Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

73
Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas

Transcript of Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Page 1: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas

Page 2: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Why Focus on Warfarin Management?

Warfarin is the second most common cause of adverse drug events in emergency departments

Incidence of major bleeding in patients prescribed warfarin ranged from 0% to 16%, and the incidence of fatal bleeding was 0% to 2.9%.

Page 3: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Warfarin

Patient Story

Page 4: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Where are the risks in prescribing and monitoring patients on warfarin?

Page 5: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Improving Reliability Using Data and Care Bundles

Page 6: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Getting started with data

• “Education, education, education”Tony Blair 1997

• “It’s the economy, stupid”Bill Clinton 1991

• No politician has yet said:– “Data, data, data”– “It’s the data, stupid”

Page 7: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Getting started with data

• Warfarin sheets audit No (%) of patients with element recorded

Name and date of birth 36 (100)

Phone number 36 (100)

Diagnosis 31 (86)

Planned duration 18 (50)

Target INR 21 (59)

Page 8: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Care Bundle

A care bundle is a set of evidence based interventions that when used together significantly improve

outcomes

Page 9: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.
Page 10: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Peter Provonost (ITU physician at Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland )

Simple message:

‘Evidence Based practice…Culture Change…Measurement of change…’

Page 11: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

A simple 5 item checklist protocol would greatly reduce infections when inserting a central venous catheter

Doctors should:•Wash their hands with soap. •Clean the patient’s skin with chlorhexidine antiseptic. •Put sterile drapes over the entire patient. •Wear a sterile mask, hat, gown and gloves. •Put a sterile dressing over the catheter site

Peter Provonost’s Care Bundle

Page 12: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

‘An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU’ Pronovost P, et al. (December 2006) N. Engl. J. Med. 355 (26): 2725–32.

Page 13: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Central line infection rate (per thousand line days)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Jan-

08

Apr-0

8

Jul-0

8

Oct-08

Jan-

09

Apr-0

9

Jul-0

9

Oct-09

Jan-

10

Apr-1

0

Jul-1

0

Oct-10

Jan-

11

Apr-1

1

Jul-1

1

2.34

0.18

92% reduction

Page 14: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

What is a Bundle?

• Aim to ensure patients receive optimum care at every contact

• Structured way of improving processes of care to deliver enhanced patient safety and clinical outcomes

Page 15: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

What is a Care Bundle?

4 or 5 elements of care

Across Patients Journey

Creates teamwork

Mix of easy and hard

All or nothing

Small frequent samples

Page 16: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Bundle vs Audit

• Audit – identifies whether individual measures are being implemented

• Bundle - data collection tool to sample whether optimum care is being delivered

Page 17: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

How does this apply to Warfarin management?

Page 18: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Process Map

Page 19: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Warfarin Bundle

Is there evidence that the last advice re warfarin dosing given to patientfollowed current Lothian Guidance/ INR Star/ RAT?

Is there evidence that the last advice re the interval for blood testing given topatient followed current Lothian Guidance/ INR Star/ RAT?

Has patient been taking the advised dose since last blood test?

INR is taken within 7 days of planned repeat INR?*

Face to face education recorded every 6 months?*

Overall compliance out of 5

Page 20: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Warfarin Bundle

Is there evidence that the last advice re warfarin dosing given to patientfollowed current Guidance

The use of a dosing algorithm can significantly improve anticoagulant control Kim, Y.K. et al Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis,2010 8,101–106.

Computerized dosing has been shown to increase the overall percentage time for which patients are in their target INR range and in some studies to reduce the frequency of testing of patients.Poller, L., Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, (2008b) 6,935–943.

Page 21: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Warfarin Bundle

Is there evidence that the last advice re the interval for blood testing given topatient followed current Guidance?

The use of a dosing algorithm can significantly improve anticoagulant control Kim, Y.K. et al Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis,2010 8,101–106.

Computerized dosing has been shown to increase the overall percentage time for which patients are in their target INR range and in some studies to reduce the frequency of testing of patients.Poller, L., Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, (2008b) 6,935–943.

Page 22: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Warfarin Bundle

Has patient been taking the advised dose since last blood test?

The practice has to ensure that the patient is informed of the correct advice regarding warfarin dosage for the patient to be able to comply with the advice. - Patient feedback

Page 23: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Warfarin Bundle

INR is taken within 7 days of planned repeat INR?*

Patient’s regular attendance for blood testing is associated with better anticoagulation control.Roswe AJ et al Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2011 May 1; 4(3):276-82. Epub 2011 Apr 19.

Page 24: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Warfarin Bundle

Face to face education recorded every 6 months?*

There is good evidence that improved patient knowledge and understanding of the use of warfarin improves anticoagulation controlTang EO at al Ann Pharmacother. 2003 Jan; 37(1):34-9.

Page 25: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Warfarin Bundle

Is there evidence that the last advice re warfarin dosing given to patientfollowed current Lothian Guidance/ INR Star/ RAT?

