Included Models

Diffusion of Innovation

Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. 2003, New York: Free Press. xxi, 551 p.

RAND Model of Persuasive Communication and Diffusion of

Medical Innovation

Winkler, J.D., K.N. Lohr, and R.H. Brook, Persuasive communication and medical technology assessment. Arch Intern Med, 1985. 145(2): p. 314-7.

Effective Dissemination Strategies

Scullion, P.A., Effective dissemination strategies. Nurse Res,

2002. 10(1): p. 65-77.

Model for Locally Based Research Transfer Development

Anderson M, Cosby J, Swan B, Moore H, Broekhoven M. The use of research in local health service agencies. Soc Sci Med 1999;49:1007–19

Window of Opportunity

• Identify health problemProblem

• Identify potential policies to solve the problemPolicy

• Identify factors affecting the policymaking process Politics

Figure 1. Three Streams of the Policy Process, Adapted from Kingdon13

Policy Change

Streams of Policy Process Kingdon, J.W., Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. 1984, Boston: Little, Brown. xi, 240 p. Kingdon, J.W., Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Updated 2nd ed. 2010, Boston: Longman. xx, 273 p.

A Conceptual Model of Knowledge Utilization Lester JP. The utilization of policy analysis by state agency officials. Sci Comm 1993;14:267–90

Conceptual Framework for Research Knowledge Transfer and Utilization Kramer DM, Cole DC. Sustained, intensive engagement to promote health and safety knowledge transfer to and utilization by workplaces. Sci Comm 2003;25:56–82

Conceptualizing Dissemination Research and Activity: Canadian Heart Health Initiative

Elliott SJ, O’Loughlin J, Robinson K, Eyles J, Cameron R, Harvey D, et al. Conceptualizing dissemination research and activity: the case of the Canadian Heart Health Initiative.

Health Educ Behav 2003;30:267-82. discussion 83–6.

Owen, N., et al., Evidence-based approaches to dissemination and diffusion of physical activity interventions. Am J Prev Med, 2006. 31(4 Suppl): p. S35-44.

Policy Framework for Increasing Diffusion of Evidence-based Physical Activity Interventions

Blueprint for Dissemination

Yuan, C.T., et al., Blueprint for the dissemination of evidence-based practices in health care. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund), 2010. 86: p. 1-16.

Framework for Knowledge Translation

Jacobson, N., D. Butterill, and P. Goering, Development of a framework for knowledge translation: understanding user context. J Health Serv Res Policy, 2003. 8(2): p. 94-9.

Framework For Analysing Adoption of Complex Health Innovations

• Atun, R., et al., Integration of targeted health interventions into health systems: a conceptual framework for analysis. Health Policy Plan, 2010. 25(2): p. 104-11.

• Atun, R.A., et al., Diffusion of complex health innovations--implementation of primary health care reforms in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Health Policy Plan, 2007. 22(1): p. 28-39.

A Framework for Spread

• Langley, G.J., The improvement guide : a practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. 2nd ed. 2009, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. xxi, 490 p.

• Nolan, K., et al., Using a framework for spread: The case of patient access in the Veterans Health Administration. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf, 2005. 31(6): p. 339-47.

Collaborative Model for Knowledge Translation Between Research and Practice Settings

• Baumbusch, J.L., et al., Pursuing common agendas: a collaborative model for knowledge translation between research and practice in clinical settings. Res Nurs Health, 2008. 31(2): p. 130-40.

Coordinated Implementation Model

• Lomas, J., Retailing research: increasing the role of evidence in clinical services for childbirth. The Milbank Quarterly, 1993: p. 439-475.

Model for Improving the Dissemination of Nursing

Research

• Funk, S.G., E.M. Tornquist, and M.T. Champagne, A model for improving the dissemination of nursing research. West J Nurs Res, 1989. 11(3): p. 361-72.

Framework for the Dissemination &

Utilization of Research for Health-

Care Policy & Practice

• Dobbins, M., DeCorby, K., Robeson, P., Tirilis, D., Public Health Model, in Models and frameworks for implementing evidence-based practice : linking evidence to action, J. Rycroft-Malone and T. Bucknall, Editors. 2010, Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester. p. xviii, 268 p.

• Dobbins, M., et al., A framework for the dissemination and utilization of research for health-care policy and practice. Online J Knowl Synth Nurs, 2002. 9: p. 7.

Framework of Dissemination in Health Services Intervention Research

• Mendel, P., et al., Interventions in organizational and community context: a framework for building evidence on dissemination and implementation in health services research. Adm Policy Ment Health, 2008. 35(1-2): p. 21-37.

Linking Systems Framework

• Robinson, K., et al., Using linking systems to build capacity and enhance dissemination in heart health promotion: a Canadian multiple-case study. Health Educ Res, 2005. 20(5): p. 499-513.

