Indirect Tax Briefing - Issue 9FILE/EY-ITB-Issue-9.pdf · In this issue Philip Robinson Global...
Transcript of Indirect Tax Briefing - Issue 9FILE/EY-ITB-Issue-9.pdf · In this issue Philip Robinson Global...
Country updates
“ Recent media reports indicate that the global economy is improving. This development has, however, not halted the reliance by governments around the world on indirect taxes.”
In this issue Philip Robinson Global Director — Indirect Tax
Themes and trends
32importers?
34 Trial measures for the VAT exemption of cross-border services supplied by businesses in China have been announced. What are the key features of these measures and how will they impact taxpayers?
14conducted a survey and published a guide covering over 100 countries that gives some insight into the tax treatment of the
20operate in a carbon-constrained economy? Are you aware of the tax incentives available to reduce the costs of carbon initiatives?
06
28 The introduction of cash accounting will impact many businesses. What are the impacts and how do the measures compare
Indirect tax changes:
Indirect tax legislation evolves and changes on a regular basis. We outline some of the recent and upcoming changes (agreed and proposed) from around the world.26
Country updates (contd.)
Mary O’Hare [email protected] +44 28 9044 5472
Ros Barr [email protected] +44 20 7980 0259
please go to www.ey.com/indirecttax.
www.ey.com/tax www.ernstyoung.mobi for mobile devices
42impact.
46terms of the agreement.
50 After much debate and an earlier postponement, Italy increased the standard VAT rate from 21% to 22% on 1 October 2013. In this article we discuss the background to this latest VAT rate increase and the VAT compliance implications for both domestic and foreign businesses operating in Italy.
54 The consumption tax rate in Japan will increase to 8% on 1 April 2014. This article outlines the details of the phased increase and some of the transitional provisions for supplies spanning the change in rate.
56
60to get ready?
64this article we set out the most relevant amendments affecting foreign trade operations.
68involved in international trade, will be affected. In this article, we look at some of the new rules relating to the time of supply and invoicing. We also look at how the changes may impact on international supply chains.
72 In this article, the second in a series focusing on Russian VAT issues, we examine the VAT treatment of services related to international trade and logistics, and outline some considerations for foreign companies doing business with Russia.
76payers to submit detailed VAT ledger reports along with their periodic VAT returns from 1 January 2014. In this article we
Recent media reports indicate that the global economy is improving. This development has not halted, however, the reliance by governments around the world on indirect taxes. Indirect tax changes continue with new VAT/
or contemplated in a number of
still being enacted and the trend for increasing rates continuing. These global trends are illustrated by many of the developments highlighted in our snapshot of indirect tax changes around the world.
In our Trends and themes section we explore a range of issues that have an impact on doing business
tax policy advisory group. Three
achievements and explain how they
can represent the views and concerns of businesses that trade in and with
Our next article focuses on the VAT/Worldwide
.1 This guide features the tax rules for cloud computing in more than 50 countries based on three common operating models. The survey shows that, in most countries, the local tax laws have not
address the taxation of cloud services, which can lead to uncertainty and risk both for service providers and their customers. To illustrate this point, the
rating for cloud service providers in incurring irrecoverable VAT costs, encountering legislative issues and having to register for VAT as non-residents.
we look at the business and tax considerations for carbon regimes. As these regimes become more prevalent and cover more industries, businesses need to prepare to operate in a low carbon environment and be aware of the tax incentives that are available to help with the cost of carbon initiatives.
In our Country updates section, we feature some of the important indirect tax issues arising in countries and
look at some of the main features of the new tax and examine what businesses
change. China continues with its VAT pilots, and it has recently set out the trial measures for the VAT exemption of cross-border services. We outline these measures and examine how they can help taxpayers and tax authorities. We also look at the planned consumption tax increase in Japan.
Welcome
1. www.ey.com/cloudtaxguide.
In this publication, we bring you a mix of articles
global trade matters and other indirect taxes, using information and insights from our global network of Indirect Tax professionals.
Welcome to edition nine of our
Our article on the introduction of cash accounting In Bulgaria sets out details of the expected reform and also features a summary of cash accounting provisions
Indirect tax compliance remains a top priority for businesses, but this is made
at very short notice. We feature articles
came into effect on the same day and from Italy where a VAT rate increase, which was expected to be postponed,
reforms and their implications for local and international businesses.
Turning to international trade, we feature articles from Canada (the
and on the free trade agreement with
Indirect Tax useful and informative. We
want this publication to continue to be relevant to you and your business,
let me know your thoughts and any suggestions for future topics that you would like us to cover.
([email protected]) or by telephone (+41 58 289 3197).
Best regards,
Themes and trends
conversation with three members
advisory body.
Tel: +44 207 980 0259
Tel: +31 88 40 71175
Tel: +33 25 117 5031
6
7
Ros:today and agreeing to talk about your experience of participating
Gijsbert:
a large number of ideas and plans and opened them up for
around VAT and the process of levying VAT to more technical concerns and to communication transparency and making sure that the Commission could take all relevant information on board in proposing changes.
half were asked on a personal basis as academics or as well-
wide group of people together for discussion, for soundings, and for the generation and the creation of ideas. This was put into
are very interesting and very open.
Ros:your own right. Can I ask how you got involved?
Gwenaelle: Well, I had participated in the Commission’s former expert group on invoicing, which was set up in 2008, and I think
VAT. I am there as an individual, not representing any
the issues that I hear from my clients, from the enterprises in the
these constraints to the Commission and to be able to make a difference by helping to create a strong legislation that can be
to their issues.
Ros:different from your and Audrey’s role in the group. Can you elaborate?
Gijsbert:
with Audrey, who is an Indirect Tax partner doing a lot of work in
Claudio Fischer, we prepare our viewpoints, our contribution, and we go to the meetings. If I can’t make a meeting, Audrey takes my place. I should also mention that we have discussions
8
that we all have the same goal, working on creating a more
Of course that is a long process, as consultations and reaching unanimity in Brussels always tend to take a long time. But I do
a feel for what is happening and where the consensus may be and especially how industry and how businesses look at the various proposals or initiatives that the Commission is working on.
Ros:partners and that being involved with something like this does
getting involved?
Gijsbert:
policy, including getting involved in consultations and public debate or even in political debate. We have our viewpoints and insights, and we represent our clients’ concerns and experiences. But more than that, we have a strategy to build a better working world. We take that very seriously. And we believe that doing
We take it as an honor doing this work and being active in the
we assist governments and lawmakers with the introduction of
place to be, for our clients and for ourselves. And if it means that we must invest in that, we will.
Ros:
Gwenaelle:add that I think we have an important role to play vis-à-vis the
we debate in the group, I can really attest that we are free to speak our minds, say to the Commission that we disagree on this
really represent business and the economies and be a good go-between and link between the position of the Commission and
enterprises face in applying the rules correctly.
I think it is important to see ourselves as a new body that is able to talk on a neutral basis. We are not politicians. We are not representing our country. But we can bring ideas on what could be improved.
Ros:
Gijsbert:topics; one of them, I think the most striking one, is the issue of the business-to-business supplies of goods cross-border between
four times. The Commission is very seriously looking at alternatives for the present system of intra-Community supplies
what to do with the VAT exemptions in the public interest.
broadcasting, telecom services and in fact every supply of digital content as of 1 January 2015. That’s more than a year away, but the changes in pricing, in IT systems and in customer relations are already starting to become visible, and businesses must
And then at one of the recent meetings we’ve discussed the standard VAT return,* which is a proposal that was made public a couple of weeks ago.
Ros: Audrey, I think you were at the meeting where the standard VAT return was discussed. Could tell us a little more about that?
Audrey:outset, it was clear that there were members of the group that felt that the standard VAT declaration as proposed was not “pure” enough. I use that phrase based on the fact that the
have to say it was primarily members who are working within
historically been the issue, it is the fact that the type of
proposals laid on the table were very helpful because they could set up their systems to produce all of the information that
would be needed and then they could simply choose to switch on
move for business and that it would actually help to reduce the administrative burden on them.
As the debate moved around the room, it was clear that the group moved toward a consensus. I thought it was good how the different aspects and interests represented by people in the room were given a voice and that that was taken on board as a whole. I think that the information-sharing was really helpful in that process.
Ros:
Gijsbert: Well, I think that Audrey put it right. The debate shows
experienced in doing that. One of the ways to do it is in a progressive manner, by at least making a start, making sure that
lead, and then others will follow.
And of course the date of implementation, 1 January 2017; seems like a long time away, but you sometimes feel that the
frames because they know what a great deal will be involved for the tax administrations in doing this. But eventually things will start moving. Business is sometimes a little bit more impatient, and you can really see that you have to reach a balance between the various elements.
Ros:
Could you explain what is involved in that?
Gijsbert:the business-to-business cross-border supplies of goods. One of
the existing transitional system that we already had for 20 years
feel that they should be looked at. And so the Commission
that we leave the situation as it is, but, within the existing legal
improvement.
Three areas of improvement have been mentioned: one is the whole issue of chain transactions and triangular transactions and
the VAT Forum, which is a different sounding board.
were formed that are studying the possibility of coming up with
and consignment stocks. I’m a member of the subgroup that is doing the work on consignment stocks, and we are now preparing for our fourth meeting with that group. There are a
subgroup, and representatives of business, industry
providing some facilitation and support to what we’re doing. I think that altogether there are 12 or so of us in the group. We are working in detail on this issue, and we will then present our
In the subgroup we are really discussing all the alternatives. The
group helps to make sure that what we suggest or what we discuss is also feasible and realistic in the eyes of the tax authorities.
Ros: When do you expect to have some outcome from that work?
Gijsbert:
2014.
Ros:pretty soon?
Gijsbert:
Ros: One of the things that I think you mentioned, Audrey, which I thought was really interesting, was the fact that working with
perceptions as an advisor. Could you expand on that?
Audrey: I suppose it’s purely from the perspective of what is realistically achievable and in what time frame, because often we see things that are maybe not working so well, and we ask, “Why
from our own country’s perspective or indeed from our own
made the whole process of policymaking much more transparent, certainly for me, which has given me a greater appreciation of the amount of work that it takes to effect a policy
consideration; it’s also the due care and attention that is paid in terms of the process that is followed and the fact that the Commission doesn’t think about these things in isolation. For
it’s thinking about, both through the consultation processes that it undertakes and through studies. One of the things that should also be highlighted is that the proposals that are laid on the table
being undertaken to validate the idea or identify issues, or we
carried out already. And the studies are always presented “warts and all,” so that we can debate and discuss them openly and to decide whether the problems or negative aspects are so
I certainly think that that level of transparency has really opened my eyes and given me a greater appreciation of what actually happens from a tax-policy perspective in Brussels.