Is there evidence that the last advice re the interval for blood testing given topatient followed current Lothian Guidance/ INR Star/ RAT?

Has patient been taking the advised dose since last blood test?

INR is taken within 7 days of planned repeat INR?*

Face to face education recorded every 6 months?*

Overall compliance out of 5

Page 26: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Its about what you do with the data…….

Page 27: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Like What?

• Practice meeting • Notice board• Process mapping • Ask patients• Try changing something….• Measure the effect.

Page 28: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.
Page 29: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Practice Feedback

• There is magic in graphs…

Henry D Hubbard, 1939

There is magic in graphs. The profile of a curve reveals in a flash a whole situation – the life history of an epidemic, a panic or an era of prosperity. The curve informs the mind, awakens the imagination, convinces….

Page 30: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Bundle Compliance

Warfarin Bundle Compliance

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

14thFeb'11

28thFeb'11

14thMar'11

28thMar'11

11thApr'11

25thApril'11

9thMay'11

23rdMay'11

6thJune'11

20thJune'11

4thJuly'11

18thJuly'11

1stAug'11

15thAug'11

29thAug'11

12thSept'11

26thSept'11

10thOct'11

24thOct'11

7thNov'11

21stNov'11

5thDec'11

19thDec'11

2ndJan'12

16thJan'12

Overall Lothian Orchard

Page 31: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Lothian Practice Experience

Page 32: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.
Page 33: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

“The care bundle was useful because it identified gaps”

“You can see week by week, month by month, whether or

not you are showing any improvement, we seem to be improving and that’s good”

Page 34: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Successes - Improved:

• Patient Care• Systems• Knowledge, Skills & Attitudes• Safety Culture• Team-working• Patient Involvement• Less Stress • Efficiency

Page 35: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.
Page 36: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Less Stress for some staff in their job

• “Staff member X who manages the register and the recall for these patients, it caused her an enormous amount of stress prior to the programme”

“ Now that the programme is much more streamlined and she feels more

confident and has taken much more clinical responsibility”

Page 37: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Staff time-saving - patients being more proactive

“staff member X doesn’t have to continually phone people up every month, that is quite a time saver for her, patients are

now more coming in cause they understand the consequences potentially

of the side effects of the potential toxic drugs”.

Page 38: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Does Bundle Compliance = better results?

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

Feb-10

Mar-10

Apr-10

May-10

Jun-10

Jul-10

Aug-10

Sep-10

Oct-10

Nov-10

Dec-10

Jan-11

Feb-11

Mar-11

Apr-11

May-11

Jun-11

Jul-11

Aug-11

Sep-11

Oct-11

Nov-11

Dec-11

Jan-12

Feb-12

Conan Doyle Wave 1 Lothian Results <1.5 & >5

Page 39: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Potential to free up appointments

Page 40: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

How well are we doing in NHS Lothian?

Page 41: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

How well are we doing in NHS Lothian?

Page 42: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Care bundles

1. Shed new light on our current practice

2. Act as a catalyst for improvement in care

3. Can lead to increased awareness

Page 43: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Questions?

Page 44: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

What about other bundles?

DMARDS Medication ReconciliationResults handling

Page 45: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

DMARD Bundle

Only those prescribed Methotrexate or Azathioprine

• Full Blood Count in the last 6 weeks• Action from abnormal results recorded• Documented review of blood tests prior to issue of last prescription• Ever had pneumococcal vaccine• Documented the patient has been asked about side effects fo their

medication at their last blood test• Compliance with full bundle (i.e. all of above)

Page 46: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.
Page 47: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

How to access the bundle data collection spreadsheet

Page 48: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Collecting your data

Page 49: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Entering your data

Page 50: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Automatically generated reportMonth

Warfarin dose Target INR

Advise recorded

INR within 7 days

Patient Education

Overall Compliant

June 60 50 50 60 50 20

July 50 50 50 70 50 10

August 80 60 50 80 40 30

September 90 80 70 80 50 30

October 80 100 70 90 40 40

November 80 80 60 80 50 50

December 80 90 70 80 70 50

January 70 90 90 90 80 60

Page 51: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Automatically generated Graphs

Warfarin dose

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

June Ju

ly

Augus

t

Septe

mbe

r

Octob

er

Nover

mbe

r

Decem

ber

Janu

ary

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

Pe

rce

nt

co

mp

lian

ce

Page 52: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Target INR

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

June Ju

ly

Augus

t

Septe

mbe

r

Octob

er

Nover

mbe

r

Decem

ber

Janu

ary

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

Pe

rce

nt

co

mp

lian

ce

Page 53: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Advise recorded

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

June Ju

ly

Augus

t

Septe

mbe

r

Octob

er

Nover

mbe

r

Decem

ber

Janu

ary

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

Pe

rce

nt

co

mp

lian

ce

Page 54: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

INR within 7 days

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

June Ju

ly

Augus

t

Septe

mbe

r

Octob

er

Nover

mbe

r

Decem

ber

Janu

ary

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

Pe

rce

nt

co

mp

lian

ce

Page 55: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Written Education Provided

