Impact and Value of Lean Six Sigma in Transactional Processes
-
Upload
vijaybijaj -
Category
Documents
-
view
1.618 -
download
2
description
Transcript of Impact and Value of Lean Six Sigma in Transactional Processes
Case Study
Impact and Valueof Lean Six Sigma
in Transactional Processes
By Dr. Andrew Parris Lockheed Martin SSC Atlas Program, Improvement Certified LM21 Black Belt
Lockheed Martin:Redefining What Is Possible
Persistent Surveillance
Space ExplorationSpace ExplorationBiometricsBiometrics
InformationInformationFusionFusion
Hypersonics
A Passion for Invention
FUSION
Unmanned andAutonomousSystems
Our Customers• Departments of:
– Defense– Homeland Security– Commerce– Energy– Health & Human Services– Housing & Urban Development– Justice– State– Transportation
• NASA• Social Security
Administration• Environmental Protection
Agency• U.S. Postal Service• Foreign Governments
Who We Are
Lockheed Martin Corporation… Transmits More Bits of Data Daily Than
All U.S. Cable Companies Combined
Employs More Software Engineers Than Microsoft
Has Delivered More Than 4,000 F-16 Fighters to Customers Worldwide
The Men and Women of Lockheed Martin
Partners to Help Customers Meet Their Defining Moments
• 132,500 Employees
• 55,000 Scientists and Engineers
• 30,000 Software and Systems Engineers
• 6 CMMI Level-5 and Level-4 Companies
• Operations in 45 States and 56 Countries
5380X.PPT AFM 12/01/2003 5
$32B 2003 Sales$32B 2003 Sales135,000 Employees135,000 Employees
ElectronicElectronicSystemsSystems
$9.0B$9.0B
Space Space SystemsSystems
$5.8B$5.8B
AeronauticsAeronautics
$9.8B$9.8B
Technology Technology ServicesServices
$3.2B$3.2B
Integrated Integrated Systems Systems
andandSolutionsSolutions
$3.2B$3.2B
Advanced TechnologyCenter Missile
Defense Systems
Commercial Space
LaunchSystems
NASA
Space Systems CompanySpace Systems Company
Space Systems
• Launch Services
• Satellites
• Strategic & Defensive Missile Systems
Space SystemsLaunch Services
Titan IVTitan IV ProtonProtonAtlas VAtlas VShuttleShuttle
Space SystemsSatellites
GPS IIRGPS IIRMILSTARMILSTAR
Advanced EHFAdvanced EHF SBIRSSBIRS
2001 Mars Odyssey2001 Mars OdysseyCommercial Remote Commercial Remote SensingSensing
TelecommunicationsTelecommunications
Space SystemsStrategic & Defensive Missile Systems
TridentTrident Airborne LaserAirborne Laser THAADTHAAD
BV+BV+ MKVMKVTargets & Targets & InterceptorsInterceptors
LM21 Organization• LM21 Operating Excellence
Corporate Office – Mike Joyce, Corporate Vice President– Responsible for strategic planning, design,
and deployment of LM21 Operating Excellence throughout Corporation
• Lead Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)– LM employees designated as leaders in their
field and competitively selected for a 2 year leadership development assignment
• Internal consultants for Operating Excellence site/program deployments
• Experts on LM21 tool-set• Leverage outside resources
Green Belt Black Belt Master Black Belt
Who
Wha
t
Participates on improvement projects and are part-time leaders of simple projects/kaizens as part of their job
• Applying Principles and tools for application in a project
• Able to lead team in closely scoped sub-project/kaizen
Leaders of improvement events, projects and teams recommended as full time dedication
• Knows and applies methods/ principles & can implement in various business processes
• Able to lead teams and mentor/train Green Belts/ Kaizen coaches
• Provides training
Full-time leader that provides training, mentoring and business-wide leadership for improvement activities.