Ros:
Gwenaelle: Well, I think since it’s the second time for me being involved in this sort of capacity, that is where it’s interesting. The
the legal aspect. In other words, the fact that we had to draft a
to be very secondary.
other way around, meaning that I think we can really bring our
to us and think as lawyers or VAT professionals, from a legal perspective, about what would be the effect of drafting the VAT
Aside from the fact that this is very interesting from an intellectual perspective, I think it allows us to bring our real expertise to bear by sharing it with one another and with the
being involved is a very interesting exercise.
Gijsbert:
Ros:
Gijsbert:expresses and the admiration that Audrey mentions for the
the Commission do and that we now get to witness at close
left out or are overlooked in Brussels, but from what we have
itself; that’s one thing. And in all the debates and topics that we discuss, there is constant attention and special focus on what certain measures or decisions mean for the VAT position and the
doing there.
Ros:
achieve?
Audrey: For me, it’s uniformity. I think there is a real drive now and desire within the Commission to get greater uniformity and
easier for all enterprises, and I think that the steps that the
on business, and I think that’s to be applauded.
Gwenaelle: Well, my dream would be that we can get to have real
redrafted in another way it could help everyone to reach a certain level of agreement for changing the things that go wrong. That would increase the amount of change or to make it
Gijsbert: In the short term, I expect that there will be progress in
as a group we will be able to come with a couple of improvements or suggestions for improvements that will be adopted in the present system.
In the long term, I think we may well be looking at a VAT system that is going to become much more feasible for businesses to
lower administrative costs. In fact, a better working world for
On 23 October 2013, the European Commission tabled a legislative proposal (COM(2013) 721) for a standard value-added tax (VAT) return. The Commission states that the aim of the standard VAT return is to reduce administrative burdens for business, ease tax compliance and make tax compliance across the European Union (EU) more
uniform set of information that businesses will have
returns, regardless of the Member State of submission. The standard VAT return, which will replace national VAT returns, will ensure that businesses are asked for the same basic information, within the same deadlines, across the EU.
Around 13% of VAT payers in the EU submit VAT returns in more than one Member State. Currently, although the objectives and logic behind a VAT return are the same in all Member States, the
between them. This is a source of complexity and administrative burdens for businesses. It is estimated that, if adopted, the new return could cut costs for EU businesses by up to €15 billion a year.
commitment to smart regulation and reducing administrative burdens for businesses. Another
in simplifying the process for taxpayers, it should also improve tax compliance and increase tax revenue collection.
compulsory boxes for businesses to complete — chargeable VAT, deductible VAT, net VAT amount (payable or receivable), total value of input transactions and total value of output transactions. In addition, Member States will be entitled to ask for up to 21 boxes of additional standardized information, covering, for example, the split between tax rates or details of cross-border transactions. The Commission considers that this is a vast improvement on the current situation, whereby some Member States require up to 100 information boxes to be completed.
The standard VAT return will have to be submitted in the language of the Member State of submission.
However, since the content of the information boxes will be the same in all Member States, and the description will be available in all EU languages, the Commission envisages that it will be easy to
foreign language.
a monthly basis, while smaller businesses will only
submit an additional annual VAT return, which some Member States currently demand, would be abolished.
the standard VAT return will be allowed to be submitted electronically throughout the EU.
by Member States in the European Council, after consultation with the European Parliament. On this
basis, the Commission envisages that the proposed directive should enter into force on 1 January 2017.
taxes more effectively for growth.
issues and opportunities.
to you or you can get the wider picture by listening to the whole webcast series.
www.ey.com/indirecttaxrgm
and the webcast in the on demand section at www.ey.com/webcasts
Themes and trends
Worldwide cloud computing
Cloud computing has burst onto the commercial scene, affecting many
hardware and software that supports transactions over a virtual network (i.e., the internet), cloud computing has a borderless
proactively manage tax risks for a product that is rapidly expanding on global scale.
Tel: +1 415 894 8732
Tel: +44 207 9514807
Worldwide cloud computing tax guide
The guide was created in response to
that a comprehensive summary of the tax treatment of cloud services did not exist on a global scale. Businesses that supply or receive cloud services typically grow rapidly and expand globally; many tax authorities have not kept up with advances in the technology sector and as such guidance is often unclear about how to treat cloud services from a tax perspective. To further add to the complexity, new products are coming onto the market within the cloud space that
purposes.
Although cloud-related operations are evolving and the tax issues around them are uncertain, the guide aims to show how
certain cloud-based operating models under current law, from a direct and indirect tax perspective. To accomplish this goal, we surveyed more than 140 countries, 50-plus of which are represented in this initial release, to understand the tax considerations under three separate operating models that involve a cloud service provider and a user of cloud services. These three models were selected based on their common use in practice and their simplicity:
Commissioned agent model: The commissioned agent operating model represents a disclosed agency arrangement in which the commissioned agent local entity provides services to the principal for an arm’s length agency commission and the customer deals directly with the principal. In this model, “commissioned
agent” refers to the entity that works on behalf of a principal to sell cloud-based services to customers in the local
agent neither signs contracts with customers nor delivers cloud-based
entity that assumes most if not all the risks associated with providing cloud services to customers.
Commissionaire model: The commissionaire operating model represents an arrangement in which the commissionaire local entity invoices the customer in its own name on behalf of an undisclosed principal. In this model, “commissionaire” refers to the entity that signs customer contracts on behalf of an undisclosed principal.
Buy-sell model: The buy-sell operating model represents an arrangement in which the local buy-sell/sales and marketing subsidiary performs in-country sales and marketing activities (i.e., promotional activities likely remunerated on a cost-plus basis) for the principal. This entity may also perform buy-sell activities directly with the customer, own the rights to intellectual property and content and assume the risk of loss with respect to the transactions in buy-sell agreements. In this model, the “buy-sell” entity refers to either a limited risk distributor
entity may sign customer orders and be contractually responsible, in part or in whole, for the cloud-based services rendered to customers.
contemplate transactions according to the three operating models mentioned above.
understand what drives economic, social and environmental change. It sets international standards on a wide range of issues, including tax policy.
The worldwide cloud computing tax guide
Tax teams need to have visibility and a good understanding of business operations globally to ensure
that they can respond to the introduction of new cloud products in new markets.
Within each operating model, this guide provides high-level tax considerations regarding contractual terms that indicate lease/rent/license, sale or service arrangements. The tax matters considered also include how such payments may be treated from the perspective of:
Withholding tax
Indirect tax
tax that may affect cloud computing services include:
Transfer pricing
The availability of a local ruling or advance pricing agreement
It should also be noted that this guide is generally focused on inbound taxation, not outbound taxation.
Certain trends emerged from the data upon review. In general,
as the laws often predate the technologies entirely. The tax analysis is therefore based on existing laws that seem to have general application to this area and our understanding of and experience with the practice of the countries’ tax authorities.
commissioned agent model, commissionaire model and buy-sell
transactions involving cloud services and assigned a risk rating for each of the 50-plus countries* in this initial release of the
countries. Those countries illustrated as yellow or red indicate
Those countries illustrated as green, while not risk free, indicate
on cloud computing services
issues on cloud computing services
issues on cloud computing services
on cloud computing services
issues on cloud computing services
issues on cloud computing services
on cloud computing services
issues on cloud computing services
issues on cloud computing services
Conclusionscross-border services (particularly those that are supplied electronically) are constantly evolving, and there are many open issues, such as whether the tax laws will be expanded
servers, whether establishment laws will evolve to consider so-called smart servers and whether there will be new rules around intangible
treatment of electronically supplied services supplied by a business to consumers, which are expected to come into force in 2015, will affect many businesses that operate in the sector in
3 At the time of this release in 2013, the
debating the appropriate taxation of certain
industries that perform their business across borders. Businesses must keep apprised of the state of affairs for cloud computing in the countries where they conduct business.
Businesses must also assess the impact of tax
decisions. The guide provides a high-level overview of how the three operating models are likely to be treated. Certain assumptions and local terms may be used, and the facts and circumstances surrounding a business’s involvement with cloud computing are likely to be more complex than the three operating
businesses operating in the cloud should seek
and circumstances.
From an indirect tax perspective, it is clear that many countries
treatment of cloud computing services. In some countries there
services would fall, as well as clear and consistent rules in
therefore important that businesses understand the product
As with any indirect tax analysis, it is important to understand the supply chain and who is obligated to account for local VAT/
involves cloud services rather than tangible goods, as the place of taxation can be misinterpreted or misunderstood by suppliers,
example, whether the customer has enough substance (human and technical resources) in the local country to be able to receive
obligations may arise and look to reduce the risk of exposure to
or agreed to as part of the commercial relationship, or a challenge by tax authorities when the place of taxation can be uncertain. On the other hand, the intangible nature of the
contractual relationships that businesses may want to consider
It is clear that many countries have
cloud computing services.
Businesses should consider where local VAT/
the risk of exposure.
Cloud computing has burst onto the commercial
as the hardware and software that supports transactions over a virtual network (i.e., the
investigating and writing tax laws in this area, increasing the risk that taxpayers will be caught unprepared in some countries. In a recent report
computing transactions as an area in which “international tax standards may not have kept pace with changes in global business practices.”
computing tax regimes in over 50 countries,
continues to develop at a rapid pace.
Access the guide at
ey.com/cloudtaxguide
Themes and trends
and tax considerations
As the expanding global economy continues to be reliant on fossil fuels,
release of carbon dioxide (CO 2) emissions
associated with the combustion of these fuels. While many countries continue to use incentives such as tax credits,
behavior, carbon regimes, including carbon taxes and cap-and-trade systems, are becoming more prevalent as a regulatory instrument to reduce greenhouse gas
numerous other regions have already adopted legislation or created pilot
Carbon regimes are not only growing geographically, but as they become more established, their regulations cover more industries.
Tel: +1 415 894 4275
Carbon taxes
introduction of a new tax can often face heavy political resistance.
which represent the right to release a certain amount of emissions. These allowances may then be transferred or “traded” in the
mechanism and the participants decide the price of emissions, not the governing authority.
Alberta,Canada
California,USA
Mexico
BrazilSouth Africa
Australia
India
Japan
China
South Korea
European Union
New Zealand
Finalized Proposed
As the need for, and effectiveness of, carbon
will become increasingly important for businesses to understand these carbon markets and prepare
to operate in a low-carbon economy.
commence in January 2015 and is expected to be the most ambitious emissions reduction program introduced
noncompliance are proposed at three times the market price of allowances, up
2 (ton of CO2).
