INDEX [assets.cambridge.org]...INDEX Abi-Saab, Georges, 537–8 access to justice, 49, 67–8, 77,...
Transcript of INDEX [assets.cambridge.org]...INDEX Abi-Saab, Georges, 537–8 access to justice, 49, 67–8, 77,...
-
INDEX
Abi-Saab, Georges, 537–8access to justice, 49, 67–8, 77, 84–6actio popularis, 139African Charter on Human and
Peoples’ Rightsarbitrary detention, 552DRC ratification, 564expulsion of aliens and, 77, 130, 549,
551human dignity, 553reparation, 560sovereignty over natural resources,
121African Commission on Human
Rights, 121, 295, 527, 532African Court on Human and Peoples’
Rights, 65aggression, 150–1, 448Ago, Roberto, 489Akande, Dapo, 516Al-Khasawneh, Judge, 106Al-Qaeda, 188Alston, P, 11Álvarez, Alejandro, 61Alvarez-Jiménez, Alberto, 392American Convention on Human
Rights, 72, 295ancient Greece, 459–60Andenas, Mads, 1–33, 371, 502,
536–69Anzilotti, Dionisio, 459apartheid, 26, 123, 306Argentina
Argentina–Germany BIT, 53extraterritorial jurisdiction and, 97ICSID arbitration, 255, 263provisional measures, ITLOS, 250
Pulp Mills (Argentina v. Uruguay),233, 243, 398–9, 526–7, 529–30
United Nations Human RightsCommittee and, 103
armed conflict, human rights law in,98–9, 124, 278, 279, 352
Armenia, Bayatayan v. Armenia, 195Aspremont, Jean de, 391Austin, John, 462, 463, 469Australia
Nuclear Tests (Australia v. France),233
Southern Bluefin case, 243, 251whaling dispute with Japan, 9
Bangladesh, Bangladesh v. Myanmar,47, 78, 270
Basel Committee, 336Belgium
Arrest Warrant (DRC v. Belgium)customary law, 402, 405dissenting views, 134facts and findings, 44–5immunity, 133, 405jus cogens, 437provisional measures, 249
Barcelona Traction (Belgium v.Spain), 111, 139, 554, 558–9
Belgian Linguistic case, 175Hissène Habré case (Belgium v.
Senegal), 103–4, 131, 403, 405,552, 553–8, 567
Iron Rhine (Belgium v. Netherlands),522, 524
Sino-Belgian Treaty case, 222, 248Van der Mussele v. Belgium, 198
Bergbohm, Carl, 459
570
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-08209-0 - A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence inInternational LawEdited by Mads Andenas And Eirik BjorgeIndexMore information
http://www.cambridge.org/9781107082090http://www.cambridge.orghttp://www.cambridge.org
-
index 571
Berman, F., 518, 534Berne Convention on Literary Property
(1886), 460Berne Treaty on General Postal Union
(1874), 460Bernhardt, R., 228, 513bilateral investment treaties
See also ICSID; UNCITRALarbitration, 39, 53–4most favoured nation (MFN)
clauses, 53–4Bjorge, Eirik, 1–33, 498–535, 551black holes, 15, 144Blackstone, William, 390, 446Blunstchli, Johann Caspar, 462, 463–4Bodansky, Daniel, 393–4Bolivia, ICSID arbitration, 255–6Bosnia-Herzegovina
Dokic v. Bosnia, 181Genocide (Bosnia v. Serbia), 149, 398,
403–4, 563, 567hybrid international criminal
tribunal, 66Boyle, Alan, 124, 393Brölmann, C., 501, 520Brownlie, Ian, 414, 503Brussels Conference (1890), 500Bryan Peace Treaties, 221–2Buckland, W. W., 390Buergenthal, Thomas, 106, 112,
302Bulgaria
Electricity Company of Sofia andBulgaria, 222, 242
ICSID case, 245Riener v. Bulgaria, 195, 197
Burkina Faso, border dispute withNiger, 83
Bush, George W., 347
Cambodia, hybrid internationalcriminal tribunal, 66
Canada, State immunity, 51Cançado Trindade, Antônio Augusto,
13–15, 56–86, 112, 537Cassese, Antonio, 540Cassin, René, 61Castellarin, Emanuel, 26–7, 320–42
categorisation of treatiesconstitutive treaties, 515–20human rights treaties, 513–15Nuclear Weapons, 515–16ordinary treaties, 520–5terminology, 510–11three-way split, 32, 499, 508–25
CEDAW (International Convention onthe Elimination of All Forms ofDiscrimination againstWomen)
Committee, 312complaint mechanism, 302ratification level, 302UDHR and, 306
Central American Court of Justice, 57CERD (International Convention on
the Elimination of All Forms ofRacial Discrimination)
Committee, 312complaint mechanism, 302declarations, 309extraterritorial obligations, 179–80free expression and, 311
Sarrazin decision, 312–17, 318–19ICJ case law, 123, 127
inter-State disputes, 141ICJ jurisdiction, 111litispendence and, 304purpose, 306, 309ratifications, 468remedies, 137reservations, 140, 304UDHR and, 306
Chad, victims of Habré regime, 83,103–4
Charney, Jonathan, 381, 393children’s rights, ECHR and, 194–5Chile
ICSID arbitration, 264, 269Letelier case, 415
ChinaBryan Peace Treaties, 221–2Sino-Belgian Treaty case, 222, 248State immunities, absolute
immunity, 423, 453Chinkin, Christine, 124, 393Churchill, R. R., 505–6
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-08209-0 - A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence inInternational LawEdited by Mads Andenas And Eirik BjorgeIndexMore information
http://www.cambridge.org/9781107082090http://www.cambridge.orghttp://www.cambridge.org
-
572 index
Cicero, Marcus Tullius, 61citizenship, Nottebohm (Liechtenstein v.