• Knows methods/ principles & can apply anywhere
• Able to lead teams, mentor/train Black Belts and advise senior leaders in the competency of continuous improvement
LM21 Training Roles
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3All employees, contractors, suppliers, etc.
• Learning Principles
• Recognize waste & be able to question sub-optimal processes and initiate improvement
General Awareness
Web Based
Upper Level Management
• Learning Principles & applying some tools to a “Just Do It” project
• Able to support and champion efforts of teams working to improve a process
LM 21Leadership Training
Change AgentsAll Audiences
(100%) (100%) (10-50%) (1-1.5%) (.05%)PopulationTargets
All AudiencesExecutive Management
LM21 2 dayLeadership Trng.Mid Level Management
• Learning Principles & applying some tools to a simulation project
• Able to support and sponsor efforts of teams working to improve a process
(50%)
LM21 Operating ExcellenceDeveloping Critical Mass of Expertise
Actual Plan
Expertise and Involvement Imbedded into LM Culture Expertise and Involvement Imbedded into LM Culture so it Becomes The Rhythm of the Businessso it Becomes The Rhythm of the Business
015,00030,00045,00060,000
00 01 02 03 04
0
10
20
00 01 02 03 04
0
5,000
10,000
00 01 02 03 04
Corporate Experts (SME’s)
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
00 01 02 03 04
Black Belts
Leadership Training Implementation Participants
LM21 Utilizes Both Lean and Six Sigma
Repeatability
ReduceSteps/Parts
Reduce Defects/VariabilitySix Sigma
Lean
# of Process Steps
1 93.32% 99.38% 99.98% 99.999%
7 61.63% 95.73% 99.84% 99.998%
10 50.08% 93.96% 99.77% 99.997%
40 25.08% 77.94% 99.07% 99.986%
100 0.10% 53.64% 97.70% 99.966%
300 - - - 15.43% 93.26% 99.898%
700 - - - 1.28% 84.97% 99.762%
1000 - - - 0.20% 79.24% 99.661%
3000 - - - - - - 50.15% 98.985%
38000 - - - - - - 0.01% 87.880%
(Distribution Shifted +/- 1.5 )
Flo
w V
eloc
ity
“Move North East”
“Move North East”
LM21 Operating Excellence
Lean processes operating at Six Sigma capabilityLean processes operating at Six Sigma capability
Events to make incremental improvements in manufacturing or transactional processes.• Removes waste • Reduces cycle time 20 – 60%• Applies to all aspects of the business
Kaizens Lean/Six Sigma Projects
Increasing capability with a Black Belt-led team using Quality tools to Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve and Control.• Improves yields from 3.5 to 4.5-5• Reactive by nature• Applies to all aspects of the business
A Philosophy to maximize producibility and customer value by Specifying Value from the Customer’s Perspective, Analyzing the Value Stream, Adding Flow & Pull and Striving for Perfection
Lean/Six Sigma Operating Excellence
Pre-design Kaizens
Events to increase producibility and ensure hardware designs support lean production methods. • Required to support lean factory • Proactive by nature• Applies to product design
Design for Six Sigma Process
A design approach that optimizes performance and cost while maximizing yield during the design of the hardware• Required to improve yields beyond 4.5• Required to meet high system yields• Proactive by nature• Applies to product design
Operating Excellence
LM21 8 Step Process
Implement&
Validate
Implement&
Validate
Identify & Prioritize
Opportunities
Identify & Prioritize
Opportunities
ProjectDefinition
ProjectDefinition
Document &MeasureCurrentReality
Document &MeasureCurrentReality
Communicate & Acknowledge
Success
Communicate & Acknowledge
Success
Measure &Sustain
Measure &Sustain
Optimize Flow&
ReduceFriction
Optimize Flow&
ReduceFriction
Analyze & IDWaste
Analyze & IDWaste
1 2 3 4
5678
ExcellenceExcellence
LM21 Path To Excellence
Lean processes operating at Six Sigma capabilityLean processes operating at Six Sigma capability
Roadmap
MarketingCustomer Systems Eng Engineering Procurement Manufacturing Test Integration Launch Customer
Design ReleaseRqmts.
