Income Computation & Disclosure Standards PPT dtd 19.08.2017.pdf · Methodology of MAT Computation...
-
Upload
nguyendung -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of Income Computation & Disclosure Standards PPT dtd 19.08.2017.pdf · Methodology of MAT Computation...
Agenda
ICDS – A brief overview
Critical analysis of ICDS
• ICDS V (Tangible Fixed Assets)
• ICDS VI (Effects of changes in foreign exchange rates)
• ICDS VIII (Government Grants)
• ICDS X (Provisions, Contingent liabilities and Contingent assets
ICDS – A Brief Overview
10 ICDS have been notified by CBDT - effective from April 1, 2016 (i.e. FY 2016-17)
Applicable to all tax payer(s)1 following mercantile system of accounting with respect to PGBP and IOS
For applicability of ICDS - no minimum threshold or exemption granted
Objective of ICDS - To provide consistency in accounting procedures while computing taxable income and to reduce tax litigation
No separate books of accounts are required to be prepared by a Taxpayer
Methodology of MAT Computation continues to be same - based on ‘book profits’
Reporting required in TAR
1 Except Individuals and HUFs not liable for tax audit u/s 44AB
Section 145 a computation mechanism and not a charging section – held by SC in
− A krishnaswai Mudaliar & others (53 ITR 122)
− Standard Triumph (67 Taxman 160)
Under Section 145, the Assessee’s regular method of accounting determines the mode of computing the taxable income but it does not determine or even affect the range of taxable income or the ambit of taxation - SC in the case of State Bank of Travancore (158 ITR 102)
ICDS has been notified u/s 145 - Is Section 145 a “Charging Section” ?
Whether ICDS is only a computation provision and not a charging provision ?
Does ICDS override the Act ?
Held by Various courts Remarks
Rules can be resorted to for the purpose of construing the provisions of a statute only where the provisions are ambiguous / doubtful and a particular construction has been put upon the statute by the rules -Delhi HC in the case of All India Lakshmi (150 ITR 1)
In case of existing differing views regarding provisions of the Act, ICDS may have persuasive value with regard to transactions on or after April 1, 2016
Rules made under the Act must be treated as if they are in the Act and have the same force as the Sections in the Act – SC in the case of Ajanta Elec (215 ITR 114, 119)
Although ICDS must be treated as a part of the Act, it remains a delegated legislation
No exercise of rule-making power can affect, control, enlarge or detract full operative effect of provisions of the Schedules / Sections; any rule that purports to do so would be ultra vires and void even though the Statute provides that it shall have the effect as if enacted in that Statute –SC in the cases of Chenniappa (74 ITR 41), Ajanta Elec (215 ITR 114) and Bombay HC in the case of K. T. Udeshi (114 ITR 542)
ICDS cannot affect, control, enlarge or detract full operative effect of provisions of the Act
Does ICDS override the Act?
Held by Various courts Remarks
A notification that has the effect of curtailing the scope of a deduction granted under the Act or imposing a tax without authority of law will be invalid – SC in the case of Sirpur Paper (237 ITR 41)
ICDS cannot curtail a deduction or impose tax
As far as possible the Act should be construed in such a way as to reconcile various provisions and unravel apparent conflict into harmony, bearing in mind that a general provision cannot derogate from a special provision regarding a certain class of cases – various HC cases
ICDS and other provisions of the Act must be read harmoniously
Act and ICDS must be read harmoniously
Preamble to ICDS
“In case of conflict between the provisions of Act and ICDS, the provisions of the Act shall prevail to that extent”
If Act contains a provision and the same is clear, Act shall prevail over ICDS. What if Act is silent or unclear ?
