Inclusive Fitness Hamilton Rule

26
INCLUSIVE FITNESS Himilton’s Rule

Transcript of Inclusive Fitness Hamilton Rule

Page 1: Inclusive  Fitness  Hamilton  Rule

INCLUSIVE FITNESSHimilton’s Rule

Page 2: Inclusive  Fitness  Hamilton  Rule

• A gene-centered view of evolution /

existence! • S. Butler, A chicken is an egg’s way of

producing another egg’• An animal is a gene way of producing

more copies of that gene• And, Parental Care

Page 3: Inclusive  Fitness  Hamilton  Rule

• Success in evolutionary terms means leaving offspring that themselves reproduce, but the 'success' of an individual is short-lived and ephemeral. In sexually reproducing species, an individual does not survive for more than one generation. But the genes are passed on to the future generations>>>>

Page 4: Inclusive  Fitness  Hamilton  Rule

• Genetic variation in ('genes for') a tendency to defend young—perhaps mediated through variations in the level of a hormone —will result in a variation in the numbers of offspring that survive to pass on the favoured genes, and so on down the generations.

Page 5: Inclusive  Fitness  Hamilton  Rule

• The direct line of parents to offspring is the only way that genes are passed on into the future, but direct parental care is not necessarily the only genetic strategy that will be successful. Helping a brother, sister, or other relatives to reproduce may also enable genes to perpetuate themselves.

Page 6: Inclusive  Fitness  Hamilton  Rule

Inclusive fitness

• Hamilton invented the idea of inclusive fitness. Fitness can be divided into two components:

• Direct fitness results from personal reproduction

• Indirect fitness results from additional reproduction by relatives, that is made possible by an individual’s actions.

Page 7: Inclusive  Fitness  Hamilton  Rule

Hamilton’s Rule• The rule generalized the circumstances in which relative-helping of

various sorts would evolve into the equation:

Br - c > 0, B is the benefit to the relative/actor and

r is the coefficient of relatedness

c the cost to the relative-helping genotype.

• The net benefit minus the cost must be positive(+) and greater than zero for the behavior to be favored.

• Where B is benefit to recipient and C is the cost to the actor. Unit of measurement for B and C is surviving offspring.

Page 8: Inclusive  Fitness  Hamilton  Rule

r b - c > 0, calculating values for r, b and c.

• r does not cause problem. r is the probability that the homologous alleles in two individuals are identical by descent.

• From basic genetics• Full Siblings, and Parents & Offspring have a 50 per

cent chance of sharing a given rare gene• (r = 0.5); • Nieces and Nephews have a 25 per cent chance of

sharing with an uncle or an aunt• (r = 0.25) and so on.

Page 9: Inclusive  Fitness  Hamilton  Rule

Calculating r

• To calculate r one should trace each path between the two individuals and count the number of steps needed. Then for this path r = 0.5 (number of steps)

• Thus, if two steps r for this path = 0.5 (2) = 0.25.• To calculate final value of r one adds together

the r values calculated from each path.

Page 10: Inclusive  Fitness  Hamilton  Rule
Page 11: Inclusive  Fitness  Hamilton  Rule
Page 12: Inclusive  Fitness  Hamilton  Rule
Page 13: Inclusive  Fitness  Hamilton  Rule

• It is not just the degree of relatedness that matters, but the number of relatives that can be helped.

• Haldane, “ I am prepared to lay down my life on behalf of four grandchildren or eighth first cousins!”

Page 14: Inclusive  Fitness  Hamilton  Rule

r b - c > 0, values b and c More Problematic

• How to measure the effect of help. If we observe one animal helping another torear its yourn, how do we know that the parent wouldn’t have been just as scessful without the help?

• Ando how do we know whtat the cost to the helper was in terms of the offspring it wold have had if it hadn’t been helping someone else?

• The mythical offspring

Page 15: Inclusive  Fitness  Hamilton  Rule

r b - c > 0, values b and c, Some Practical Examples

• Hamilton on Isoptera(termites) and Hymenoptera(ants, bees, wasps)

• With Extreme Altruistic Behavior.

Page 16: Inclusive  Fitness  Hamilton  Rule
Page 17: Inclusive  Fitness  Hamilton  Rule

The 0.75 relatedness among Hymenoptera Sisters

Page 18: Inclusive  Fitness  Hamilton  Rule

How to Explain the sociality of Termites

1 0 0 0, 0 0 0 s Offspring

Page 19: Inclusive  Fitness  Hamilton  Rule

Naked Mole-rats

• Naked mole-rats are highly unusual mammals.

• They are nearly hairless and ectothermic. They are eusocial and, like termites, can digest cellulose with the help of bacteria in their gut.

Page 20: Inclusive  Fitness  Hamilton  Rule

Fig 51.33

Naked Mole Rats

Page 21: Inclusive  Fitness  Hamilton  Rule

Naked Mole-rats

• The behavior of naked mole-rats is similar to that of colonial insects.

• There is a single reproductive female (queen) and 1-3 reproductive males. The remaining individuals act as workers. They dig tunnels to find food, defend the tunnel system from other mole-rats, and tend the young.

Page 22: Inclusive  Fitness  Hamilton  Rule

Naked Mole-rats

• Leading hypothesis for why naked mole-rats are eusocial is inbreeding.

• Average coefficient of relatedness is 0.81 and about 85% of matings are between parents and offspring or between full siblings.

Page 23: Inclusive  Fitness  Hamilton  Rule

Naked Mole-rats

• Despite high level of relatedness conflicts still occur because reproductive interests of workers and reproductives are not identical.

Page 24: Inclusive  Fitness  Hamilton  Rule

Naked Mole-rats

• Queens maintain control through physical dominance.

• Queen aggressively shoves workers who do not work hard enough and shoves are mainly directly towards less closely related individuals.

• Workers double their work rate after being shoved.

Page 25: Inclusive  Fitness  Hamilton  Rule

Naked Mole-rats

• In addition to inbreeding, ecological factors such as severely limited breeding opportunities and group defense appear to contribute to eusociality in naked mole-rats.

Page 26: Inclusive  Fitness  Hamilton  Rule

“We are survival machines—robot vehicles blindly

programmed to preserve the selfish molecules known as

genes”

brp
You are all familiar some behavorial phenomenon was pivotal in the recent closing of the university