Marketing and Distribution System for Public Health

• Kreuter, M.W., C.M. Casey, and J.M. Bernhardt, Enhancing dissemination though marketing and distribution systems: A vision for public health, in Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice, B. RC, G. Colditz, and P. EK, Editors. 2012 (In Press), Oxford University Press: New York; Oxford.

OPTIONS Model

• Martin, G.W., et al., A social marketing model for disseminating research-based treatments to addictions treatment providers. Addiction, 1998. 93(11): p. 1703-15.

A Conceptual Model for the Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations

• Greenhalgh, T., et al., Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q, 2004. 82(4): p. 581-629.

Health Promotion Research Center Framework

Harris JR, Cheadle A, Hannon PA, Forehand M, Lichiello P, Mahoney E, et al. A framework for disseminating evidence-based health promotion practices. Prev Chronic Dis 2012;9:E22.

Knowledge Exchange Framework

• Ward V, Smith S, Carruthers S, House A, Hamer S. Knowledge Brokering. Exploring the process of transferring knowledge into action Leeds: University of Leeds 2010.

• Ward VL, House AO, Hamer S. Knowledge brokering: exploring the process of transferring knowledge into action. BMC Health Serv Res 2009;9:12. • Ward V, Smith S, House A, Hamer S. Exploring knowledge exchange: a useful framework for practice and policy. Social Science and Medicine. 2012:

(74): 297-304.

Research Knowledge Infrastructure

• Lash, S.J., et al., Implementation of evidence-based substance use disorder continuing care interventions. Psychol Addict Behav, 2011. 25(2): p. 238-51. • Lavis, J.N., et al., Assessing country-level efforts to link research to action. Bull World Health Organ, 2006. 84(8): p. 620-8. • Lavis, J.N., et al., How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers? Milbank Quarterly, 2003. 81(2): p. 221-248. • IWH. Institute for Work and Health - Knowledge Transfer & Exchange Guides. 2006 [cited 2011 October 15]; Available from: http://www.iwh.on.ca/kte-guides.

We developed a framework for assessing country-level efforts to link research to action. The framework has four elements. The first element assesses the general climate (how those who fund research, universities, researchers and users of research support or place value on efforts to link research to action). The second element addresses the production of research (how priority setting ensures that users’ needs are identified and how scoping reviews, systematic reviews and single studies are undertaken to address these needs). The third element addresses the mix of four clusters of activities used to link research to action. These include push efforts (how strategies are used to support action based on the messages arising from research), efforts to facilitate “user pull” (how “one-stop shopping” is provided for optimally packaged high-quality reviews either alone or as part of a national electronic library for health, how these reviews are profiled during “teachable moments” such as intense media coverage, and how rapid-response units meet users’ needs for the best research), “user pull” efforts undertaken by those who use research (how users assess their capacity to use research and how structures and processes are changed to support the use of research) and exchange efforts (how meaningful partnerships between researchers and users help them to jointly ask and answer relevant questions). The fourth element addresses approaches to evaluation (how support is provided for rigorous evaluations of efforts to link research to action

A Convergent Diffusion and Social Marketing Approach for Dissemination

• Dearing, J.W., E.W. Maibach, and D.B. Buller, A convergent diffusion and social marketing approach for disseminating proven approaches to physical activity promotion. Am J Prev Med, 2006. 31(4 Suppl): p. S11-23.

Framework for Dissemination of Evidence-Based Policy

• Dodson, E.A., R.C. Brownson, and S.W. Weiss, Policy Dissemination Research, in Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice, R. Brownson, G. Colditz, and P. EK, Editors. 2012 (in press), Oxford University Press: Oxford ; New York.

Health Promotion Technology Transfer Process

• Orlandi, M.A., Health promotion technology transfer: organizational perspectives. Can J Public Health, 1996. 87 Suppl 2: p. S28-33.

Real-World Dissemination

• Chambers, R., Hoagwood, & Patel and Adapted from Pettigrew, Real-World Dissemination, in PowerPoint. 2002.

• Pettigrew, A.M., E. Ferlie, and L. McKee, Shaping strategic change: making change in large organizations: the case of the National Health Service. 1992: Sage.

A Framework for the Transfer of Patient Safety Research into Practice

• Nieva, V.F., et al., From Science to Service: A Framework for the Transfer of Patient Safety. 2005.

Interacting Elements of Integrating Science, Policy, and Practice

• TIDIRH Working Group; Adapted from Ward et al. Interacting Elements of Integrating Science, Policy, and Practice. in Training Institute for Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health. 2011. Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Interactive Systems Framework

• Wandersman, A., et al., Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. Am J Community Psychol, 2008. 41(3-4): p. 171-81.