Supreme Court judgement – Law of Land
Supreme Court is the law of the land since Article 141 of the Constitution provides that the Law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all Courts within the territory of India
Following SC cases lay down this principle:
U.P. Pollution Control Board vs Kanoria Industrial Ltd. (259 ITR 321)
Shenoy And Co. vs The Commercial Tax Officer (1985 SCR (3) 659)
Assistant Collector Of Central vs Dunlop India Ltd. And Ors (1985 SCR (2) 190 SC)
Based on above, Supreme court’s judgments' declares the Act as it always stood
Covers assets (such as land, building, machinery, plant, furniture) held with an intention of being used for producing goods / providing services.
Not applicable to assets held for sale in normal course of business. Expenditure on software – revenue vs. capital ?
Tangible fixed asset to be recorded at actual cost including purchase price, taxes (excluding those that are recoverable) and any other direct cost for making the asset ready for its intended use
Stand-by equipment and service equipment to be capitalized
Spares / consumables need to be expensed-off
If connected with a particular fixed asset and used irregularly - to be capitalized
In case of assets exchanged, fair value of cost of asset “acquired” needs to be considered
Consolidated price for acquiring group of assets shall be apportioned on fair basis
ICDS V: Tangible Fixed AssetsHighlights
MasterMaster
Cost of improvement (which increases the previously assessed level of performance) to be capitalized, otherwise to be expensed-off
What about minor improvement or repairs (such as, replacement of computer RAM or hard disk) ?
What about major inspection costs (such as, aircraft interiors) ? Under Ind-AS such inspection costs to be capitalized if recognition criteria is met.
Depreciation and capital gain on transfer of asset will be as per the Act
Only deals with tangible fixed assets. Unlike AS-10, it does not provide for ‘Goodwill’
Revaluation of assets not permitted under ICDS
Silent on decommissioning, restoration and similar liabilities. Under Ind-AS such costs to be capitalized.
ICDS V: Tangible Fixed AssetsHighlights
Actual cost defined u/s 43(1); depreciation to be computed u/s 32; and capital gains to be computed u/s 45. Limited purpose is served by ICDS V (Tangible Fixed Assets).
Expenditure on start-up and commissioning of a project to be capitalized [Para 8 ICDS V- refer Appendix]
Expenditure post commencement of commercial production to be expensed-off
Treatment of costs for time period between trial run and commencement of commercial production is unclear
1 Also held by Gujarat HC in the case of Saurashtra Cement (127 ITR 47), Delhi HC in the case of Food Specialities (136 ITR
203), Bombay HC in the case of G T Industries (203 ITR 538)
2 On a combined reading of ICDS, a view emerges that expense incurred during the period between trial run and commercial production may have to be capitalized. Also, stands clarified vide Ques No. 15 of the FAQs issued by CBDT on 23.03.2017
ICDS V: Tangible Fixed Assets
Construction / acquisition of asset
Trial run – ready to use
Commercial
production
Capitalize as per ICDS 1 Revenue as per ICDS
Capitalize or revenue expense? 2
Initial Cost of starting the project
MasterMaster
ICDS VI: Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates
Scope
Enterprise carrying activities involving foreign exchange
Treatment of transactions in foreign
currencies
Translating financial statements of foreign
operation
Treatment of foreign currency transactions
in the nature of forward exchange
contracts
Like other ICDS - applicable only for computation of income chargeable under the head ‘PGBP’ or ‘Other Sources’
MasterMaster
ICDS VI: Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates
Some important terms
Foreign currency transaction
A transaction which is denominated in or requires settlement in a foreign currency, including transactions arising when a person :-
(i) Buys or sell goods or services whose price is denominated in a foreign currency; or
(ii) Borrows or lends funds when the amount payable or receivable are denominated in a foreign currency; or
(iii) Becomes party to an unperformed forward exchange contracts; or
(iv) Otherwise acquires or disposes of assets, or incurs or settles liabilities, denominated in a foreign currency.
MasterMaster
ICDS VI: Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates
Some important terms
Monetary Items
• Means the money held and assets to be received or liabilities to be paid in fixed or determinable amount of money.