DefinitionStress
Analysis
ProcessLevel
ProcessLevel
ProcessLevel
ProcessLevel
Inputs Outputs
Engineering
Events Projects Do-Its
EVENT TOPIC EVENT TOPICPRO-JECT
PRO-JECT
ACTIONITEM
EVENT TOPIC EVENT TOPICPRO-JECT
PRO-JECT
ACTIONITEM
EVENT TOPIC EVENT TOPICPRO-JECT
ACTIONITEM
ACTIONITEM
ACTIONITEM
Value Stream Analysis
Value Stream Map
KaizenPDK
ProjectInstant Fix
DM
Program
Office
Eng-Design
Drafter -Centaur
Drafter -Booster
Eng-Structures
Eng-Avionics
Eng -Fluids
Eng-Checking
Eng-Mission Int
Eng-Software
Supplier Data
Eng-Chief
Configuration Management
Admin
Safety
Eng-Systems
Model Control
ReleaseMission Success
Order Control
Quality
Contracts
Subcontract -AdminMaterial
Planning0
Eng -Production
Process Planning
Eng-QA
Asset SpecialistsPrint Crib
Machinist -
Tool
Eng-Mechanical
Eng -Test
Production Planning
Product Assurance
Reproduction
Repro -
Data Entry
Repro -Lead
Reproduction -
Photographer
Repro -Copy
Repro -Distribution
Receiving
Receiving -Asset Specialist
Receiving -
Data
ReceivingQuality Inspection
Truck Driver
Mission Integration
Cape Receiving
Eutelsat
Purchasing -
Planning
Buyer -LabargeEng-
Labarge
CSC Harlingen
CODS EDE
ProE
TRMS
CODS
ProE
CODS
CODS CVS PADR
CODSProE
ProEPADR
TSOCODS
PADR
Support
Sup
port
Sup
port
MAC
PAC
MPPS
Support
CODS
MAC
PAC
CODS
MPPS
PADRCODS
ELC
MPPS
CVS
FMP
MACPAC
PIRSPODS
KSA
EMAS
Reflec
tions
CADS
CADS
CADS
Sup
port
Sup
port
Support
Support
MAC
PAC
Live
Link
TSO ELC
DM
Program
Office
Eng-Design
Drafter -Centaur
Drafter -Booster
Eng-Structures
Eng-Avionics
Eng -Fluids
Eng-Checking
Eng-Mission Int
Eng-Software
Supplier Data
Eng-Chief
Configuration Management
Admin
Safety
Eng-Systems
Model Control
ReleaseMission Success
Order Control
Quality
Contracts
Subcontract -AdminMaterial
Planning0
Eng -Production
Process Planning
Eng-QA
Asset SpecialistsPrint Crib
Machinist -
Tool
Eng-Mechanical
Eng -Test
Production Planning
Product Assurance
Reproduction
Repro -
Data Entry
Repro -Lead
Reproduction -
Photographer
Repro -Copy
Repro -Distribution
Receiving
Receiving -Asset Specialist
Receiving -
Data
ReceivingQuality Inspection
Truck Driver
Mission Integration
Cape Receiving
Eutelsat
Purchasing -
Planning
Buyer -LabargeEng-
Labarge
CSC Harlingen
CODS EDE
ProE
TRMS
CODS
ProE
CODS
CODS CVS PADR
CODSProE
ProEPADR
TSOCODS
PADR
Support
Sup
port
Sup
port
MAC
PAC
MPPS
Support
CODS
MAC
PAC
CODS
MPPS
PADRCODS
ELC
MPPS
CVS
FMP
MACPAC
PIRSPODS
KSA
EMAS
Reflec
tions
CADS
CADS
CADS
Sup
port
Sup
port
Support
Support
MAC
PAC
Live
Link
TSO ELC
DM
Program
Office
Eng-Design
Drafter -Centaur
Drafter -Booster
Eng-Structures
Eng-Avionics
Eng -Fluids
Eng-Checking
Eng-Mission Int
Eng-Software
Supplier Data
