayashi, F. Narita, K. Ishii and A. Muranaka, Chem.–Eur. J.,
2009, 15, 10173.68 S. Y. Li, Q. Y. Zheng, C. F. Chen and Z. T. Huang, Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry, 2005, 16, 641, and references therein.69 S. Caccamese, G. Principato, C. Geraci and P. Neri, Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry, 1997, 8, 1169, and references therein.70 Y. T. Wu, T. Hayama, K. K. Baldridge, A. Linden and J. S. Siegel,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 6870.71 A. Shivanyuk, K. Rissanen, S. K. Korner, D. M. Rudkevich and
J. Rebek, Helv. Chim. Acta, 2000, 83, 1778, and references therein.72 S. Saito, C. Nuckolls and J. Rebek, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122,
9628.73 C. Schmidt, E. F. Paulus, V. Bohmer and W. Vogt, New J. Chem.,
2000, 24, 123.74 B. Kuberski, M. Pecul and A. Szumna, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2008,
3069.75 B. Y. Wang, X. G. Bao, Z. Q. Yan, V. Maslak, C. M. Hadad and
J. D. Badjic, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 15127.76 B. Y. Wang, S. Rieth and J. D. Badjic, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009,
131, 7250.
Dow
nloa
ded
by U
nive
rsity
of
Suss
ex o
n 24
Feb
ruar
y 20
13Pu
blis
hed
on 3
0 Se
ptem
ber
2010
on
http
://pu
bs.r
sc.o
rg |
doi:1
0.10
39/B
9195
27K
View Article Online