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

June Ju

ly

Augus

t

Septe

mbe

r

Octob

er

Nover

mbe

r

Decem

ber

Janu

ary

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

Pe

rce

nt

co

mp

lian

ce

Page 56: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Warfarin Overall Compliance

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

June Ju

ly

Augus

t

Septe

mbe

r

Octob

er

Nover

mbe

r

Decem

ber

Janu

ary

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

#N/A

Pe

rce

nt

co

mp

lian

ce

Page 57: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Example of Data

Page 58: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Composite Tayside

Composite Measure for 8 practices - Sept10-May11

35%

55%

68%

62%

57%

71%

84%80%

86%

97%

84%

93%

85%83%

65%

59%

46%44%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Wk1 Wk2 Wk3 Wk4 Wk5 Wk6 Wk7 Wk8 Wk9 Wk10 Wk11 Wk12 Wk13 Wk 14 Wk15 Wk16 Wk17 Wk18

* A new patient measure to be added in June will change the nature of the data with the composite likely to decrease initially.

Page 59: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Achievement – Wave 1

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Wave 1 Wave 2

Care Bundle Wave 1 & 2 Practices

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Monthly

% c

om

plian

ce

Wave 1 Wave 2

Care Bundle Wave 1 & 2 Practices

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Au

g-1

0

Se

p-1

0

Oct-

10

No

v-1

0

De

c-1

0

Ja

n-1

1

Fe

b-1

1

Ma

r-1

1

Ap

r-1

1

Ma

y-1

1

Ju

n-1

1

Ju

l-1

1

Au

g-1

1

Se

p-1

1

Oct-

11

No

v-1

1

De

c-1

1

Ja

n-1

2

Fe

b-1

2

Ma

r-1

2

Ap

r-1

2

Monthly

% c

om

plia

nce

Wave 1 Wave 2

Wave 1& 2 Achievements

Composite Measure for Wave 1 & 2 Practices June 2010-April 2012

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Au

g-1

0

Sep

-10

Oct-

10

No

v-1

0

Dec-1

0

Jan

-11

Feb

-11

Mar-

11

Ap

r-11

May-1

1

Ju

n-1

1

Ju

l-11

Au

g-1

1

Sep

-11

Oct-

11

No

v-1

1

Dec-1

1

Jan

-12

Feb

-12

Mar-

12

Ap

r-12

Wave 1 Wave 2

Patient Measure introduced July2011

Page 60: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

1 Invite patients who have failed to comply by telephone

2 Send information stating reasons for why it is important to attend

3 Put a note on patients repeat prescription

Ensure patients prescribed Methotrexate or Azathoprine attend a monthly review for blood monitoring

Patients complying by attending blood monitoring will increase

Using a variety of engagement methods

4 Restrict the amount of repeat prescription available to them to encourage attendance

5 Stop repeat prescription until they attend

PDSA - Improve Compliance of Patients Attending Monthly Blood Monitoring

Patients engaging

Page 61: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Tayside Vision Guideline

Page 62: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Side Effects

Page 63: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Reliable systems

“The practice team are more aware of the need to adopt "failsafe" systems rather than assume 100% adherence to systems”

Page 64: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Medication Reconciliation

Page 65: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Medication Reconciliation • Unreliable at admission

• Inaccurate and delayed at discharge,

• Unreliable systems in place in primary care for updating

Page 66: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

“The process of obtaining an up-to-date and accurate medication list that has been compared with the most recently available information and has documented any discrepancies, changes, deletions or additions resulting in a complete list of medication accurately communicated”

(Institute for Healthcare Improvement, www.IHI.org

Page 67: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Medication Reconciliation Measures

• Has the Immediate Discharge Document been workflowed on the day of receipt?

• Has medicines reconciliation occurred within 2 working days of the Immediate Discharge Document being workflowed to the GP/Pharmacist

• Is it documented that any changes to the medications have been acted upon?

• Is it documented that any changes to the medications have been discussed with the patient or their representative?

Page 68: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Utilising I.T.

• Implementation of READ Codes for Medicines Reconciliation

• Development of Guideline/Macros on Clinical System

Page 69: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Meds rec data – NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Page 70: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

DVD Margaret

Page 71: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Results handling

No. ITEM

YES

NO

1.

Test(s) results were reviewed by a practice clinician 2 working days of being received by the practice?

2.

A definitive decision was recorded by a practice clinician on ALL test results within 7 calendar days of being received by the practice?

3.

The decisions for ALL test results have been ‘actioned’ by the practice, including the patient being informed as instructed? (Where no actions are required record as Yes )

5. All measured met

Page 72: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Results

In addition please answer the following During the past month have you carried out a process to identify results which have not been returned to the practiceHow many of these tests were not received by the practice………

Page 73: Improving the reliability of care in high risk areas.

Have a look at the bundles ?Comments /QuestionsCould you use them in your workplace?