Improving the Translation of Evidence-Based Recommendations of Client Reminder/Recall for Childhood...
-
Upload
dominick-wells -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Improving the Translation of Evidence-Based Recommendations of Client Reminder/Recall for Childhood...
Improving the Translation of Evidence-Based Recommendations of Client Reminder/Recall for
Childhood Immunizations
Gary Wheeler, MD, Principal Investigator
Tereasa Holmes, Project Manager
Role of Vaccines
• More than a 90% decline in vaccine preventable diseases when compared to pre-vaccine era
• Effectiveness tested and need for vaccination reinforced during recent outbreak of measles in California in 2008
The Economics of Vaccination
• For every $1 spent on vaccination, $16.50 is saved
• According to the 317 Coalition, “For every birth cohort who receives seven vaccines . . . society saves $9.9 million in direct health care costs; 33,000 lives are saved and 14 million cases of disease are prevented.”
• Keeps parents working, keeps many as productive citizens
Cost Effectiveness
FY 2011 Congressional Justification Safer Healthier PeopleTM Immunization and Respiratory Diseases Budget Request. http://www.317coalition.org/learnmore/FY11_Presidents_Budget_Congressional_Justification.pdf
Arkansas Statistics
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
4+DTaP 3+ Polio 1+ MMR 3+Hib 3+ HepB
1+ Var 3+PCV
2007
2008
2009
Chart adapted from CDC data: “Estimated Vaccination Coverage with Individual Vaccines and Selected Vaccination Series Among Children 19-35 Months of Age by State and Local Area US, National Immunization Survey.” 2007-2009.
Currently in Arkansas . . .
• Vaccine registry housed in ADH—called the Immunization Network for Children.– Currently, a child is entered at birth allowing
authorized users to access the age and vaccination status of those under 22.
– Difficulty Tracking patients
• Lack of use of current recall systems in Arkansas
Results from other studies
• Other studies demonstrate improvement in vaccination rate and preventive services.
• 80% effective
• Increase in immunization rate ranging from 5-20%
• Vaccine “champion”
Barriers
Identified Problems• Lack of time to learn a
system• Lack of staff• Lack of funding• Inability to identify
children who are under-immunized
• Physicians who don’t vaccinate
Proposed Solutions• AFMC will provide
training• Outsourcing may be a
solution• Working with ADH to
allow for better patient tracking
• Encourage patients to get vaccinated
Project Goals
• To increase the adoption of recall systems in physician practices in various geographic regions of Arkansas with diverse socioeconomic characteristics
• To increase practice vaccination rates
Study Design
How will we increase the use of recall
Programs in practicesWho treat kids <2?
Control GroupN=34
Office-based recallN=34
Out-sourced recall center
N=34
All Groups
• Pre and Post Surveys
• Informed Consent for participation
• Business Agreements
• Patient list for RATE database
Intervention Groups
∙ AFMC call center will scan registry weekly for under-vaccinatedPatients
∙ Attempts will be made 3 times and each method will be recordedby the call center staff
∙ Complete pre and post surveys
∙ Generate rate lists
∙ Generate recall lists for new patients 2 and under
∙ Identify modes of contact
∙ Quarterly monitoring for sustainability
∙ Business agreements
∙ Informed Consent
Office-Based Out-sourced
∙ Academic detailers will asses each office and will offer modifications to make use of the vaccine registry.
∙Hands on registry demonstration
∙ Weekly monitoring of registry by office staff with contact attempts and records for under-vaccinated kids.
∙ Business plans to estimate costs
∙
Modes of Communication
Evaluation
• Evaluation of changes in knowledge, attitude and practices of participating physicians
• Changes in vaccination rate
Benefits
• Maintenance of Certification
• Possibly Pay for Performance in future
• Application to other physician practices
• Benefit to your patients
Future Implications
• May apply to other preventive care measures
• Could translate this to older population for Varicella Zoster or Pneumovax vaccines
• Reminder system
• Toolkit
AFMC Key Players
• Gary Wheeler, MD, Principal Investigator
• Tereasa Holmes, Project Manager
• Mick Tilford, PhD
• Zoran Bersac, PhD
• Statistics Team
• Academic Detailers
Sources
• Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine and Council on Community Pediatrics. “Increasing Immunization Coverage.” Pediatrics. 2010; 125; 1295-1304.
• FY 2011 Congressional Justification Safer Healthier PeopleTM Immunization and Respiratory Diseases Budget Request. http://www.317coalition.org/learnmore/FY11_Presidents_Budget_Congressional_Justification.pdf
• “Immunization Coverage in the U.S.” Children NIS Data 2007, 2008, 2009. CDC Online. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/stats-surv/imz-coverage.htm
• “Outbreak of Measles --- San Diego, California, January--February 2008.” MMWR. February 29, 2008; 57(08);203-206. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5708a3.htm
• Shaw KM, Barker LE. “How do caregivers know when to take their child for immunizations?” National Immunization Program, CDC. Atlanta, Georgia. BMC Pediatrics. http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2431-5-44.pdf
• Szilagyi PG, Bordleyy , Vann JC, Chelminski A, Kraus RM, Margolis PA, Rodewald LE. “Effet of Patient Reminder/Recall Interventions on Immunization Rates, A Review.” JAMA, October 11, 2000. Vol 284, No 14. 1820-1826,
• Tierney CD, Yusaf H, McMahon SR, Rusinak D, O’Brien MA, Massoudi MS, Lieu TA. “Adoption of Remind and Recall Messages for Immunizations by Pediatricians and Public Health Clinics.” Pediatrics. 2003; 112; 1076-1082.