Industrial Strength - MAIP

Industrialstrength

2013 regional Demographic& Workforce

Report

Grand River Dam Authority coal-fired Power Plant

Contentspurpose of study ............................................4

Study area ................................................................6

Demographics .......................................................8 Population ...........................................................................................9 migration .................................................................................................9

Economy .................................................................... 10 Cost of living index ................................................................11 Household income ..................................................................11 Housing opportunity index ......................................12 Poverty ....................................................................................................12 per capita income ....................................................................13 sales tax rates ...........................................................................13

workforce ............................................................ 14 Jobs and Business Establishments ........ 15 Unemployment rate ........................................................... 15 Professional Jobs .............................................................. 16 Earnings Per Worker ..................................................... 16 creative Jobs .................................................................................17 Average Annual Pay by Industry .................. 18 Commuting Patterns ......................................................... 19 Educational Attainment ............................................20 Occupational Employment ....................................22

^Tulsa

OklahomaCity

Purposeof study

THE MidAmerica Industrial Park is Oklahoma’s largest industrial

park, serving nearly 80 companies and set on 9,000 acres in Mayes

County east of Tulsa. This Demographic and Workforce Profile

provides an overview of population, standard of living, employment, mi-

gration and commuting specific to the area served by the park. This re-

port will serve as a launching pad for developing a strategic plan to grow

the park into a community where Oklahomans can live, work and play.

midamerica industrial park^

^Tulsa

OklahomaCity

Major highways in oklahoma

midamericaindustrial

park

^

^

Tulsa

DelawareRogers

Mayes

Tulsa

CherokeeWagoner

MidAmerica Industrial Park

Claremore

Glenpool

Grove

OwassoPryorCreek

Tahlequah

Wagoner

THE primary area selected for this study

is comprised of five counties: Chero-

kee, Delaware, Mayes, Rogers and

Wagoner. This area will be referred to in this

report as the MAIP Region. Tulsa County data

has also been included as a secondary geo-

graphic territory for addition or comparison to

the MAIP Region. Multiple sources were used to

compile the data, which

were the most up-to-

date that was available.

study AreaMajor highways in the

MAIP Region and Tulsa County

^

Tulsa

DelawareRogers

Mayes

Tulsa

CherokeeWagoner

MidAmerica Industrial Park

Claremore

Glenpool

Grove

OwassoPryorCreek

Tahlequah

Wagoner

Major highways in the MAIP Region and Tulsa County

demographics

9Demographics

Population

Migration

Region Total Population 2012 20 to 64 Population 2011 65+ Population 2011

MAIP Counties 294,156 167,622 43,787Tulsa County 613,816 364,210 74,918Combined 907,972 531,832 118,705

Source: US Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP)

The combined population of the MAIP Region is 294,156. Adding Tulsa County to the region more than triples the total population to a total of 907,972. Approximately 57% of the MAIP Region’s population is between the ages of 20 to 64, compared to Tulsa County with 60% in that age group. Also, the MAIP Region contains a 65 or older population of 15%, while Tulsa County has 12% in that category.

Net Migration is the difference between the number of people relocating into or out of an area over a period of time. A positive value represents more people entering the region than leaving it, while a negative value repre-sents more people leaving than entering it.

The MAIP region had a net migration of +2,624 residents during 2010-2012. In the same time period, Tulsa County had a net migration of only +2,104 residents. The com-bined net migration of the MAIP Region and Tulsa County is +4,728 residents.

Region Residents

MAIP Counties +2,624Tulsa County +2,104Combined +4,728

Note: positive values indicate positive net flow into the region.

Source: Estimates of the Components of Resi-dent Population Change, April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2012, U.S. Census Bureau

Georgia-Pacific Gypsum

economy

The cost of living is the amount of money it takes to ac-quire basic necessities of life. These necessities include things such as groceries, housing, utilities, transportation, healthcare and miscellaneous goods and services such as clothing. The cost of living index compares local costs of living to the national average. The national average is set to 100, and each index is read as a percent of the national average. Index values above 100 mean that the local area has a cost of living above the national average, while values below 100 mean that the local area has a cost of living below the national average.

The MAIP Region has an index of 90.3, which is almost ten points below the national aver-age. When including Tulsa County, the combined region has an index about five points below the national average at 95.2. Tulsa County by itself has an index close to the national average at 97.5.