ChinaChina recently initiated a pilot cap-and-trade scheme in the province of
industries and accounting for 40% of the city’s CO2exchange is one of seven pilot schemes due to be launched in 2013 to 2014. On
market, the price for allowances traded in
2.
company-level cap-and-trade system of allowances for CO2
countries and covers around 50% of the
2have historically traded in the range of
2 but are currently
2. The penalty for noncompliance is currently set at
2.
law in the state of California, aiming to
2020. The cap-and-trade program is a key element in this plan and covers industries
emissions. The program started on 1 January 2013 and encompasses approximately 350 businesses
reserve price for 2013 has been set at
2 and is set to rise by over
not meet the compliance obligations will
every allowance above the emissions cap.
carbon price regime in July 2012 to reduce carbon pollution to 80% below 2000 levels by 2050. The price per
tax, and it will increase from
2 in 2012 to
2 in 2015. In July 2015, the carbon price is expected to transition to
has recently been drafted to repeal the carbon tax by July 2014 and/or replace it
currently active, it is unclear whether this legislation will continue to be in effect in the near future.
Companies must be proactive and prepare for a carbon-constrained economy since carbon regulations will have an impact on
prepare an integrated carbon management strategy to manage the carbon footprint of their operations.
preparing a robust carbon strategy include:
Reduce energy consumption
and cost-effective opportunity to reduce the energy usage of a business and provides a direct impact on its associated
continuously assess their operations and
reduce energy use.
Switch to renewable energyuse of energy from renewable sources could also help to reduce a business’s carbon footprint. Installation of renewable energy systems is an attractive strategy to reduce emissions, control energy costs and provide increased reliability in energy
incentives.
Purchase offsets or allowancestaxpayers can meet their obligations under a carbon tax or cap-and-trade scheme through the use of carbon offsets.
can undertake these carbon-offset
Reduce:
energy consumption in operations
Switch: transitioning to low-carbon, low-emission energy sources like wind, solar, geothermal, fuel cells, biomass, combined heat and power, microturbines, waste heat recovery, alternative fuel vehicles
Offset:
carbon management strategy to manage the carbon footprint of their operations.
increasingly offering incentives to
reduce the carbon intensity of their operations. Incentives are available to
and renewable measures that encourage activities in the reduce, switch and offset categories. They include:
Tax credits for investments in, or production from, renewable and alternative energy assets
Tax deductions in the form of accelerated depreciation for energy-
energy property and infrastructure
Reduced excise taxes on alternative fuels and fueling infrastructure
entities to encourage sustainability investments
purchased by companies and energy providers to comply with government
renewable energy production
customers as mandated by government regulations
Feed-in tariffs (FITs), production-based incentives for renewable energy producers
Incentives offered by different authorities can often be “stacked” to reduce the cost of sustainability initiatives and improve
procedures to research and identify all
factor them into the evaluation of energy
European UnionGermany: Interest rate reductions and grants for
UK: Feed-in tariffs for renewable energy
France: Asset
energy
USA California: 30% tax credit for
South Africa: Tax deductions
Turkey: Feed-in tariffs with
China:
Russia: Accelerated tax
Australia: for renewable energy
world. Businesses can then use offsets toward meeting their compliance obligations under the carbon regime.
In a cap-and-trade system, taxpayers can also trade emission allowances. A certain number of allowances may be distributed free of charge or purchased from the government entity.
they obtain from the government, they must purchase additional allowances through a market system or face penalties for noncompliance.
is the treatment of offsets and allowances for accounting and tax purposes at the subnational, national or international level.
to be inventory, supplies, business expenses or intangible property?
the compliance period if that period is longer than one year? When should the tax basis of an offset or allowance be expensed?
and offsets be treated for tax purposes?
What are the tax implications of transferring offsets or
Are gains or losses associated with the trading of emission allowances considered to be capital or ordinary income?
in another country?
What are the indirect tax implications of allowances and
to develop processes and controls to accurately measure,
and tax purposes. It will be important for businesses to ensure
penalties.
Companies may have an opportunity to manage and reduce their cost of compliance through the advance purchase of offsets and
sustainability investments and the timing of purchasing offsets
price of CO2 allowances in economic analyses in order to accurately estimate the return on planned capital expenditures
ConclusionsCarbon regimes are assuming an increasingly important role as economies transition into
carbon intensity of companies’ operations. As taxpayers look to sustainability strategies to reduce their carbon emissions, they should be aware of the tax incentives that are available to help reduce the costs of these initiatives and improve the return on investment. Additionally, as taxpayers begin trading in offsets and allowances, they should be aware of the
teams in discussions around carbon regimes and sustainability initiatives will ensure that companies have a better understanding of the tax policies in place and will help drive better decision-making.
will need to consider how to develop processes and controls to accurately
emissions to governing authorities.
Global trade management: high performers move ahead
some of the world’s largest global traders exchanged ideas about how global trade management can give high performers a competitive edge.
www.ey.com/customs
www.ey.com/customs
Tradewatch — December 2013
from countries and regions around the world.
www.ey.com/vatguide
Worldwide VAT, GST and sales tax guide
Our Worldwide VAT, GST and sales tax guide helps you understand how indirect taxes will affect your
provides coverage of
Worldwide cloud computing guide
Our
rapid pace.
ey.com/cloudtax guide
Worldwide R&D incentives reference guide
Our
Recent reports suggest that the global economy is slowly
shift toward indirect taxes continues apace with the
a broadening of the tax base.
This graphic displays some of the indirect tax changes (agreed and proposed) that have taken place across the world in late 2013 and those that are due to take place in 2014 and beyond.
These changes supplement those set out in our report, Indirect Taxes in 20131 and in previous editions of Indirect
2
A more comprehensive analysis of changes due to take place in 2014 and beyond, will be provided in our annual overview, Indirect tax in 2014, due to be published in February 2014.
1. 2.
Canada
rate to 9% (from 10%), resulting in a
rate to 8% (from 9%), resulting in a
13 January 2014: standard rate will increase to 19% (from 18%), reduced rate will increase to 9% (from 8%)
increase (new rate not yet announced)
1 January 2014: VAT introduced to replace turnover tax system
1 July 2014: introduction of value-added tax
1 October 2013: new VAT cash accounting regime introduced
Reduced VAT rate of 9% on tourism related goods and services (due to expire and revert to 13.5% on
Mexico
1 January 2014: VAT rate of
Region eliminated resulting in a
1 January 2014: Cash accounting regime introduced
1 August 2013: nationwide expansion of VAT pilot scheme, affecting transportation and certain modern services sectors
Croatia
1 January 2014: reduced rate VAT increase to 13% (from 10%)
rate of 17.5% will apply
1 January 2014: France plans to increase its
India
the state and central indirect taxes currently in force, date of implementation not yet agreed
1 October 2013: standard VAT rate increased to 22% (from 21%)
1 April 2014: consumption tax rate will increase to 8% (from 5%)
1 October 2015: consumption tax rate will increase to 10% (from 8%)
1 January 2014: proposed introduction of VAT on cross border e-commerce
The VAT place of supply for B2C supplies of e-services, broadcasting and telecommunications services will be the customer’s country in all cases
1 January 2014: services performed
standard rate of 21% (previously exempt)
1 July 2013: standard VAT rate increased to 19% (from 17%)
January 2014: reduced VAT rate increased to 10% (from 8%)
(detailed VAT ledger) introduced
1 January 2014: cash accounting regime introduced
Following the example of many
Bulgarian tax authorities plan to introduce cash accounting for VAT. If the draft law amendments are accepted, they will take effect from the beginning of 2014. On the one hand, this new legislation will likely have a positive impact
other hand, the new regime
to be more disciplined in their accounting, as input tax recovery in some cases will depend on payments made. In this article we look at the proposed Bulgarian rules in more detail and how they compare with similar
Tel: +359 2 81 77 100
Tel: +359 2 81 77 100
Bulg
aria
measures aimed at combating intercompany indebtedness. VAT-registered suppliers of goods and services often provide credit to the state by paying the VAT due on their supplies before they have received the cash from their customers. In the
input VAT without effectively paying anything (including tax) to
Therefore, with the aim of reducing intercompany indebtedness,
measure is to shorten commercial payment terms, and another is to introduce an optional cash accounting scheme for VAT.
scheme in their national legislation from 1 January 2013.
have already introduced the VAT cash accounting scheme. For
not allow cash accounting currently, but they are both considering legislative proposals for its introduction. The newest
was already using the regime even before its accession, and it continues to do so.
According to the proposed amendments to the Bulgarian law, output VAT under the cash accounting regime will be payable by a supplier when it receives payment from its customers. The customer will, in the meantime, be allowed to claim the VAT on the invoice only after it actually pays the supplier for the goods or services bought, including the VAT due.
after consulting with the VAT Committee. The maximum
maximum threshold, as per Figure 1). In some countries, the
scheme is applied without a threshold for certain industries (e.g.,
Committee, the threshold will be €500,000 when the scheme is introduced.
Austria 2 million
Belgium
Bulgaria *
Croatia
Cyprus
2 million
Finland
France
500,000
422,000
Ireland 1.25million
Italy 2 million
100,000
500,000
2 million
1.2 million
500,000
Romania 500,000
400,000*
350,000
VAT-registered suppliers of goods and services often provide credit to the state by paying the VAT due on their supplies before they have received the cash from their customers.
*Cash accounting will be available in these countries from January 2014.
in Bulgaria will apply to all the economic activities undertaken by suppliers registered in Bulgaria whose taxable turnover is below the threshold. In some
certain types of activities or businesses such as agricultural producers, engineers
higher threshold applicable to agricultural producers and animal farmers than the general threshold applicable to all
combination of thresholds; the scheme applies to all activities if the taxable turnover is below one threshold, while the scheme applies to other activities regardless of turnover.
been suggested for businesses to apply together with cash accounting for VAT, which is the absence of administrative penalties for tax and social security violations for the last calendar year.
Also, other ideas about eligibility can be
omitted from the calculation of the
accounting, such as incidental supplies of capital goods and immovable property
measures allow the cash accounting scheme to apply more widely by not excluding otherwise eligible businesses because of one-off or incidental activities that might distort their total turnover.
application of the cash accounting scheme is voluntary, but there are exceptions. Cash accounting will be optional in Bulgaria for all suppliers that
the advantage of deferring the VAT charge, a taxable person may choose to follow the standard procedure (i.e., that VAT is due on the accruals basis), despite being eligible to apply the scheme.
there will be no deadline after which suppliers must account for VAT even if the customer has not yet paid. This means that, if the supplier never receives payment from the customer, it will never
invoiced amount. This allows a wide measure of bad debt relief, which is a welcome feature of cash accounting for
To protect the state budget, a deadline for the supplier to wait for payment could be
payment is 90 days overdue, VAT becomes chargeable regardless of the
payment is made two months after issuing the invoice, the VAT needs to be accounted for in the following month; in
is a serious compromise with the purpose of the scheme, it is hoped that any deemed chargeability is postponed for a longer term.
