Improve - IV: Getting from Idea to Implementation Tactical Planning Is it Working? How Soon will You...
-
Upload
mackenzie-strawder -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Improve - IV: Getting from Idea to Implementation Tactical Planning Is it Working? How Soon will You...
Improve - IV: Getting from Idea to
Implementation
Tactical Planning
Is it Working? How Soon will You Know?
Control Planning
Northeast Center for Risk Management Education
Northeast Center for Risk Management Education
This module originated by:John Conway – PRO-DAIRY
123 Lake St. Cooperstown, NY 13326
Learning Objectives:Develop a robust implementation plan. Co-create a plan to find discretionary time needed to make it happen through priority setting/time management.
Match the implementation plan with a control plan that answers the “is it working” question early on
Approximate Time Needed:30 minutes
AV Equipment Needed:LCD Projector and screen
Laptop Computer running MS PowerPoint
Flip chart and pens
Overhead projector and pens
Tactical Planning Module
Prelude
• This module may be a stand alone or at a point designated (slide 8), switch over to Time Management. Then come back and re-start with slide 10.
• It just depends on how you structure the sessions in the overall workshop.
Presenter: Title Slide
• Quickly introduce yourself
• This module helps you evaluate your goals and put them into action
Improve - IV: Getting from Idea to Implementation
Tactical Planning
Is it Working? How Soon will You Know?
Control Planning
John Conway – [email protected]
607-547-2536
Northeast Center for Risk Management Education
Northeast Center for Risk Management Education
Presenter: Implementation Plan
The Implementation Plan worksheet is in a booklet format. The cover allows you to identify the plan based on a project name, date and who is involved.
Implementation Plan for ____________________Project
Date Formulated: ________________
Achieving the goals of a planned project requires a sequence of actions (tactics). Assuring the actions taken are actually leading to the goal requires proof (control points) along the way.
This project plan lays side-by-side tactical and control components to help meet your SMART* goal. While most control points may pertain to the goal that has been set, you may find important tactics also demanding control. Additions to the initial plan are commonplace, leading to a growing document that seconds as a communications tool to keep everyone on track.
*Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic and Timed
People Involved: ___________________________________________________
I ncluding:
Action Oriented
Tactical Components
AN
D
Proof Oriented
Control Components
Presenter: Implementation Plan
Inside left is the tactical plan. The grid is set up to help evolve all aspects of getting a project going. Using it helps trigger sub sequential steps which are overlooked when working from the “seat of the pants”.
Like most modern businesses dairies tend to consume all of everyone’s workday with activities. We added the “What’s Got to Give to Make this Happen” column so worthy projects get traction. Unless some time is prioritized, the project may be “on paper only”.
You can either switch from this presentation to the “Priority Setting/Time Management” module at this point (fits the context) or continue with this.*
If you have been working the full group by using flipchart and/or acetate worksheets and an overhead projector, using a clean tactical plan sheet should work well. Take the group generated “winning” idea and run through as many tactics as you can collectively think of to give the project wheels. Asterisk the ones that probably only came up after writing down a prior tactic.
Implementation Plan for _______________________ ProjectTactical Plan
What task or activityis to be done?
Who is Responsible?
How and/or where should the task be done?
When to perform task or activity (deadline, frequency,
under what conditions?)
whendone
What’s “got to give” for this to happen?
Presenter: Control Plan
• Inside right is the control plan. It is complementary to the tactical plan and is best viewed like this on an apposed page. Again, grid elements are designed to be thorough and to help beg the next line. Since timing can be a critical factor, an early indicator which is not definitive proof the plan is working may be in there. For example, you may monitor 1st test butterfat percent as a proxy for sub-clinical ketosis when the plan is to help minimize fresh cow problems. Later you may have more definitive data, but in the short run the trend may be positive.
• If you have been working the full group by using flipchart and/or acetate worksheets and an overhead projector, using a clean control plan sheet should work well. Take the group generated tactical plan and marry a control plan to it. Again, note the line items which emerged from seeing other line items on paper.
Implementation Plan for _______________________ ProjectControl Plan
What Critical ControlPoints* will be monitored?