Guatemala), 545–9, 566Colombia, Nicaragua v. Colombia,
270comity, 184, 414, 424, 428Committee on Economic, Social and
Cultural Rights (CESCR), 563Committee on the Rights of Persons
with Disabilities, 107Committee on the Rights of the Child,
312company rights, Diallo, 558–9compulsory jurisdiction, 69–71, 75–6,
541constitutional/constitutive treaties,
categorisation, 515–20constitutional courts, convergence of
international law and, 2context, international law and, 4–5convergence
coherence in content, 526–9coherence in method, 529–33domestic and international
tribunals, 80–2factors, 17–18, 42, 146–70, 476–9growth of international tribunals
and, 79–80incremental transformation, 566–9judicial dialogue and, 167–8precedents and, 165–7principles of international law and,
43–6, 73–5sources of authority, 562–6
Cook Islands, 468corpus juris gentium, 61Corten, Olivier, 392Costa, Vice-President, 20Costa Rica, Costa Rica v. Nicaragua,
401, 404–5, 522counter-terrorism, 42, 124, 133, 144,
355–6, 552Court of Justice of the European Union
(CJEU)compulsory jurisdiction, 70, 76, 541economic competences, 323, 329EU as new legal order, 322EU law versus international law, 337
international law reception, 506,516–19
treaty interpretationapproach, 492–4CILFIT, 492–4effectiveness principle, 480
WTO and, 335Crawford, James, 4, 274, 521, 523, 524,
528, 530–1, 533, 535crimes against humanity, 66–7, 133–4,
183criminal international law
See also specific tribunalsICC. See International Criminal
Court (ICC)treaty interpretation, 481
customary international lawcoherence, 40ECtHR and, 543–4formation, 528–9historical scholarly debate, 467human rights, third party
obligations, 138–9humanitarian law, 42, 117ICJ and, 118
Article 38(1)(b), 382, 392contribution, 537, 568ILC assessment, 538–9,
542–3Jurisdictional Immunities, 396,
482North Sea Continental Shelf, 377,
381, 386, 395, 469reluctance, 541role, 371, 390–4, 468–70, 542,
544–5soft play approach, 394–406
identification, 377–82framework custom, 387, 391international courts, 467–70main actors, 371–7rule of recognition, 372, 373–4,
378, 379, 382scientism, 387–94State immunities, 412–17State practice, 387
immunities, 44, 156, 183, 412–17,422–4
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-08209-0 - A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence inInternational LawEdited by Mads Andenas And Eirik BjorgeIndexMore information
http://www.cambridge.org/9781107082090http://www.cambridge.orghttp://www.cambridge.org
-
index 573
interpretation approaches, 481–3methodological fragmentation, 9–12moulding treaties, 4necessity, 4overview, 28–30proportionality, 4regional custom, 40State practice and, 40treaty provisions becoming custom,
41, 119UN resolutions and, 119
customary lawprimacy of jus cogens, 20
CyprusLoizidou v. Turkey, 181, 207Northern Cyprus secession, 123
D’Amato, Anthony, 382, 389decolonisation, 119–23Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)
African Charter on Human andPeoples’ Rights and, 564
Arrest Warrant (DRC v. Belgium)customary law, 402, 405dissenting views, 134facts and findings, 44–5immunity, 133, 405jus cogens, 437provisional measures, 249Diallo. See Diallo (Guinea v. DRC)
DRC v. France, 153DRC v. Rwanda, 140DRC v. Uganda, 129–30, 179, 281–2,
548, 550reparation, 136
provisional measures, ICSIDarbitration, 264, 269
deportationDiallo. See Diallo (Guinea v. DRC)
assessment of domestic humanrights, 202
provisional measures, 257–8IHRL and, 100–1, 130, 549,
551Descamps, Édouard, 61detention. See liberty and securityDiallo (Guinea v. DRC)
authority, 563–6
consistency of international law and,107
consular relationsapproach, 402, 529–30, 548–62company and investor rights,
558–9facts and findings, 548human rights and, 527–8, 530–3,
549–58dissenting views, 101free movement, 100–1human rights
approach, 530–3consular relations and, 527–8,
530–3, 549–58issues, 100–3, 130liberty and security, 101
ill-treatment of prisoners, 102–3incremental change, 567–9judicial dialogue, 47–8, 77–8, 527–8,
530–3, 551, 568–9length of proceedings, 562reparation, 102, 136, 545, 559–62,
565United Nations Human Rights
Committee and, 94–6diplomatic and consular relations
See also Vienna Convention onConsular Relations (1963)
Barcelona Traction, 111, 139, 554,558–9
DRC v. Uganda, 548, 550human rights law and
Diallo, 141, 549–58ICJ cases, 129–30
ICJ decisions, 526–8Diallo. See Diallo (Guinea v.
DRC)human rights law and, 129–30implementation, 343, 345–52LaGrand, 129, 177, 178, 247, 248,
249, 258–9, 266–7, 345–52, 528,533, 568
Nottebohm (Liechtenstein v.Guatemala), 545–9, 566
self-contained regime, 499, 530–1Tehran Hostages (US v. Iran), 117,
136, 261, 499, 527, 530
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-08209-0 - A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence inInternational LawEdited by Mads Andenas And Eirik BjorgeIndexMore information
http://www.cambridge.org/9781107082090http://www.cambridge.orghttp://www.cambridge.org
-
574 index
domestic courtsactors of international legal order,
345implementation of ICJ decisions, 28,
343–68assessment, 365–8consular relations cases, 343,
345–52Jurisdictional Immunities, 343,
361–5Wall opinion, 344, 352–61
domestic law, international law and,80–2
drafting, international differences,162–5
DRC. See Democratic Republic ofCongo
Dupuy, J. M., 517–18, 526Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, 169, 384, 537Dupuy, René-Jean, 468
East Timor, 66, 139ECHR. See European Convention on
Human Rightseconomic institutions
constitutional diversity, 331–4EU and, 320–42
from periphery to centre, 321–7social constraints, 334–40social recognition, 327–34theoretical assessment, 340–2
network, 324–5ECSI. See European Convention on
State ImmunityECtHR. See European Court of Human
RightsEcuador, ICSID cases, 246, 252–3effectiveness principle, 480, 531Egypt, WHO-Egypt case, 452environmental law
origins of international law, 38self-contained regime, 8–9, 504
erga omnes obligationscustomary law, 117diplomatic relations and, 130Genocide Convention, 117, 126Hague Regulations (1907), 275self-determination, 117
State responsibility and, 131–2torture prohibition, 116, 553–8United Nations Human Rights
Committee decisions, 90Eritrea–Ethiopia Claims Commission
(EECC), 149Eskridge, W., 159espionage, 411euro crisis, 337European Central Bank, 332, 337European Commission
ILC Draft Articles on responsibilityof international organisationsand, 340
inter-institutional balance, 332troika rescue plan, 337
European Convention on HumanRights (ECHR)
See also European Court of HumanRights, specific rights
children’s rights, 194–5contextual interpretation, 43free expression and racial speech,
315international law and
improving, 211–12provisions, 197–8similarities, 201, 212–13
permissible detention grounds, 287provisional measures, Rule 39,
228–30State immunities and, 426–30
European Convention on StateImmunity (ECSI) (1972), 409,425, 450, 451, 452, 454
European Court of Human Rights(ECtHR)
case load, 175compliance with decisions, 84compulsory jurisdiction, 70creation, 65ECHR interpretation in context, 43effectiveness principle, 480, 531humanitarian law and, 295–6ICJ case law influence on, 173–90
extraterritorial obligations,179–82
immunities, 183–7
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-08209-0 - A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence inInternational LawEdited by Mads Andenas And Eirik BjorgeIndexMore information
http://www.cambridge.org/9781107082090http://www.cambridge.orghttp://www.cambridge.org
-
index 575
increasing role, 215–17interpretation of treaties, 177Jones v. UK, 396provisional measures, 177–8restitutio in integrum, 182–3
ICJ judicial dialogue and, 527, 532–3international law reception, 506–7
Al-Adsani v. UK, 506, 543–4assessing domestic human rights,
202assessment of factors, 210–14customary law, 543–4ECHR more profitable, 205–7ECHR provisions, 197–8gap filling, 200–1general rules, 5harmonisation need, 194–7humanitarian law, 203improving ECHR, 211–12increasing ICJ role, 215–17influencing factors, 191–217intertwining international law,
193–4invocation at domestic level,
192–3jurisdiction and, 505, 543political issues, 203–5pre-existing reasons, 211procedural and substantive law,
207–8ratification record, 209self-sufficiency, 191, 213–14similarities, 201, 212–13specific guidelines, 201–2State interests, 203–5technical reasons, 211uncertainties, 198–9universal reach, 209–10
jurisdiction, 174inter-State actions, 174international law and, 505, 543prima facie, 238–9
limits to State voluntarism, 65, 75provisional measures
case law, 200–1ICJ influence, 177–8prima facie jurisdiction, 238–9purpose, 247–8
Rule 39, 228–30, 268scope, 265–7urgency, 256–8
reparation, inter-State disputes, 141reservations to treaties and, 140sources of authority, 565State immunities
Al-Adsani v. UK, 49–51, 135, 270,407, 408, 418, 427–30, 436
case law, 426–30civil versus criminal immunities,
407ICJ case law and, 183–7Jones v. UK, 51, 396, 407, 416, 418,
428–9UN obligations and, 187–9United Nations Human Rights
Committee and, 194, 208VCLT and, 7–8
European Court of Justice. See Court ofJustice of the European Union
European External Service, 332European Union (EU)
competences, 323–4, 327–31Court of Justice. See Court of Justice
of the European Unioninternational economic
participationcompetences, 327–31constitutional diversity, 331–4dispute settlement mechanisms,
338–40from periphery to centre, 321–7social constraints, 334–40social recognition, 327–34survey, 320–42theoretical assessment, 340–2
legal supremacy, 54new legal order of international law,
27, 322, 517permanent revolution, 322, 333quasi-federalism, 322self-contained regime, 504, 528sui generis international
organisation, 27, 321WTO and, 335
evidence, procedural differences,160–2
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-08209-0 - A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence inInternational LawEdited by Mads Andenas And Eirik BjorgeIndexMore information
http://www.cambridge.org/9781107082090http://www.cambridge.orghttp://www.cambridge.org
-
576 index
exhaustion of local remedies, 549, 558,567
extraterritorial jurisdictionhuman rights law, 96–8, 127–8ICCPR, 96–8, 179ICJ and human rights, 96–8
influence on ECtHR, 179–82Wall opinion, 96–8, 179
factors in fragmentation/convergencegoals, 477–8identity of court, 147–55
function, 150–1institutional context, 152–5permanent versus ad hoc, 147–50
international institutions, 42judicial activism, 478–9modulation factors, 476–9overview, 17–18, 146–70procedures, 160–8
drafting process, 162–5evidence, 160–2precedents, 165–7
subjects, 476–7substantial legal differences, 155–60
controversy and change, 159–60level of development, 157–8treaty or custom, 155–7
fair hearingInter-American Court of Human
Rights (IACtHR) case law, 129ICJ case law, 104–6
Fernandes, Raul, 61Fikfak, Veronika, 28, 343–68financial crisis (2008), 336, 337Finnis, John, 382–3, 391forced labour, ILO Convention, 198Forowicz, Magdalena, 21–4, 191–217forum shopping, 77fragmentation
between and within regimes,297–300
diversity in application ofinternational law, 46–54
diversity in treaty-making, 40–6factors, 17–18, 146–70forms, 4–12human rights law. See human rights
ICJ and, 32–3, 499, 536–40autonomous regime as others,
540–5institutional fragmentation, 6–7methodological fragmentation, 7–12pre-fragmentation golden age, 38scholarly warnings, 37substantive fragmentation, 4–6treaty interpretation, 498–535whether problem, 38–40
FranceBryan Peace Treaties, 221–2customary law, 378DRC v. France, 153EU law supremacy and, 54human rights and UNSC
resolutions, 188Lac Lanoux, 522Nuclear Tests (Australia v. France),
233Nuclear Tests (New Zealand v.