Commission, they make up nearly 99% of 1
economic development, employment and social integration. At the same time, they are much more vulnerable to the negative effects of intercompany indebtedness. Because of that, cash accounting is
In Bulgaria, most local businesses are highly in favor of the idea of VAT cash accounting, and they would prefer an even higher turnover threshold for eligibility. Although the threshold may be increased in future years, this cannot happen without the explicit approval of
some Bulgarian trade associations have also expressed concerns over possible complications of the scheme for business, such as VAT compliance and the short
its introduction.
1.
Cash accounting will apply to all the economic activities undertaken by suppliers registered in Bulgaria whose taxable turnover is below the threshold.
The main advantage of using the scheme is the positive impact on the supplier’s
payer as, under this regime, the supplier should not bear the burden of paying VAT on the supply before receiving the payment from customers.
consider an example of a supplier who has only one transaction during the reporting month of August 2014:
If the supplier sells goods for €100 on 20 August 2014 under the regular VAT accounting, it must pay €20 VAT by
when the customer makes a payment.
If, however, the taxable person applies VAT cash accounting and receives payment on 1 October 2014, the €20 VAT should be paid to the state by
later.
If, on the other hand, the taxable
1 October 2014, it must remit €10 VAT
Therefore, the cash accounting regime is favorable for companies that have VAT
payment on time for their supplies, and this new option could generally improve
deemed VAT payment provision were to
would not be as clear cut. In the above example, if a six-month rule were to apply and the customer did not pay by 25 February 2015, the supplier would still
Therefore, in this case, the advantage of the cash accounting regime would only be temporary, and it would not provide bad debt relief.
For purchasers, VAT recovery is delayed
accounting. Therefore, the regime will
the entities that opt to apply cash accounting by eliminating the situations
reclaim before paying the supplier. In such cases, the customer would likely prefer to pay all invoices for which the cash accounting scheme is applied instead of keeping the invoices unpaid.
Another positive side effect from the VAT cash accounting scheme is that it provides
often, VAT is drained through fraudsters reclaiming input VAT on invoices
application of the VAT cash accounting scheme should limit the number of such cases.
have stronger negotiation powers and are dictating certain contractual conditions, such as long payment terms. These
reclaim on their purchases before they actually pay the price (including the tax)
cash accounting is introduced, this will no longer be possible. The need to recover input VAT may prove an incentive for
accounting scheme may not be attractive
losing a big client who might dislike this
predict whether this is a legitimate issue.
could be mitigated over time. To a large extent, the effectiveness and attractiveness of the scheme depends much more on the practical complexity of the registration procedure and the
view, the scheme should not be
taxpayer, and its application should not depend on covering numerous conditions, such as having no outstanding tax liabilities or recent administrative violations (as currently proposed).
reviewing and voting on the proposals for introducing the VAT cash accounting
scheme is implemented may vary from the proposals. Therefore, the new rules
rules takes time for the Bulgarian tax administration. Furthermore, the secondary legislation and probably even some of the VAT standard forms will also
needs of the new scheme.
The taxable persons that are eligible to apply the scheme should consider the effectiveness of the new regime in view of their own business (such as the
on customer relationships). The introduction of cash accounting will
procedures, and probably changes in contracts and in the settings of accounting software, not only for businesses that apply the scheme but also for their customers.
The effectiveness and attractiveness of the scheme
depends on the practical complexity of the registration procedure and
Canadano “plug-and-play” solution for importers of consumer electronics.
Rarely does a Canada Border
as much attention as did
effectively reversed the
the issue at the center of the
Although the new approach of
welcome, importers are still
challenges when applying duty-free treatment under Tariff Code 9948 for consumer electronics. In this article, we report on recent developments surrounding this issue.
The “iPod tariff”
applicability of Tariff Code 99481 to certain consumer electronics stems from
9948. In this administrative policy
importers to collect and keep records of
consumer electronics imported as 9948 goods are actually being “used in” computers and video game consoles. For consumer electronics that might
typical scenario is one where importers and end users do not interact directly but through several intermediaries, including distributors, wholesalers and retailers. Clearly, the administrative burden of
from consumers, especially when the importers are several degrees removed in the supply chain from the end users, would place a serious burden on both importers and intermediaries such as distributors and retailers.
2013, and importers no longer need to worry about communicating with end
, reads as follows:
goods imported and released duty free
schedule to the Customs Tariff, it will be
importer of the goods to attest to the intended use to be made of the goods in an article listed in tariff item
signed by the user of the commercial goods attesting to their actual use.”
It is unclear whether this change resulted from lobbying pressures2 or was simply a
under existing Canadian customs law. It is importers who bear the burden of proving
computers, video game consoles and other items within the strict meaning of
Customs Tariff.
Importers bear this burden at the time of importation, where the very declaration
considered statement that the concerned consumer electronics are 9948-eligible. They continue to bear this burden for up to four years after importation, the legislative period in which those
(and even longer if the importer has applied for refunds by drawback on previously imported products where 9948
written attestation from the importer is in
provision.
responsible for diversions of goods from intended use (i.e., if the importer becomes aware that such goods are not being
that, if the importer becomes aware of any diversion of 9948 imports, it is the importer who will be held responsible for reporting the diversion and for remitting additional duties and owed taxes. The
consider the obligation as being unmet or will pursue enforcement action are
consumer electronics importers have visibility on the sale and end use of the goods they import.
Although Canadian importers will now be able to document the end use of articles imported under 9948 by attesting to their intended use, this does not amount to “plug-and- play” duty relief for consumer
records of this use? Additionally, certain imports of consumer electronics simply
remain in determining whether they
Canada, in addition to familiarity with the
become comfortable with the
Furthermore, importers remain responsible for reporting any known diversions from the end use to which they
suggests that this controversy has not been fully resolved.
Cana
da
remain responsible for diversions of goods from intended use.
China Administration of Taxation
52 (Circular 52), which sets out the trial measures for the VAT exemption of cross-border services, effective 1 August 2013. In this article, we set out the key features of Circular 52 as well as our observations on how Circular 52 would impact taxpayers.
the administrative measures that govern taxpayers engaging in the provision of cross-border services. As the VAT exemption
measures for VAT exemption on cross-border services shortly
transportation and selected modern services.
This announcement about the administrative measures, although they are of “trial” nature, is welcome news for
observed varying local practices adopted by the tax authorities in
is applied.*
Circular 52 sets out the scope of cross-border services that are eligible for VAT exemption. In addition, details aiming to clarify or provide further details for “in scope” cross-border services
A.mineral resources are outside China on cross-border transactions with regard to VAT exemption for
this item.
B. Conference and exhibition services if the conference or exhibition takes place outside China conferences or exhibitions held overseas for customers.
C. Warehousing services with storage locations outside Chinaon cross-border transactions with regard to VAT exemption for this item.
Tangible personal property leasing services with the property used outside China on cross-border transactions with regard to VAT exemption for
this item.
television programs (works) that are provided outside China
programs (works) refers to the distribution of works and the transfer of reporting or broadcasting rights of sports competitions and other recreational activities to overseas entities or individuals. The works and sports competitions and other recreational activities must be broadcasted and reported outside China.
“Broadcasting services” of works outside China refers to business activities of screening or broadcasting works in cinemas, theaters, video halls and other places outside China.
Broadcast services of works supplied overseas through cable
satellite, internet and cable TV, are not considered as distribution and broadcasting services of works that are rendered outside China.
Chin
a
* It is not uncommon for taxpayers providing the same cross-border services to be told to apply different VAT treatments. For instance, a consulting company with branches operating in different locations could have had some of its consulting services provided to its overseas clients treated as exempt from VAT at some of its operating locations and not at others. This is because only some of the tax bureaus in charge of companies were “temporarily” allowing VAT exemption before the trial administrative measures set out in Circular 52 were announced.
administrative measures for VAT exemption on cross-border services shortly after the nationwide expansion
selected modern services.
F. International transportation services that are not eligible
International transportation services undertaken by
Business license
International transportation services undertaken on land without obtaining a Road Transportation Business
include “international transportation”
International transportation services undertaken by air
the business scope does not include “international air passenger, cargo and mail transportation business”
on cross-border transactions with regard to VAT exemption for this item.
Transportation services undertaken by sea to Taiwan
Transportation services undertaken by air without
operations does not include “international and domestic
transportation business”
on cross-border transactions with regard to VAT exemption for this item.
computation method:
International transportation services
Research and development services and design services provided to overseas entities or units, excluding the design services provided for real estate located in China
on cross-border transactions with regard to VAT exemption for this item.
I. Taxable services rendered to overseas entities or units:
Research and technology services, (excluding research and development services and engineering survey services
Information technology services
Culture creativity services (excluding design services, advertising services, and conference and exhibition services)
services)
Authentication and consulting services
(works)
Time charter businesses involved in ocean transportation
Voyage charter businesses involved in ocean transportation
Wet-lease business in air transportation
Advertising services if the advertising takes place outside China
Aviation ground services, port terminal services, freight and passenger station services, salvage services, loading, unloading and carrying services rendered by taxpayers to overseas entities that 1) carry out international transportation
at domestic airports, ports, stations, airspace, inland water or sea, are considered as logistic auxiliary services rendered to overseas entities.
The following services are not considered as services rendered to overseas entities or units:
Contractual energy management services where the
Authentication and consulting services rendered to immovable properties located within the territory
Authentication and consulting services rendered with the
carrying out the services
“Advertising services if the advertising takes place outside China” refers to the advertising services related to advertisements released outside China.
VATable services rendered to entities or units in special customs supervision areas would not be considered as cross-
Taxpayers providing “in scope” services need to meet certain conditions in order for their services to be eligible for VAT exemption. We have set out these conditions in Table 2.
A service contract signed by both the service provider(s) and the service recipient(s) must be in place.
The entire service fees that correspond to the supply of services provided to an overseas recipient should be collected from overseas.
revenue and input VAT transferred outTaxpayers should separately account for their VAT-exempt service revenue and transfer out the input VAT associated with the supply of VAT-exempt services.
registrationTaxpayers must register their contracts with the tax bureaus that are responsible for
their registration.
The submission package should contain the following documents:
A registration form for VAT-exempt cross-border services
A cross-border services contract (original and photocopy)
services
For cross-border services provided to overseas entities, evidence to prove/ support that the service recipients are physically located in overseas locations
Changes/amendments made to service contracts or to the services that have already been registered
For service contracts that are already registered with the tax bureaus for VAT exemption purposes, any change(s) to the contract or change(s) to the nature or scope of the delivery of services must be re-registered with the tax bureaus.
The materials submitted for the purposes of the VAT exemption registration must be kept properly and in full.
Perform a detailed review of service contract(s)
Review all service contract(s) in accordance with the details set out in Article 2 of Circular 52. The review would include an analysis of the nature of the services provided with reference to the precise scope of VAT-exempt services set out in Circular 52. Other considerations include the location of the service recipients, details of payments and supportive evidence that could be made available to support the VAT exemption registration process.
