Impact of Deworming and Micronutrient Supplementation on Maternal and Child Nutritional status
description
Transcript of Impact of Deworming and Micronutrient Supplementation on Maternal and Child Nutritional status
1
Impact of Deworming and Micronutrient Supplementation on Maternal and Child
Nutritional status
End-line Preliminary Findings from a Randomised Control Trial in North-West Bangladesh with NDP
2
Economic Empowerment/ Livelihood component:
1. Creating access to land•Land leasing •Promotion of share-cropping
2. Vegetables production and consumption
3. Cash support
Project activities
3
Nutrition Component:
1. Behaviour Change Communication•Cooking demonstration•IYCF messages – Group meeting•Hygiene and Sanitation
2. Micronutrient supplements (MNS)
3. Regular deworming
4
Total BHHs
Intervention Group
Control Group
Excluded (n = 15)
1043 BHHs
Baseline nutrition survey
Provision of supplements
Midline nutrition survey
Intervention Group
Control Group
End-line survey
Figure : Trial profileControl group will receive 3
months of supplementation
After 6 months of
supplementation
After 12 monthsDecember 2011
May-June 2011
December 2010
October 2010
5
Methodology:
1.Longitudinal Panel study
2.Cluster Randomised Trial
3.Mixed Method (Qualitative & Quantitative)
4.Sample size (Quantitative): 1043 BHHs
537 Intervention
503 Control
6
OBJECTIVES
Quantitative Surveys:Through the bi-annual surveys (midline and end-line surveys) the project aims to determine:-
•intra-individual biannual change in nutritional status •Change in household food intake and food security status. •and, as such, the outcomes of the nutrition intervention package.
Qualitative Investigation:
Capture the lessons learnedBeneficiary perspectivesManagement issuesGuidance for scaling up and future project planning
7
Data collected on: (Quantitative)
1.Socio-demography2.Anthropometry3.Blood Haemoglobin4.Morbidity5.Household Food Intake6.Food Coping Mechanism (Food Security)
8
Preliminary Findings from the
End-line Survey
9
Compliance:
•Sprinkles were taken and liked by everyone
•It was seen as an ‘asset’, “the rich have meat and fish, and we have pushti’.
•The control group wanted it.
• Sharing pushti with other members of the family - The mothers admitted that about once a week they do this don’t share with husbands or much older kids – it’s seen as a women and kids item.
10
Household Food Intake
1. Mean no of food items consumed
2. Another way of measuring food diversity based on 7 food groups as defined by WHO/UNICEF
11
Households asked whether eaten 13 food items in the previous 7 days – provides a measure of food
diversity
12
Improvement from survey 1 (6.42 foods) to 8.77 foods in survey 2 continued to 9.5 in survey 3
Measuring food diversity based on 7 food groups as defined by WHO/UNICEF
Grains, roots and tubers, legumes and nuts, dairy products, flesh foods, eggs, vitamin A rich fruits and vegetables
14
HOUSEHOLD FOOD SECURITYHouseholds asked about 10 food coping strategies
15
Mean Food Coping Strategy fell from 4.56 to 2.2
16
Maternal Nutritional Status
1.Anthropometry1. Change in body weight2. Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)3. Chronic energy deficiency (CED)
Measured by BMI
2.Haemoglobin (Anaemia)
17
Mother’s Mean Haemoglobin concentration by HH head
18
Upward trend in blood heamoglobin concentration was found in both male and female
headed households
19
20
Mother’s Mean Haemoglobin concentration in control and Intervvention group, after removing the effect of mother’s age and sex of the HH head
21
Change in Child (U-5) Nutritional Status
1.Anthropometry1. Weight for Height (wasting)2. Weight for Age (underweight)3. Height for Age (stunting)
2.Haemoglobin (Anaemia)
22
Change in mean weight and height
23
Weight for Height Z-Scores (WHZ)
24
25
Height for Age Z-Scores (HAZ)
26
27
Weight for Age Z-Scores (WAZ)
28
29
Haemoglobin Concentration (Children-U5)
30
31
Before the intervention
32
After the intervention
33
Limitation of the study1. No socio-economic information2. Lack of detailed dietary data
34
THANKS
35
36
37
Micronutrient Contents of each 1 gm sachetVitamin A 0.4mgVitamin C 30mgVitamin D 0.005mgVitamin E 5mgVitamin B1 0.5mg
Riboflavin 0.5mgNiacin 6mgPyridoxine 0.5mgVitamin B12 0.0009 mg
Folic acid 0.15mgIron 10mgZinc 4.10mgCopper 0.56mgSelenium 0.017mgIodine 0.09mg
38
Methodology: (Mixed)1. Quantitative (Longitudinal trial)
Structured QuestionnaireAnthropometric and Hb Measurement
39
2. Qualitative InvestigationFocus Group Discussions (BHHs)In-depth InterviewsInterviews of project staff
And.....3. NDP’s
MonitoringData
40
Reasons for attrition
Attrition(number)
Attrition(%)
Intervention group
Control group
Intervention group
Control group
Migration 19 32 3.54 6.36
Not participating in programme activities
11 6 2.05 1.19
Morbidity and Mortality
1 15 0.19 2.98
Others 19 15 3.54 2.98
Total attrition rate 11.31% - Information was collected on 927 mothers and 298 under 5 years old children.
