IMPACT. EXAMPLES IN KONYA CLOSED BASIN AND BÜYÜK...
Transcript of IMPACT. EXAMPLES IN KONYA CLOSED BASIN AND BÜYÜK...
IMPRESS ON SW WORKSHOP
APRIL 2016
Asensio Navarro Hernández
IMPACT. EXAMPLES IN KONYA CLOSED BASIN AND BÜYÜK
MENDERES BASIN
INDEX
1. IMPACT ESTIMATION: REMINDER.
2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜK MENDERES
ABOUT IMPACTS.
1. IMPACT ESTIMATION: REMINDER.
Water bodies and their impacts are classified in:
• WB with verified impact.
• WB with likely impact.
• WB with no apparent impact.
• WB with no data on their status.
Because the monitoring of water bodies under the WFD is not available yet, the
impacts on the water bodies, at this first step, are analyzed by the thresholds of
the Turkish legislation: Surface Water Quality By-Law CRG-30/11/2012-28483
(Amended statement: OG-15/4/2015-29327) and the Water Pollution Control By-
law RG-13/2/2008-26786.
Only the classification of water quality done by the River Basin Protection
Action Plan of each river/closed basin under the repealed law (Water Pollution
Control By-law RG-13/2/2008-26786) is available.
1. IMPACT ESTIMATION: REMINDER.
The class of water quality defined by the Water Pollution Control By-law RG-
13/2/2008-26786 and their consideration as impacts are:
• Class I could be considered as “No impact” for chemical and physicochemical
quality.
• Class II could be considered as “Likely impact” for chemical and
physicochemical quality.
• Class III and IV could be considered as “Verified Impact”.
• Bacteriological parameters (D) could be used for protected areas.
The water bodies with information about impact, based on the previous legislation
(RG-13/2/2008-26786), and considered the “global quality” of each water body
(the worst "water quality class" among all groups of parameters analyzed in each
water body).
The future detailed impact analysis, in line with the WFD requirements, will be
done with the results of the monitoring that is now in progress.
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN,Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMapcontributors, and the GIS User Community
400000 500000 600000
41
00
00
042
00
00
043
00
00
0
¯0 20 40 6010km
1:1.200.000Scale:
Title:
Legend:
Technical Assistance for Conversion of River Basin Action Plans into River Basin Management Plans
Impact evaluation in surface waterbodies in Konya Closed Basin
Date: 01 - February - 2016
IMPACTS River Water Bodies
Verified
No data
IMPACTS Lakes Water Bodies
Verified
No data
Konya Close Basin
Konya Close Basin Boundary
Ref. Drawing:GIS_005_2.03.05_&_2.03.09_KO_EN_V00_R00
General Notes:
Example nº1
Example nº2
2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS
Example nº1: Peçenek Barajı Mansap (Tuz Gölü Memba)
2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS
Example nº1: Peçenek Barajı Mansap (Tuz Gölü Memba)
2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS
Example nº2: Çarşamba Çayı 3 (Apa Barajı Memba)
2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS
Examples nº1 and 2 Konya Closed Basin
2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS
KONYA CLOSED BASIN PRESSURES IMPACT
Water body code Water body namePoint source of
pollution
Diffuse source of
pollution
Water abstraction
and flow regulation
Morphological
alterations
Other human
pressuresImpact level
TR1602NEH021261702 Çarşamba Çayı 3 (Apa Barajı Memba) X X X X NO data
TR1608NEH011240201Peçenek Barajı Mansap (Tuz Gölü
Memba)X X X Verified
[1] blue cell = pressure inventoried, and marked blue cell with "x " = significant pressure
Only 14 of the 92 surface waterbodies (rivers and dams) have quality analysis (15.21%).
Therefore, only it´s possible to calculate the impact in these water bodies.
Detailed results are:
• 1 waterbody (1.08%) with class III quality (verified impact).
• 1 waterbody (1.08%) with class III and class IV quality (verified impact).
• 12 waterbodies (13.04%) with class IV quality (verified impact).
• 78 waterbodies (84.78%) without quality determination
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN,Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMapcontributors, and the GIS User Community
500000 600000 700000 800000
41
00
00
042
00
00
043
00
00
0
¯0 10 20 305km
1:1.000.000Scale:
Title:
Legend:
Technical Assistance for Conversion of River Basin Action Plans into River Basin Management Plans
Impact evaluation in inland surfacewater bodies in Büyük Menderes Basin
Ref. Drawing:GIS_005_2.03.05_&_2.03.09_BM_EN_V00_R00
General Notes:
Date: 01 - February - 2016
IMPACTS River Water Bodies
No data
Likely
Verified
IMPACTS Lake Water Bodies
No data
River Basin Boundary
River Basin District Boundary
Coastal Water BodiesExample nº1
Example nº2
2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS
Example nº1: Yukarı Büyük Menderes
2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS
Example nº1: Yukarı Büyük Menderes
2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS
Example nº1: Yukarı Büyük Menderes
2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS
Example nº1: Yukarı Büyük Menderes
2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS
Example nº1: Yukarı Büyük Menderes
2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS
Example nº1: Yukarı Büyük Menderes
2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS
Example nº2: Girme Deresi
2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS
Example nº2: Girme Deresi
2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS
Example nº2: Girme Deresi
2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS
Examples nº1 and 2 Büyük-Menderes Basin
2. PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN KONYA AND BÜYÜKMENDERES ABOUT IMPACTS
[1] blue cell = pressure inventoried, and marked blue cell with "x " = significant pressure
BÜYÜK MENDERES BASIN PRESSURES IMPACT
Water body code Water body namePoint source of
pollution
Diffuse source of
pollution
Water abstraction
and flow regulation
Morphological
alterations
Other human
pressures
Impact
level
TR0702NEH011262002 Yukarı Büyük Menderes 1 X X X X Verified
TR0709NEH011147301 Girme Deresi 2 X Likely
Only 21 of the 129 (16.27%) inland surface waterbodies have quality
analysis. Therefore, only it´s possible to calculate the risk in these water
bodies.
Detailed results are:
• 1 waterbody (0.77%) with class II quality (Likely impact).
• 7 waterbodies (5.42%) with class III quality (verified impact).
• 1 waterbody (0.77%) with class III and class IV quality (verified impact).
• 12 waterbodies (9.30%) with class IV quality (verified impact).
• 108 waterbodies (83.5%) without quality determination.