France), 233provisional measures, 219State immunities, Sabeh El Leil v.
France, 427–8Franck, T., 524free expression
CERD and, 311Sarrazin decision, 312–17, 318–19
ECtHR, 195, 315instruments, 306racial speech and, 308, 315
free movement, ICJ case law, 99–101Fujimori, Alberto, 82
G-groups, 325Gardiner, R, 517GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs
and Trade 1947), 324, 330, 336Geiger, Rudolf, 393–4Geneva Conventions
Additional Protocols, 41, 42, 274inter-State concept, 275negotiations, 274non-international armed conflicts,
277occupied territories, 354ratifications, 468
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-08209-0 - A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence inInternational LawEdited by Mads Andenas And Eirik BjorgeIndexMore information
http://www.cambridge.org/9781107082090http://www.cambridge.orghttp://www.cambridge.org
-
index 577
universal ratification, 289Wall opinion and, 352, 356
genocideConvention. See Genocide
ConventionICJ case law, 87, 123, 132–3
Genocide (Bosnia v. Serbia), 398,403–4, 563, 567
inter-State dispute, 141reparation, 136third party obligations, 139
ICJ jurisdiction, 111, 146, 153international criminal tribunals and,
67jurisdictions, 146jus cogens prohibition, 117standard of proof, 161State versus individual
responsibility, 132–3Genocide Convention
context, 5erga omnes obligations, 117, 126facilitating convergence, 155–6purpose, 273–4ratifications, 467reservations, 114, 557
Gentz, Friedrich von, 459Gény, François, 459Georgia, Georgia v. Russia
extraterritorial obligations, 127,179–80
jurisdiction, 567provisional measures, 123, 137, 233,
242Germany
Argentina–Germany BIT, 53Avena and, 345Factory at Chorzów, 260GDR border policing, 204–5Jurisdictional Immunities.
See also JurisdictionalImmunities (Germany v. Italy)
LaGrand (Germany v. US), 129, 177,178, 247, 248, 249, 258–9,266–7, 345–52, 528, 533, 568
provisional measures, 219, 222Sarrazin decision, 312–17, 318–19State immunities, Empire of Iran, 413
Ghana, ARA Libertad (ITLOS), 236,250, 263
globalisation, 159, 337good faith, United Nations Human
Rights Committee and, 90Gowlland-Debbas, Vera, 15–17, 109–45Gradoni, Lorenzo, 28–9, 371–406Greece
1944 Distomo massacre, 185–6, 187euro crisis, 337Jurisdictional Immunities, 50, 361–5
Greenwood, Christopher, 10, 13,37–55, 505, 537, 542, 543
Grotius, Hugo, 61, 460Guatemala
ICSID arbitration, 254Nottebohm (Liechtenstein v.
Guatemala), 545–9, 566Guillaume, Gilbert, 32, 112, 310,
541–2, 564, 566–7Guinea
Diallo. See Diallo (Guinea v. DRC)provisional measures
ICSID arbitration, 264, 269M/V Saiga (No. 2), 262
Guinea-Bissau, maritime dispute withSenegal, 241
Guyana/Suriname arbitral tribunal,149
Habré, Issène, 83, 103Haggenmacher, Peter, 374–5, 460Hague Conference on Private
International Law, 42Hague Convention on Adoption, 193,
207–8Hague Convention on Child
Abduction, 193, 207–8, 209Hague Conventions, 463Hague Peace Conference (1899), 56Hague Peace Conference (1907), 56, 57Hague Regulations (1907)
erga omnes obligations, 275occupied territories, 121, 354prisoners of war, 275Wall opinion and, 352
Halpérin, Jean-Louis, 30, 459–70Hambro, E., 519–20
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-08209-0 - A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence inInternational LawEdited by Mads Andenas And Eirik BjorgeIndexMore information
http://www.cambridge.org/9781107082090http://www.cambridge.orghttp://www.cambridge.org
-
578 index
Hart, H. L. A., 372, 373–4, 378, 379,382, 461–2
Hegel, G. W. F., 1, 342Higgins, Rosalyn, 12, 19, 106, 112, 161,
176, 179, 189–90Hill-Cawthorne, Lawrence, 24–5,
272–96Holy See, 468Huber, Max, 61, 122, 248, 524–5human dignity, 74, 306, 553human rights
balancing rights, 307–8burden of proof, 553categorisation of treaties, 513–15centre stage, 109conflict potential
jurisdictions, 303–5jurisprudence conflicts, 305–12litispendence, 303–5procedural safeguards, 303–5, 308proliferation of regimes and
institutions, 300–3res judicata, 304survey, 300–12
conflicting rights, 307–8consular protection and, 549–58emergence, 272–4extraterritorial jurisdiction, 96–8,
127–8fragmentation
debate, 91–4, 297potential conflicts, 300–12shared normative content, 305–7
fundamental norms, source andcontent, 118–24
general international law andcriminal jurisdiction, 131–2diplomatic relations, 129–30ICJ cases, 129–35immunities, 133–5State versus individual
responsibility, 132–3hierarchy of rights
collective interest treaties, 114–16enriched terminology, 116–18ICJ case law, 113–24
humanitarian law andboundaries, 98–9
bridging, 124–8contemporary conflicts, 293ICJ cases, 124–8, 278–92Legality of Nuclear Weapons,
278–83, 287lex specialis, 278–92relationship, 125–7Wall opinion, 125–6, 279–83
ICJ and treaty bodiescase law, 96–108general approach, 94–6interaction, 142–3
ICJ as human rights treaty body,87
ICJ casesadding value, 538applicability in armed conflict, 98,
124assessment, 106–8, 143–5collective interest, 114–16consular protection and IHRL,
549–58court jurisdiction, 110–11extraterritorial jurisdiction, 96–8fair hearing, 104–6free movement, 99–101fundamental norms, 118–24hierarchy of rights, 113–24humanitarian law and human
rights law, 124–8, 278–92IFAD, 104–6, 137–8IHRL and general international
law, 129–35ill-treatment of prisoners, 102–3impact, 113–28liberty and security, 101limitations of the court, 139–43Nuclear Weapons, 98–9procedural issues, 96–9remedies, 135–9reparation, 102, 559–62, 565substantive issues, 99–106third party obligations, 138–9torture and universal jurisdiction,
103–4treaty bodies and, 96–108Wall opinion, 96–8, 99–100
ICJ jurisdiction, 110–11
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-08209-0 - A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence inInternational LawEdited by Mads Andenas And Eirik BjorgeIndexMore information
http://www.cambridge.org/9781107082090http://www.cambridge.orghttp://www.cambridge.org
-
index 579
inter-State jurisdiction, 111,139–41
ICJ limitations, 139–43bilateral nature of State disputes,
139–41non-State actors, 142
jurisprudence conflictsincoherence and incompatibility,
305–12shared normative content, 305–7
methodological fragmentation,10–12
Nuremberg Tribunal and, 38object and purpose of treaties,
514–15reservations to treaties, treaty bodies
and, 92–4, 109self-contained regime, 504, 505State immunities and, 426–32
ECHR, 426–30ICJ influence on ECtHR, 183–7Jurisdictional Immunities, 361–4
third party obligations, 138–9treaty bodies
facing fragmentation, 317–19ICJ approach, 94–6ICJ case law, 96–108, 142–3juridical status of outputs, 88–91reservations of treaties and, 92–4,
109treaty categorisation, 513–15treaty interpretation, 480–1tribunals, 64–6
domestic law and, 80–2general principles of law and, 73limits to State voluntarism, 65–6,