11Economy

Cost of living indexRegion 2012 Index

MAIP Counties 90.3Tulsa County 97.5Combined 95.2

Sources: ACS 2010 3-year Popu-lation Estimates, U.S. Census Bureau, and the 2012 Annual Av-erage Cost of Living Index from the Council for Community and Economic Research (C2ER)

Household incomeHouseholds by income 2011

The majority of households in the MAIP Region (55%) have combined incomes of less than $50,000. Twenty percent of the households have incomes between $50,000 to 74,999. Twenty-five percent of households have incomes at $75,000 or more. (The nine categories do not add up to 100% due to rounding error.)

15%

13%

12%

16%

20%

13%

9%

2% 2%

<$15,000$15,000 - $24,999$25,000 - $34,999$35,000 - $49,999$50,000 - $74,999$75,000 - $99,999$100,000 - $149,999$150,000 - $199,999$200,000+

The housing opportunity index (HOI) measures the percentage of homes sold in an area that would have been affordable to a family earning the local median in-come. The MAIP Region has

an HOI index of 79.4%. Adding in Tulsa County, the index is 77.8%, while Tulsa County by itself has an HOI of 76.9%. The national HOI average is 74.9%, as reported in February 2013 by the National Association of Homebuilders. Therefore, the MAIP Region, Tulsa County, and the two combined are more affordable than the national average, with the MAIP Region being the most affordable of the three.

Housing opportunity index

Region Housing Units Surveyed Percent Affordable

MAIP Counties 65,932 79.4%

Tulsa County 113,644 76.9%Combined 179,576 77.8%

Source: ACS 2011 3-year estimates, DP04, U.S. Census Bureau

12 Economy

PovertyThe poverty threshold (a.k.a. poverty level) is the minimum level of income deemed adequate for a household. As of 2012, all 48 contiguous states and Wash-

ington D.C. had the same poverty threshold. Determining the poverty threshold is usually done by finding the total cost of all the essential resources that an average human adult consumes in one year. The threshold is adjusted for each household based on how many children live there and whether the householder is over 65 or not. The measure of poverty used here is the percentage of households below 200% of the poverty level. For the MAIP region, this statistic amounts to 35.1% of households. It is 36% for Tulsa County and 35.7% combined. So from this measure, the MAIP region has a slightly lower poverty rate than Tulsa County.

RegionPercent of Population

Below 200% of the Poverty Level

MAIP Counties 35.1%Tulsa County 36.0%Combined 35.7%

Source: ACS 2011 3-year estimates, S1701, U.S. Census Bureau

solae

per capita income

13Economy

sales tax rates

Per capita income, also known as income per person, is the average (mean) income of persons in a re-gion. It is calculated by adding together all personal income for people who live in the region and divid-ing it by the region’s population. In this measure, the MAIP Region is close to Oklahoma as whole. The MAIP Region has a per capita income of $22,597, which is about $600 less than Oklahoma. When com-pared to the U.S. as a whole, the region’s per capita income is about $4,500 lower. Tulsa County com-pares more closely to the U.S. figure. Tulsa County

has a per capita income of $26,952, which is slightly lower than the U.S. as a whole at $27,158.

Region Per Capita Income

MAIP Counties $22,597Tulsa County $26,952Combined $25,539Oklahoma $23,303United States $27,158

Source: American Community Survey 2011 3-year estimates, B19301 and S0101, U.S. Census Bureau

The state sales tax rate in Okla-homa is 4.5%. Municipal tax rates in the MAIP Region vary between 2.0% and 4.5%.

Adding togther state, county, and municipal rates, the total sales tax rates for municipalities in the com-bined area of the MAIP Region and Tulsa County average to 8.9%.

Counties County Municipal State Total Range

Cherokee 1.75% 2.50-4.50% 4.5% 8.75-10.75%Delaware 1.40% 3.00-3.75% 4.5% 8.90-9.65%Mayes 1.38% 2.00-4.00% 4.5% 7.88-9.88%Rogers 1.83% 3.00-4.00% 4.5% 9.33-10.33%Tulsa 0.85% 3.00-4.00% 4.5% 8.35-9.35%Wagoner 1.30% 3.00-4.00% 4.5% 8.80-9.80%

Source: Rates and Codes for Sales, Use, and Lodging Tax, Oklahoma Tax Commission

GRDA Pensacola dam, Grand Lake o’ the cherokees

workforce

performance pipe

Jobs and Business Establishments

15workforce

Unemployment rate

The number of jobs for both the MAIP Region and Tulsa County increased by 2% over the three-year period from 2009 to 2012. The MAIP Region added 1,698 jobs during that time, while Tulsa County added 7,426. Dividing jobs by establishments, it is evident that in 2012 establishments av-eraged 23.1 employees in the MAIP Region, while in Tulsa County the figure was 21.5 employees.

