Implement Agriculture Qualifications FORM THE AGRICULTURE MATRIX TO THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF...

13
Implement Agriculture Qualifications www.impaqproject.eu FORM THE AGRICULTURE MATRIX TO THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEARNING OUTCOMES APPROACH State of the Art and Perspectives A Note of Presentation of a Work-in-Progress Prof. Francesco Mauro – Università degli Studi “Guglielmo Marconi” Antonino Magistrali – Italia Forma Maria Concetta Bottazzi – Italia Forma Rossella Reggente – Università degli Studi “Guglielmo Marconi” André Huigens – Wellantcollege

Transcript of Implement Agriculture Qualifications FORM THE AGRICULTURE MATRIX TO THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF...

Page 1: Implement Agriculture Qualifications  FORM THE AGRICULTURE MATRIX TO THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEARNING OUTCOMES APPROACH State of.

Implement Agriculture Qualificationswww.impaqproject.eu

FORM THE AGRICULTURE MATRIXTO THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

OF LEARNING OUTCOMESAPPROACH

State of the Art and Perspectives

A Note of Presentation of a Work-in-ProgressProf. Francesco Mauro – Università degli Studi “Guglielmo Marconi”

Antonino Magistrali – Italia Forma

Maria Concetta Bottazzi – Italia Forma

Rossella Reggente – Università degli Studi “Guglielmo Marconi”

André Huigens – Wellantcollege

Page 2: Implement Agriculture Qualifications  FORM THE AGRICULTURE MATRIX TO THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEARNING OUTCOMES APPROACH State of.

AIM

The aim of this note is to offer some information

and preliminary results of WP2 of the project in

order to facilitate the contacts at national and

European level with the stakeholders, first of all

the National Coordination Points, in order to share

the finding emerging from the project, and to

foster in the future the referencing process and to

evidence where further research.

Page 3: Implement Agriculture Qualifications  FORM THE AGRICULTURE MATRIX TO THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEARNING OUTCOMES APPROACH State of.

THE SECTORAL APPROACH

In general, the results confirm the possibility, actually the advisability, to follow a sectoral approach for several reasons:

to support the development of EQS at sectoral level

to involve the various actors

to take into account inter-(intra-) sectoral differences.

In the agriculture field, this choice appears more correct and

necessary due to the extreme difference, differentiation, and

diversity of agriculture (and of agricultural education and

training) in the various countries.

Page 4: Implement Agriculture Qualifications  FORM THE AGRICULTURE MATRIX TO THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEARNING OUTCOMES APPROACH State of.

METHODOLOGY

The analysis carried out by chains (of interest for the various countries)

For now, the attention is concentrated on level 1 to 6 (HE’s levels

treated elsewhere)

To collect learning descriptors for groups of comparison.

To connect qualifications to some kind of

classification system

Learning paths can be formal, non-formal, informal

An enlarged definition of agriculture from traditional

to multifunctional is used

Page 5: Implement Agriculture Qualifications  FORM THE AGRICULTURE MATRIX TO THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEARNING OUTCOMES APPROACH State of.

OPERATIONAL CHOICE

EQF analysis in depth on groups of comparison:

levels 1 & 2 (often a qualification shortage),

level 3 for production process of plant production

macro-chain,

level 4 for entire flower et al. sub-chain,

level 5 for entire wine sub-chain,

level 6 for entire animal production macro-chain.

Page 6: Implement Agriculture Qualifications  FORM THE AGRICULTURE MATRIX TO THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEARNING OUTCOMES APPROACH State of.

PRELIMINARY RESULTS (1/3)

Level 1 & 2

It is confirmed a shortage of qualifications linked to

insufficient or even non-existing organized education in

many countries (with exception of some central-

northern Europe countries).

Page 7: Implement Agriculture Qualifications  FORM THE AGRICULTURE MATRIX TO THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEARNING OUTCOMES APPROACH State of.

PRELIMINARY RESULTS (2/3)

Level 3

(a)The descriptors observed in the qualification are

sufficiently coherent with the learning outcomes but

semantic differences between countries have been

noticed and need to be investigated.

(b)In general, levels of autonomy and responsibility

are considered.

Page 8: Implement Agriculture Qualifications  FORM THE AGRICULTURE MATRIX TO THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEARNING OUTCOMES APPROACH State of.

PRELIMINARY RESULTS (3/3)

Level 4

(a)In some cases, the learning outcomes bestride

the limits of the chain/sub-chain option.

(b)Regional differences within national situations

can be present.

(c)Importance of management and administration

areas.

Level 5

(a)As 3(a)

(b)As 3(b)

Page 9: Implement Agriculture Qualifications  FORM THE AGRICULTURE MATRIX TO THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEARNING OUTCOMES APPROACH State of.

SOME CONCLUSIONS (1/4)

Page 10: Implement Agriculture Qualifications  FORM THE AGRICULTURE MATRIX TO THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEARNING OUTCOMES APPROACH State of.

SOME CONCLUSIONS (2/4)

Page 11: Implement Agriculture Qualifications  FORM THE AGRICULTURE MATRIX TO THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEARNING OUTCOMES APPROACH State of.

SOME CONCLUSIONS (3/4)

Page 12: Implement Agriculture Qualifications  FORM THE AGRICULTURE MATRIX TO THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEARNING OUTCOMES APPROACH State of.

SOME CONCLUSIONS (4/4)

Page 13: Implement Agriculture Qualifications  FORM THE AGRICULTURE MATRIX TO THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEARNING OUTCOMES APPROACH State of.

THANKS FOR THE ATTENTION!

[email protected]

Contacts:

Prof. Francesco Mauro – Università degli Studi “Guglielmo Marconi”[email protected]

Antonino Magistrali – Italia [email protected]

Maria Concetta Bottazzi – Italia [email protected]

André Huigens – [email protected]

Rossella Reggente – Università degli Studi “Guglielmo Marconi” [email protected]