75standing, 65
UN core treaties, 300–3UNSC resolutions and,
presumption, 216humanitarian interventions, 128humanitarian law
See also Geneva ConventionsHagueRegulations (1907)
1864 Geneva Convention, 460customary status, 42, 117development, 274–5
ECtHR and, 203human rights law and
boundaries, 99bridging, 124–8contemporary conflicts, 293debate, 298ICJ case law, 124–8, 278–92Legality of Nuclear Weapons,
278–83, 287lex specialis, 278–92relationship, 125–7Wall opinion, 125–6, 279–83
ICJ case law, 123Martens clause, 123occupied territories, 121self-contained regime, 504
Humphrey, John, 61Hungary, Korbely v. Hungary, 203
ICCPR. See International Covenant onCivil and Political Rights
ICED. See International Conventionfor the Protection of All Personsfrom Enforced Disappearance
Iceland, Icelandic Fisheries (UK v.Iceland), 233
ICRC. See International Committee ofthe Red Cross
ICSID (International Convention onthe Settlement of InvestmentDisputes)
EU and, 339provisional measures
Article 47, 226–8prima facie jurisdiction, 237–8purpose of measures, 244–7scope, 263–5urgency, 252–6
VCLT and, 476ICTY. See International Criminal
Tribunal for the FormerYugoslavia
IHL (international humanitarian law).See humanitarian law
IHRL (International human rightslaw). See human rights
ILC. See International LawCommission
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-08209-0 - A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence inInternational LawEdited by Mads Andenas And Eirik BjorgeIndexMore information
http://www.cambridge.org/9781107082090http://www.cambridge.orghttp://www.cambridge.org
-
580 index
ILO. See International LabourOrganisation
immunities. See State immunitiesin dubio mitius, 520–5indigenous people, 121–2individual standing
human rights tribunals, 65ICJ and, 63
Indonesia, ICSID cases, 245, 269Institute of International Law
biennial meetings, 167creation, 462customary law and, 466development of international law,
152influence, 156State immunities, 414
institutional fragmentationSee also international tribunalsgrowth of international tribunals, 46meaning, 6–7torture and, 43–6whether problem, 38–9
Inter-American Court of HumanRights
compliance with decisions, 84–5creation, 65due process, 129effectiveness principle, 480general principles of law and, 74ICJ judicial dialogue and, 527, 532–3immunities and, 72Juridical Condition and Rights of
Undocumented Migrants, 74limits to State voluntarism, 65, 75provisional measures, 84reparations, 83State responsibility, 81
inter-State jurisdictionECtHR, 141, 174ICJ, 14, 59–63, 111, 139–41
human rights and, 111, 139–41inter-State outlook, 59–63PCIJ, 58–9
interim measures. See provisionalmeasures
International Committee of the RedCross (ICRC), 42, 385
International Convention on theElimination of All Forms ofDiscrimination againstWomen. See CEDAW
International Convention on theElimination of All Forms ofRacial Discrimination. SeeCERD
International Convention for theProtection of All Persons fromEnforced Disappearance(ICED), 302, 304
International Convention on theRights of Persons withDisabilities, 302, 306, 307
International Convention on theRights of the Child (CRC), 302,306, 352, 468
International Convention on theSettlement of InvestmentDisputes. See ICSID
International Convention againstTorture and Other Cruel,Inhuman or DegradingTreatment or Punishment(CAT)
Article 1, 430–2Article 6, 555Article 7, 555Article 14, 435–6complaint mechanism, 302duty to prosecute, 432–5jus cogens, 442–3, 553–8UDHR and, 306
International Court of Justice (ICJ)advisory opinions, 68–9, 477case load, 38–9centre of international law, 219compulsory jurisdiction, 69, 76consular protection. See diplomatic
and consular relationscontext of international law, 4–5controversial issues, 148convergence role, 168–70customary international law and,
118Article 38(1)(b), 382, 392contribution, 537, 568
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-08209-0 - A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence inInternational LawEdited by Mads Andenas And Eirik BjorgeIndexMore information
http://www.cambridge.org/9781107082090http://www.cambridge.orghttp://www.cambridge.org
-
index 581
definition, 10Jurisdictional Immunities, 396North Sea Continental Shelf, 377,
381, 386, 395reluctance, 541role, 371, 390–4, 544–5soft play approach, 394–406
domestic enforcement of decisions,28
assessment, 365–8consular relations cases, 343,
345–52Jurisdictional Immunities, 343,
361–5survey, 343–68Wall opinion, 344, 352–61
drafting process, 163–5ECtHR use of ICJ case law, 173–90
extraterritorial State obligations,179–82
immunities, 183–7increasing role, 215–17LaGrand, 177, 178restitutio in integrum, 182–3
effectiveness principle, 531environmental law, special regimes,
9evidence
burden of proof, 161standard of proof, 161–2
fragmentation and, 32–3, 499,536–40
autonomous regime as others,540–5
incremental transformation,566–9
function of the court, 112general principles of law and, 75
principle of humanity, 83, 117source and content, 118–24
human rights and. See human rightshumanitarian law and human rights
law, 124–8, 278–92immunities. See State immunitiesindividual rights and, 541institutional fragmentation and, 6judges, 106, 112judicial dialogue, 17
Diallo, 47–8, 77–8, 527–8, 530–3,551, 568–9
trend, 77–8, 167–8jurisdiction
beyond inter-State, 64consular relations, 347genocide, 146, 153individuals, 63, 83inter-State, 14, 59–63, 79, 541:
East Timor case, 63; humanrights and, 111, 139–41
interpretation of UN Charter, 173Monetary Gold principle, 63, 139party consent, 152–4raising issue, 70status, 173–4treaty or custom, 157UN actions in Kosovo, 142, 216UN Charter, 347, 467, 538
length of proceedings, 562overview, 12–18precedents and, 166provisional measures. See
provisional measuresreassertion, 2, 33rules of general international law
and, 5sources of authority, 562–6
general principles of law, 73State immunities. See State
immunitiesState responsibility
ICTY and, 52–3Nicaragua v. US, 52–3, 178, 233standard of proof, 161–2
State sovereignty and, 541, 545status, 6, 17, 147–8, 215treaty interpretation
presumptions, 500restrictive interpretations, 481
universal jurisdiction and, 83use of force, 159
International Covenant on Civil andPolitical Rights (ICCPR)
See also United Nations HumanRights Committee
application in armed conflict, 98,278, 279, 352
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-08209-0 - A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence inInternational LawEdited by Mads Andenas And Eirik BjorgeIndexMore information
http://www.cambridge.org/9781107082090http://www.cambridge.orghttp://www.cambridge.org
-
582 index
International Covenant on Civil andPolitical Rights (ICCPR) (cont.)