The unemployment rate is calculated by dividing the number of unem-ployed by the number of people in the labor force. Unemployment rates in all three study areas are 5.5%. The rates

have declined from 2009 to 2012 in the combined region by 1.4 percentage points. The MAIP Region at 1.5 points had a greater decline in unemployment than Tulsa County at 1.3 points.

RegionUnemployment

Rate 2009Unemployment

Rate 2012 Change

MAIP Counties 7.0% 5.5% -1.5%Tulsa County 6.8% 5.5% -1.3%Combined 6.9% 5.5% -1.4%

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

RSU Pryor at midamerica industrial park

Region2009 Jobs

2012 Jobs Change % Change

2012 Establishments

2012 Employees per Establishment

MAIP Counties 108,790 110,488 1,698 2% 4,781 23.1Tulsa County 429,930 437,361 7,426 2% 20,389 21.5Combined 538,720 547,849 9,124 2% 25,170 21.7

Source: EMSI Complete Employment - 2013.1

16 workforce

Professional Jobs

Earnings Per Worker

RegionProfessional

Jobs 2009Professional

Jobs 2012Total

ChangeTotal % Change Openings

Median Hourly Earnings 2012

MAIP Counties 9,102 9,653 551 6.05% 1,475 $28.23Tulsa County 48,165 49,616 1,451 3.01% 5,809 $35.39Combined 57,267 59,269 2,002 3.50% 7,284 $34.22


Professional jobs in the region are represented here by these classes of workers:

• Lawyers, Judges, and Related Workers

• Top Executives

• Business Operations Specialists

• Financial Specialists

• Health Diagnosing and Treating Practitioners

These careers typically pay higher wages, require higher levels of education, and offer more job security.

Professional jobs are growing at twice as fast a rate in the MAIP Region at 6% than Tulsa County at 3%. The number of professional jobs has been increasing in the combined region since 2009, with an increase of over 2,000 jobs from 2009 to 2012. The median hourly earn-ings for professional jobs are $28.23 for the MAIP region and $34.22 for the combined area.

Region 2012 Average EarningsPer Worker

MAIP Counties $35,549Tulsa County $52,405Combined $49,005


Average Earnings Per Worker (AEPW) is an estimate of annual earnings, which pro-vides an idea of the financial well-being of a region’s residents and workforce. Re-gional AEPW is calculated by dividing the total earnings in a region by the number of workers in the region. The 2012 average earnings for the MAIP Region was $35,549. This compares to Tulsa County at $52,405 and the combined region at $49,005.

hemsaw

17workforce

creative JobsRegion Creative

Jobs 2009Creative Jobs 2012

Total Change

Total % Change

Openings Median Hourly Earnings 2012

MAIP Counties 3,139 3,183 44 1.37% 512 $21.41Tulsa County 18,574 18,636 62 0.33% 2,116 $30.06Combined 21,713 21,819 106 0.49% 2,628 $28.80


Creative jobs in the region are represented here by these classes of workers:

• Architects, surveyors, and cartographers

• Mathematical science occupation workers

• Life scientists

• Physical scientists• Entertainers and

performers• Sports and related

workers

• Computer occupation workers

• Art and design workers• Engineers

Creative jobs have grown at four times as fast a rate in the MAIP Region at 1.37% as Tulsa County at 0.33%. The number of creative jobs has been increasing in the combined region since 2009, with an increase of over 2,000 jobs from 2009 to 2012. The median hourly earn-ings for creative jobs were $21.41 for the MAIP Region and $28.80 for the combined area.

18 workforce

Average Annual Pay by Industry

Average Annual Pay is another estimate of earnings, but it differs from Average Earnings Per Worker in that it is based on workers who are covered by unemployment insurance. Average Annual Pay is defined by the total pay given to workers covered by unemployment insurance divided by the number of workers covered by unemployment insurance. The numbers here are broken down by four industry sectors for Tulsa County, two selected counties in the MAIP Region, Oklahoma, and the U.S.

The results show that when Mayes, Rogers, and Tulsa counties are combined, they average anywhere from slightly higher to much lower wages than the U.S. average. In the information industry sector, the three counties combined for about $22,000 less than the U.S. average during 2011 and 2012. The three counties’ wages increased by over $2,600 during the times-pan, but the wages did not keep pace with the U.S. increase of almost $4,000. In the manu-facturing and services sectors, the three counties were about $6,000 below the U.S. average

for both years. However, the three counties combined showed gains on the U.S. average by about $400 in manufacturing and $800 in services between 2011 and 2012. Finally, in Trade, Transportation, and Utili-ties, the three counties had wages increase by almost $1,600 between 2011 and 2012. This sector’s wages in the counties were almost $900 higher than the U.S. average in 2011 and over $1,350 above it in 2012.