Assess the status of the VAT exemption “temporarily” allowed by the tax authorities
Taxpayers who have adopted VAT exemption treatments based on the “temporary” VAT exemption allowed by their tax bureaus should assess whether they should be eligible for the VAT exemption based on the Circular 52 rules.
taxpayers should decide whether and how they should approach their tax bureaus.
Prepare documents to support the VAT exemption registration
been registered with their tax bureaus.
Develop plan to follow up closely on the VAT exemption registration process to understand the administrative measures and could develop some local adaptations
or interpretation of the Circular 52 rules.
It is anticipated that taxpayers will raise a high volume of VAT exemption registration
taxpayers should develop a robust plan with clear time lines, roles and responsibilities to follow up with their tax bureaus.
As Circular 52 has an effective start date of 1 August 2013, varying VAT treatments could apply to services supplied from different locations, depending on the VAT-exempt position taken or allowed to be taken by each tax bureau.
for VAT exemption, the following should be observed:
If the taxpayers have already adopted VAT exemption, the taxpayers should “make up” for the VAT exemption registration procedures now.
If the taxpayers have not yet adopted VAT exemption, they should start registering for the VAT exemption. If the registration is successful and has been accepted by the tax authorities, the taxpayers should be eligible for refund of any VAT overpaid or be allowed to offset the VAT overpaid against any future VAT payables. As the taxpayers have not yet
adopted VAT exemption and have issued special VAT invoices to their customers, the taxpayers should collect all the stubs or copies of the special VAT invoices from customers. Otherwise, the VAT exemption registration may not be processed.
For taxpayers rendering cross-border services that are not
adopted VAT exemption prior to 1 August 2013, the taxpayers
payment of the VAT to their tax bureaus.
The long-awaited Circular 52 should provide some relief to Chinese taxpayers providing cross-border services. Taxpayers can now start registering their services for VAT exemption purposes. Taxpayers may also consider taking the following actions as part of their planning for the VAT exemption registration:
Varying VAT treatments could apply to services supplied from different locations,
depending on the VAT-exempt position taken or allowed to be taken by each tax bureau.
The publication of Circular 52 is doubtless welcome news for taxpayers as it has
the circular has yet to cover the following VAT technical and practical issues:
We understand some companies, especially corporate group companies, may have entered into group or multiple-party contracts involving multiple service providers and service recipients in a “many to many” relationship. In this regard, discussions would need to be made with the tax authorities to clarify whether the
valid supporting evidence for VAT exemption purposes. Companies may consider making changes to their contractual arrangements to ensure compliance (e.g., from a “many to many” relationship to multiple “one to
contracts (e.g., services provided by consultants charged on a time-spent basis) entered into without setting out the level of service fees could also face
tax authorities.
entire service fee corresponding to the supply of services provided overseas should be collected from overseas. Although the circular has not indicated whether overseas payments must be received
from overseas service recipients, it would not be uncommon for some tax authorities to anticipate a full match between the provider of services, recipient of services and service fees payments. In this respect, arrangements would need to be made between the contractual parties and their respective banks to meet with the
by the tax authorities, if any.
provided to overseas entities do not include authentication and consulting services related to domestic goods”
to apply their own understanding on the
instance, if a China-based consultant advises his overseas clients on the Chinese export VAT implications with respect to an export sales of goods, it may not be clear whether his services could be in scope for Circular 52 and hence become eligible for VAT exemption registration.
Circular 52 has clearly set out the need for taxpayers to provide true copies and photocopies of service contracts.
problems as the service contracts can
and the taxpayers may not be able to or may not want to make the contracts available to the tax bureaus. In addition, the number of contracts to be taken to the tax bureaus for registration
VAT exemption registration could take time to go through all the contracts to be provided by the taxpayers, and it is anticipated that the contract review may be completed only at a relatively slow pace.
ConclusionsThe announcement of Circular 52 has long been anticipated, and it should help create a uniform platform for taxpayers and tax authorities to apply the VAT exemptions
circulars (i.e., Caishui [2013]
some room for further
we believe the Chinese authorities are likely to issue further circulars to provide the
businesses should keep abreast of future changes, and we will continue to report on developments in this area.
Circular 52 has answered many of the
authorities but has yet to cover certain VAT technical and practical issues.
Garrett Grennan Tel: +974 4457 4210
of Preference
duty rates granted under the
petrochemical industries will be affected by this change and these sectors will need to assess its impact on their businesses and develop strategies to mitigate the
both of which have free trade
likely to result in a competitive advantage for these countries over
Tel: +974 4457 4200
by granting preferential or 0% customs duty rates on exports of products to the
focus on nations in most need, poor developing and least developed nations. Accordingly, effective 1 January 2014,
or “upper-middle income” countries by the World Bank for three consecutive
from 1 January 2014, standard customs duty rates will apply on products from
While the importation of crude oil from
As a result, the customs duty on certain
to 4.7% and the customs duty rate on certain downstream products, including chemicals, polymers and aluminum will increase to 7.5%.
5.5%) and aluminum (up to 7.5%).
coming months. With competition from
have effective free trade agreements with
customs duty cost from customers at
markets. This point is illustrated further in Table 1 which compares the current
products with the future treatment for these produces from 1 January 2014 and contrasts the treatment of such products under the free trade agreement between
can draw some conclusions about the possible impact of the new rates on
Oil and gasproducts may become uneconomic
various customs regimes to prevent
has had several conversations with national Customs Authorities and the
possible solutions on customs duty
binding air transport agreements which
from duties and taxes, irrespective of origin. The Commission is examining
customs duty after 1 January 2014.
Chemicals and petrochemicalssimilar to oil and gas products,
origin may also become uneconomic
customs regimes available to this type of product to reduce or prevent the imposition of customs duty is greater.
the application of end-user reliefs (e.g., inward processing relief or bonded warehouses) to reduce or defer the landed cost of products at import. These reliefs are discussed in greater detail below.
From 1 January 2014, standard customs duty rates will apply on
Fertilizers
producers should give due consideration to the commercial advantage of certain competitors from
effective free trade agreement.
Aluminum
producers of aluminum wish to consider the application of certain customs
customs regimes may help to avoid or reduce customs duties on the import of
following:
Inward processing reliefallows product to be imported into the
duty, if the product is processed and
Various processing operations (e.g. such as blending within the oil and gas industry) may be considered in this respect.
Bonded warehouseswarehouse is a building or other secured area where dutiable products may be stored, manipulated or undergo manufacturing operations without the imposition of customs duty. After manipulation and within the warehouse period, the products may be exported
of customs duty. Alternatively, the products may be withdrawn from the
upon payment of customs duty at the rate applicable to the products in their manipulated condition at the time of withdrawal.
Korean and the EU
Oil and gas products
Jet fuel 0.00% 4.70% 0.00%
0.00% 3.50% 0.00%
Base oil 0.00% 3.70% 0.00%
3.00% 0.00%
3.00% 0.00%
Chemicals 2.00% 5.50% 0.00%
Ammonia1 0.00%
0.00%
Aluminum Aluminum bars (not alloyed) 4.00% 7.50% 0.00%
0.00%
understand the supply chain of their products at all stages from manufacturing through to end consumption.
gas and petrochemical industries should
impact of the new rules on their operations. Actions to consider include the following:
Assess the value of products imported
Identify the ultimate countries of destination and/or usage of the affected products
Investigate current agreements with customers to determine whether the potential increased duty charges may be passed on to them
Assess the possible use of customs regimes to reduce the commercial impact of the change
oil, gas and petrochemical industries should prepare now to
the new rules on their operations.
Tel: +974 4457 4200
A free trade agreement (referred to here as the
agreement that covers trade in goods and services, government procurement, and other areas of
sectors that are expected to
telecommunications, electrical and electronic
and steel-related industries.
Garrett Grennan Tel: +974 4457 4210
compared with other foreign exporters.
will be relaxed.
investors. In addition, the procedural
advice before seeking to apply preferential tariff treatment under the agreement.
The agreement provides for comprehensive tariff elimination that will
compared with other foreign imports
of tariff lines will gain exempt status by 2018.
Rules of origin determine the nationality of a product for customs purposes. In the
preferential treatment if at least 35% of the ex-works price (value-added percentage) can be attributed to manufacturing and other operations in the originating country. There are, however, 10 products where the origin criteria are based on a change in tariff
To determine the value-added percentage, the following formula applies:
x 100% > 35%
The ex-works price is the price paid for the product ex-works to the manufacturer in
after the production of the goods, including transportation, insurance and
of materials originating from outside the
and vice versa when determining origin. This accumulation rule should help
eliminated.
relaxed, although more legislative changes may be needed.
operating in Qatar and Bahrain.
At least 35% value must be added to the goods by manufacturing and other operations in one of the member countries, based on the ex-works price.
operations for purposes of conferring origin.
transshipment is allowed, provided certain conditions are met.
compared with other foreign exporters.
confer origin to the product. They include operations to preserve goods, simple operations such as the removal of dust, changes in packing and the breakup and assembly of consignments, placing product in bottles, simple cutting, placing marks or labels on goods or their packaging, the slaughter of animals, and any combination of the above.
products must be shipped directly from
although transshipment in third countries may be allowed, provided certain conditions are met.
The agreement provides for certain customs procedures to aid the free
Advance rulings on the eligibility of originating goods for preferential
low-value originating goods
Risk management to focus on high-risk goods and to facilitate the clearance of low-risk consignments
providers with enhanced market
limits in certain key sectors of interest to
services, distribution services and hospital
board for all sectors between 70% and 100%.
limits in certain key sectors:
construction services, distribution services, hospital services and legal advisory services.
the foreign capital investment law, but
services supplier can demonstrate it has
construction services.
seven sectors at 100%: construction; banking; insurance; information technology and software development; hospital and other health services; tourism and hotels; and culture, information and marketing.
for companies at 100%, while Oman will
companies at 70% across all sectors.
permanent residents, local companies and
to maintaining an open and transparent system of procurement to give competitive opportunities to the suppliers of both sides to penetrate each other’s markets.
same price preference of 10% that is
use of any goods or services that are
procurement of goods and services.
wishing to use the provisions under the agreement should seek advice prior to executing transactions.
ConclusionsWith increased trade between
reduce costs in their supply
trade” should more accurately be termed “conditional trade,” because in order to obtain the preferential treatment, businesses must comply with
determine whether a product
rules are complex, and terms must be fully complied with to
agreement and to avoid the risk of incorrectly claiming
maintaining an open and transparent system of procurement to give competitive opportunities to the suppliers of both sides
to penetrate each other’s markets.
Tel: +39 02 851 4458
Tel: +39 05 127 8421
In recent years, we have reported on the global rise in VAT rates, particularly in the
many countries have come to rely more and more on
budgets. This trend has continued, and as a result of the latest economic challenges and after much debate, Italy has increased the standard VAT rate from 21% to 22% effective 1 October 2013, although the 4% and 10% reduced VAT rates have remained unchanged.
