Improving the Recognition and Management of ADHD in Adults · Describe the presentation of...
Transcript of Improving the Recognition and Management of ADHD in Adults · Describe the presentation of...
1
Provided by Integrity Continuing Education, Inc.Supported by an educational grant from Shire.
Improving the Recognition and Management of ADHD in Adults
2
Faculty Affiliation
Oren Mason, MDAssistant Professor
College of Human MedicineMichigan State UniversityGrand Rapids, Michigan
Physician/OwnerAttention MD
Grand Rapids, Michigan
3
Faculty Disclosures
▪ Royalty: Lulu Press
▪ Consultant: Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
4
Learning Objectives
▪ Describe the presentation of attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults, as well as currently accepted diagnostic criteria and patient characteristics that are closely associated with the disorder
▪ Outline a therapeutic approach for the management of ADHD in adult patients
▪ Identify psychiatric comorbidities that are frequently associated with ADHD and describe an approach to management
5
ADHD in Adults
6
Overview
8.1
4.1
1.7
Lifetimeprevalence
12-monthprevalence
12-monthprevalenceclassified as
"severe"
US
Ad
ult
Po
pu
lati
on
(%
)
▪ Neurological disorder characterized by frequent and sometimes severe levels of inattention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity
▪ Traditionally viewed as emerging during childhood and usually resolved by young adulthood, but now understood to persist well into adulthood
▪ Strongly associated with poor outcomes related to social function, education, criminality, alcohol use, substance use/abuse, and occupational status
Available at: https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/prevalence/attention-deficit-hyperactivity-disorder-among-adults.shtml
7
Productivity Losses Associated with Adult ADHD
*P < .05 Of Abs, Official Absences; STD, short-term disability; Tot Abs, Total Absences (unofficial + official absences); Total Days equals sum of total absences, short-term disability, and worker compensation; Unof Abs, Unofficial Absences; WC, worker compensation.
Secnik et al. Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(1):93-102.
12.29
4.33
16.63
4.93
21.47
43.03
12.81
1.13
13.95
2.82
12.66
29.34
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Of Abs Unof Abs* Tot Abs* STD WC Total Days*
Day
s
Individuals with ADHD
Matched Controls
8
Increased Healthcare Utilization Among Adults with ADHD
Service % ADHD % Control P Value
Outpatient services
Psychiatrist 27.53 2.22 <.01
Psychologist 16.03 1.38 <.01
Outpatient GP 57.77 51.20 <.01
Mental health facility 0.09 0 .16
Mental health/chemistry department facility 1.33 0.27 <.01
Inpatient services
Emergency room 14.34 10.26 <.01
Inpatient admission 6.71 4.09 <.01
Frequency – number of admissions
0 93.29 95.91 <.01
1 5.24 3.55 —
2 1.02 0.40 —
3+ 0.45 0.14 —
Secnik et al. Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(1):93-102. GP, general practitioner.
9
Untreated ADHD and the Risk for Substance Use Disorder
*6 study meta-analysis; †97% stimulants; ‡stimulantsCI, confidence interval
Reviewed in: Upadhyaya HP. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry 2008;10(3):211-221.
Study Population Follow-up Risk for SUD
Biederman et al. 1999
Medicated (N=56)Nonmedicated (N=19)Controls (N=137)
4-year, throughadolescence
Medicated patients at reduced risk
Adjusted OR=0.15 (95% CI=0.04 to 0.6)
Wilenset al. 2003
Medicated† (N=674)Nonmedicated (N=360)
Into adolescence & adulthood*
~2-fold reduced risk in medicated subjects
Pooled estimate OR=1.9
(95% CI=1.1 to 3.6)
Barkley et al. 2003
Medicated‡ (N=9)Nonmedicated (N=21)
>13-year into adulthood
Stimulant use and drug use in adulthood was
not associatedP>.05
Katusicet al. 2005
Medicated‡ (N=295)Nonmedicated (N=84)
17.2 years into adulthood (mean)
Substance abuse in 20% of medicated vs
27% of nonmedicated
Adjusted OR=0.6 (95% CI=0.3 to 1.0)
10
Clinician Confidence in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Adult ADHD*
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Not Confident SomewhatConfident
ExtremelyConfident
SomewhatConfident +ExtremelyConfident
Pe
rcen
tage
of
Re
spo
nd
en
ts
Primary care physiciansPsychiatrists
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Not Confident SomewhatConfident
ExtremelyConfident
SomewhatConfident +ExtremelyConfident
Pe
rcen
tage
of
Re
spo
nd
en
ts
Primary care physiciansPsychiatrists
Diagnosis in Adults with ADHD† Treatment in Adults with ADHD†
Goodman DW. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2012;14(4):PCC.
