IMPROVED RESPONDENT EXPERIENCE AND QUALITY THROUGH FEEDBACK Anneli Ström, Statistics Sweden.

13
IMPROVED RESPONDENT EXPERIENCE AND QUALITY THROUGH FEEDBACK Anneli Ström, Statistics Sweden

Transcript of IMPROVED RESPONDENT EXPERIENCE AND QUALITY THROUGH FEEDBACK Anneli Ström, Statistics Sweden.

Page 1: IMPROVED RESPONDENT EXPERIENCE AND QUALITY THROUGH FEEDBACK Anneli Ström, Statistics Sweden.

IMPROVED RESPONDENT EXPERIENCE AND QUALITY THROUGH FEEDBACK

Anneli Ström, Statistics Sweden

Page 2: IMPROVED RESPONDENT EXPERIENCE AND QUALITY THROUGH FEEDBACK Anneli Ström, Statistics Sweden.

2

Content

• Purpose

• Technichal solution

• Information in the feedback report

• Who will recieve the report?

• Evaluation

• The feedback report in the future

Page 3: IMPROVED RESPONDENT EXPERIENCE AND QUALITY THROUGH FEEDBACK Anneli Ström, Statistics Sweden.

3

Feedback

• Motivate the respondents

- Outcome of the survey

- Comparision with other surveys

• Feedback is recieved in a positive way

Page 4: IMPROVED RESPONDENT EXPERIENCE AND QUALITY THROUGH FEEDBACK Anneli Ström, Statistics Sweden.

4

Purpose of our feedback report

• To motivate the respondents.

• To reduce non-responses and shorten production time.

• To increase data quality and the number of re-contacts.

Page 5: IMPROVED RESPONDENT EXPERIENCE AND QUALITY THROUGH FEEDBACK Anneli Ström, Statistics Sweden.

5

Technical solution

• Uses the same technical solution as the web based collection.

• Tables with aggregated data from the different surveys.

• Updated daily

Page 6: IMPROVED RESPONDENT EXPERIENCE AND QUALITY THROUGH FEEDBACK Anneli Ström, Statistics Sweden.

6

Information in the feedback report

Page 7: IMPROVED RESPONDENT EXPERIENCE AND QUALITY THROUGH FEEDBACK Anneli Ström, Statistics Sweden.

7

Page 8: IMPROVED RESPONDENT EXPERIENCE AND QUALITY THROUGH FEEDBACK Anneli Ström, Statistics Sweden.

8

Who will recieve the report?

Page 9: IMPROVED RESPONDENT EXPERIENCE AND QUALITY THROUGH FEEDBACK Anneli Ström, Statistics Sweden.

9

Evaluation

• 290 municipalities

• 87 officials from 79 different municipalities answered the form.

• 70 had looked at the report and thought it was helpful for the reporting

• 24 contributed with suggestions for improvement

• 6 had not looked at the feedback report

Page 10: IMPROVED RESPONDENT EXPERIENCE AND QUALITY THROUGH FEEDBACK Anneli Ström, Statistics Sweden.

10

Evaluation

• Highly appreciated

• An easy way to check the vadility

• Good overview

• Found errors to correct

• Positive that it arrived shortly after they reported the data

Page 11: IMPROVED RESPONDENT EXPERIENCE AND QUALITY THROUGH FEEDBACK Anneli Ström, Statistics Sweden.

11

Evaluation

• More detailed information is desired

• More measures for quality controls

• Put the data in relation to a reference point

Page 12: IMPROVED RESPONDENT EXPERIENCE AND QUALITY THROUGH FEEDBACK Anneli Ström, Statistics Sweden.

12

The feedback report in the future

• Development to suit the needs.

• Improve and expand the existing feedback report.

• Make it available for non-governmental schools.

• Add more calculations and comparisions.

• Evaluate whether the method can be used more genrerally in both business and public sector.

Page 13: IMPROVED RESPONDENT EXPERIENCE AND QUALITY THROUGH FEEDBACK Anneli Ström, Statistics Sweden.

Thank you!

[email protected]