In this article, we discuss the background to this latest VAT rate increase and what it implies for VAT compliance for both Italian and foreign businesses operating in Italy.
Italy
When another planned standard VAT rate
2012, it created broad debate not only
the country in general. The controversy
VAT rate increase, from 20% to 21%, took
legislation proposing the increase1 was supposed to enter into force on 1 July
postponement of the increase2 until 1 October 2013 in order to stimulate consumer spending.
Contrary to expectations, the Italian
VAT rate increase from 1 October 2013
the new 22% standard VAT rate applies to all supplies of goods and services if the tax point is triggered on or after 1 October 2013.
Issues to consider are applying the correct VAT rate, especially for activities that span the change in rate, and adapting VAT reporting processes to take account of the new rate.
The VAT rate increase may also have a
For most Italian businesses, VAT charged on purchases is recoverable in full as input tax against. Therefore, the main concern of the rate increase is to avoid penalties for undercharging VAT to customers or
businesses in VAT-exempt sectors (such as banking and insurance) suffer VAT charged on purchases and overheads as a cost, so the rate increase will add to their effective costs. Also, an increase in the
impact of delayed VAT refunds for businesses that are in a VAT repayment
3 provides the general criteria to determine when a supply is deemed to take place for VAT purposes (known as the “tax point”). If the tax point occurs before 1 October 2013, the VAT rate is 21%, but if the tax point falls on or after 1 October 2013, the VAT rate is 22%.
In theory, this seems pretty straightforward. But determining the tax point for certain transactions is not always easy, as different rules may apply for particular supplies of goods and services as well as for certain classes of taxpayers.
For supplies of movable property, the tax point generally occurs on the date of delivery or dispatch of the goods (unless title to the goods passes to the customer after delivery or dispatch, in which case the tax point is triggered when title is
delivered before 1 October 2013, the standard rate of 21% applies irrespective of the date of payment.
For supplies of immovable property, the tax point generally occurs when the parties sign the agreement transferring ownership in the property.
These basic rules have exceptions. If an invoice is issued before these events or if an advance payment is received for all or part of the consideration, the tax point is brought forward to the date of invoice or receipt of payment. For example, if payment was received in full prior to 1 October 2013, the 21% rate applies even if the goods are delivered after the change. In some cases, both rates may apply to the same transaction. For example, if an advance payment is received before 1 October 2013, the corresponding invoice must be issued with the 21% VAT rate, while the invoice for the balance of the value issued after
22% rate.
The new VAT rate at 22% implies a number of important changes for Italian businesses and multinational companies operating in Italy.
deemed to be when the transport or
do not trigger a tax point in these circumstances. This means that in the
buyer must account for Italian VAT through the reverse-charge mechanism by applying the 21% VAT rate.
The time of supply for imported goods is the date of importation (i.e., when the customs bill is accepted by the customs
declaration is accepted on or after
VAT at 22% at importation.
The tax point for domestic supplies of services is deemed to be when the consideration is paid or, if earlier, when an
services rendered after 1 October 2013 but invoiced or paid before that date are
services rendered before 1 October 2013 but invoiced or paid for on or after that
taxable persons established outside Italy
reverse-charge mechanism. The tax point for these services occurs when the service is completed. Therefore, the relevant date for determining the VAT rate depends on the whether the service was completed before or after 1 October 2013.
VAT Code, and based on general criteria
notes (i.e., credit or debit notes) related to invoices that have already been issued must be issued showing the same tax rate that was applied to the original supply. Thus, for example, irrespective of when
rate is applied if the transaction being
21% rate.
Transactions with the Italian state, regional or local authorities, and
VAT Code4 are deemed to occur when the invoice is issued, even if the tax becomes due at the time of payment by the public body (under the so-called “deferred VAT payment” scheme).
transactions carried out by taxpayers who opt for the cash accounting scheme (IVA per cassa). The cash accounting scheme can be applied by taxpayers whose annual
turnover is not higher than €2 million and other small businesses. For businesses using cash accounting, the VAT rate increase does not apply to transactions with invoices dated before 1 October 2013, even though the relevant payment is received afterward.
For businesses, a VAT rate change means an increase of the VAT compliance, especially for multinational companies that often carry out large numbers of often-complex transactions every day. As
software in an accurate and timely manner so that all changes are properly dealt with in their accounting and reporting systems.
When fundamental changes apply to VAT accounting, errors and mistakes occur
codings or confusion about the correct VAT rate to apply, for example. The Italian tax authorities seem to be aware of this, and in a press release dated
three months that the new standard VAT rate applies, no penalties will be applied to taxpayers who did not manage to issue
updating their invoicing or accounting systems.
All businesses making supplies of goods and services in Italy need to ascertain the correct VAT rate applicable to their supplies.
ConclusionsThe new Italian standard VAT rate of 22% became effective on 1 October 2013.
Taxpayers must ascertain the correct standard VAT rate applicable to each transaction by reference to the tax point rules, which differ
transactions.
An effective analysis of the main business VAT implications, including a review of contracts,
administrative burdens and prevent negative
provided that the incorrect invoices are properly amended through the issuance of debit notes (in accordance with Article
correct VAT amount (i.e., 22%) plus any interest due is paid to the Italian
table at right).
Quarterly
VAT rate applies, no penalties will be applied to taxpayers who did not manage to issue invoices
invoicing or accounting systems.
announced that, effective 1 April 2014, the consumption tax rate will increase to 8% from the current rate of 5%, in accordance with previously enacted legislation. We outline the details of the phased increase and outline some transitional provisions for supplies spanning the rate change.
Japa
n
The consumption tax rate will increase to 8% (including local consumption tax of 1.7%) effective 1 April 2014. A further increase to 10% (including local consumption tax of 2.2%) effective 1 October 2015 has also been enacted.
(enacted on 22 August 2012) included a
increase phase, as well as an “economic resiliency” clause that serves as a mechanism whereby the increase can be canceled if it is deemed necessary based on prevailing economic conditions. In making this determination, the overall economic situation is to be considered, with reference to key indicators such as
clause will not be invoked to cancel the
consumption tax rate increase (to 10%, effective 1 October 2015) also has this economic resiliency clause. Another determination of the overall economic situation will be made prior to its implementation.
A number of transitional measures provide for continued application of the current 5% rate following the effective date of the general rate increase, in certain situations. The main transactions that are affected by the transitional
that transitional measures may apply to other situations, so businesses should
the correct tax point for particular transactions.
The 5% rate applies under transitional rules to the following transactions with a key date of 1 October 2013:
made on or after 1 April 2014 pursuant to a construction contract concluded prior to 1 October 2013
on or after 1 April 2014 pursuant to a lease agreement concluded prior to 1 October 2013, the term of which begins prior to and extends beyond 1 April 2014
these items on or after 1 April 2014 pursuant to a subscription agreement concluded prior to 1 October 2013 for
members of the general public and for which payment was made before 1 April 2014
products on or after 1 April 2014 via mail order or online platforms, for which the vendor had advertised (or completed preparations to advertise) sales terms including the price prior to 1 October 2013, the order was received prior to 1 April 2014 and the sale is made in accordance with those advertised terms
The 5% rate applies under transitional rules to the following transactions with a key date of 1 April 2014:
transport of passengers or admission of customers to movies, theaters, horse races, bicycle races, art galleries, amusement parks or similar entertainment venues, on or after 1 April 2014, for which fees were paid prior to 1 April 2014
continuous provision of electricity, gas, water or telecommunications pursuant to an agreement with a term beginning prior to and extending beyond 1 April 2014, for which the right to receive payment is established between 1 April and 30 April 2014
sale of certain newspapers or
prior to 1 April 2014, and for which delivery to the general public occurs at
monthly
installment payments with a due date on or after 1 April 2014 pursuant to sales that occurred prior to 1 April 2014
ConclusionsBusinesses operating in Japan must make detailed preparations for the consumption tax increases, including assessing their impact on existing contracts, prices, and IT and invoicing systems, particularly if they provide any goods or services
transitional provisions.
The consumption tax rate will increase to 8% effective 1 April 2014. A further increase to 10% effective 1 October 2015 has also been enacted.
reaching changes to its VAT
surprisingly, the new rules have caused concern and
businesses and consumers in a wide variety of sectors. In
their possible impact on the
Tel: +254 20 271 5300
and other the media have been full of comments, especially complaints about an expected general rise in prices of
from the countryside who deliver their supplies in the wee hours of the
This is one tax law that affects everyone
the population can read and interpret the VAT law?
act continue to bother me and other parties affected by the changes, especially how any omissions and errors under the new rules will be dealt with. The new rules have affected manufacturing, oil and gas, media and publications, the health sector, tourism and many other sectors in one way or another.
and exempt goods from over 300 items to
incentives to investors have been scrapped, and the 12% VAT rate has been abolished.
of the provisions in VAT Act 2013 likely to
The biggest motivation behind most of the changes in the VAT Act 2013 is to
especially if the revenues are eventually put to good use.
A critical look at the provisions in the VAT Act 2013 makes me optimistically
yield is an underestimation. For exemption, as a result of the exemption of VAT on supplies made to oil and gas and geothermal companies, more VAT
from oil and gas suppliers. Charging
consumed by consumers and businesses that are not VAT-registered also implies that the corresponding
VAT remission on capital investments has always been a big incentive for
ground. The repeal of the VAT remission incentive may discourage
example, the removal of the incentive would mean incurring an extra
remissions granted under the repealed
The new act does not provide for as
previously. As such, fewer claims for tax refunds are expected (as fewer businesses will have an excess of input
the economy not only by raising VAT on new areas that were previously not taxed, but also by allowing for the
an increased revenue enforcement.
will be needed to process and audit refunds, so they will be able to concentrate on more critical areas of revenue collection.
woke to the news that the VAT Act
supplies and inputs. This has made
less expensive and has also encouraged
VAT cost since donors normally do not agree to have the funds used for tax
the VAT cost, this hits deeper into the current budget. With extra spending, the economy is negatively affected, as some sectors’ allocations are reduced.
In the new VAT Act, animal feeds are taxable, whereas unprocessed milk is exempt from VAT. This implies that people who deal in the supply of unprocessed milk will incur VAT on the animal feeds used for their cattle, but they will not be able to reclaim the VAT as their milk sales are exempt from VAT. On the other hand, a buyer of the unprocessed milk who processes it to
milk and yogurt will need to be VAT-registered and to charge VAT to the next person in the supply chain.
Therefore, the VAT charged on the feed will be trapped in the supply chain. The costs for farmers who produce unprocessed milk and incur
VAT on animal feeds will go up, and they may be forced to sell their product at a higher price to the milk processor, who will again push the extra cost to
distorts the economy as a whole.