*Differences between primary care physicians and psychiatrists are significant at P < .001 for diagnosis and treatment of ADHD.†Primary care physicians: n = 1,145; psychiatrists: n = 600.
11
Undertreatment of ADHD in Adults
Faraone et al. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:1720–1729.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Subthreshold ADHD (N=41) Late-Onset ADHD (N=79) Full ADHD (N=127)
Life
tim
e T
reat
me
nt
for
AD
HD
Counseling Counseling and Pharmacotherapy Pharmacology None
12
Recognition and Diagnosis
13
Case Evaluation #1: 18-year-old Female
▪ First-year college student
▪ Generally high functioning, in good academic standing, involved in multiple extracurricular activities
▪ Feels overwhelmed by too many commitments, tends to procrastinate, has become increasingly forgetful of appointments and course assignments
▪ Reports that her grades have started to decline
▪ Speaks very quickly and abruptly, loses her train of thought when speaking, appears to be having difficulty sitting still in her chair
▪ When queried, she reveals that she has always had to work really hard to keep up and takes longer to complete tasks than any of her peers
14
▪ What aspects of the patient’s clinical presentation might lead you to suspect that she has ADHD?
▪ What other conditions would you consider? (eg, mania)
▪ What additional questions would you pose?
▪ What criteria would you use to make a diagnosis?
Case Evaluation 1: Discussion
15
Common Dysfunctional Behavior Patterns in Adult ADHD
Adapted from Rostain AL, Ramsay JL: Adults with ADHD? Try medication and psychotherapy. Curr Psychiatry. 2006;5:13-27; Available at: http://www.clevelandclinicmeded.com/medicalpubs/diseasemanagement/psychiatry-psychology/attention-deficit-hyperactivity-disorder-in-adults/.
Behavior Description Short-term Gain/Long-term Loss
Anticipatory avoidance
• Magnification of difficulty of a pending task with doubts about the ability to complete it
• Rationalizations to justify procrastination
• Defers short-term stress but creates a self-fulfilling prophecy
• Task looms ahead and can seem overwhelming when facing a deadline
Brinkmanship• Waiting until the last moment to
complete a task, often when facing an impending deadline
• Deadline-associated stress can be focusing, but leaves little room for error and can yield suboptimal results
16
Common Dysfunctional Behavior Patterns in Adult ADHD (Cont’d)
Adapted from Rostain AL, Ramsay JL: Adults with ADHD? Try medication and psychotherapy. Curr Psychiatry. 2006;5:13-27; Available at: http://www.clevelandclinicmeded.com/medicalpubs/diseasemanagement/psychiatry-psychology/attention-deficit-hyperactivity-disorder-in-adults/.
Behavior Description Short-term Gain/Long-term Loss
Pseudoefficiency
• Completing several low-priority, manageable tasks (eg, checking e-mail)
• Avoiding high-priority tasks (eg, work projects)
• Creates sense of productivity by reducing a to-do list
• Defers more difficult projects
Juggling
• Taking on new, exciting projects
• Feeling busy without completing projects
• Becoming motivated to start a novel project is easier than completing an ongoing one
• Usually results in many incomplete projects
17
Overview of DSM-5 Criteria for ADHD in Adults
▪ Presence of ≥ 5 symptoms of inattention and/or hyperactivity-impulsivity:
– Prior to 12 years of age
– For ≥ 6 months to a degree inconsistent with developmental level
– In ≥ 2 settings
▪ Clear evidence that symptoms interfere with, or reduce the quality of social, academic, or occupational functioning
▪ Not occurring exclusively during the course of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder, and not better explained by another mental disorder
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5™); 2013.
