InfluenceMap Ranking Tables

8

Click here to load reader

description

InfluenceMap Ranking Tables

Transcript of InfluenceMap Ranking Tables

Page 1: InfluenceMap Ranking Tables

1

InfluenceMap Scoring Tables:

Corporations and Influencers

Here are our ranking tables of corporations and influencers (trade associations etc.)

on their influence on climate change policy. Progressive organizations supporting

climate policy are at the top of the table with obstructive ones at the bottom in the F

band. The names of the companies and influencers are hyperlinked back to our site.

The full interactive version is available here

14th September 2015

Corporations

InfluenceMap Performance Band

Organization Engagement Intensity

Sector Region

B Google 18 Information Technology North America

B Unilever 49 Consumer Staples Europe

B Cisco Systems 21 Information Technology North America

B- GlaxoSmithKline 21 Healthcare Europe

B- Deutsche Telekom 16 Telecommunications Europe

B- National Grid 34 Utilities Europe

B- Vodafone Group 13 Telecommunications Europe

C+ Nestle 25 Consumer Staples Europe

C+ Apple 19 Information Technology North America

C+ Vinci 18 Commercial Services Europe

C+ Telefonica 20 Telecommunications Europe

C Johnson & Johnson 11 Healthcare North America

C Orange 11 Telecommunications Europe

C ABB 30 Industrials Europe

Page 2: InfluenceMap Ranking Tables

2

InfluenceMap Performance Band

Organization Engagement Intensity

Sector Region

C Coca Cola 18 Consumer Staples North America

C Hewlett Packard 14 Information Technology North America

C Iberdrola 42 Utilities Europe

C Mondelez International 6 Consumer Staples North America

C L'Oreal 15 Consumer Staples Europe

C PepsiCo 18 Consumer Staples North America

C Walt Disney 7 Media North America

C- Deutsche Post 21 Airlines and Logistics Europe

C- Qualcomm 12 Information Technology North America

C- Softbank 17 Telecommunications Asia

C- Siemens 20 Industrials Europe

C- Samsung Electronics 8 Information Technology Asia

C- Honda Motor 17 Automotive Asia

C- Microsoft 9 Information Technology North America

C- Philip Morris International 5 Consumer Staples North America

C- Nippon Telegraph & Telephone

8 Telecommunications Asia

C- EDF 56 Utilities Europe

C- Novartis 7 Healthcare Europe

C- United Technologies 14 Industrials North America

C- Anheuser Busch InBev 10 Consumer Staples Europe

C- Express Scripts Holding 4 Healthcare North America

D+ Walmart Stores 9 Retailing North America

D+ Oracle 14 Information Technology North America

D+ Amgen 4 Healthcare North America

Page 3: InfluenceMap Ranking Tables

3

InfluenceMap Performance Band

Organization Engagement Intensity

Sector Region

D+ E.ON 48 Utilities Europe

D+ Enel 36 Utilities Europe

D+ United Parcel Service 12 Airlines and Logistics North America

D+ Honeywell International 24 Industrials North America

D+ Walgreens Boots Alliance 7 Retailing North America

D+ Nissan 21 Automotive Asia

D+ General Motors 16 Automotive North America

D+ Moller Maersk Group 11 Airlines and Logistics Europe

D Pfizer 9 Healthcare North America

D DuPont 20 Chemicals North America

D Verizon Communications 9 Telecommunications North America

D IBM 10 Information Technology North America

D Hitachi 21 Industrials Asia

D Toyota Motor 16 Automotive Asia

D Sanofi 10 Healthcare Europe

D Suncor Energy 28 Energy North America

D BHP Billiton 23 Materials Oceania

D Airbus Group 18 Industrials Europe

D BMW Group 22 Automotive Europe

D General Electric 34 Industrials North America

D ENI 30 Energy Europe

D- Volkswagen 20 Automotive Europe

D- Royal Dutch Shell 45 Energy Europe

D- British American Tobacco 6 Consumer Staples Europe

Page 4: InfluenceMap Ranking Tables

4

InfluenceMap Performance Band

Organization Engagement Intensity

Sector Region

D- Daimler 19 Automotive Europe

D- Roche Group 8 Healthcare Europe

D- Hyundai Motor 12 Automotive Asia

D- Delta Air Lines 5 Airlines and Logistics North America

D- Intel 19 Information Technology North America

D- Boeing 13 Industrials North America

E+ Home Depot 8 Retailing North America

E+ Ford Motor 16 Automotive North America

E+ Total 40 Energy Europe

E+ Time Warner 9 Media North America

E+ America Movil 9 Telecommunications North America

E+ Bayer 28 Healthcare Europe

E+ Rio Tinto Group 27 Materials Europe

E+ Lukoil 12 Energy Europe

E+ Dow Chemical 28 Chemicals North America

E+ Schlumberger 12 Energy North America

E+ Mitsubishi Corporation 13 Commercial Services Asia

E+ Merck 10 Healthcare North America

E CVS Health 9 Retailing North America

E Cargill 16 Materials North America

E BASF 35 Chemicals Europe

E Hutchison Whampoa 4 Telecommunications Asia

E UnitedHealth Group 7 Healthcare North America

E AT&T 10 Telecommunications North America

Page 5: InfluenceMap Ranking Tables

5

InfluenceMap Performance Band

Organization Engagement Intensity

Sector Region

E Exxon Mobil 32 Energy North America

E Caterpillar 19 Industrials North America

E 21st Century Fox 17 Media North America

E BP 37 Energy Europe

E- Procter & Gamble 9 Consumer Staples North America

E- Mitsui & Co 10 Commercial Services Asia

E- Chevron 38 Energy North America

E- Hon Hai Precision Industry 7 Information Technology Asia

E- Occidental Petroleum 15 Energy North America

E- Berkshire Hathaway 15 Industrials North America