complaint mechanism, 302consular relations and, 77deportation and, 100–1, 130, 549,
551detention and
arbitrary detention, 552treatment of detainees, 552
ECHR similarities, 201ECtHR and, 194, 204–5extraterritorial jurisdiction, 96–8,
179fair hearing, 105–6free expression, 195, 306
racial speech and, 315free movement, 99liberty and security, 101nuclear weapons and, 125ratifications, 302, 467reparation, 560reservations, 92–3, 304torture prohibition, 552United Nations Human Rights
Committee and, 563International Covenant on Economic,
Social and Cultural Rights(ICESCR), 99, 302, 352, 467
International Criminal Court (ICC)aggression, 150–1codified law, 157compulsory jurisdiction, 71contribution to international
jurisprudence, 148creation, 66domestic courts and, 81, 154drafting process, 165Elements of Crime, 156evidence, 160–1
standard of proof, 161genocide jurisdiction, 146judicial dialogue, Lubanga, 78jurisdiction, 150–1, 154–5Kampala Review Conference (2010),
150International Criminal Tribunal for
Rwanda (ICTR)creation, 66
drafting process, 165evidence, 160–1genocide jurisdiction, 146ICJ source of authority, 563jurisdiction, 154later case law, 150legal innovation, 158precedents and, 166
International Criminal Tribunal for theFormer Yugoslavia (ICTY)
creation, 66drafting process, 165evidence, 160–1ICJ source of authority, 563inter-ethnic conflict and, 276–7jurisdiction, 146, 154later case law, 150legal innovation, 158precedents and, 166self-contained regime, 504State responsibility, ICJ and, 52–3,
142–3Tadic, 52–3, 504treaty interpretation, 481
international criminal tribunalsSee also individual tribunalscase load, 39general principles of law and, 73growth, 66–7
international economic institutions.See economic institutions
international human rights law(IHRL). See human rights
international humanitarian law (IHL).See humanitarian law
International Labour Organisation(ILO)
Administrative Tribunal (ILOAT),104
forced labour, 198ECHR similarities, 201
VCLT and, 489, 492International Law Association, 88, 375,
384, 386, 390International Law Commission (ILC)
coherence factor, 42customary law
diplomatic relations, 402
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-08209-0 - A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence inInternational LawEdited by Mads Andenas And Eirik BjorgeIndexMore information
http://www.cambridge.org/9781107082090http://www.cambridge.orghttp://www.cambridge.org
-
index 583
formation, 375–6, 379ICJ interaction, 538–9ICRC study and, 385identification, 383–4State responsibility, 398
development of international law,152, 538
diplomatic protection, 402,558
Draft Articles on responsibility ofinternational organisations,340
ICJ reassertion and, 2reports, influence, 156role, 152, 538State immunities, 407, 408
criminal proceedings, 417–18scope, 411UN Convention and, 426universal jurisdiction, 433–4
State responsibilitycustomary law, 398erga omnes obligations, 131–2,
554–5influence on UK jurisprudence,
419jus cogens, 439, 544knowledge, 132reparation, 137third party obligations, 138–9
Study Group Fragmentation Report,33, 187
effect of sub-systems, 297human rights, 298ICJ and, 405lex specialis, 283–4, 286systemic nature of international
law, 536treaty interpretation and conflict
resolution, 499–500unity of international law,
542–3techniques of general international
law, 533on treaty reservations, 93–4unity of international law, 6–7, 373,
507, 512, 528–9, 542–3VCLT and, 196, 487, 489
international legal order, concept, 30,459–62
International Monetary Fund (IMF),324, 337, 338
international organisationsimmunities, 135responsibility, ILC Articles, 340
International Prize Court, 56International Tribunal for the Law of
the Sea. See ITLOSinternational tribunals. See also
individual courts and tribunalscompliance with decisions, 84–6compulsory jurisdiction and, 69–71,
75–6cross-fertilisation, 77–9domestic law and, 80–2effect, 79–80
end of impunity, 67–8objective law, 79
emergence, 56–7emerging conceptions of
international judicial function,72–3
future, 82–6general principles of international
law and, 73–5growth, 46, 62–9
advisory jurisdiction, 68–9criminal tribunals, 66–7human rights, 64–6
inter-State jurisdiction, 58–9rule of law, 68
investment lawSee also ICSID; UNCITRALarbitration, 39, 53–4human rights law and, 297
investor rights, Diallo (Guinea v. DRC),558–9
Iran, Tehran Hostages (US v. Iran), 117,136, 261, 499, 527, 530
IraqUK territorial obligations, 181UNSC Resolution 1546, 188
Irelandeuro crisis, 337McElhinney v. Ireland, 184, 427
Israel, Wall opinion. See Wall opinion
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-08209-0 - A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence inInternational LawEdited by Mads Andenas And Eirik BjorgeIndexMore information
http://www.cambridge.org/9781107082090http://www.cambridge.orghttp://www.cambridge.org
-
584 index
ItalyJurisdictional Immunities.
See also JurisdictionalImmunities (Germany v. Italy)
Saadi v. Italy, 202ITLOS (International Tribunal for the
Law of the Sea)Bay of Bengal case, 47, 78, 270case load, 39compulsory jurisdiction, 71, 76judicial dialogue, 47, 78jurisprudence record, 46–7provisional measures, 268
Article 290, 224–6future, 269–70prima facie jurisdiction, 234–7purpose, 243–4scope, 261–3urgency, 249–52
rules of general international lawand, 5
JapanSouthern Bluefin case, 243, 251whaling dispute with Australia, 9
Jehovah’s Witnesses, 195Jenks, Wilfred, 489, 492Jennings, Robert, 32, 60, 504, 505, 520,
534, 541, 543, 566–7judicial dialogue
convergence factor, 167–8ICJ, 17, 77–8
Diallo, 47–8, 77–8, 527–8, 530–3,551, 568–9
ITLOS, 47, 78trend, 77–9
Jurisdictional Immunities (Germany v.Italy)
1944 Distomo massacre, 185–6, 187arguments, 133–5civil versus criminal immunities,
407, 408customary law, 482different understanding of
international law, 364–6human rights versus immunities,
50–1, 133–5, 147, 185, 186implementation, 343, 361–5
issues, 361–4Italian judgments, 50–1, 186, 343misapplication of doctrine, 419–21normative hierarchy, 434relevant treaties, 425–6restrictive doctrine of State
immunities, 410–11status of ICJ decision, 367
jus cogens. See customary internationallaw
Kamto, Maurice, 388Keith, Kenneth, 373Kelly, Patrick, 378Kelsen, Hans, 459, 461, 462, 464–6kidnapping, 411Kiel Canal, 499Kingsbury, Benedict, 391Klabbers, J., 517Kolb, Robert, 30–1, 473–85, 509–10Kolodkin, R. A., 407Kooijmans, Peter, 106, 112Koskenniemi, Martti, 286, 287, 318,
462, 533, 542Kosovo
hybrid international criminaltribunal, 66
ICJ jurisdiction, 142, 216independence, 122, 401–2
Kunz, Josef, 387Kuwait
State immunities, 418, 425, 453State sovereignty, 445torture, 440
La Pradelle, Albert de, 61Lasson, Adolf, 462Latvia, Kononov v. Latvia, 204Lauterpacht, Elihu, 516Lauterpacht, Hersch, 12, 61, 111, 521,
534–5law of armed conflict (LOAC). See
humanitarian lawlaw of the sea. See UNCLOSLeague of Nations
failure, 466mandate commissions, 477minority protection, 16, 113
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-08209-0 - A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence inInternational LawEdited by Mads Andenas And Eirik BjorgeIndexMore information
http://www.cambridge.org/9781107082090http://www.cambridge.orghttp://www.cambridge.org
-
index 585
PCIJ and, 221–2protectorates, 115United States and, 41
Lebanon, hybrid international criminaltribunal, 66
legality principle, 465Leino, Päivi, 318liberty and security
arbitrary detention, 552Diallo, 101ECHR, 287treatment of detainees, 102–3, 552
Liechtenstein, Nottebohm(Liechtenstein v. Guatemala),545–9, 566
Lindroos, Anja, 288–9Lithuania, Cudak v. Lithuania, 429litispendence, 303–5Loder, B. C. J., 14, 61Lowe, Vaughan, 292, 505–6
McKinnon, Gary, 445McNair, A. D., 12, 32, 390, 499, 500–3,
508–9, 523, 534–5Malaysia, provisional measures, ITLOS,
250Mandelstam, André, 61Martens clause, 123Max Planck Institute, 60–1Mendelson, Maurice, 384mental health, voting rights and, 107–8Meron, Theodor, 276, 540methodological fragmentation
customary international law, 9–12human rights law, 10–12meaning, 7–12
MexicoAvena (Mexico v. US), 129, 178, 343,
345–52NAFTA cases, 43