DSM-5, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition.
18
DSM-5: Symptoms of Inattention
Lack of attention to details/careless errors
Difficulty sustaining attention
Does not seem to listen
Does not follow through on instructions
Difficulty organizing tasks and activities
Avoids sustained mental efforts
Loses and misplaces objects
Easily distracted
Forgetful in daily activities
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5™);2013.
19
DSM-5: Symptoms of Hyperactivity-Impulsivity
Fidgetiness (head or feet)/squirms in seat
Leaves seat frequently
Running about/feeling restless
Excessively loud or noisy
Always “on the go”
Talks excessively
Blurts out answers
Difficulty waiting his/her turn
Tends to act without thinking
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5™);2013.
20
Relative Frequency of ADHD Symptoms in Adults
Wilens TE, et al. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70(11):1557-62.
Difficu
ltyp
laying q
uie
tly
Difficu
lty rem
ainin
g seate
d
Ru
ns/clim
bs e
xcessive
ly
Talks exce
ssively
Drive
n b
y a mo
tor
Difficu
lty waitin
g turn
Fidge
ts
Inte
rrup
tso
r intru
de
s
Blu
rts ou
t answ
ers
Care
less/slo
pp
y
Lose
s thin
gs
Forge
tful in
daily activitie
s
Do
esn
’t listen
Difficu
lty organ
izing tasks/activitie
s
Difficu
lty follo
win
g instru
ction
s
Difficu
lty with
sustain
ed
me
ntal e
ffort
Difficu
lty sustain
ing atte
ntio
n
Easily distracte
d
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
Pe
rce
nt
of
Sub
ject
s
Hyperactive/ImpulsiveSymptoms
InattentiveSymptoms
N = 107
21
After ruling out other conditions, you diagnose the patient with ADHD.
▪ Do you have enough information to classify this patient’s ADHD?
– Importance of acquiring a full clinical history
– Corroborating with a third party
▪ What further questions would you pose?
▪ How can classification inform management goals and treatment for adults with ADHD?
Case Evaluation 1: Discussion
22
DSM-5: ADHD Subtypes
CombinedPredominantly
inattentive
Predominantly hyperactive-
impulsive
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5™);2013.
23
DSM-5: ADHD Severity
▪ Mild
– Few symptoms beyond the required number for diagnosis
– Minor impairment in social, school, or work settings
▪ Moderate
– Symptoms or functional impairment between “mild” and “severe”
▪ Severe
– Many symptoms beyond the required number for diagnosis
– Several symptoms are particularly severe
– Marked impairment in social, school, or work settings
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5™);2013.
24
▪ What type of validated tools are available to aid in your evaluation? Which would you choose to employ?
– WHO Screener: brief, free resource, easily completed in the waiting room, and can be used to guide patient interview
Case Evaluation 1: Discussion
25
ADHD Rating Scales
ACDS ADHD Clinical Diagnostic Scale for Adults
ASRS Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale
BADDS Brown Attention-Deficit Disorder Symptom Assessment Scale for Adults
ADHD-RS-IV ADHD Rating Scale IV with Adult Prompts
BCS Barkley Current Symptom Scale
CSS Current Symptom Scale
WRAADDS Wender-Reimherr Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale
CAARS-S-S Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales Short Version Self-Report
26
WHO Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale Screener
Check the box that best described how you have felt and conducted yourself over the past 6 months. Please give the completed questionnaire to your health care professional during your next appointment to discuss the results.1. How often do you have trouble wrapping up the final details of a
project once the challenging parts have been done?2. How often do you have difficult getting things in order when you
have to do a task that requires organization?3. How often do you have problems remembering appointments or
obligations?4. When you have a task that requires a lot of thought, how often
do you avoid or delay getting started?5. How often do you fidget or squirm with your hands or feet when
you have to sit down for a long time?6. How often do you feel overly active and compelled to do things,
as if you were driven by a motor?
Add the number of checkmarks that appear in the darkly shaded areas. Four or more checkmarks indicate that your symptoms may be consistent with adult ADHD. It may be beneficial for you to talk with your health care provider about an evaluation.