Push-Pull Capacity Model

• Green, L.W., et al., Inferring strategies for disseminating physical activity policies, programs, and practices from the successes of tobacco control. Am J Prev Med, 2006. 31(4 Suppl): p. S66-81.

Research Development Dissemination and Utilization Framework

• Havelock, R.G., Planning for innovation through dissemination and utilization of knowledge. 1969: Centre for Research on Utilization of Scientific Knowledge, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

Utilization-Focused Surveillance Framework

• Green, L.W., et al., Diffusion theory and knowledge dissemination, utilization, and integration in public health. Annu Rev Public Health, 2009. 30: p. 151-74.

"4E" Framework for Knowledge Dissemination and Utilization

• Farkas, M. and W.A. Anthony, Bridging science to service: using Rehabilitation Research and Training Center program to ensure that research-based knowledge makes a difference. J Rehabil Res Dev, 2007. 44(6): p. 879-92.

• Farkas, M., et al., Knowledge dissemination and utilization in gerontology: An organizing framework. The Gerontologist, 2003. 43(suppl 1): p. 47.

Critical Realism & the Arts Research Utilization Model (CRARUM)

• Kontos, P.C. and B.D. Poland, Mapping new theoretical and methodological terrain for knowledge translation: contributions from critical realism and the arts. Implement Sci, 2009. 4: p. 1.

Davis' Pathman-PROCEED Model

• Davis, D., et al., The case for knowledge translation: shortening the journey from evidence to effect. BMJ, 2003. 327(7405): p. 33-5.

• Pathman, D.E., et al., The awareness-to-adherence model of the steps to clinical guideline compliance: the case of pediatric vaccine recommendations. Medical Care, 1996. 34(9): p. 873.

• Green, L.W. and M.W. Kreuter, Health program planning : an educational and ecological approach. 4th ed. 2005, New York: McGraw-Hill. 1 v. (various pagings).

Dissemination of Evidence-based Interventions to Prevent Obesity

• Dreisinger, M.L., et al., Contextual factors influencing readiness for dissemination of obesity prevention programs and policies. Health Educ Res, 2011.

Knowledge Translation Model

of Tehran University of

Medical Sciences

• Gholami, J., et al., How should we assess knowledge translation in research organizations; designing a knowledge translation self-assessment tool for research institutes (SATORI). Health Res Policy Syst. 9: p. 10.

• Majdzadeh, R., et al., Knowledge translation for research utilization: design of a knowledge translation model at Tehran University of Medical Sciences. J Contin Educ Health Prof, 2008. 28(4): p. 270-7.

Multi-level Conceptual Framework of Organizational Innovation Adoption

• Frambach, R.T. and N. Schillewaert, Organizational innovation adoption: a multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research. Journal of Business Research, 2002. 55(2): p. 163-176.

Ottawa Model of Research Use

• Logan, J. and I.D. Graham, Toward a comprehensive interdisciplinary model of health care research use. Science Communication, 1998. 20(2): p. 227.

• Logan, J. and I.D. Graham, The Ottawa Model of Research Use, in Modesl and Frameworks for Implementating Evidence-Based Practice: Evidence to Action, J.R.-M.a.T. Bucknall, Editor. 2010, Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford.

The RE-AIM Framework

• Glasgow, R.E., T.M. Vogt, and S.M. Boles, Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health, 1999. 89(9): p. 1322-7.

The Precede-Proceed Model

• Green, L.W. and M.W. Kreuter, Health program planning : an educational and ecological approach. 4th ed. 2005, New York: McGraw-Hill. 1 v. (various pagings).

Facilitating Adoption of Best Practices (FAB) Model

• Damush TM, D.V., Bravata DM, Plue L, Woodward-Hagg H, Williams LS, Facilitation of Best Practices (FAB) Framework. Stroke QUERI Center Annual Report. 2008.

A Six-Step Framework For International Physical Activity Dissemination

• Bauman, A.E., et al., Dissemination of physical activity evidence, programs, policies, and surveillance in the international public health arena. Am J Prev Med, 2006. 31(4 Suppl): p. S57-65.

Pathways to Evidence Informed Policy

• Bowen, S. and A.B. Zwi, Pathways to "evidence-informed" policy and practice: a framework for action. PLoS Med, 2005. 2(7): p. e166.

CDC DHAP’s Research-to-Practice Framework

• Collins, C., et al., The diffusion of effective behavioral interventions project: development, implementation, and lessons learned. AIDS Educ Prev, 2006. 18(4 Suppl A): p. 5-20.

• Collins, C.B., Jr., W.D. Johnson, and C.M. Lyles, Linking research and practice: evidence-based HIV prevention. Focus, 2007. 22(7): p. 1-5.