Monitoring procedureincluding who’s responsible?
Monitoringtime interval?
Standard to meet with upper/lower limits?
If standards not met,who’s responsible to reformulate plan?
*What are the earliest measurable indicators that either individualdual tactics or the goal itself will be realized?
…Back to Your Farm or Case Farm one last time
Using your “winning” improvement in the decision grid, take it for a spin through the tactical and control plan template. Naturally you are making most of this up. But stick with it for a few lines so you can see how one tactic leads to another, and that it’s definitely worth getting on paper!
Likewise with control… it’s not always as easy as it would seem to answer “is it working at least as well as expected” early on.
Implementation Plan for _______________________ ProjectTactical Plan
What task or activityis to be done?
Who is Responsible?
How and/or where should the task be done?
When to perform task or activity (deadline, frequency,
under what conditions?)
whendone
What’s “got to give” for this to happen?
Implementation Plan for _______________________ ProjectControl Plan
What Critical ControlPoints* will be monitored?
Monitoring procedureincluding who’s responsible?
Monitoringtime interval?
Standard to meet with upper/lower limits?
If standards not met,who’s responsible to reformulate plan?
*What are the earliest measurable indicators that either individual tactics or the goal itself will be realized?
Presenter: Tactical Plan Example
A filled out tactical plan for building and installing swivel-up isolation boxes (“winner” from decision grid). Can be used as an example if time is short.
I mplementation Plan f or ______________________Tactical
Components
What task or activityis to be done?
Who is Responsible?
How and/ or where shouldthe task be done?
When to perf orm task or activity(deadline, f requency, under what conditions?)
Flip-up I solation Boxes
Determine number needed at peak demand
J ohn
I D known “off enders”, review projected dry periods, include heif ers
March 1
Measure up, try to build template, look at hardware
I n-barn, use last of hutch plywood. Test rings as swivels, chain & snap.
J ohn
I n-barn, use last of hutch plywood. Test rings as swivels, chain & snap.
March 8
Make lumber, f astener, hardware list. Get prices
J ohn
Offi ce. Do the math. Try all three lumberyards with f ree delivery
March 10
Build ‘em!Bruce &J ohn
I n shop. Test one full cut out before going to “assembly line”
Rest of March. Shoot f or 2 hours per day (barring catastrophe). Mon. Fri.
Place order J eanineOffi ce – give very specific directions on where to land it!!
March 11
I nstall Bruce &J ohn
I n barn. Test speed of swing up, ease of snap & unsnap.
No later than April 5th.
I nstall anti-headbonking device f or tall guys
ScabheadBruce!
I n barn. Foam or f elt bumpers, glue or double sided tape
ASAP
(Later )
Presenter: Control Plan Example
A filled out control plan to complement the “isolation box” tactical plan. Can be used as an example if time is short.
_______________________ ProjectControl Components
What Critical ControlPoints will be monitored?
Monitoring procedureincluding who’s responsible?
Monitoringtime interval?
Standard to meet with upper/ lower limits?
I f standards not met,who’s responsible to reformulate plan?
Nailing the “whens” in tactical plan?
J ohn – check in on task completion, March 10 & 25
Re-evaluate if off more than 2 days
J ohn
Make “before”performance measures
J ohn – use f resh cow scoring system;past 4 months
Becomes the standard to beat
J ohn
All test days before install
Observe estimated DMI –Transition cows
J ohn – scale what’s going in & swept away
Lower limit –21 lbs. DM if over 1350 lbs.
J ohn2 days ahead of calc. f resh
Observe estimated DMI –Transition cows
J ohn – same as “before”. “I n-betweens” separate
Must % of cows score 1 by 25%
J ohnContinue indefi nitely
Make “af ter”performance measures
Trans.Cows
Trans.Cows
Trans.Cows
MilkCows
Make “before”performance measures
MUNs, BF, Milk, lameness scores onall “off enders”
1x. Do before install
Becomes the standard to beat
J ohn
MilkCows
Make “af ter”performance measures
MUNs, BF, Milk, lameness scores onall “off enders”
Continue indefi nitely
Must meet or exceed rest of herd average
J ohn
Flip-up I solation Boxes