Source: “Adult ADHD SELF-REPORT SCALE – V1.1 (ASRS-V1.1) SCREENER,” FROM WHO COMPOSITE INTERNATIONAL DIAGNOSTIC INTERVIEW, © WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION.
Bilkey T, et al. Scientific American Mind. 2014;25:64-69.
Nev
er
Rar
ely
Som
etim
es
Oft
en
Ve
ry O
fte
n
27
Treatment Strategies
28
You diagnose the patient as having ADHD (combined presentation and moderate severity).
▪ What is your initial treatment approach?
▪ How do you go about choosing a first-line therapy for a newly diagnosed patient such as this one?
Case Evaluation 1: Discussion
29
Approaches to the Treatment of ADHD in Adults
*Form of psychosocial therapy using cognitive-behavioral principles
Weisler RH and Childress AC. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2011;13(6). pii: PCC.
Nonpharmacologic
• Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)
• Metacognitive therapy• Dialectical behavioral
therapy (DBT)-based psychotherapy
Pharmacologic
• Psychostimulants• Nonstimulants
30
FDA-Approved Pharmacologic Treatments
Class Agents Mechanism of Action
Psychostimulants
• Methylphenidate
• Dexmethylphenidate
• Mixed amphetamine salts
• Lisdexamfetamine
• Increase availability of synaptic dopamine
Nonstimulant• Atomoxetine • Specifically inhibits
norepinephrine reuptake
FDA, US Food and Drug Administration.
31
Considerations for Choice of Pharmacotherapy
▪ Stimulant vs nonstimulant
– Risk for abuse/misuse
▪ Short-acting* vs long-acting
– Required duration of symptom control
– Patient preference
– Risk for nonadherence
– Risk for abuse/misuse
*Short-acting stimulants are not currently approved for adult ADHD
32
Osmotic-Release Oral System (OROS) Methylphenidate
AISRS, Adult ADHD Investigator System Symptom Report Scale; IR, immediate release; MPH, methylphenidate; TID, 3 times per day.Spencer et al. J Atten Disord. 2011;15(4):286-294.
Me
an A
ISR
SSc
ore
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Week
24
20
16
12
8
4
0
IR-MPH (TID)
OROS-MPH
33
Lisdexamfetamine Treatment Improves Executive Function Among Adults with ADHD
Me
an (
SD)
BR
IEF-
A G
EC T
-Sco
re
Lisdexamfetamine PlaceboDimesylate
≥100
90
80
70
60
50
40
≤30
Means at Baseline and End Point* Change From Baseline
Baseline Week 10/end point/early termination
Ch
ange
Fro
m B
ase
line
,LS
Me
an (
SE)
BR
IEF-
A G
EC T
-Sco
re
Lisdexamfetamine PlaceboDimesylate
0
–10
–20
–30†
Mean (SD) self-reported BRIEF-A GEC T-score at baseline and week 10/end point/early termination, and Change from baseline LS mean (SE) self-reported BRIEF-A GEC T-score at week 10/end point/early termination.*Shaded area represents range of T-scores considered to represent clinically significant impairments.†P < .0001.GEC, Global Executive Composite; LS, least squares; SD, standard deviation; SE, standard error.
Adler et al. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013;74(7):694-702.
34
Safety and Tolerability of Lisdexamfetamine
Adverse Event* LDX (n=79) N (%) PBO (n=80) N (%)
Any event 62 (78.5) 47 (58.8)
Decreased appetite 26 (32.9) 5 (6.3)
Dry mouth 25 (31.6) 6 (7.5)
Headache 20 (25.3) 2 (2.5)
Feeling jittery 10 (12.7) 0 (0.0)
Insomnia 10 (12.7) 3 (3.8)
Initial insomnia 8 (10.1) 5 (6.3)
Irritability 8 (10.1) 3 (3.8)
Weight decreased 8 (10.1) 0 (0.0)
Diarrhea 6 (7.6) 2 (2.5)
Fatigue 6 (7.6) 3 (3.8)
Hyperhidrosis 5 (6.3) 0 (0.0)
Upper respiratory tract infection 5 (6.3) 1 (1.3)
Anorexia 4 (5.1) 0 (0.0)
Heart rate increased 4 (5.1) 2 (2.5)
Libido decreased 4 (5.1) 0 (0.0)
Nasopharyngitis 4 (5.1) 4 (5.0)
Nausea 2 (2.5) 5 (6.3)
*Preferred Terminology, Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities.LDX, lisdexamfetamine dimesilate; PBO, placebo
Adler et al. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013;74(7):694-702.