migrantsInternational Convention (ICMW),
302Sarrazin decision, 312–17, 318–19
Milanovic, Marko, 289, 291Miles, Cameron, 24, 218–71minority rights
League of Nations and, 16, 113
PCIJ case law, 113, 176Moldova, ECtHR cases, 181, 194Monetary Gold principle, 63, 139Mongolia, UNCITRAL arbitration, 247Murase, Shinya, 375–6Myanmar, Bangladesh v. Myanmar, 47,
78, 270
NAFTA, rules of international law and,43
natural law, 119natural resources, sovereignty over, 121necessity, customary law and, 4Netherlands
Iron Rhine (Belgium v. Netherlands),522, 524
provisional measures, Arctic Sunrise,263, 269
Nevill, P., 530–1, 535New Haven School, 475New Zealand
Nuclear Tests (New Zealand v.France), 233
Southern Bluefin case, 243, 251Nicaragua
Costa Rica v. Nicaragua, 401, 404–5,522
humanitarian law and, 128Nicaragua v. Colombia, 270Nicaragua v. US, 52–3, 178, 233
Niger, border dispute with BurkinaFaso, 83
non-international armed conflictsGeneva Conventions and, 277ICTY and, 276–7
non-State actors, ICJ and humanrights, 142
Norman, George, 377Norway, UN Convention on State
Immunities and, 426nuclear weapons
ICCPR and, 125right to life and, 98, 125, 278–9
Nuremberg Principles, 426Nuremberg Tribunal, 38, 66, 273
occupied territories, humanitarian law,121
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-08209-0 - A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence inInternational LawEdited by Mads Andenas And Eirik BjorgeIndexMore information
http://www.cambridge.org/9781107082090http://www.cambridge.orghttp://www.cambridge.org
-
586 index
O’Connell, Daniel Patrick, 390OECD (Organization for Economic
Cooperation andDevelopment), 324, 338
Oellers-Frahm, Karin, 240, 248, 254opinio juris, 118, 155, 372, 394, 397,
410, 483Oppenheim, Lassa Francis, 10Orakhelashvili, Alexander, 29–30,
407–58ordinary treaties, categorisation, 520–5Owada, Hisashi, 568
pacta sunt servanda, 464, 465pacta tertiis nec prosunt nec nocent, 503Pakistan, ICSID case, 246Palchetti, Paolo, 31–2, 486–97Palestinian Liberation Organisation
(PLO), 142Palestinian Territory
See also Wall opinionrights of Palestinians, 122sovereignty over natural resources,
121Paraguay, Avena and, 345Paris Convention on Intellectual
Property (1883), 460Paris Treaty on International Telegraph
(1865), 460Pauwelyn, Joost, 283Payandeh, Mehrdad, 25–6, 297–319PCIJ. See Permanent Court of
International JusticePellet, Alain, 93, 393Permanent Court of Arbitration, 56,
461, 500, 522Permanent Court of International
Justice (PCIJ)first president, 15advisory jurisdiction, 68case law influence, 176–7compulsory jurisdiction, 69customary law and, 466, 469Danzig case, 174, 175inter-State jurisdiction, 58–9Island of Palmas (Netherlands v. US),
525Lotus case, 144, 466–7, 469
national minority protection, 113,176
origins, 56, 461petition mechanism, 174, 175provisional measures, 221–3, 231,
242, 248, 260–1restitutio in integrum, 182–3Sino-Belgian Treaty case, 222, 231,
248special regimes and, 9SS Wimbledon, 499, 524treaty interpretation, approach, 521
Peru, State responsibility, 82Pissard, Hippolyte, 378Poland
Polish Upper Silesia, 260State immunity, 51, 397
Politis, Nicolas, 61Portugal, euro crisis, 337positivism, 30, 410, 460–2precedents
convergence factor, 165–7UK State immunities and, 454–7
principles of international lawECtHR case law, 200humanity considerations, 83, 117ICJ and, 118–24relevance to international tribunals,
73–5unifying element, 43–6
prisoners, ill treatment, 102–3, 552prisoners of war, Hague Regulations
(1907), 275privacy and family life, ECHR,
provisional measures, 256property rights, Diallo (Guinea v.
DRC), 558–9proportionality, customary law and, 4protectionism, 38provisional measures
ECtHRcase law, 200–1ICJ influence, 177–8prima facie jurisdiction, 238–9purpose, 247–8Rule 39, 228–30, 268scope, 265–7urgency, 256–8
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-08209-0 - A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence inInternational LawEdited by Mads Andenas And Eirik BjorgeIndexMore information
http://www.cambridge.org/9781107082090http://www.cambridge.orghttp://www.cambridge.org
-
index 587
forms, 219–20fragmentation, 267–9
future, 269–70ICJ, 83, 137
Anglo-Iranian Oil, 225, 232, 237Article 41, 177, 220, 223Georgia v. Russia, 123, 137, 233,
242influence, 24, 267–9LaGrand, 178, 240, 248, 249,
258–9, 266–7practice, 231prima facie case, 231–4purpose, 239–43scope and force, 258–61urgency, 248–9
ICSIDArticle 47, 226–8prima facie jurisdiction, 237–8purpose of measures, 244–7scope, 263–5urgency, 252–6
Inter-American Court of HumanRights (IACtHR), 84
PCIJArticle 41, 221–3purpose, 242scope, 260–1Sino-Belgian Treaty case, 222, 231urgency, 248
prima facie jurisdictionECtHR, 238–9ICJ, 231–4ICSID, 237–8ITLOS, 234–7review, 231–9
purpose of measuresECtHR, 247–8ICJ, 239–43ICSID, 244–7ITLOS, 243–4PCIJ, 242review, 239–48
scope and forceECtHR, 265–7ICJ, 258–61ICSID, 263–5ITLOS, 261–3
PCIJ, 260–1review, 258–67
substantive preconditionsprima facie jurisdiction, 231–9purpose, 239–48review, 230–67scope and force, 258–67urgency, 248–58
UNCLOS/ITLOS, 268Article 290, 224–6future, 269–70prima facie jurisdiction, 234–7purpose, 243–4scope, 261–3urgency, 249–52
urgencyECtHR, 256–8ICJ, 248–9ICSID, 252–6ITLOS, 249–52PCIJ, 248review, 248–58
public interestcollective interest treaties, 114–16expansion of concept, 109
Pulkowski, D., 527
racial discriminationfree expression and, 308, 315ICJ case law, 123, 127, 179–80
Redgwell, C., 9Refugee Conventions, 193, 206–7regimes of international law
See specific regimescategorisation
categorisation of treaties, 520–5constitutional/constitutive
treaties, 515–20human rights treaties, 513–15Nuclear Weapons, 515–16terminology, 510–11three-way split, 32, 499, 508–25
consular relations. See diplomaticand consular relations
environment. See environmentallaw
EU. See European Unionhuman rights. See human rights
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-08209-0 - A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence inInternational LawEdited by Mads Andenas And Eirik BjorgeIndexMore information
http://www.cambridge.org/9781107082090http://www.cambridge.orghttp://www.cambridge.org
-
588 index
Refugee Conventions (cont.)humanitarian law. See humanitarian
lawoverview, 18–28self-contained regimes
concept, 498, 499–508Crawford, J. 528fragmentation and, 42ICJ and, 540–5McNair, A. 32
Reisman, Michael, 393reparation
Diallo, 102, 136, 545, 559–62, 565ICJ human rights case law, 135–9restitutio in integrum, 136, 182–3
Republika Srpska, 123res judicata, 304, 354reservations to treaties
Genocide Convention, 114, 557human rights treaties, 92–4, 109, 140ICCPR, 92–3, 304VCLT, 109, 114
responsibility to protect, 128restitutio in integrum, 136, 182–3Reuter, Paul, 387, 388, 511–12, 513–14Rhodesia, 123Rieter, Eva, 88right to liberty. See liberty and securityright to life
armed conflicts and, 282ECHR, 180, 256nuclear weapons and, 98, 125, 278–9provisional measures and, 127, 137,
256Rio Treaty (Inter-American Treaty on
Reciprocal Assistance), 41Rodley, Nigel, 15, 87–108Romano, Santi, 459Rosenne, S., 60, 63, 144rule of law
administrative law principle, 465compulsory jurisdiction and, 69international tribunals and, 68, 69,
85Russia
Bartik v. Russia, 195, 197Crimean secession and, 123ECtHR cases, 181, 194
Georgia v. Russiaextraterritorial obligations, 127,
179–80jurisdiction, 567provisional measures, 123, 137,
233, 242humanitarian law and ECtHR, 203provisional measures, Arctic Sunrise,
263, 269Yevdokimov v. Russia, 565
RwandaCERD reservations, 140DRC v. Rwanda, 140DRC v. Uganda and, 140
sabotage, 411Salamanca, School of, 460San Francisco Treaty (1945), 467Sarooshi, D., 253Saudi Arabia
discrimination, 480State sovereignty, 445torture, 440UK–Saudi relations, 444–5
Savigny, Friedrich Carl von, 462–3Scelle, Georges, 61, 217Schachter, Oscar, 387–8Schlütter, Birgit, 392Scott, James Brown, 61security of person. See liberty and
securityself-defence, 4self-determination
East Timor, 139erga omnes obligations, 117ICJ case law, 119–23origins of right, 115
Senegalfailure to prosecute for torture,
103Hissène Habré case (Belgium v.