Sector YearMayes County

Rogers County

Tulsa County Oklahoma

United States

Average of Mayes, Rog-ers & Tulsa

Counties

Compared to theUnited States

Information 2011 $51,342 $41,492 $54,935 $46,616 $74,395 $53,133 -$21,2622012 $56,261 $42,396 $57,683 $50,305 $78,331 $55,787 -$22,544

Manufacturing 2011 $48,236 $53,265 $51,152 $46,449 $57,256 $51,240 -$6,016

2012 $48,244 $54,483 $53,852 $48,163 $59,210 $53,616 -$5,594

Services 2011 $26,217 $32,808 $40,074 $34,576 $44,734 $38,433 -$6,301

2012 $26,352 $33,399 $42,525 $36,054 $46,017 $40,544 -$5,473

Trade, Transpor-tation, & Utilities

2011 $28,879 $36,577 $41,247 $34,897 $39,109 $39,999 +$8902012 $28,715 $37,267 $43,064 $36,289 $40,222 $41,580 +$1,358

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages

AECI Chouteau power plant

19workforce

Commuting Patterns

Mayes, 64%Tulsa, 15%

Rogers, 10%

Craig, 3%

Cherokee, 2%

Delaware, 2%Wagoner, 1%

Other, 5%

Where Mayes County Residents

Commute to, by County

Where Mayes County Workers

Commute from, by County

Mayes, 80%

Rogers, 6%

Delaware, 4%

Cherokee, 2%

Tulsa, 2%

Craig, 2%Wagoner, 2%

Other, 2%

Only sixty-four percent of Mayes County residents work in Mayes County. Fifteen percent of Mayes County residents commute to Tulsa County, and ten percent commute to Rogers County. Eight percent commute to the combination of Craig, Cherokee, Dela-ware or Wagoner Counties, and the remain-ing five percent commute to work elsewhere.

Eighty percent of the Mayes County work-force lives in Mayes County. Six percent of the workforce commutes from Rogers Coun-ty, four percent commutes from Delaware County, and eight percent commutes from the combination of Cherokee, Tulsa, Craig and Wagoner counties. All other locations account for two percent of Mayes County workers.

20 workforce

Educational Attainment

Educational attainment is the highest level of education that an individual has completed. This is distinct from the level of schooling that an individual is currently attending. Current-ly, the MAIP Region trails Tulsa County in the percent of people over 25 that have a bach-elor’s degree or higher (19.6% vs. 28.2%). In terms of growth, in the past three years the MAIP region has had a net increase of 0.3% people with at least a bachelor’s degree, while Tulsa County had a net loss of 0.18%. However, when population increases are factored in, both the MAIP Region and Tulsa County ended up with smaller percentages of people in 2012 than in 2009 who had a least a bachelor’s degree.

Region

2009 Bachelor's or Higher

2009 % Bachelor's or Higher

2012 Bachelor's or Higher

2012 % Bachelor's or Higher Change

% Change

MAIP Counties 37,821 19.8% 37,933 19.6% 112 0.30%Tulsa County 112,927 28.8% 112,729 28.2% -198 -0.18%Combined 150,747 25.8% 150,662 25.4% -85 -0.06%


AECI Chouteau power plant

21workforce

Education 2009 Population 2012 Population Change % Change

MA

IP R

egio

n

Less Than 9th Grade 6,171 4,822 -1,349 -22%9th Grade to 12th Grade 20,577 22,369 1,792 9%High School Diploma 67,557 66,172 -1,385 -2%Some College 46,058 48,647 2,589 6%Associate's Degree 13,201 13,997 796 6%Bachelor's Degree 26,292 27,255 963 4%Graduate Degree+ 11,529 10,678 -851 -7%Totals 191,385 193,939 2,554 1%

Tu

lsa

Cou

nty

Less Than 9th Grade 16,859 12,801 -4,058 -24%9th Grade to 12th Grade 30,738 38,079 7,341 24%High School Diploma 106,196 107,602 1,406 1%Some College 95,448 98,278 2,830 3%Associate's Degree 30,180 30,261 81 0%Bachelor's Degree 77,244 76,578 -666 -1%Graduate Degree+ 35,683 36,151 468 1%Totals 392,349 399,751 7,402 2%

Com

bin

ed R

egio

n

Less Than 9th Grade 23,031 17,623 -5,408 -23%9th Grade to 12th Grade 51,315 60,448 9,133 18%High School Diploma 173,753 173,774 21 0%Some College 141,507 146,925 5,418 4%Associate's Degree 43,381 44,258 877 2%Bachelor's Degree 103,536 103,833 297 0%Graduate Degree+ 47,211 46,829 -382 -1%Totals 583,734 593,690 9,956 2%


A more detailed view shows the various edu-cational attainments for individuals age 25 or older for seven categories of attainment. The number of individuals with less than a 9th grade education declined at a rate of 22% for the MAIP Region and 24% for Tulsa County.