The new VAT exemption for taxable supplies imported or purchased for use in geothermal, oil or mining prospecting or exploration implies that a large part of the input tax incurred on services or goods provided to these
of the suppliers in this sector are foreign investors who may be
receipts from other taxes, such as income taxes.
businesses source from nonresidents
service providers who do not have a
appoint a local tax representative implies that nonresidents will face
discourage some nonresidents from
to take their businesses to other
a less-attractive investment destination.
of revenue in the hands of irresponsible, careless or even corrupt
introduction of penalties and
collections, which will go toward the provision of basic services.
This change in VAT rate for fuel will increase the cost of doing business and
the economy rely heavily on either electricity or heavy diesel oil.
funds to refund taxpayers’ input VAT paid in excess of output tax, and some taxpayers have sought the intervention of the courts to have their refunds paid. The new act has not given an undertaking on fast tracking of VAT refunds. This does not solve the current challenges and will continue to
businesses that will have a negative
The new rules have affected manufacturing, oil and gas, media and publications, the health sector, tourism, and many other sectors in one way or another.
ConclusionsThe new VAT Act has both positive and negative
ensure that all stakeholders fully understand how to implement the VAT Act 2013 and how it will affect their businesses. For instance, more
tax representative and what their responsibilities will be, as well as that of the principal they are representing. Will the tax representatives be appointed on application, or can anyone act in
expected to proactively issue public rulings to correct some obvious errors or ambiguities that exist in the VAT law, especially in the listings of
For businesses, it is to be hoped that they “do not let the tax tail wag the commercial dog,” as the saying goes. In other words, businesses should not be discouraged from doing business
any extra tax that comes with the VAT Act 2013.
how the changes affect their activities and pay extra attention to their compliance and accounting for goods and services supplied in
transparent, keep good records and make investment plans using available incentives.
personal hope is that the measures raise the
In a budget announcement on
announced the implementation of the long-awaited goods and services
on 1 April 2015 with a tax
is similar in conception to many other value-added tax (VAT) systems around the world. This change represents a total reform of the country’s single-stage consumption tax system, which will have far-reaching effects for individuals and businesses alike. In this article we set out some of the main features of the new tax and some actions that you may want to take now if you do business in
applied at each stage of the supply chain.
supplies it makes. This credit mechanism
added at each stage of production, and it can be cost-neutral to a business, with the full burden of the tax falling on the
due when a sale is made and not necessarily when payment is received. This aspect of the tax can create negative
pay late or do not pay (as the supplier must account for the VAT charged in a period even if no payment has been received).
goods and services made in the furtherance of any business by a
also charged on the importation of goods
standard rate by default unless a provision states that a supply can be treated differently. This approach means there is no list of what is treated as standard-rated (unlike in the current system). Instead, the
Zero-rated suppliesis a taxable supply, but the tax rate is 0%.
supply can be recovered, although the
purchases is likely to exceed your output
supplies include certain agricultural products, foodstuffs, water supplied to domestic consumers, electricity supply (with limits) for domestic users, exports of goods and international services.
Exempt supplies
to the sale, but the supplier has no right
exempt supplies, you will not be able to
cost to your business. If you supply goods
exempt supplies include residential property, private health care and private
Out-of-scope activities
and the supplier is not obliged to register
activity (although the supplier may be
limited but include a transfer of a business as a going concern and supplies made by
passports and licenses, except some supplies of services prescribed by the
radical nature of the changes, complying
businesses to start planning and acting now to be fully prepared in 2015.
be excluded from the obligation to
rolling 12-month period. A business will also be obliged to register at any time if this registration threshold is expected to be breached. Therefore, for large
most businesses to start planning and acting now to be fully prepared in 2015.
the current single-stage consumption taxes (sales tax levied at 5% and 10% and
2014. Businesses will need to take particular care over transactions that span the change from sales or service tax
following measures to help individuals and businesses to adapt to the change. These measures will be effective from 2015:
There will be one-off cash assistance of
households that receive the Bantuan
paid to lower-income households.
Individual income tax rates are to be reduced by 1% to 3%.
The income tax structure for individuals is to be reviewed to ensure a more progressive tax structure, including increasing the chargeable income
Corporate income tax will be reduced from 25% to 24%. At the same time, the income tax rate for small and medium
20% to 19%. Both reductions will take
The cooperative income tax rate will be reduced by 1% to 2% from the year of assessment 2015.
limits) will be allowed as tax-deductible expenditures from the year of assessment 2015.
Accelerated capital allowances on the cost of information and communications technology (ICT)
to be given a further tax deduction for the years of assessment 2014 and 2015.
of employees in 2013 and 2014, and
software in 2014 and 2015.
system. Therefore, implementation of the
practical issues still need to be worked out fully, and we will continue to report on developments as more detailed guidance
Businesses will need to take particular care over transactions that span the change from sales
business, accounting and reporting systems, staff, suppliers and customers for the new regime:
accounting systems, training expenses, hiring of additional
basis
deal with the new tax
Review accounts payable processes to ensure tracking and posting of expenses are done in a timely manner
expense claims
documentation to comply with the new tax
2015 and April 2015)
accounting and reporting processes
Identify the legal implications of existing long-term
contracts for services to be supplied throughout 2015)
Mexico important amendments to the
31 October 2013. These
foreign trade operations in
changes will come into force on 1 January 2014, some will be deferred for a limited period. In this article, we set out the most relevant amendments affecting foreign trade operations.
Rocio Mejia
Importers and exporters are no longer
export entries and customs declarations (pedimento).
While importers/exporters may opt to continue using a customs broker to perform their customs clearance procedures, they also may choose to perform such procedures on their own behalf by designating a legal representative or “customs representative” who will be responsible
documentation.
It is important to note that the “customs
the importer/exporter for the payment of duties and other taxes due upon the import/export of goods.
authorities will establish the mechanisms to be used by importers/exporters performing customs clearance procedures on their own behalf.
allow for the establishment of a strategic bonded warehouse (Recinto Fiscalizado
country. While these amendments will
establishing a strategic bonded warehouse, goods that are imported
electronic foreign trade platform, commonly referred to as the “Ventanilla
mandatory in order to perform the
Customs law merge the former Ventanilla
clearance process will be performed electronically and through digital documents, including the import/export declaration and supporting documentation (commercial invoice, bill of
electronic declaration with information on the value of imported goods. The amendments to the Customs law establish
may be imposed on importers if they declare inexact or false data in their electronic value declarations.
Also, in order to expedite the customs clearance process, the secondary review of goods during the import customs clearance process is eliminated.
importer’s ability to make post-entry amendments to customs declarations. For
importer is generally limited to correcting the information on declarations up to two
declaration, such as the country of origin or the description of the goods, cannot be amended.
The amendments to the Customs law allow for changes to be made regarding the information contained in the customs declaration at any time and as many times
determined the scenarios for which prior
acknowledge the possibility for importers
expired temporary imports, limiting the importer’s exposure to the payment of omitted duties, if any, and VAT.
extended
allowed a change of regime from temporary to permanent importation only for goods that were temporarily imported for manufacturing, transformation or repair purposes (for example, goods
now make it possible to change the customs regime for other goods (e.g., that
be temporarily imported, such as samples and goods imported by foreign residents.
Importers and exporters are no longer
entries and customs declarations.
66
The VAT is currently waived when goods are temporarily
other customs regimes (i.e., bonded warehouse for the auto industry, bonded warehouse for transformation and strategic bonded warehouse). In accordance with the amendments to the
imports under these customs regimes when the import
recovered through a credit or refund, the recovery process may
obligation.
controls of their temporary or in-bond imports. While these
against the VAT that has to be paid for the temporary
and must be renewed 30 days prior to its expiration date.
Alternatively, companies that choose not to obtain the
temporary or in-bond imports as long as they guarantee the VAT
The obligation to pay the VAT upon the temporary or in-bond importation of goods will become effective one year after the
credit will be applied.
buyer of the goods). This VAT should be recoverable by the
will be in force across the country.
customs regimes
The excise tax, which applies to the importation of beverages with alcohol content, beer, cigarettes, gasoline and diesel, was usually waived when such goods were temporarily imported into
bonded warehouse for the auto industry, bonded warehouse for transformation and strategic bonded warehouse). In accordance with the recently approved amendment, the excise tax will now have to be paid on imports of excisable products under these
excise tax that has to be paid for the temporary or in-bond importation of goods or guarantee the excise tax payments
The obligation to pay the excise tax upon the temporary or in-bond importation of goods will become effective one year
which the tax credit will be applied.
The VAT rate of 11% that currently applies
will be in force across the country.
67
Conclusions
Although the addition of VAT and excise taxes to temporary and in-bond imports may create cash
the Customs law will mostly be welcomed, especially the ability for importers to change their customs declarations.
effect on 1 January 2014. These changes affect fundamental aspects of the
the rules relating to the time of supply, the time when input VAT can be claimed, the invoicing process and the taxable amount.
affected to some extent by these far-reaching changes. But, along with the changes already in force since April 2013, they will be
businesses involved in international trade. In this article, we set out some of the new rules relating to the time of supply and invoicing,
VAT changes may have a
supply chains.
Tel: +48 22 557 7339
68
One of the main VAT changes coming in 2014 relates to the general time of supply (or tax point). The tax point determines when a taxable supply of goods or services takes place. It decides which tax period a supply falls into (and therefore when the tax charged must be paid to the tax authorities).
the date of delivery of goods or the provision of services. This means that in many cases the tax point will be
than before.
rules, covering situations where the basic tax point rule is not considered appropriate (e.g., for telecommunications, energy, transport, construction, rental and many others sectors). In some cases, these special rules will be removed and the basic tax point rule will apply instead (e.g., in transport services), while in other
triggered by different events.
Implications for business:taxpayers should identify and track the necessary tax point events for their
rules (for example, when goods are
information and documents to ensure the tax is captured at the right time, which is
not in relation to any invoice issued by the system. In addition, commercial contracts concluded in the past may not to accommodate the new rules properly and should be reviewed to avoid any adverse effects once the law is changed.
Businesses that are registered for VAT are entitled to offset VAT paid by them on purchases (input tax) against VAT charged on sales (output tax). The new rules have an impact on input tax deduction in a number of ways.
Time of deduction: According to the new provisions, the taxpayer’s right to deduct input VAT will depend on two dates:
1) The date when the tax point arose for the supplier
2) The date when the invoice documenting the supply was received
been the crucial date for deduction in most cases. Therefore, the deduction could happen if an invoice has been issued before the service is completed or the transfer of the right to the goods has been allowed (assuming that it took place
claim was made, with certain exceptions). Also, in general, the recipient has not been obliged to track when the supplier
issue invoices before and after the supply,
correctly determine when to deduct input VAT. In particular, implementing the
between different departments within the company and awareness of what information is needed.