• Eg. Cash, receivables, payables, etc.
Non-monetary Items
• Assets & liabilities other than monetary items
• Eg. Fixed assets, inventories, investments in equity shares, etc.
MasterMaster
ICDS VI: Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates
Initial recognition
Foreign currency amount
Exchange rate at the
date of transaction
Amount in reporting currency
Initial recognition - exchange rate at the “date of transaction”
An average rate for a week or a month might be used for all transactions during that period
o However, if exchange rates fluctuate significantly, the use of exchange rate for a period is unreliable
No key deviation from AS – No change in tax positions
MasterMaster
Monetary items – to be converted by applying “the closing rate”
o Where closing rate does not reflect with reasonable accuracy or is unrealistic – relevantmonetary item shall be converted at the “amount” which is likely to be realized from or requiredto disburse such item at the last date of previous year.
ICDS VI: Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates
Conversion at last date of each previous year
Foreign currency amount
Closing rate Amount in reporting currency
Monetary Items
No key deviation from AS – No change in tax positions
MasterMaster
ICDS VI: Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates
Conversion at last date of each previous year
Non-monetary Items
Inventory carried at NRV denominated in
foreign currency
Others
Rates that existed when such value was
determined
Rates at the date of transaction
No key deviation from AS – No change in tax positions
MasterMaster
ICDS VI: Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates
Recognition of exchange difference
Particular On last day of
previous year
On settlement
Monetary items Yes Yes
Non-Monetary items No Yes
Above provisions are subject to section 43A of Act
MasterMaster
ICDS VI: Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates
Translation
• Translation to be done using the principles and procedures laid down for foreign currency transactions
• Revised ICDS VI has done away with the distinction between Integral and Non-Integral Foreign Operations
MasterMaster
ICDS VI: Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates
ICDS vis-à-vis AS
Particulars ICDS AS
Monetary Items
• Integral Financial Operations Exchange difference is
recognized as income or expense
Same as ICDS
• Non-Integral Financial Operation
Difference is recorded in FCTR and recognized at
disposal*
Non-monetary Items
• Integral Financial Operations
Exchange difference “not” recognized
Exchange difference is recognized as income or
expense
• Non-Integral Financial Operation
Similar to ICDS – exchange difference is accumulated in
FCTR
* Question No. 16 of FAQ issued by CBDT – FTCR balance as on 1st April 2016 pertaining to exchange difference on
monetary items for non-integral operations – to be recognized in AY 2017-18 (to the extent not recognized in the income computation in the past)
MasterMaster
Above provision are applicable only where contract is - Not intended for trading or speculation purpose Contracts is entered into to establish the amount of reporting currency required or available at the
settlement date of transaction
ICDS VI: Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates
ICDS vis-à-vis AS
Particulars ICDS AS
Premium / discount To be amortized over the life of contract
Same as ICDSExchange difference on re-statement (on MTM basis)
at year-end
To be recognized as income / expense
Exchange difference on renewal or cancellation
To be recognized as income / expense
MasterMaster
ICDS VI: Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates
ICDS vis-à-vis AS
Forward contract entered
ICDS AS
For trading or speculation purposes
Premium / discount / exchange difference
accounted for on settlement basis
Premium / discount is ignored
MTM gain / losses is
recognized
To hedge firm commitments or a highly probable
transaction
MTM losses are recognized.MTM gains are ignored*
* Under Ind-AS –MTM gain / losses to be recognized as income / expense in OCI
MasterMaster
Critical Analysis
ICDS VI: Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates
Open issues
Income / loss needs to be recognized in case of revaluation of loan / payables related to fixed assets(except as covered under Sec 43A)
Whether in case of Indian asset purchased with foreign loan, gain / loss onrevaluation thereof may be recognized in the tax computation ???
Earlier, few courts have held that the same is capital loss / gain and hence, not tax deductible /chargeable to tax.
