Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

27
information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24

Transcript of Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

Page 1: Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

information policy issues in RePEc

Thomas Krichel

2009-02-24

Page 2: Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

todays talk

• “information policy” In fact, I am only talking about copyright issues here.

• “RePEc” I have to take some time to explain what RePEc is. I will start with some history.

Page 3: Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

RePEc History

• It started with me as a research assistant an in the Economics Department of Loughborough University of Technology in 1990.

• a predecessor of the Internet allowed me to download free software without effort

• but academic papers had to be gathered in a painful way

Page 4: Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

CoREJ

• published by HMSO– Photocopied lists of contents tables recently

published economics journal received at the Department of Trade and Industry

– Typed list of the recently received working papers received by the University of Warwick library

• The latter was the more interesting.

Page 5: Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

working papers

• early accounts of research findings• published by economics departments

– in universities– in research centers– in some government offices– in multinational administrations

• disseminated through exchange agreements

• important because of 4 year publishing delay

Page 6: Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

1991-1992

• I planned to circulate the Warwick working paper list over listserv lists

• I argued it would be good for them– increase incentives to contribute– increase revenue for ILL

• After many trials, Warwick refused. • During the end of that time, I was offered a

lectureship, and decided to get working on my own collection.

Page 7: Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

1993: BibEc and WoPEc

• Fethy Mili of Université de Montréal had a good collection of papers and gave me his data.

• I put his bibliographic data on a gopher and called the service "BibEc"

• I also gathered the first ever online electronic working papers on a gopher and called the service "WoPEc".

Page 8: Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

NetEc consortium

• BibEc printed papers

• WoPEc electronic papers

• CodEc software

• WebEc web resource listings

• JokEc jokes

• HoPEc

a lot of Ec!

Page 9: Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

WoPEc to RePEc

• WoPEc was a catalog record collection

• WoPEc remained largest web access point

• but getting contributions was tough

• In 1996 I wrote basic architecture for RePEc. – ReDIF– Guildford Protocol

Page 10: Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

1997: RePEc principle

• Many archives – archives offer metadata about digital objects (mainly

working papers)• One database

– The data from all archives forms one single logical database despite the fact that it is held on different servers.

• Many services – users can access the data through many interfaces. – providers of archives offer their data to all interfaces

at the same time. This provides for an optimal distribution.

Page 11: Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

based on close to 1000 archives

• WoPEc• EconWPA• DEGREE• S-WoPEc• NBER• CEPR• Blackwell

• US Fed in Print• IMF• OECD• MIT• University of Surrey• CO PAH• Elsevier

Page 12: Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

to form a 700k item dataset

279,000 working papers

415,000 journal articles

1,700 software components

5,000 book and chapter listings

18,900 author contact and publication listings

10,800 institutional contact listings

Page 13: Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

RePEc is used in many services

• Econpapers

• Economists Online

• NEP: New Economics Papers

• Inomics• RePEc author service

• IDEAS

• RuPEc

• EDIRC

• LogEc

• CitEc

Page 14: Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

… describes documentsTemplate-Type: ReDIF-Paper 1.0Title: Dynamic Aspect of Growth and Fiscal PolicyAuthor-Name: Thomas Krichel Author-Person: RePEc:per:1965-06-

05:thomas_krichelAuthor-Email: [email protected] Author-Name: Paul Levine Author-Email: [email protected] Author-WorkPlace-Name: University of SurreyClassification-JEL: C61; E21; E23; E62; O41 File-URL: ftp://www.econ.surrey.ac.uk/

pub/RePEc/sur/surrec/surrec9601.pdf File-Format: application/pdfCreation-Date: 199603 Revision-Date: 199711 Handle: RePEc:sur:surrec:9601

Page 15: Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

… describes persons (RAS)template-type: ReDIF-Person 1.0name-full: MANKIW, N. GREGORYname-last: MANKIWname-first: N. GREGORYhandle: RePEc:per:1984-06-16:N__GREGORY_MANKIWemail: [email protected]:http://post.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/ mankiw/mankiw.htmlworkplace-institution: RePEc:edi:deharusworkplace-institution: RePEc:edi:nberrusAuthor-Article: RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:76:y:1986:i:4:p:676-91Author-Article: RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:77:y:1987:i:3:p:358-74Author-Article: RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:78:y:1988:i:2:p:173-77….

Page 16: Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

… describes institutions

Template-Type: ReDIF-Institution 1.0 Primary-Name: University of SurreyPrimary-Location: GuildfordSecondary-Name: Department of EconomicsSecondary-Phone: (01483) 259380Secondary-Email: [email protected]: (01483) 259548Secondary-Postal: Guildford, Surrey GU2 5XHSecondary-Homepage: http://www.econ.surrey.ac.uk/Handle: RePEc:edi:desuruk

Page 17: Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

ReDIF data

• ReDIF data may contain abstracts. Thus it is more than just factual information.

• RePEc archives may contain material other than ReDIF data, surch as full-text files of papers. Such documents presumably have the same legal status as the ReDIF data.

Page 18: Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

copyright of RePEc

• One vision of RePEc copyright is that it has no copyright of its own. All the copyright lies with the individual archives.

• When an archive is opened, there is no formal copyright agreement or licensing of contents.

• The agreement to copy is implicit, like if the material were on a simple web site.

Page 19: Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

RePEc copyrightable?

• The RePEc dataset has no supporting organization, neither legal nor de facto.

• Thus there is no entity to hold a copyright over RePEc just in case there would be one.

Page 20: Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

RePEc as a compilation of facts

• It is known since Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991) that a collection of facts is not subject to copyright.

• But standards for originality are usually low.

• Members of the RePEc community did issue a set of licensing conditions.

http://repec.org/docs/RePEcDataUse.html

Page 21: Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

Use of RePEc data

• You are free to do whatever you want with this data collected on the archives that are described here, provided that:

a. You do not charge for it or include it in a service or product that is not free of charge.

Page 22: Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

Restrictions b• b. When displaying the contents of a

template (or part of a template) the following fields must be shown if they are present in the template: Title, Author-Name File-Restriction.

• If there is a Restriction field in the series or archive template this should be shown if there is no File-Restriction field

Page 23: Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

Restrictions c and d

You must participate in RePEc by maintaining an archive that actively contributes material to RePEc.

You do not contravene any copyright statement found in any of the participating archives.

Page 24: Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

Restriction e

You attribute RePEc as the source of the data: for example, by adding a statement that the data are obtained from RePEc and linking to http://repec.org wherever RePEc data are displayed.

Page 25: Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

RePEc violates its own conditions

The Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) database is a multi-million dollar cash cow for the American Economic Association. They are strong on historical data and journal articles but weak on working papers.

RePEc have an agreement that hands over their data to the JEL without data return.

Page 26: Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

Past problems

• Xavier Sala-i-Martin copied EDIRC records on his homepage and claimed they were his. The RePEc team felt this was inappropriate and the abuse was stopped by appeals to his superiors. See http://wot an.liu.edu/home/krichel/email/sala-i-martin. html

• Ecommunics.com copied the entire RePEc dataset but gave no attribution.

Page 27: Information policy issues in RePEc Thomas Krichel 2009-02-24.

http://openlib.org/home/krichel

Thank you for your attention!