Senegal), 103–4, 131, 403, 405,552, 553–8, 567
maritime dispute withGuinea-Bissau, 241
Serbia, Genocide (Bosnia v. Serbia),136, 149, 398, 403–4, 563, 567
Shoah, 26, 306
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-08209-0 - A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence inInternational LawEdited by Mads Andenas And Eirik BjorgeIndexMore information
http://www.cambridge.org/9781107082090http://www.cambridge.orghttp://www.cambridge.org
-
index 589
Sierra Leone, hybrid internationalcriminal tribunal, 66
Simma, Bruno, 11, 106, 112, 135, 143,274, 317, 527
Sinclair, Ian, 451sources of authority, 562–6sovereignty. See State sovereigntySpain
Barcelona Traction (Belgium v.Spain), 111, 139, 554, 558–9
investment arbitration, 53Spielmann, Dean, 18–21, 173–90Spiropoulos, Jean, 61Stahl, F. J., 459State equality, 523State immunities
American Convention on HumanRights and, 72
civil versus criminal immunities,407
customary international law, 44,156, 183
ECtHRcase law, 426–30ICJ influence, 183–7
English law. See United Kingdomfragmentation theory and, 43–6,
48–51, 407–10human rights and, 426–32
Arrest Warrant, 44–5, 133, 134,147, 183, 437
ECHR, 426–30ICJ case law, 133–5ICJ influence on ECtHR, 183–7Jurisdictional Immunities.
See also JurisdictionalImmunities (Germany v. Italy)
torture, 43–6, 430–2ICJ case law, 147
DRC v. France, 153influence on ECtHR, 183–7Jurisdictional Immunities.
See also JurisdictionalImmunities (Germany v. Italy)
restrictive doctrine, 410–11WHO-Egypt case, 452
international organisations, 135normative hierarchy
CAT and criminal proceedings,432–5
jus cogens, 436–43survey, 432–43universal civil jurisdiction, 435–6
restrictive doctrinecomity, 424criminal proceedings, 417–18customary law and, 422–4general essence, 412–17misapplication, 418–21placing, 410–24problem, 410–11scope of practice, 411–12State practice, 29–30, 422–4
treatiesECSI, 409, 425, 450, 451, 452, 454relevance, 424–6UN Convention (2004), 407,
425–6, 429–30, 450State practice
approaches, 481–3convergence, 2identification of customary law, 40,
387State immunities, 29–30
restrictive doctrine, 422–4scope, 411–12
State responsibilityerga omnes obligations and, 131–2,
398, 554–5ICJ case law, 52–3, 161–2, 178, 233IHRL and humanitarian law, 124ILC Draft Articles. See International
Law Commissionindividual responsibility, breaches of
IHRL, 132–3Inter-American Court of Human
Rights (IACtHR), 81State sovereignty
auto-limitation, 464changing concepts, 537, 545citizenship and, 546East Timor, 63human rights and, 106, 111, 183ICJ and, 541, 545meaning, 525natural resources, 121
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-08209-0 - A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence inInternational LawEdited by Mads Andenas And Eirik BjorgeIndexMore information
http://www.cambridge.org/9781107082090http://www.cambridge.orghttp://www.cambridge.org
-
590 index
State sovereignty (cont.)Nottebohm (Liechtenstein v.
Guatemala), 546ordinary treaties and, 520–5restrictive interpretation of treaties
and, 520–5territorial limits, 412vexatious ICJ applications, 233
Suárez, Francisco, 61, 460substantive fragmentation, meaning,
4–6Sweden
Bryan Peace Treaties, 221–2Cruz Varas v. Sweden, 177–8, 265–6Maroufidou v. Sweden, 563UN Convention on State
Immunities and, 426Switzerland
Goppera Radio v. Switzerland, 195Nada v. Switzerland, 188–9, 193provisional measures, 222State immunities and jus cogens, 440Stoll v. Switzerland, 177UN Convention on State
Immunities and, 426
terrorism. See counter-terrorismThirlway, Hugh, 10–11, 542Thürer, Daniel, 302Tokyo Tribunal, 66torture
CAT. See International Conventionagainst Torture and OtherCruel, Inhuman or DegradingTreatment or Punishment(CAT)
ECHR prohibition, provisionalmeasures, 230, 256, 257–8
erga omnes obligations, 116, 553–8ICCPR prohibition, 552ICJ jurisdiction, 111immunities and, 43–6, 49–51, 430–2
criminal proceedings, 417, 432–5inter-State disputes, 141jus cogens prohibition, 49–50, 118,
185, 432, 442–3UN Committee Against Torture,
103–4
universal jurisdiction, 83civil jurisdiction, 435–6Hissène Habré case (Belgium v.
