Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form - PSDS
-
Upload
sinned-seyer -
Category
Documents
-
view
227 -
download
0
Transcript of Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form - PSDS
-
8/10/2019 Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form - PSDS
1/8
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
Republic of the Philippinesepartment of Education
Region IV ADivision of BatangasMALVAR DISTRICT
Name of Employee: LUISITO P. DE CASTRO Name of Rater: DR. CARLITO D. ROCAFORT, CESO V
Position: OIC - PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT SUPERVISOR Position: SCHOOLS DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT
Review Period: JANUARY-DECEMBER 2014 Date of Review : JANUARY 2015
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONTO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING
EVALUATION
MAJOR FINAL
OUTPUTS
KEY RESULT AREAS OBJECTIVES TIME LINE WEIGHT
PER KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL
RESULTS
RATING
Planning, Organizing
and Networking
Provided assistance to at least 2-3 school
heads who need assistance in preparingSchool Improvement Plan/AIP, and Learningcenters Improvement Plan within target date.
April May
2014
20 %
6
(5) Complete and timely submission of
consolidated reports on school andlearning centers improvement plan andwith the following components: Schools situationer within the
district Summary of Performance Indicators Common Actions Points/Programs M & E Mechanisms Financial Requirements Recommendations ConsolIdate/validate accuracy of
data, reports submitted by schoolsfor the Division MIS as delegated bySDS
(4) Consolidated reports containing 4parts and with good and feasiblerecommendations.
-
8/10/2019 Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form - PSDS
2/8
(3) Consolidated reports fairly presented,with missing components/parts
(2) Poor presentation of reports;components/parts largely missing.
(1) No consolidated report
Analyzed and interpreted educationindicators within target date.
March 2015 8 (5) > Record of Performance Indicators
> Trending Analysis
> Action Plan/s to address criticalIndicators
> Implementation Report on
Interventions and Programs
> Full report submitted to SDS
(4) All conditions were met andsatisfactorily accomplished.
(3 ) 3-4 conditions were met withsatisfactory results.
(2) Conditions are largely absent, with noactions to address critical indicators.
(1) Data only with no analysis. Conducted at least one (1) action research onnon-academic factors affecting learningprogress and achievement with target date.
August 2014-January 2015
6 (5) 5 Action research conductedfollowing prescribed format andfeasible/substantive recommendations,with results adopted for decisions.
(4) 4 Action research conductedfollowing prescribed format with verygood results adopted and utilized fordecisions.
(3) 3 Action research conductedfollowing prescribed format and withresults adopted and utilized for
decisions.(2) 2 action research conducted withresults adopted and utilized fordecisions.
(1) 1 action research conducted adopted
-
8/10/2019 Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form - PSDS
3/8
and utilized for decisions.
CurriculumImplementation and
Evaluation
Visited and monitored at least 10 schools outof 20 for supervision of curriculumimplementation on target dates.
January December 2014
35 %
15
(5) 130% and above schools were visitedand monitored with completemonitoring report
(4) 115-129% schools were visited andmonitored with complete monitoring
report(3) 100-114% schools were visited andmonitored with complete monitoringreport
(2) 51-99% schools were visited andmonitored with complete monitoringreport
(1) 50% and below of schools visited andmonitored with complete monitoringreport
Provided technical assistance to at least 3-5school heads in matters of instructionalsupervision such as classroom observationtechniques, management of facilities andresource mobilization, when solicited, withintarget date.
January December 2014
6
(5) 130 and above covered and wereprovided
* technical assistance, withconsolidated report on nature ofassistance with reference toperformance and other problems
* monitored desks, textbook or moduledeliveries/allocations (wit monitoringreport)
(4) 115-129% of schools covered withtechnical assistance provided
(3) 100-114% % of schools covered withtechnical assistance provided
(2) 51-99% of schools covered withtechnical assistance provided
(1) 50% and below o f schools coveredwith technical assistance provided
Assisted and served as resource person andfacilitator in at least 4 schools during INSETs
January December 2014
(5) 130% and above of the schools servedand assisted (with INSET monitoring
-
8/10/2019 Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form - PSDS
4/8
within the rating period 6 form)
(4) 115-129% of the schools served andassisted (with INSET monitoring form)
(3) 110-114% of the schools served andassisted (with INSET monitoring form)
(2) 51-99% of the schools served andassisted (with INSET monitoring form)
(1) 50% and below of the schools servedand assisted (with INSET monitoringform)
Monitored implementation of at least 1 ALSprogram, project and activity within targetdate.
January December 2014
8 (5) * 130% and above of ALS classesmonitored (with monitoring report andrecommendations)
* Reports submitted anddiscussed/presented to SDS.