ATTRITION
41
COMPLIANCE
mothers children U5
% of targeted beneficiaries receiving antehelmintics
94.1 98.1
% of targeted beneficiaries receiving MNP sprinkles
94.1 98.0
42
Household Food Intake
Figure 2: Mean number of food types consumed by control and intervention group
Figure 3: Mean food diversity by control and intervention group
MFC- increased from 6.41 to 8.77 MFD- increased from 4.44 to 5.01
43
animal protein consumption has improved significantly
•meat and poultry consumption have increased from 3.3% and 6.6% to 13.5% and 23.7% respectively, •eggs (14.1% to 45.4%)•milk (21.7% to 58.3%)•dried fish (32.6% to 67.2%)•fresh fish (66.2% to 80.1%)
•Green veg. 96.6% to 96.1%•Other veg. 82.0% to 98.8%
44
Household Food Security
Figure 4: Mean food coping strategy by control and intervention groups
with a fall in mean number of coping strategies used from 4.56 to 3.77
45
Most beneficiaries consumed fish and egg maybe twice a month
That fish and egg was divided 3 or 4 ways among family members.
Consuming more vegetables and slightly more rice than before, as they could sell the vegetables and purchase rice and also had 40 taka wage supplementation when they worked on their fields
46
Most families could afford about 50grams of cooking oil per week (i.e. very little). Only one even mentioned eating 100 gm of dal in a week.
47
MorbidityCondition Day of survey Previous 7 days Previous 30 days
Baseline Midline p Baseline Midline p Baseline Midline P
Diarrhoea
Control 10.5 6.0 0.023 29.2 24.1 ns 42.6 38.1 ns
Intervention
8.5 3.6 0.002 34.7 20.5 <0.001 44.6 31.9 <0.001
Total 9.4 4.8 <0.001 32.2 22.2 <0.001 43.7 34.9 <0.001
Passed worms
Control 20.6 14.6 0.022 48.8 25.2 <0.001 65.0 33.6 <0.001
Intervention
21.4 10.6 <0.001 49.9 19.9 <0.001 69.9 25.4 <0.001
Total 21.0 12.5 <0.001 49.0 22.5 <0.001 62.8 29.4 <0.001
48
After veg After sprinkles
Intervention gp
Reduced illness Cold-Fever headaches weakness/dizziness diarrhoea/worms cold sores/lesions on lips
More of the previous + Greater increase in
appetite More energetic, normal health Kids with sprinkles no
illness compared to her older brother
Older women said she’s not dizzy and tired and working more
‘after taking sprinkles, sickness reduced so appetite increased’
49
After veg After sprinkles
Control Less dizzy and weak, less fainting,
Intervention group look livelier and more energetic
Control No feverNo jaundiceNot loose motionBetter eyesightWalking stick gone!
Some of us have higher haemoglobin!
50
Greater appetite was reported by all 6 groups.
Their appetite increased after starting consuming vegetables and practicing hygiene, and rose further with taking the sprinkles.
It was chiefly seen as a primarily function of reduced chronic ill-health
Before the intervention they claimed that when working sometimes they felt they had to stop because of weakness, tingling, dizziness and fainting.
51
Variables Control Group Intervention group CMS3 March 2011Survey Change Survey Change Survey P
Baseline
Midline Baseline
Midline Mar 10 Mar 11
Mean values No changes are significant
Weight 39.57 40.160.59
40.10 41.29 1.19 41.8 42.2 0.4
BMI 18.11 18.370.26
18.19 18.73 0.54 18.9 19.0 0.1
Haemoglobin 117.78 118.801.02
118.76 122.59 3.83 116.0 115.7 -0.3
CategoriesBMI <18.5 63.4 56.3
+7.158.0 51.6 +6.4 53.1 51.5 +1.6
Anaemic 51.7 51.70
53.3 33.6 +19.7 58.5 56.2 +2.3
Nutritional Status of Mothers
52
Groups Nutritional status
Survey p Survey P
Control Mean Baseline Midline Prevalence (%)
Baseline Midline
Height-for-age -1.83 -1.73 ns Stunting 50.5 46.2 ns
Weight-for-age -2.13 -2.05 ns Underweight 51.6 51.6 ns
Weight-for-height
-1.57 -1.57 ns Wasted 34.1 29.7 ns
Haemoglobin 107.43 112.21 0.004 Anaemic 50.5 42.4 nsIntervention Height-for-age -1.53 -1.51 ns Stunting 38.9 41.6 ns
Weight-for-age -1.98 -1.88 ns Underweight 50.4 53.1 ns
Weight-for-height
-1.6 -1.5 ns Wasted 33.6 25.7 0.049
Haemoglobin 107.06 118.14 <0.001
Anaemic 53.2 20.2 <0.001
Child Nutritional Status
53
Indicators(Change between baseline and midline)
Intervention(Midline – Baseline)
Control(Midline – Baseline)
(Intervention – Control)
CMS3 March 2011
Height-for-age +0.02 +0.11 -0.088 -0.16 Weight-for-age +0.099 +0.086 +0.013 -0.14 Weight-for-height
+0.085 -0.15 +0.24-0.07
Haemoglobin (g/l)+11.35 +5.14 +6.39
+4.0g/L
Indicators NDP Midline CMS3 March 2011
Height-for-age 0.5 % less stunting 2% more stunting
Weight-for-age 1 % more underweight 1.0% more underweight
Weight-for-height 6.4 % less wasting 1.0% less wasting
Haemoglobin (g/l) 22 % less anaemia 11% less anaemia
Intervention- 30% less anaemia
Control- 8.1% less anaemia
54
Challenges faced and Lessons learned:
Integrating NutritionNutrient content
BCC components (Strengthen)IYCF messagesMessages for PW and BF motheres
Strong Intervention MonitoringWell desinged structure
Staff turnover
Contents:
Background and General Project ActivitiesStudy Design Changes in Nutritional Status Qualitative findings Limitations Challenges Faced Learnings
55
56
57