Eng-Chief
Configuration Management
Admin
Safety
Eng-Systems
Model Control
ReleaseMission Success
Order Control
Quality
Contracts
Subcontract -AdminMaterial
Planning0
Eng -Production
Process Planning
Eng-QA
Asset SpecialistsPrint Crib
Machinist -
Tool
Eng-Mechanical
Eng -Test
Production Planning
Product Assurance
Reproduction
Repro -
Data Entry
Repro -Lead
Reproduction -
Photographer
Repro -Copy
Repro -Distribution
Receiving
Receiving -Asset Specialist
Receiving -
Data
ReceivingQuality Inspection
Truck Driver
Mission Integration
Cape Receiving
Eutelsat
Purchasing -
Planning
Buyer -LabargeEng-
Labarge
CSC Harlingen
CODS EDE
ProE
TRMS
CODS
ProE
CODS
CODS CVS PADR
CODSProE
ProEPADR
TSOCODS
PADR
Support
Sup
port
Sup
port
MAC
PAC
MPPS
Support
CODS
MAC
PAC
CODS
MPPS
PADRCODS
ELC
MPPS
CVS
FMP
MACPAC
PIRSPODS
KSA
EMAS
Reflec
tions
CADS
CADS
CADS
Sup
port
Sup
port
Support
Support
MAC
PAC
Live
Link
TSO ELC
DM
Program
Office
Eng-Design
Drafter -Centaur
Drafter -Booster
Eng-Structures
Eng-Avionics
Eng -Fluids
Eng-Checking
Eng-Mission Int
Eng-Software
Supplier Data
Eng-Chief
Configuration Management
Admin
Safety
Eng-Systems
Model Control
ReleaseMission Success
Order Control
Quality
Contracts
Subcontract -AdminMaterial
Planning0
Eng -Production
Process Planning
Eng-QA
Asset SpecialistsPrint Crib
Machinist -
Tool
Eng-Mechanical
Eng -Test
Production Planning
Product Assurance
Reproduction
Repro -
Data Entry
Repro -Lead
Reproduction -
Photographer
Repro -Copy
Repro -Distribution
Receiving
Receiving -Asset Specialist
Receiving -
Data
ReceivingQuality Inspection
Truck Driver
Mission Integration
Cape Receiving
Eutelsat
Purchasing -
Planning
Buyer -LabargeEng-
Labarge
CSC Harlingen
CODS EDE
ProE
TRMS
CODS
ProE
CODS
CODS CVS PADR
CODSProE
ProEPADR
TSOCODS
PADR
Support
Sup
port
Sup
port
MAC
PAC
MPPS
Support
CODS
MAC
PAC
CODS
MPPS
PADRCODS
ELC
MPPS
CVS
FMP
MACPAC
PIRSPODS
KSA
EMAS
Reflec
tions
CADS
CADS
CADS
Sup
port
Sup
port
Support
Support
MAC
PAC
Live
Link
TSO ELC
DM
Program
Office
Eng-Design
Drafter -Centaur
Drafter -Booster
Eng-Structures
Eng-Avionics
Eng -Fluids
Eng-Checking
Eng-Mission Int
Eng-Software
Supplier Data
Eng-Chief
Configuration Management
Admin
Safety
Eng-Systems
Model Control
ReleaseMission Success
Order Control
Quality
Contracts
Subcontract -AdminMaterial
Planning0
DM
Program
Office
Eng-Design
Drafter -Centaur
Drafter -Booster
Eng-Structures
Eng-Avionics
Eng -Fluids
Eng-Checking
Eng-Mission Int
Eng-Software
Supplier Data
Eng-Chief
Configuration Management
Admin
Safety
Eng-Systems
Model Control
ReleaseMission Success
Order Control
Quality
Contracts
Subcontract -AdminMaterial
Planning0
Eng -Production
