Examining, implementing and testing of RFC2557 (MHTML) Status of
Implementing the Language Proficiency Requirements Status ......28 March 2013 Page 1 Implementing...
Transcript of Implementing the Language Proficiency Requirements Status ......28 March 2013 Page 1 Implementing...
28 March 2013 Page 1
Implementing the
Language Proficiency
Requirements – Status
Report
25 March 2013
28 March 2013 Page 2
Outline
• What does implementation mean?
• How have we assessed the level of implementation over time?
• Where we stand today
28 March 2013 Page 3
What does LPR implementation mean
• LPRs are included in national regulations
• Licenses/personnel records are endorsed based on holders demonstrating their ability to speak and understand the language used in RT communication
• Levels 4 and 5 are re-evaluated on a regular basis
28 March 2013 Page 4
The 2005 Survey
• 38 questions:
– demographic information, regulations, testing for English language proficiency, training for English language proficiency, ICAO guidance and international cooperation.
• 36 States and 2 international organizations
• The results affected by responses from States where English is a first language.
28 March 2013 Page 5
ANC Decision
• Survey results inconclusive
• No justification to change the applicability date of 5 March 2008
28 March 2013 Page 6
Survey of 27 October 2006 SL AN 12/44-06/90
• Applicability date of 5 March 2008 maintained
• States reminded to take the necessary steps to implement the LPR
• States were asked:
– Will all pilots, controllers and aeronautical station operators involved in international operations be able to speak and understand English in accordance with ICAO Operational Level 4 by 5 March 2008?
28 March 2013 Page 7
October 2006 survey results
• 58 States responded – 31 %
• 74 % - ATPL and/or CPL will be proficient by 5 March 2008
• 65% - Controllers will be proficient by 5 March 2008
• Most listed challenges: – testing and training; lack of test design and
training expertise, availability of tests and courses and difficulty in selecting adequate providers and costs.
28 March 2013 Page 8
Resolution A36-11
• States not compliant by 5 March 2008 to submit an implementation plan
• October 2007 – creation of FSIX website
– http://legacy.icao.int/fsix/lp.cfm
• State letter AN 12/44.6-08/9
– Reminder to submit implementation plans
• State Letter AN 12/44.6-09/53
– By 1 June 2009:
28 March 2013 Page 9
Resolution A36-11 (Continued)
State Letter AN 12/44.6-09/53 - By 1 June 2009:
– 90 States had submitted a plan
– 19 had updated it for 2009
– 49 had not provided information on compliance
Asked: “Will your State be compliant with the ICAO Language Proficiency Requirements by 5 March 2011?”
– 81 States said “yes”
28 March 2013 Page 10
Assembly Resolution A37-10
• States that were not compliant to send their implementation plans by 5 March 2011
• ICAO to verify plans to ensure completeness
28 March 2013 Page 11
LPR Implementation Today FSIX Website
• http://legacy.icao.int/fsix/lp.cfm
States that are No of States
Compliant 78
Submitted a plan for 2013 1
Submitted a plan for 2012 4
Submitted a plan for 2011 22
Submitted a plan for 2008-2010
59
28 March 2013 Page 12
LPR Implementation Today USOAP Protocol Question 3.651
PQ 3.651 - Has the State promulgated regulations for aviation personnel to demonstrate their ability to speak and understand the language used for radiotelephony communications?
28 March 2013 Page 13
Level of Lack of Effective Implementation for PQ 3.651
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
APAC ESAF EUR/NAT MID NACC SAM WACAF
28 March 2013 Page 14
LPR Implementation Today USOAP Protocol Question 3.653
• PQ 3.653 - Has the State established a plan to implement relevant ICAO provisions to ensure that licence holders would demonstrate their ability to speak and understand the language used for radiotelephony communications at the level required for their licence?
28 March 2013 Page 15
Level of Lack of Effective Implementation for PQ 3.653
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
APAC ESAF EUR/NAT MID NACC SAM WACAF
28 March 2013 Page 16
LPR Implementation Today USOAP Protocol Question 3.655
• PQ 3.655 - Has the State established a system for formally evaluating the ability of aeroplane and helicopter pilots, flight navigators required to use the radiotelephone, air traffic controllers and aeronautical station operators to speak and understand the language used for radiotelephony communications at the level specified in the Appendix to Annex 1?
28 March 2013 Page 17
Level of Lack Effective Implementation for PQ 3.655
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
APAC ESAF EUR/NAT MID NACC SAM WACAF
28 March 2013 Page 18
LPR Implementation Today USOAP Protocol Question 3.657
• PQ 3.657 – Has the State established a system for formally re-evaluating the ability of those aeroplane and helicopter pilots, flight navigators required to use the radiotelephone, air traffic controllers and aeronautical station operators, who demonstrate proficiency below the Expert Level (Level 6), at intervals in accordance with an individual’s demonstrated proficiency level?
28 March 2013 Page 19
Level of Lack of Effective Implementation for PQ 3.657
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
APAC ESAF EUR/NAT MID NACC SAM WACAF
28 March 2013 Page 20
LPR Implementation Today Global Lack of Effective Implementation
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
APAC ESAF EUR/NAT MID NACC SAM WACAF
28 March 2013 Page 21
LPR Implementation Today iStars (Continued)
• Lack of Effective Implementation (LEI) is 34.54%
• FSIX and iStars roughly match
28 March 2013 Page 22
Thank You