(4) 115-129% of ALS classes monitored(with monitoring report andrecommendations)
* Reports submitted anddiscussed/presented to SDS.
(3) 100-114% of ALS classes monitored(with monitoring report andrecommendations)
* Reports submitted anddiscussed/presented to SDS.
(2) 51-99% of ALS classes monitored(with monitoring report andrecommendations)
* Reports submitted anddiscussed/presented to SDS.
(1) 50% and below of ALS classes
monitored (with monitoring report andrecommendations)
* Reports submitted anddiscussed/presented to SDS.
Human ResourceDevelopment and
Conducted at least 2 formal classroomobservations per week among teachers for
January toFebruary 2014
30%10
(5) 130% of the teachers and above wereobserved and given assistance to
-
8/10/2019 Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form - PSDS
5/8
Management their professional development. And
July -Dec. 2014
improve teaching competence (withsupervisory plans, reports andrecommendations)
(4) 115-129% of the teachers wereobserved and given assistance toimprove teaching competence (withsupervisory plans, reports andrecommendations)
(3) 100-114% were observed and givenassistance to improve teachingcompetence (with supervisory plans,reports and recommendations)
(2) 51-99% were observed and givenassistance to improve teachingcompetence (with supervisory plans,reports and recommendations)
(1) 50 \% and below were observed andgiven assistance to improve teachingcompetence (with supervisory plans,reports and recommendations)
Monitored the conduct of Teacher InductionProgram activities to at least 5 newly hiredteachers (0-3 years), when solicited
June toDecember 2014
7 (5) 130% of the newly hired teachers (0-3years ) were given Teacher InductionProgram activities (with monitoring andaccomplishment report)
(4) 115-129% of the newly hired teachers(0-3 years ) were given Teacher InductionProgram activities (with monitoring andaccomplishment report)
(3) 100-114% of the newly hired teachers(0-3 years ) were given Teacher InductionProgram activities (with monitoring andaccomplishment report)
(2) (51-99% of the newly hired teachers(0-3 years ) were given Teacher InductionProgram activities (with monitoring andaccomplishment report)
(1) 50% and below of the newly hired
-
8/10/2019 Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form - PSDS
6/8
teachers (0-3 years ) were given TeacherInduction Program activities (withmonitoring and accomplishment report)
Organized and managed at least 1 district in-service training/professional enhancementbased on needs of teachers
January-December
2014
5 (5) 130% and above of district in-servicetrainings were organized and managed(with approved training matrix, M&Ereport)
(4) 115-129% of district in-servicetrainings were organized and managed(with approved training matrix, M&Ereport)
(3) 100-114% of district in-servicetrainings were organized and managed(with approved training matrix, M&Ereport)
(2) 51-99% of district in-service trainingswere organized and managed (withapproved training matrix, M&E report)
(1) 50% and below of district in-servicetrainings were organized and managed
(with approved training matrix, M&Ereport)
Evaluated performance of the ALSCoordinator & Mobile Teachers within targetdate
January December 2014
8 (5) 130% and above of ALS coordinatorscovered
(4) 115-129% of ALS coordinatorscovered
(3) 100-114% of ALS coordinatorscovered
(2) 51-99% of ALS coordinators covered
(1) 50% and below of ALS coordinatorscovered
Special Tasks/ otherAssignments
Assisted at least 2-3 school heads in self-management, decision-making and utilizationand development of school resources, whensolicited.
June-Dec. 2014& Jan-March
2015
15 % 7
(5) 130% and above covered and wereprovided assistance with report onnature of assistance given with referenceto self-management, decision makingand development of school resources.
(4) 115-129% covered and were provided
-
8/10/2019 Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form - PSDS
7/8
assistance with report on nature ofassistance given with reference to self-management, decision making anddevelopment of school resources.
(3) 100-114% covered and were providedassistance with report on nature ofassistance given with reference to self-management, decision making anddevelopment of school resources.
(2) 51-99% covered and were providedassistance with report on nature ofassistance given with reference to self-management, decision making anddevelopment of school resources.
(1) 50% and below covered and wereprovided assistance with report onnature of assistance given with referenceto self-management, decision makingand development of school resources.
Represented the SDS in the Local School
Board meeting and allocation of budget
January-
December 2014
8 (5) 130% and above of the tasks
assigned by the SDS were performedaccording to standards set withaccomplishment report submitted toauthorities concerned
(4) 115-129% of the tasks assigned by theSDS were performed according tostandards set with accomplishmentreport submitted to authoritiesconcerned
(3) 100-114% of the tasks assigned by theSDS were performed according tostandards set with accomplishment
report submitted to authoritiesconcerned
(2) 51-99% of the tasks assigned by theSDS were performed according tostandards set with accomplishment
-
8/10/2019 Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form - PSDS
8/8