Goods and services supplied to Poland: A further complication related to input tax deduction concerns international
are taxed using the reverse-charge mechanism. For these transactions, the
must account for the output tax and
law allows the taxpayer to deduct input tax only if the output tax was reported in the correct VAT return.
Further restrictions have been also introduced with respect to the intra-
the right to deduct the input VAT on an
collects commercial invoices issued by his
allow a three-month waiting period). Thus, the timely collection and processing of foreign commercial invoices will be
right to deduct the input VAT on these transactions.
system are being changed, affecting all
invoices will also change on 1 January 2014. In particular, it will be possible to issue a VAT invoice 30 days before the actual delivery date of goods. It will also be possible to issue an invoice much later than is currently allowed. The general invoicing deadline will be extended from seven days after the supply to the 15th day of the month following the month of the supply (which could extend the issue date by more than a month in some
choosing when to issue an invoice.
may allow them to align their invoicing practices more closely to other commercial processes. And this trend
VAT invoicing in general (e.g., allowing invoices to be issued on behalf of another
and archive tax documents electronically
combined with changes in the input VAT deduction rules, will not only affect
impact on invoice recipients.
chains in the following areas:
Reverse charge: governing the reverse-charge mechanism
charge mechanism is not applicable if a foreign supplier is registered for VAT
the reverse-charge conditions might have an impact on international supply chains that involve sales made by a nonresident principal. Changes may apply to the
principal and to those imposed on any entity registered for VAT purposes in
Chain transactions: The rules concerning the allocation of transport in chain transactions where three or more parties
an intermediary (e.g., party B in the example) is responsible for the transport, the “default” transaction that is treated as an intra-Community supply is no longer clearly indicated. Therefore, chain transactions involving multiple parties should be looked at carefully to ensure
intra-Community supplies.
Restrictions on input tax for intra-Community acquisitions of goods: The introduction of conditions for deducting
recovery will be lost if businesses do not introduce effective controls and
point and the receipt of the supplier’s invoice documenting. Furthermore, input
number is given to the supplier but the
country. Therefore, taxpayers need to review their processes to ensure the
supplied in all chain transactions involving
on your tablet. With information on more
or
In the modern world, international trading plays an important role in most types of business, and every day millions of cross-border trade transactions take place
in value. Transportation and logistics are often important cost factors in these transactions. In Russia, international logistics plays a particularly important role as the country is still very dependent on imported goods.
In this article, the second in a series focusing on Russian VAT issues, we look at the VAT treatment of services related to international trade and logistics, and we outline some considerations for foreign companies doing business with Russia.
In most countries around the world, international transport and international
purposes. This is also the case in Russia; however, in Russia, there is a catch. According to the Russian VAT place-of-supply rules, transportation services or transportation-related services are
supplied by a Russian company and the departure point and/or the destination point of the transportation is located in Russia. For these purposes, the term “international transportation” should be
departure point or the destination point is outside the Russian territory.
As we have said, international transportation and certain related
Russia. The advantages of applying the
The supplier does not charge VAT with respect to the services, but it can still
and wait for a refund of input VAT.
A non-Russian buyer does not incur non-recoverable Russian VAT.
In Russia, the VAT treatment of the cross-border transport of goods generally hasn’t been discussed (but is generally
complication lies in the treatment of
logistics services connected to the cross-border transport. The Russian Tax Code provides a list of certain logistic
if they are provided in the context of arranging international carriage and if they are provided under a “freight-forwarding agreement.”
A freight-forwarding agreement is a
the Russian civil legislation. In particular, under a freight-forwarding agreement a forwarding agent agrees to perform or arrange for the performance of certain services connected with the transportation of the goods for a fee. In Russia, federal law regulates freight-forwarding services. There are, however,
the law with respect to logistic services (such as licensing, a special registration or the necessity to own transportation means). As a result, any company can provide freight-forwarding services.
In practice, therefore, there may be uncertainty as to whether the 0% rate or the 18% VAT rate should be applied to certain types of logistic services. For example, doubts may arise for logistic services that are not provided under a freight-forwarding agreement or for services where a forwarding agent does
transportation itself. In these cases, service providers often prefer to apply the 18% VAT rate instead of the 0% VAT rate. As a result, VAT risks are transferred to the buyer of the services, as the tax authorities could argue that such services
the recovery of such VAT by the buyer.
Recent court practice with respect to the VAT treatment of logistic services related to international transportation shows the following trends:
The court applies a “substance over form” approach to freight-forwarding services. This means that the court supports the application of the 0% VAT rate even if the agreement under which the services are provided is not formally called a freight-forwarding agreement.
in substance should match the key features of a freight-forwarding agreement. As a result, application of
The court supports the position that a freight forwarder should apply the 0% VAT rate even if the freight forwarder neither transported the goods itself nor arranged such transportation. In particular, this approach could be applied to loading, unloading, warehousing, the execution of documents, customs clearance and many more services. This conclusion is based on the fact that the services rendered by the freight forwarder are performed for the purposes of transporting the goods from Russia,
the 0% VAT rate.
Russ
ia
Transportation and related services are
Russian company and the departure point and/or the destination point is located in Russia.
There may be uncertainty as to whether the 0% rate or the 18% VAT rate should be
applied to certain types of logistic services.
These court decisions are very important because they raise the following issues:
A broader range of services rendered during international
logistics support services supplied during the export or import
costs related to the transportation of goods. Russian buyers
There is increased risk that the tax authorities may successfully challenge the deduction of input VAT charged on international logistics support services, making it more likely that clients will refuse to pay VAT charged by logistics service providers.
ConclusionsIn view of the above it is important to carefully review any Russian VAT being charged by logistics service providers in relation to cross-border logistics support. We believe there is no black-or-white solution to dealing with some of these issues, so a balanced approach should be
services where possible and including protective clauses in the agreement in case the tax authorities challenge the related input VAT deduction.
fraud, the tax administration
(which was recently approved
submit detailed VAT ledger reports along with their periodic VAT returns, effective 1 January 2014.
In this article, we set out details of the new reporting obligation and how it may affect businesses operating in
Tel: +421 2 333 39130
Tel: +421 2 333 39110
76
77
The VAT ledger report will provide the
information on virtually every business
payers. As a result, the volume of audits
increase after the introduction of the new
ready to meet this increased level of scrutiny.
payers to submit detailed information about the transactions they undertake each month. Reports will include the information for every invoice received or issued by the VAT payer, including
invoices and cash register receipts.
exempt supplies are excluded. The transaction values declared in the VAT ledger report should generally match the data declared in the VAT return for the
exceptions for certain transaction types).
Items to be declared for each invoice
document number (and a reference to the original invoice number in the case of an
transaction values, and the amount of deducted VAT. For supplies of certain
charge, additional information will be
issued (e.g., cash register receipts) are to be reported in aggregate for the tax period net of tax declared separately for each VAT rate applied.
A supplementary VAT ledger report should be submitted to declare any changes or additions to the transactions reported.
VAT payers will be obliged to submit VAT ledger reports together with each VAT return. This obligation will arise for each
are carried out). The proposals have no de minimis threshold below which a ledger is
In accordance with the approved legislative bill setting out the change, the
January 2014.
The VAT payer must compile all the
template for the VAT ledger form, which has recently been passed to the
providing more detailed information on the VAT ledger form are also expected shortly.
electronically within 25 days after the end of the VAT period, but not later than the
by the end of the month following the tax
such as failing to submit the VAT ledger report, submitting the VAT ledger report late, or declaring incomplete or incorrect information. The penalty may go up to
of repeated omissions, the penalty range extends up to €100,000.
The current wording of the legislation suggests that penalties will also apply to
the character of the change.
A draft ledger report has been published for comment by VAT payers and stakeholders. In the absence of clear guidelines for completion of the VAT ledger template, we believe that some of
The obligation to mention customs tariff numbers according to the Common Custom Tariff, as well as the type and amount of certain types of
charge, has stayed in the bill, but this
that may need to be collected externally or be extracted from their IT systems.
VAT payers to submit detailed information about the transactions they undertake each month.
noncompliance, such as failing to submit the VAT
ledger report, submitting the VAT ledger report late or
declaring incomplete or incorrect information.
78
The obligation to report data for each individual invoice has
automotive or utilities sectors).
Transactions that did not lead to an obligation to issue an
include those made with employees or deliveries that are taxable prior to the invoice being issued. These items may be
reporting purposes.
It is sometimes not clear which transaction properties or which types of transactions should be reported in which columns and rows of the VAT ledger form, as currently proposed. There are
transactions may thus be easily misreported. This may cause
review purposes and result in harsh penalties being levied on VAT payers, even when there is no effective tax loss.
report is planned to be implemented in January 2014.
Through information declared in the VAT ledger report, the
virtually every business transaction performed by a VAT payer. This will likely serve as a basis for the selection of VAT payers for VAT inspections and cross audits. As a result, the number of
seamless reporting and compliance with this new statutory
VAT payers have minimal time to incorporate the new reporting
their IT systems.
obligation from its date of introduction. Questions that will need to be addressed include:
received from our suppliers and issued to our customers
If not, can this be easily extracted from the documents and
where VAT is to be declared based on documents other than invoices?
situations where VAT is to be declared based on documents other than invoices (e.g., down payments,
supplied cross-border for which no VAT invoice is available,
notes and debit notes formally issued)? Can the information for such transactions be extracted easily from contracts, purchase orders, warehouse receipts or delivery
for each transaction separately?
Could there be cases when certain transactions reported correctly in our VAT return might be declared incorrectly in the VAT return by our supplier or customers (e.g., different tax period reporting, different values and different VAT treatments)?
return? Are penalties likely to apply?
The following actions may also help to prepare for the new
differences arising between transactions reported in VAT returns and VAT ledger reports:
prepare the VAT ledger
time
Convert available data into the VAT ledger template (once the electronic form is published), e.g., by mapping the VAT
sections of the VAT ledger form
Carry out a simulated in-house tax audit with a focus on the correct implementation of VAT ledger processes to identify gaps and weaknesses
in advance to ensure seamless reporting and compliance with this new statutory obligation from its date of introduction.
your tax obligations responsibly and proactively can make a critical difference. Our global teams of talented people bring you technical knowledge, business experience and consistency, all built on our
whatever tax services you need.
We create highly networked teams who can advise on planning, compliance and reporting and help you maintain constructive
technical networks across the globe can work with you to reduce
tax professionals, in more than 140 countries, are committed to
support your tax function.
All Rights Reserved.
This material has been prepared for general informational purposes only and is not
to your advisors for specific advice.
ey.com
| Assurance | Tax | Transactions | Advisory
trust and confidence in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We develop outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to all of our stakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role in building a better working world for our people, for our clients and for our communities.
company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients.
Circular 230 Statement:be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.