Treatment of derivatives contract like cross currency swaps, futures, interest rate swaps etc. ???
Under AS - Forward exchange contract means an agreement to exchange different currenciesat a forward rate.
Under ICDS - An agreement to exchange different currencies at a forward rate, and includes aforeign currency option contract or another financial instrument of a similar nature.
MasterMaster
ICDS VI: Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates
Reconciliation of ICDS vis-à-vis AS
Effect of foreign exchange difference on purchase of indigenous assets (not covered under Section 43A)
Transitional provision w.r.t. FCTR balance as on 1 April 2016 and effect of exchange difference on monetary items in case of Non Integral financial operations
Effect of exchange difference on non-monetary items – Integral Financial Operations
Premium / discount / exchange difference on forward contract entered for trading / speculation or for hedging of firm commitments or a highly probable transaction
MasterMaster
Deals with the treatment of Government grants - does not cover government assistance
Government grants not to be recognized until there is a reasonable assurance that :-
The person shall comply with the related conditions attached; and The grants shall be received
All government grants related to depreciable fixed assets needs to be reduced from cost of the asset
Grants received for a group of assets needs to be apportioned
Grants for compensation of expense / loss or for giving immediate financial support with no furtherrelated costs - to be recognized as income in the year in which it is receivable
In all other cases (including non-depreciable assets) to be recognized as income :-
on upfront basis - if there is no condition attached;or on proportionate basis - over the period of time over which cost of meeting condition is incurred
ICDS VII: Government Grants
Highlights
MasterMaster
ICDS VII: Government Grants
Key deviations from AS
ICDS does not permit the capital approach for recording of government grants as was allowed underIndian GAAP – in line with the amended definition of “income” under section 2(24) of the Act.
Recording grants in the nature of promoter’s contribution or grants related to non-depreciableassets, directly in shareholder’s fund as a capital reserve not permitted
Initial recognition of grant cannot be postponed beyond the date of actual receipt.
MasterMaster
Provision is to be recognized only if there is a ‘reasonable certainty’ that an outflow of resourcesembodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation:
obligations should arise out of past event (existing independently of future actions); and in case of a new law yet to be finalized, an obligation arises only when the legislation is enacted.
Contingent liability should not be recognized.
Contingent assets are to be assessed continuously and any assets / related income is to be recognized ifit is “reasonably certain” that an inflow of economic benefits will arise.
Indian GAAP provides for the test of “virtual certainty” for recognition of contingent assets.
Intention appears to bring tax treatment of losses and gains at par.
Provision and contingent assets are to be reviewed at each year end and reversed if they do not meetrecognition criteria.
ICDS X: Provisions, Contingent liabilities and
Contingent assets
Highlights
MasterMaster
Unlike Indian GAAP, ICDS-X does not cover provisions for onerous contracts.
Accordingly, no upfront provision of onerous contract may be allowed in tax computation
Recognition criteria of provision / assets and related income in the ICDS is based on “reasonablecertainty”
Indian GAAP requires “probable certainty” for provision and “virtual certainty” for assets /related income.
The term “reasonable certainty” is neither defined in the ICDS nor in the Act - may become difficult toclaim such provision created for an expenditure which was otherwise allowable as per earlier judicialprecedents.
ICDS X: Provisions, Contingent liabilities and
Contingent assets
Key deviations from AS
Certainty Pre ICDS Post ICDS
Income Expense Income Expense
Probable Certainty - Recognize N.A. N.A.
Reasonable Certainty N.A. N.A. Recognize Recognize
Virtual Certainty Recognize - N.A. N.A.
Para 8 of ICDS V
Para 8 - The expenditure incurred on start‐up and commissioning of the project, including the expenditure incurred on test runs and experimental production, shall be capitalized.
The expenditure incurred after the plant has begun commercial production, that is, production intended for sale or captive consumption, shall be treated as revenue expenditure.