Process Planning
Eng-QA
Asset SpecialistsPrint Crib
Machinist -
Tool
Eng-Mechanical
Eng -Test
Production Planning
Product Assurance
Reproduction
Repro -
Data Entry
Repro -Lead
Reproduction -
Photographer
Repro -Copy
Repro -Distribution
Receiving
Receiving -Asset Specialist
Receiving -
Data
ReceivingQuality Inspection
Truck Driver
Mission Integration
Cape Receiving
Eutelsat
Purchasing -
Planning
Buyer -LabargeEng-
Labarge
CSC Harlingen
Eng -Production
Process Planning
Eng-QA
Asset SpecialistsPrint Crib
Machinist -
Tool
Eng-Mechanical
Eng -Test
Production Planning
Product Assurance
Reproduction
Repro -
Data Entry
Repro -Lead
Reproduction -
Photographer
Repro -Copy
Repro -Distribution
Receiving
Receiving -Asset Specialist
Receiving -
Data
ReceivingQuality Inspection
Truck Driver
Mission Integration
Cape Receiving
Eutelsat
Purchasing -
Planning
Buyer -LabargeEng-
Labarge
CSC Harlingen
CODS EDE
ProE
TRMS
CODS
ProE
CODS
CODS CVS
CODS EDE
ProE
TRMS
CODS
ProE
CODS
CODS CVS PADR
CODSProE
ProEPADR
TSOCODS
PADR
Support
Sup
port
Sup
port
MAC
PAC
MPPS
Support
CODS
MAC
PAC
CODS
MPPS
PADRCODS
ELC
MPPS
CVS
FMP
MACPAC
PIRSPODS
KSA
EMAS
Reflec
tions
CADS
CADS
CADS
Sup
port
Sup
port
Support
Support
MAC
PAC
Live
Link
TSO ELC
DM
Program
Office
Eng-Design
Drafter -Centaur
Drafter -Booster
Eng-Structures
Eng-Avionics
Eng -Fluids
Eng-Checking
Eng-
PADR
CODSProE
ProEPADR
TSOCODS
PADR
Support
Sup
port
Sup
port
MAC
PAC
MPPS
Support
CODS
MAC
PAC
CODS
MPPS
PADRCODS
ELC
MPPS
CVS
FMP
MACPAC
PIRSPODS
KSA
EMAS
Reflec
tions
CADS
CADS
CADS
Sup
port
Sup
port
Support
Support
MAC
PAC
Live
Link
TSO ELC
DM
Program
Office
Eng-Design
Drafter -Centaur
Drafter -Booster
Eng-Structures
Eng-Avionics
Eng -Fluids
Eng-Checking
Eng-Mission Int
Eng-Software
Supplier Data
Eng-Chief
Configuration Management
Admin
Safety
Eng-Systems
Model Control
ReleaseMission Success
Order Control
Quality
Contracts
Subcontract -AdminMaterial
Planning0
Eng -Production
Process Planning
Eng-QA
Asset SpecialistsPrint Crib
Machinist -
Tool
Eng-Mechanical
Eng -Test
Production Planning
Product Assurance
Reproduction
Repro -
Data Entry
Repro -Lead
Reproduction -
Photographer
Repro -Copy
Mission Int
Eng-Software
Supplier Data
Eng-Chief
Configuration Management
Admin
Safety
Eng-Systems
Model Control
ReleaseMission Success
Order Control
Quality
Contracts
Subcontract -AdminMaterial
Planning0
Eng -Production
Process Planning
Eng-QA
Asset SpecialistsPrint Crib
Machinist -
Tool
Eng-Mechanical
Eng -Test
Production Planning
Product Assurance
Reproduction
Repro -
Data Entry
Repro -Lead
Reproduction -
Photographer
Repro -Copy
Repro -Distribution
Receiving
Receiving -Asset Specialist
Receiving -
Data