E- Comcast 7 Media North America

F Phillips 66 14 Energy North America

F Duke Energy 28 Utilities North America

F Reliance Industries 10 Energy Asia

F Koch Industries 35 Energy North America

Page 6: InfluenceMap Ranking Tables

6

Influencers

InfluenceMap Performance Band

Organization

Engagement Intensity

Sector Region

C- International Council of Chemical Associations (ICCA)

7 Chemicals Europe

C- Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers

19 Automotive North America

C- Confederation of British Industry (CBI)

43 All Sectors Europe

C- Confederation of Indian Industry (CII)

19 All Sectors Asia

D+ International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)

21 Chemicals Europe

D German Automotive Association (VDA)

16 Automotive Europe

D Eurelectric 31 Utilities Europe

D- Federation of Korean Industries (FKI)

19 All Sectors Asia

D- Japan Chemical Industry Association (JCIA)

22 Chemicals Asia

D- European Roundtable of Industrialists (ERT)

20 All Sectors Europe

D- National Confederation of Industry Brazil (CNI)

18 All Sectors South America

D- International Federation of Industrial Energy Consumers (IFIEC)

35 Chemicals Europe

D- German Industrial Federation (BDI)

42 All Sectors Europe

D- American Chemistry Council (ACC)

26 Chemicals North America

E+ The Business Council of Australia

28 All Sectors Oceania

E+ Japan Business Federation (Keidanren)

30 All Sectors Asia

E Business Roundtable 27 All Sectors North America

E Business Europe 39 All Sectors Europe

E European Automobile Manufacturers Association (ACEA)

25 Automotive Europe

E German Chemical Industry Association (VCI)

32 Chemicals Europe

E- European Chemical Industry Council (CEFIC)

39 Chemicals Europe

E- US Chamber of Commerce 36 All Sectors North America

Page 8: InfluenceMap Ranking Tables

8

Notes on Our Scoring The Organization Scores To measure and score corporate influence on climate change policy, we have developed a comprehensive process of examining a series of publicly available and reliable data sources (e.g. legislative consultations, respected press, CDP responses) and querying them, for each corporation, against a set of climate change policy and legislation related queries (e.g. position on a carbon tax, energy efficiency standards). We score each data source/query intersection (or cell) on a 5-point scale, with clearly consistent evidence and guidelines for our scorers. There are 96 such scoring cells at present and the Organizational Score for each corporation is computed over these, by our proprietary algorithm that accounts for weightings and irrelevant data sources/queries. The Organizational Score is expressed as a % with 100% representing very supportive influence on climate policy. We note here that a corporation and an influencer (e.g. a trade body, chamber of commerce, advocacy group) are scored in exactly the same way to arrive at their respective Organizational Score.

The Relationship Scores A corporation, as well as its Organizational Score will have a Relationship Score. It is computed by aggregating the Organizational Scores of the Influencers (trade bodies etc.) it has relationships with, weighted by both the strength of these relationships and the relative importance of the Influencers towards climate change policy. A corporation will have a number of relationships with Influencers mapped in our database. In turn these Influencers will themselves have organizational scores as computed by exactly the same method as was done for the corporations. Such relationships vary in nature and strength and we account for this in our assessment by assigning Relationship Strengths. For example a trade association may have 2000 member corporations with 10 of them on its executive committee. The 10 Executive Committee members would have strength of 8 compared to 3 for the regular members, for example.

The Performance Bands For Corporations, the Organizational Scores and Relationship Scores are combined to result in an Overall Rating that places the Corporation in a Performance Band. There are 20 performance bands from A+ (representing a total score from 95-100%) through to E- (a score of 25-30%), with scores below 25% falling in the red "F" band. So it is a relative scale. Most companies fall within the 45-55% band that indicates they are neither actively obstructing nor supporting the climate policy process. A score of 60% or more indicates the company is actively supporting polices and regulations towards a low carbon future. Conversely lower than a 40% band generally indicates obstructing behavior. As different sectors face differing regulatory issues, it is most useful to compare the Performance Bands of corporations within the same sector.

Engagement Intensity The engagement intensity is a metric of the extent to which the company is engaging on climate change policy matters, whether positively or negatively. It is a number from 0 (no engagement at all) to 100 (full engagement on all queries/data points. Clearly energy and energy intensive users more affected by climate regulations will have a higher engagement intensity than, for example retailers. So an organization’s score should be looked at in conjunction with this metric to understand the amount of evidence we are using in each case to base our score on. Full details on our scoring can be found here.