Improve Product Performance Through Annual Review

36
Improve Product Performance Through Annual Review Barbara Copeland Amway Corporation

Transcript of Improve Product Performance Through Annual Review

Improve Product Performance Through

Annual Review

Barbara CopelandAmway Corporation

Learning ObjectivesBe able to:• Perform an Annual Product Review• Modify it for any industry• Determine areas for improvement• Use to measure progress

Understanding Current Status• Global impact of the drug industry• Rising costs• Health and safety of consumers• Protect investments • Maximize profits

FDA Regulatory EnvironmentFDA 21 CFR 211.180(e) states that:

“Written records required by this part shall be maintained so that data therein can be used for evaluating, at least annually, the quality standards of each drug product to determine the need for changes …”

FDA Regulatory Environment

Let’s see that again….

FDA Regulatory Environment

“Written records required by this part shall be maintained so that data therein can be used for evaluating, at least annually, the quality standards of each drug product to determine the need for changes …”

FDA Regulatory Environment

“Written records required by this part shall be maintained so that data therein can be used for evaluating, at least annually, the quality standards of each drug product to determine the need for changes …”

FDA Regulatory Environment

“Written records required by this part shall be maintained so that data therein can be used for evaluating, at least annually, the quality standards of each drug product to determine the need for changes …”

FDA Regulatory Environment

“Written records required by this part shall be maintained so that data therein can be used for evaluating, at least annually, the quality standards of each drug product to determine the need for changes …”

Annual Drug Product Review

• Understand current status• Identify areas for improvement• Don’t just check the box!

Annual Drug Product ReviewOverview:• Production statistics• Data analysis and compliance• Non-conformance history• Rework history• Complaint analysis• Change Control

Scope of the Review• Single product or product family• Size• Type of container• Manufacturing site

Production Statistics• Number of lots produced• Number of lots rejected• Number of non-conformances• Number of recalls

Data Analysis• Finished product• Raw Materials• Components• Process data

Data Analysis• Lab analysis

–Chemical–Physical–Microbiological

• In-process testing–Weights–Torques–Anything that is measured

Time Series Plot

Process Capability

0.540.520.500.480.46

LSL USLLSL 0.45Target *USL 0.55Sample Mean 0.499701Sample N 134StDev (Within) 0.00599904StDev (O v erall) 0.00812869

Process DataC p 2.78C PL 2.76C PU 2.79C pk 2.76

Pp 2.05PPL 2.04PPU 2.06Ppk 2.04C pm *

O v erall C apability

Potential (Within) C apability

% < LSL 0.00% > USL 0.00% Total 0.00

O bserv ed Performance% < LSL 0.00% > USL 0.00% Total 0.00

Exp. Within Performance% < LSL 0.00% > USL 0.00% Total 0.00

Exp. O v erall Performance

Process Capability of Active Ingredient

Time Series Plot

Histogram

4.44.34.24.14.03.9

18

16

14

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

pH

Freq

uen

cy

USLLSLHistogram of pH

Raw Material Analysis

37332925211713951

100.0

99.5

99.0

98.5

Observation

Indi

vidu

al V

alu

e

LSL

USLAssay of Raw Material

In-process Analysis• Weights• Torques• Pressures• Temperatures• Anything that is measured

Non-conformance History• Out-of-specification incidences• Repeated incidences• Root Cause Analysis

History of Actions Taken• Corrective Actions• Preventive Actions• Responsibility and Timing• Follow up• Effectiveness checks• Tracking

Rework – The Hidden Factory• Review rework history• Trends• Repeated issues• Root cause detemined• The Hidden Factory!

Stability Data

Complaint Analysis• Number by type of complaint• Pareto chart to determine trends

YTD 132 69 22 17 10Percent 52.8 27.6 8.8 6.8 4.0Cum % 52.8 80.4 89.2 96.0 100.0

C1 OtherColorAdverse EventCodingSeal

250

200

150

100

50

0

100

80

60

40

20

0

YTD

Per

cen

t

Pareto Chart of Complaints

Change Control• Review the change control history• Number processed• Types of changes• Proactive or reactive?

Non-drug products• Determine critical metrics• Examples:

–Reliability data–Line Fall-out–Mean time to failure–Mean time to repair

Problem Solving• “Minor” issue repeats • Review reveals frequency• Related customer complaints

= Escalated priority!

Problem Solving• Lotion with lumps • Emulsion formation problem• Mix history RPM • Raw material viscosity history • Root cause = Combination

Draw Conclusions• The state of the product• The state of the process• The need for change• Where to focus resources!

Next Year…• Compare to the previous review• Has improvement been made?• Take it all to the next level!

Learning ObjectivesBe able to:• Perform an Annual Product Review• Modify it for any industry• Determine areas for improvement• Use to measure progress

QUESTIONS?

Barbara [email protected]

616-787-1375