Inclusions Regulation Testing Inclusions Regulation Testing SituationsSituations

Decide if the situation is a violation or not a violation.

Cite the page and paragraph number from the document(s) to support your decision.

04/10/23 1

Situation 1Situation 1A scribe wrote answers on a sheet ofpaper for a student with disabilities whocan have a scribe. The student wasrequired to copy answers into a StudentResponse Booklet as he had done throughout the school year.

Not a Violation

Page 18-19 – InclusionsUse of Scribes

04/10/23 2

Situation 2Situation 2A student was hospitalized for a severelybroken leg (in traction). The hjmeboundteacher administered the test to thestudent in the hospital.

Not a Violation

Page 5 – Inclusions Summary, paragraph 4

Page 13 – Section 4, part B

04/10/23 3

Situation 3Situation 3Two students had similar answers, buthad not copied. It was determined thatone had listened intently as the otherdictated answers to a scribe.

Violation

Page 9 – Administration PracticesNot Acceptable, paragraph 1

04/10/23 4

Situation 4Situation 4A student has a learning disability thatsignificantly impacts her reading ability. HerIEP states materials may be presented

orally. The guidance counselor had her come to hisoffice so he could read the test to her.

Not a Violation

Page 9 – Administration PracticesNot Acceptable, paragraph 1

Acceptable, paragraph 104/10/23 5

Situation 5Situation 5A school needs to use multiple scribesand readers with special educationstudents. The school schedules thesescribes and readers to provideaccommodations at the same time in asingle room.

Violation

Page 9 – Administration PracticesNot Acceptable, paragraph 1

04/10/23 6

Situation 6Situation 6The district has three new students that havebeen identified as needing specificaccommodations to be included in a 504Plan. The ARC immediately develops 504 Plans,close to testing, which will allow thestudents to use the accommodations forinstruction and during testing.

Not a Violation

Page 6 – Inclusions2a, b, c

04/10/23 7

Situation 7Situation 7A student routinely uses a wordprocessor with word prediction asoutlined in his 504 Plan and he uses bothfeatures for K-PREP.

Not a Violation

Page 9 – Administration PracticesAcceptable, paragraph 1

Page 6 – Inclusions 2a, b, c

04/10/23 8

Situation 8Situation 8Documentation of a student’s IEP isshared with the proctor that will beadministering the state assessmentto the student.

Not a Violation

Page 9 – Administration PracticesAcceptable, paragraph 1

04/10/23 9

Situation 9Situation 9A proctor questions a student’s use of apersonal cueing notebook that seems tobe very content specific. Additionalinvestigation finds that all specialeducation students have the same exactnotebook.

Violation

Page 22-23 – InclusionsPrompting and Cueing

04/10/23 10

Situation 10Situation 10A student was taking the Mathematicsportion of the K-PREP. He used (from

hisprompting and cueing notebook) acue card with multiple mathematicalformulas and sample problems.

Violation

Page 23-24 of the Inclusions document Use of Prompting and Cueing

04/10/23 11

Situation 11Situation 11

A student with illegible handwritingwas given a scribe.

Violation

Page 18-19 of the Inclusions document

Use of Scribes

04/10/23 12

Situation 12Situation 12Five LEP students were purposelyassigned the same form of the testso one interpreter could work withall the students at the same time.

Not a Violation

Page 11 – InclusionsSection C, 1, paragraph 2

04/10/23 13