• Neumann, M.S. and E.D. Sogolow, Replicating effective programs: HIV/AIDS prevention technology transfer. AIDS Educ Prev, 2000. 12(5 Suppl): p. 35-48.

• Sogolow, E., et al., The HIV/AIDS Prevention Research Synthesis Project: scope, methods, and study classification results. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 2002. 30 Suppl 1: p. S15-29.

• Sogolow, E.D., et al., Strengthening HIV prevention: application of a research-to-practice framework. AIDS Educ Prev, 2000. 12(5 Suppl): p. 21-32.

• CDC-DHAP. HIV/AIDS Prevention Research Synthesis Project. 2011 August 12 [cited 2011 October 15]; Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/research/prs/index.htm.

PRS: Prevention Research Synthesis REP: Replicating Effective Programs Pre-implementation Implementation Maintenance and Evolution DEBI: Diffusion of Evidence Based Interventions

Practical, Robust

Implementation and

Sustainability Model (PRISM)

• Feldstein, A.C. and R.E. Glasgow, A practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf, 2008. 34(4): p. 228-43.

Active Implementation Framework

• Fixsen, D.L., L.P.F. Mental, and U.o.S. Florida, Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. 2005: National Implementation Research Network.

• Institute, F.C.D. National Implementation Research Network. 2008 [cited 2011 October 15]; Available from: http://www.fpg.unc.edu/~nirn/implementation/01_implementationdefined.cfm.

An Organizational Theory of Innovation Implementation

• Weiner, B.J., M.A. Lewis, and L.A. Linnan, Using organization theory to understand the determinants of effective implementation of worksite health promotion programs. Health Educ Res, 2009. 24(2): p. 292-305.

Conceptual Model of Implementation Research

• Proctor, E.K., et al., Implementation research in mental health services: an emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Adm Policy Ment Health, 2009. 36(1): p. 24-34.

Implementation Effectiveness Model

• Klein, K.J., A.B. Conn, and J.S. Sorra, Implementing computerized technology: An organizational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001. 86(5): p. 811.

• Klein, K.J. and J.S. Sorra, The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of management review, 1996: p. 1055-1080.

Normalization Process Theory

• May, C., Murray, E., Finch, T., Mair, F., Treweek, S., Ballini, L., Macfarlane, A. and Rapley, T. Normalization Process Theory On-line Users’ Manual and Toolkit. 2010 [cited 2011 October 15]; Available from: http://www.normalizationprocess.org.

• May, C. and T. Finch, Implementing, Embedding, and Integrating Practices: An Outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology-the Journal of the British Sociological Association, 2009. 43(3): p. 535-554.

• Murray, E., et al., Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med, 2010. 8: p. 63.

Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS)

• Kitson, A., G. Harvey, and B. McCormack, Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework. Quality in Health Care, 1998. 7(3): p. 149.

• Kitson, A.L., et al., Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges. Implement Sci, 2008. 3: p. 1.

• Rycroft-Malone, J., The PARIHS framework--a framework for guiding the implementation of evidence-based practice. J Nurs Care Qual, 2004. 19(4): p. 297-304.

Pronovost's 4E's Process

Theory

• Pronovost, P.J., S.M. Berenholtz, and D.M. Needham, Translating evidence into practice: a model for large scale knowledge translation. BMJ, 2008. 337.

Sticky Knowledge

• Elwyn, G., M. Taubert, and J. Kowalczuk, Sticky knowledge: a possible model for investigating implementation in healthcare contexts. Implement Sci, 2007. 2: p. 44.

• Szulanski, G., Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic management journal, 1996. 17: p. 27-43.

Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

• Damschroder, L.J., et al., Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci, 2009. 4: p. 50.

• Damschroder, L. Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) Wiki. 2010 November 8, 2010 [cited 2011 October 15]; Available from: http://wiki.cfirwiki.net.

Replicating Effective Programs Plus Framework

• Kilbourne, A.M., et al., Implementing evidence-based interventions in health care: application of the replicating effective programs framework. Implement Sci, 2007. 2: p. 42.

Availability, Responsiveness & Continuity (ARC): An Organizational & Community Intervention Model

• Glisson, C. and S.K. Schoenwald, The ARC organizational and community intervention strategy for implementing evidence-based children's mental health treatments. Ment Health Serv Res, 2005. 7(4): p. 243-59.

• Glisson, C., et al., Randomized trial of MST and ARC in a two-level evidence-based treatment implementation strategy. J Consult Clin Psychol, 2010. 78(4): p. 537-50

Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors

• Aarons, G.A., M. Hurlburt, and S.M. Horwitz, Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Adm Policy Ment Health, 2011. 38(1): p. 4-23.