In terms of persons with a 9th to 12th grade education, both areas also showed large percent increases, with the MAIP Region at 9% and Tulsa County at 24%. The number of people with graduate degrees or higher declined in the MAIP Region at a rate of 7%, while Tulsa County’s increase of 1% failed to keep with the population increase of 2%.

power soak

SOC Code Description

2009 Jobs

2012 Jobs Change

PercentChange Openings

2012 Median Hourly

Earnings41 Sales and Related 13,317 13,556 239 2% 2,098 $12.33

11 Management 13,111 12,404 -707 -5% 1,258 $16.21

43 Office and Administrative Support 12,111 12,002 -109 -1% 1,322 $12.67

51 Production 7,397 7,880 483 7% 1,733 $15.67

47 Construction and Extraction 7,814 7,598 -216 -3% 1,029 $14.32

53 Transportation and Material Moving 6,027 6,361 334 6% 1,089 $14.36

35 Food Preparation and Serving Related 5,998 6,106 108 2% 1,109 $8.64

25 Education, Training, and Library 6,244 6,048 -196 -3% 683 $16.47

13 Business and Financial Operations 4,700 5,064 364 8% 841 $21.45

39 Personal Care and Service 4,606 4,739 133 3% 801 $10.22

37 Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance

4,137 4,414 277 7% 623 $9.54

49 Installation, Maintenance, and Repair 4,057 4,207 150 4% 711 $15.35

29 Healthcare Practitioners and Technical 3,792 4,130 338 9% 707 $29.26

33 Protective Service 2,362 2,676 314 13% 636 $15.39

27 Arts, Design, Entertainment, Sports, and Media

2,412 2,526 114 5% 421 $14.07

31 Healthcare Support 2,231 2,505 274 12% 471 $10.90

21 Community and Social Service 1,643 1,598 -45 -3% 176 $16.18

45 Farming, Fishing, and Forestry 1,559 1,465 -94 -6% 250 $10.32

55 Military 1,245 1,182 -63 -5% 10 $14.55

17 Architecture and Engineering 1,042 1,064 22 2% 178 $26.89

15 Computer and Mathematical 1,003 964 -39 -4% 117 $22.66

23 Legal 698 692 -6 -1% 79 $28.13

99 Unclassified 636 664 28 4% 79 $12.78

19 Life, Physical, and Social Science 649 641 -8 -1% 112 $25.97

Totals (Hourly Earnings is an average) 108,790 110,488 1,698 2% 16,532 $14.83


This table describes jobs in the MAIP Region, broken down by occupation type using the Stan-dard Occupational Classification (SOC) system. The table is sorted by the number of 2012 jobs per occupation type. Job types are analyzed here by looking at the highest and lowest ranking types for each measure discussed. The highest and lowest chosen are based on natural breaks in the data as opposed to an arbitrary number of high and low types.

22 workforce

Occupational Employment

The job types with the most employed in 2012 were Sales and Related, Management, and Office and Administrative Support. The ones with the least employed were Legal, Unclassi-fied, and Life, Physical, and Social Science. In terms of change in number of jobs between 2009 and 2012, the highest growth occupation types were Production, Business and Finan-cial Operations, Healthcare Practitioners and Technical, Transportation and Material Mov-ing, and Protective Service. The job types that shrank the most were Education, Training, and Library, Construction and Extraction, and Management. In terms of percentage change, the job types with the highest growth rates were Protective Service, Healthcare Support, Healthcare Practitioners and Technical, and Business and Financial Operations. The job types with the highest negative growth rates were Computer and Mathematical, Military, Management, and Farming, Fishing, and Forestry.

The next category to discuss is the number of times a job type was open between 2009 and 2012, which is an indicator of opportunity and turnover. The job types with the most open-ings were Sales and Related, Production, Office and Administrative Support, and Manage-ment. The job types with the fewest openings were Legal, Unclassified, and Military. Finally, the highest earning job types were Healthcare Practitioners and Technical, Legal, Archi-tecture and Engineering, and Life, Physical, and Social Science. The lowest earning were Healthcare Support, Farming, Fishing, and Forestry, Personal Care and Service, Building and Grounds Cleaning and Maintenance, and Food Preparation and Serving Related.

23workforce

Report created by:

Industrial Strength - MAIP

Documents

Transcript of Industrial Strength - MAIP