Senegal), 131ICJ case law, 103–4
Trachtman, Joel, 377trade law, 38, 297
See also World Trade OrganizationTrail Smelter Arbitration, 478
treaty interpretationSee also Vienna Convention on Law
of Treaties (1969)coherence in content, 526–9coherence in method, 529–33factors. See factors in
fragmentation/convergencefragmentation issue, 498–535general considerations, 473–6ICJ, 481, 500McNair, A. 500–3modulation factors, 476–9
goals, 477–8judicial activism, 478–9subjects, 476–7
North Sea Continental Shelf, 478organisational rules and, 486–97
interpretation rules, 494–6lex specialis, 491–4VCLT preparatory works, 488–91
overview, 30–3restrictive interpretation, 481, 520–5salient subject-matters, 479–84self-contained regimes, 499–508Trail Smelter Arbitration, 478
treaty-making, diversity, 40–6Triepel, Heinrich, 459Turkey
Akdivar case, 175Demir and Baykara v. Turkey, 196humanitarian law and ECtHR,
203–4Loizidou v. Turkey, 181, 207Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey,
7–8, 19, 200–1, 239, 266–7, 269,506–7
UDHR. See Universal Declaration ofHuman Rights (1948)
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-08209-0 - A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence inInternational LawEdited by Mads Andenas And Eirik BjorgeIndexMore information
http://www.cambridge.org/9781107082090http://www.cambridge.orghttp://www.cambridge.org
-
index 591
Uganda, DRC v. Uganda, 126, 129–30,136, 140, 179, 281–2, 548, 550
Ukraine, secession of Crimea, 123Ulfstein, G., 525UNCITRAL, 247, 253UNCLOS (Convention on the Law of
the Sea)See also ITLOSprovisional measures
Article 290, 224–6future, 269–70ICJ influence, 268prima facie jurisdiction, 234–7purpose, 243–4scope, 261–3urgency, 249–52
rules of general international lawand, 5
self-contained regime, 504United States and, 41
United Kingdom (UK)Civil Service Unions v. UK, 199extradition, 445extraterritorial obligations
Al-Jedda v. UK, 181, 188, 193, 204,216
Al-Skeini v. UK, 181, 204floodgates argument, 445–6Golder v. UK, 200human rights and UNSC
resolutions, 188Icelandic Fisheries (UK v. Iceland),
233international law dualism, 446–9,
452refugees, Chahal v. UK, 206Saudi relations, 444–5State immunities, 20
Al-Adsani, 49–51, 135, 184–5,270, 407, 408, 418, 425, 427–30,453
case law, 413–15Cristina, 412–13, 446–7English law, 443–57incorporation doctrine, 446–9Jones v. Saudi Arabia, 45, 407,
418–19, 425, 431, 438, 455,456–7
Jones v. UK, 51, 396, 407, 416, 418,428–9
Khurts Bat, 411, 417Lampen Wolfe, 409, 414, 417, 420,
426Pinochet, 44, 415, 417, 430, 432–3,
436, 442–3, 456–7policy considerations, 443–6precedent doctrine, 454–7restrictive doctrine, 410State Immunity Act, 409, 449–54CAT and, 430–2
United NationsCharter
enforcement of ICJ decisions, 343human rights, 272, 300ICJ jurisdiction, 347, 467, 538interpretation by ICJ, 173, 478,
494primacy, 188, 216, 362purposes and principles, 123racial discrimination and, 123sovereign equality principle, 523
Convention on the Law of the Sea.See UNCLOS
customary international law and,386
economic competences, 324ECtHR jurisprudence and, 187–9General Assembly resolutions
customary law and, 119self-determination, 120
human rights core treaties, 300–3Kelsen and, 466membership, 41Secretariat, 42Secretary-General, 143Security Council. See United Nations
Security CouncilSpecial Human Rights Mandates,
563State Immunity Convention (2004),
407, 425–6, 429–30, 450United Nations Committee Against
Torture, 103–4United Nations Committee on
Economic, Social and CulturalRights (CESCR), 99
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-08209-0 - A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence inInternational LawEdited by Mads Andenas And Eirik BjorgeIndexMore information
http://www.cambridge.org/9781107082090http://www.cambridge.orghttp://www.cambridge.org
-
592 index
United Nations Committee on theRights of Persons withDisabilities, 107
United Nations Human RightsCommittee
ECtHR and, 194, 208general comments, 91humanitarian law and, 295ICJ and, 142
extraterritorial jurisdiction, 97fair hearing, 105–6free movement, 100–1general approach, 94–6ill treatment of prisoners, 102–3judicial dialogue, 532, 562liberty and security, 101reparation, 102
juridical status of outputs, 89–91on treaty reservations, 92–3, 140voting rights of mentally disabled,
107–8United Nations Security Council
(UNSC)creation of international criminal
tribunals, 66Resolutions
1546 (Iraq), 188domestic implementation, 28human rights and, 187–9, 216interpretation, 23, 216, 483
United States (US)Alabama arbitration in Geneva, 461,
462Bryan Peace Treaties, 221–2equality of States, 523ICJ Vienna Convention on Consular
Relations decisionsAvena (Mexico v. US), 129, 178,
343, 345–52implementation, 345–52, 367LaGrand (Germany v. US), 129,
177, 178, 247, 248, 249, 258–9,266–7, 345–52, 528, 533, 568
Medellin v. Texas, 347–52status of decisions, 367
Israeli policy, 97Nicaragua v. United States, 52–3,
178, 233
Nottebohm and, 547, 566prison officials, exemption from
liability, 446State immunities, 409, 412
jus cogens and, 440Letelier, 415, 417restrictive doctrine, 423Victory transport, 413–14
Tehran Hostages (US v. Iran), 117,136, 261, 499, 503, 530
terrorism, legal black holes, 15, 144treaty interpretation, 479treaty-making, refusals, 41
Universal Declaration of HumanRights (1948) (UDHR)
free expression, 306, 315implementation, 566origins, 272Preamble, 26, 306racist speech and, 315reference point, 306, 316Tehran Hostages (US v. Iran) and,
117UNSC. See United Nations Security
CouncilUruguay
extraterritorial jurisdiction, 97Pulp Mills (Argentina v. Uruguay),
233, 243, 398–9, 526–7, 529–30use of force, ICJ case law, 159
Vatican, 468VCLT. See Vienna Convention on Law
of Treaties (1969)Versailles Treaty, 499, 512Vienna Convention on Consular
Relations (1963)Avena (Mexico v. US), 129, 343customary law and, 405Diallo, 77implementation of ICJ decisions in
domestic courts, 345–52LaGrand, 129, 528
Vienna Convention on Law of Treaties(1969) (VCLT)
Article 5, 7–8, 31, 487–91, 495,496–7, 507
Article 31, EEA Treaty and, 518
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-08209-0 - A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence inInternational LawEdited by Mads Andenas And Eirik BjorgeIndexMore information
http://www.cambridge.org/9781107082090http://www.cambridge.orghttp://www.cambridge.org
-
index 593
Article 31(1), 513–14Article 31(3)(c)
ECtHR interpretation, 266, 427–8effect, 537ICJ interpretation, 404, 495ILC on, 500interpretation, 197principle, 42–3unity of international law, 279
Article 48, 488Article 53, 439, 544Article 64, 544Articles 31–3, 475–6, 484
ECtHR and, 7–8organisational rules and, 486–8
ECtHR jurisprudence, 7–8, 177,506–7
flexibility, 476, 479–84impact, 534organisational rules and, 486–8
VCLT preparatory works, 488–91success, 30, 475treaty reservations, 109, 114unity of international law, 279,
512Vienna Convention on the Law of
Treaties (1986), 490, 495Vienna Treaty (1815), 511Virally, Michel, 490Vitoria, Francisco de, 61, 460von Bar, Carl Ludwig, 459voting rights, mentally disabled, 107–8
Waldock, Humphrey, 490–1, 496Wall opinion
1995 Agreement and, 122applicability of IHRL in armed
conflict, 98, 99concepts of judicial role, 358–61, 365erga omnes obligations, 117extraterritorial jurisdiction, 96–8factual basis, 354–8, 366free movement issue, 99–100
ICCPR and, 179IHL and IHRL, 279–83implementation issue, 344, 352–61proportionality, 164reparation, 137security necessity, 355–7sources of authority, 562sovereignty over natural resources,
121status of ICJ decision, 366–7UN responsibility for Palestine,
120war crimes, 50–1, 67, 133–4, 183, 204,
419–21Watts, A., 520Webb, Philippa, 17–18, 146–70Weibel, M., 534Weiler, H. H., 501, 510, 516–17, 520Wilde, Ralph, 538Wildhaber, Luzius, 20Wood, Michael
customary lawICJ and, 376, 538–9, 542–3ICRC and, 385identification, 383–4, 386Jurisdictional Immunities, 394
rules of recognition, 383–4systemic nature of international law,
6–7, 11, 373, 528–9, 536World Bank, 324, 337World Customs Organization (WCO),
330, 336World Trade Organization (WTO), 42
dispute settlement system, 338–40effect on EU law, 335ICJ and, 541, 567OECD peer review, 338origins, 324WTO. See World Trade Organization
Yang, Xiaodong, 419Yugoslavia, Legality of the Use of Force,
234
www.cambridge.org© in this web service Cambridge University Press
Cambridge University Press978-1-107-08209-0 - A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence inInternational LawEdited by Mads Andenas And Eirik BjorgeIndexMore information
http://www.cambridge.org/9781107082090http://www.cambridge.orghttp://www.cambridge.org
http://www: cambridge: org:
9781107082090: