S. Bachu - Geologic Storage Site Selection and Characterization
Indore BRT: Route Planning Options and Challenges - Prashanth Bachu
description
Transcript of Indore BRT: Route Planning Options and Challenges - Prashanth Bachu
Indore BRT: Route Planning Options & ChallengesPrashanth Bachu, Program Manager, Integrated Urban Transport, EMBARQ India
Operation Plan: Key Assumptions
11.6 km5.0 km
6.5
km
2.5 km
1.5 km
Bus Speed :: 21 kmph (Current: 15 kmph)
Fare Structure :: Existing Fares
Existing Ridership (Corridor + Extension) ::16k pax/day
Projected Demand – Peak Hour Peak Section :: 1,800 pax/hr/dir
Internal – Internal Trips ::62%
Internal – External (IE/EI) ::35%
External – External Through :: 0%
External – External Trips ::3%
Ope
ratio
n Pl
an: O
-D M
atrix
BRT CorridorNorth of
NiranjanpurDewasNaka -
Satya SaiVijaynagar -
PalasiaGitaBhavan -
NavlakahaHolkar Coll. -
BhavarkuaDDU - RG
SquareSouth of BRT
North of Niranjanpur 0% 0% 2% 1% 0% 0% 0%DewasNaka -
Satya Sai 1% 0% 4% 3% 1% 0% 1%Vijaynagar -
Palasia 3% 5% 11% 8% 4% 1% 3%GitaBhavan -
Navlakaha 2% 4% 9% 3% 1% 1% 5%Holkar Coll. -
Bhavarkua 0% 1% 4% 2% 0% 0% 3%DDU - RG
Square 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 2%
South of BRT 0% 0% 3% 4% 2% 2% 2%
Operation Plan: Option 1 (Hybrid – Direct)
23 buses5.0 km
6.5
km
2.5 km
1.5 km
11.6 km12 buses
12 b
usRoute Fleet
Route Length
Speed (km/hr) Trip Time Buses/Hr
peak hr capacity
1 12 18.3 18 132 5.5 3272 12 18.4 18 133 5.4 326
BRT 1 23 11.8 21 72 19.1 1143Standby 3
Total 50 30 1796
Issues Requires conductors on 24 buses outside the BRT Corridor.
Possibility of revenue leakage
Advantages Caters to the total demand
Direct buses for passengers travelling beyond the BRT corridor
No fare penalty for transfer
Operation Plan: Option 1 (Hybrid – Direct)
23 buses5.0 km
6.5
km
2.5 km
1.5 km
11.6 km812 buses
12 b
us
Operation Plan: Option 2 (Hybrid – Transfer)
36 buses5.0 km
6.5
km
2.5 km
1.5 km
11.6 km4 buses
5 b
us 2 buses
Route FleetRoute Length
Speed (km/hr) Trip Time Buses/Hr
peak hr capacity
Tejaji 5 6.5 15 62 4.8 290IPS 4 5 15 50 4.8 288
Panchwati 2 2.5 15 30 4.0 240BRT 36 11.8 21 72 29.8 1789
Standby 3Total 50 43 2608
Issues Integrating fare collection
Managing transfers
Requires conductors on 11 buses
Advantages Caters to the total demand
Optimal combination of a ‘closed’ and ‘open’ system
Reduces conductors and leakage
Operation Plan: Option 2 (Hybrid – Transfer)
36 buses5.0 km
6.5
km
2.5 km
1.5 km
11.6 km4 buses
5 b
us 2 buses
Operation Plan: Option 3 (Closed System)
36 buses5.0 km
6.5
km
2.5 km
1.5 km
11.6 km0 buses
0 b
us 0 buses
Route FleetRoute Length
Speed (km/hr) Trip Time Buses/Hr
peak hr capacity
BRT 36 11.8 21 72 29.8 1789Standby 3
Total 39 30 1789
Issues Will lose 22% ridership (Financial impact ~45 lakhs/mo)
Travel becomes expensive and inconvenient for another 15%
Advantages No conductors on bus
Near zero leakage
Simple and easy operations
Operation Plan: Option 3 (Closed System)
36 buses5.0 km
6.5
km
2.5 km
1.5 km
11.6 km0 buses
0 b
us 0 buses