35
Extended-Release Mixed Amphetamine Salts
Weisler R, et al. CNS Drugs. 2017;31:685–697.
AD
HD
-RS-
AP
To
tal S
core
, Me
an ±
SD
Baseline 1 2 3 4Treatment Week
50
40
30
20
10
0
Placebo (n=86)12.5 mg/day SHP465 MAS (n=89)37.5 mg/day SHP465 MAS (n=88)
CG
I-I S
core
, Me
an ±
SD
1 2 3 4Treatment Week
5
4
3
2
1
0
*
* †
†
Placebo (n=86)12.5 mg/day SHP465 MAS (n=89)37.5 mg/day SHP465 MAS (n=88)
ADHD-RS-AP, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale with Adult Prompts; CGI-I, Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement; MAS, mixed amphetamine salts; MMRM, mixed-effects model for repeated measures.
*P < .001;†P < .001
36
Atomoxetine Treatment Is Associated with Improved Executive Function in Young Adults with ADHD
*N includes all randomized patients who also had a BRIEF-A baseline score and a postbaseline score at Visit 4 (Week 5) and/or Visit 6 (Week 12), as applicable.
Adler LA, et al. PLoS One. 2014; 9(8):e104175.
Week Treatment N* LS Mean Change ± SE Difference P Value 95% CI
5
Atomoxetine 157 –18.02 ± 1.69 –7.11 .002 –11.49 to –2.73
Placebo 166 –10.91 ± 1.67
12
Atomoxetine 115 –22.53 ± 2.07 –7.78 .005 –13.19 to –2.36
Placebo 128 –14.75 ± 2.00
BRIEF-A Mean Change from Baseline to Postbaseline Visitors for All Randomized Patients –Repeated Measures Analysis for Global Executive Composite Scores
37
Increased Response to Atomoxetine Over 6 Months of Treatment
Wietecha et al. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2016;22:546–557.
CAARS AISRS
LS M
ean
Sco
re C
han
ge
0 1 2 4 6 to 8 10 to 12 14 to 16 20 to 22 24 to 26Weeks
0
–5
–10
–15
–20
PLAATX
*
*
† † † † †† LS
Me
an S
core
Ch
ange
0 1 2 4 6 to 8 10 to 12 14 to 16 20 to 22 24 to 26Weeks
0
–5
–10
–15
–20
†
*
*
PLAATX
† † ††
*(A) P ≤ .006 atomoxetine vs placebo; (B) P ≤ .012 atomoxetine vs placebo. †P < .0001 atomoxetine vs placebo. ATX, atomoxetine; PLA, placebo.
38
Atomoxetine Treatment: Onset and Resolution of AEs
AEs, adverse events.
Upadhyaya et al. 2016. Postgrad Med. 2016;127:677-685.
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3
Pe
rce
nta
ge o
f P
atie
nts
wit
h E
ven
t (%
)
Month of Onset
Nausea
Headache
Dry mouth
Decreased appetite
Fatigue
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400Days to Event Resolution
Pe
rce
nta
ge o
f U
nre
solv
ed
Eve
nts
(%
) 100
80
60
40
20
0
Nausea
Headache
Dry mouth
Decreased appetite
Fatigue
39
▪ Would you also recommend nonpharmacologic intervention for the patient? If so, what type?
▪ How strong is the evidence in support of nonpharmacologic therapies for the treatment of ADHD?
Case Evaluation 1: Discussion
40
Effect of CBT on ADHD Symptoms and Global Function
ADHD (BCS/CSS)
GLOBAL FUNCTION (CGI)
CBT, cognitive behavior therapy.
Jensen CM, et al. Atten Defic Hyperact Disord. 2016;8(1):3-11.
Experimental Control Std. Mean Difference Std. Mean Difference
Study or Subgroup Mean SD Total Mean SD Total Weight IV, Random, 95% CI IV, Random, 95% CI
Emilsson 2011 15.7 8.7 15 25 8.5 17 50.1% -1.05 (-1.80, -0.31)
Safren 2005 14.8 8.7 16 23.9 9.9 15 49.9% -0.95 (-1.70, -0.20)
Total (95% CI) 31 32 100.0% -1.00 (-1.53, -0.48)
Heterogeneity: Tau2 = 0.00; CHI2 = 0.04; df = 1 (P = .85); I2 = 0%
Test for overall effect: Z = 3.72 (P = .0002)
-4 -2 0 2 4
Favors (experimental) Favors (control)
Experimental Control Std. Mean Difference Std. Mean Difference
Study or Subgroup Mean SD Total Mean SD Total Weight IV, Random, 95% CI IV, Random, 95% CI
Emilsson 2011 3 0.8 8 4.1 0.9 13 36.5% -1.22 (-2.19, -0.25)
Safren 2005 3.3 0.8 16 4.1 1.1 15 63.5% -0.81 (-1.55, -0.08)
Total (95% CI) 24 28 100.0% -0.96 (-1.55, -0.38)
Heterogeneity: Tau2 = 0.00; CHI2 = 0.04; df = 1 (P = .97); I2 = 0%
Test for overall effect: Z = 3.02 (P = .002)
-4 -2 0 2 4
Favors (experimental) Favors (control)
41
Effect of CBT vs Standard Treatment on Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety
DEPRESSION
ANXIETY
Experimental Control Std. Mean Difference Std. Mean Difference
Study or Subgroup Mean SD Total Mean SD Total Weight IV, Random, 95% CI IV, Random, 95% CI
Emilsson 2011 5 5.8 15 15.4 9.3 17 47.4% -1.29 (-2.06, -0.52)
Safren 2005 7.6 4.3 16 12.4 7.7 15 52.6% -0.76 (-1.49, -0.02)
Total (95% CI) 31 32 100.0% -1.01 (-1.54, -0.48)
Heterogeneity: Tau2 = 0.00; CHI2 = 0.96; df = 1 (P = .33); I2 = 0%
Test for overall effect: Z = 3.72 (P = .0002)
-4 -2 0 2 4
Favors (experimental) Favors (control)
Experimental Control Std. Mean Difference Std. Mean Difference
Study or Subgroup Mean SD Total Mean SD Total Weight IV, Random, 95% CI IV, Random, 95% CI
Safren 2005 3.7 3.5 16 7.2 4.9 15 49.2% -0.81 (-1.54, -0.07)
SaEmilsson 2011 7.3 5.9 15 12.8 7.5 17 50.8% -0.79 (-1.51, -0.06)
Total (95% CI) 31 32 100.0% -0.80 (-1.31, -0.28)
Heterogeneity: Tau2 = 0.00; CHI2 = 0.04; df = 1 (P = .97); I2 = 0%
Test for overall effect: Z = 3.02 (P = .002)
-4 -2 0 2 4
Favors (experimental) Favors (control)
Jensen CM, et al. Atten Defic Hyperact Disord. 2016;8(1):3-11.
42
Psychiatric Comorbidities of ADHD
43
▪ Presents to his PCP for symptoms of depression
▪ History of mild depression during his early 20s with excessive alcohol consumption (not currently an issue)
▪ Diagnosed at the age of 8 with ADHD and treated with methylphenidate until the age of 14
▪ Reports being recently laid off from his job as a research associate during a company-wide reorganization. Adds that his last 2 performance reviews were mediocre and “would have been let go soon anyway.”
▪ Further questioning reveals employer feedback suggesting a lack of ability to carefully follow directions and track multiple ongoing projects, as required for his position
Case Evaluation #2: 32-Year-Old Male
PCP, primary care physician.
44
▪ What additional questions would you ask the patient to further assess the nature of his symptoms?
▪ How do you discern whether the patient’s symptoms and behavioral patterns are primarily due to ADHD or to depression?
– Patient interview
– Third party account
– Is trouble with concentration worse than usual?
▪ What are your management goals for this patient?
▪ Would you refer this patient to a psychiatrist?
Case Evaluation #2: Discussion
45
Comorbidities of ADHD in Adults
*P ≤ .05; **P ≤ .0001
Hodgkins P et al. Primary Care Companion to CNS Disorders. 2011;13(2):PCC.
0.9
2.3 2.11.6
7.1
0.9
4.1
0.20.9
21.5
0.3
14.0
3.8
7.5
0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0
1.2 1.5
0.30.6
2.8
1.5 1.4
7.3
0.9
2.7
0.10.6
15.7
0.1
3.2
0.6
2.2
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.1
0
5
10
15
20
25
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f P
atie
nts
(%
)
ADHD (n = 31,752)
Non-ADHD (n = 95,256)
**** ** *
**
***
**
**
**
**
**
** * ** **** **
**
Physical Comorbidities Psychiatric Comorbidities
46
Risk for Psychiatric Comorbidities by ADHD Presentation Subtype
5.6
3.0
7.7
4.7
3.3
2.2
1.5
3.6
2.11.8
6.0
3.5
7.2
3.8
2.5
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
GeneralizedAnxiety Disorder
MajorDepression
Bipolar EffectiveDisorder
ObsessiveCompulsive
AlcoholDependence
Od
ds
Rat
io
Combined
Hyperactive-impulsive
Inattentive
Adults with ADHD, n = 17,899
Friedrichs B, et al. J Atten Disord. 2012;16:13-22.
47
Impact of Adjunctive Atomoxetine Therapy in Adults with ADHD and Anxiety
BP, blood pressure; HAM-A, Hamilton Anxiety Scale.Gabriel et al. Atten Defic Hyperact Disord. 2011;3(4):319-326.
Total HAM-A 6.6 <.001
Cognitive anxiety subscale 6.7 <.001
Somatic anxiety subscale 4.8 <.001
Total Sheehan’s Disability Scale 6.3 <.001
Occupational disability 4.6 <.001
Social disability 5.6 <.001
Family and home responsibilities 4.9 <.001
Weight 1.3 <.20
Systolic BP 1.1 <.30
Diastolic BP -.10 <.92
Pulse -1.2 <.25
48
Atomoxetine in Adults with ADHD and Alcohol Use Disorder
Wilens et al. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;96(1-2):145-154.
Atomoxetine ADHD/SUD Study Group
Cu
mu
lati
ve H
eav
y D
rin
kin
g D
ays
0 20 40 60 80 100Follow-up Time (days)
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
AtomoxetinePlacebo
Event ratio = 0.737P value = .0230
49
Considerations for Optimizing ADHD Management
50
Patient Education
▪ Manage therapeutic expectations
▪ Provide information about how medications work (eg, relationship between timing of release and therapeutic effects)
▪ Emphasize the importance of adherence to therapy
▪ Address patient concerns regarding development of tolerance and long-term safety
▪ Ensure patient awareness of the potential for misuse
51
Medication Adherence
▪ Mean adherence was 86.8% (SD = 14.5%) to ADHD medications in the 2 weeks prior to assessment.
▪ Level of education was not associated with adherence.
▪ Self-reported adherence to ADHD medications was negatively associated with severity of ADHD symptoms.
Adherence Level % of Patients
<80% 22%
<90% 44%
100% 26%
Safren et al. J Atten Disord. 2007.10(3):257-260.
52
Summary
▪ ADHD is a disorder that affects adults as well as children, and has been found to have pervasive negative impact across multiple life domains
▪ Application of DSM-5 criteria and knowledge of characteristics closely associated with adult ADHD can facilitate diagnosis, which is complicated by heterogeneous clinical presentation and the frequent presence of psychiatric comorbidities
▪ Several pharmacotherapies have been shown to be effective for treating adult ADHD, especially when combined with disorder-oriented psychotherapy to address residual symptoms
▪ To optimize disease management, clinicians should tailor treatment based on behavioral and physiological patient characteristics, as well as provide education on the nature of ADHD and the importance of treatment adherence
53
Questions and Answers
54
Thank You!