ReceivingQuality Inspection
Truck Driver
Mission Integration
Cape Receiving
Eutelsat
Purchasing -
Planning
Buyer -LabargeEng-
Labarge
CSC Harlingen
Repro -Distribution
Receiving
Receiving -Asset Specialist
Receiving -
Data
ReceivingQuality Inspection
Truck Driver
Mission Integration
Cape Receiving
Eutelsat
Purchasing -
Planning
Buyer -LabargeEng-
Labarge
CSC Harlingen
CODS EDE
ProE
TRMS
CODS
ProE
CODS
CODS CVS PADR
CODSProE
ProEPADR
TSOCODS
PADR
Support
Sup
port
Sup
port
MAC
PAC
MPPS
Support
CODS
MAC
PAC
CODS
MPPS
PADRCODS
ELC
MPPS
CVS
FMP
MACPAC
PIRSPODS
KSA
EMAS
Reflec
tions
CADS
CADS
CADS
Sup
port
Sup
port
Support
Support
MAC
PAC
Live
Link
TSO ELC CODS EDE
ProE
TRMS
CODS
ProE
CODS
CODS CVS PADR
CODSProE
ProEPADR
TSOCODS
PADR
Support
Sup
port
Sup
port
MAC
PAC
MPPS
Support
CODS
MAC
PAC
CODS
MPPS
PADRCODS
ELC
MPPS
CVS
FMP
MACPAC
PIRSPODS
KSA
EMAS
Reflec
tions
CADS
CADS
CADS
Sup
port
Sup
port
Support
Support
MAC
PAC
Live
Link
TSO ELC
DM
Program
Office
Eng-Design
Drafter -Centaur
Drafter -Booster
Eng-Structures
Eng-Avionics
Eng -Fluids
Eng-Checking
Eng-Mission Int
Eng-Software
Supplier Data
Eng-Chief
Configuration Management
Admin
Safety
Eng-Systems
Model Control
ReleaseMission Success
Order Control
Quality
Contracts
Subcontract -AdminMaterial
Planning0
Eng -Production
Process Planning
DM
Program
Office
Eng-Design
Drafter -Centaur
Drafter -Booster
Eng-Structures
Eng-Avionics
Eng -Fluids
Eng-Checking
Eng-Mission Int
Eng-Software
Supplier Data
Eng-Chief
Configuration Management
Admin
Safety
Eng-Systems
Model Control
ReleaseMission Success
Order Control
Quality
Contracts
Subcontract -AdminMaterial
Planning0
Eng -Production
Process Planning
Eng-QA
Asset SpecialistsPrint Crib
Machinist -
Tool
Eng-Mechanical
Eng -Test
Production Planning
Product Assurance
Reproduction
Repro -
Data Entry
Repro -Lead
Reproduction -
Photographer
Repro -Copy
Repro -Distribution
Receiving
Receiving -Asset Specialist
Receiving -
Data
ReceivingQuality Inspection
Truck Driver
Mission Integration
Cape Receiving
Eutelsat
Purchasing -
Planning
Buyer -LabargeEng-
Labarge
CSC Harlingen
Eng-QA
Asset SpecialistsPrint Crib
Machinist -
Tool
Eng-Mechanical
Eng -Test
Production Planning
Product Assurance
Reproduction
Repro -
Data Entry
Repro -Lead
Reproduction -
Photographer
Repro -Copy
Repro -Distribution
Receiving
Receiving -Asset Specialist
Receiving -
Data
ReceivingQuality Inspection
Truck Driver
Mission Integration
Cape Receiving
Eutelsat
Purchasing -
Planning
Buyer -LabargeEng-
Labarge
CSC Harlingen
CODS EDE
ProE
TRMS
CODS
ProE
CODS
CODS CVS PADR
CODSProE
ProEPADR
TSOCODS
PADR
Support
Sup
CODS EDE
ProE
TRMS
CODS
ProE
CODS
CODS CVS PADR
CODSProE
ProEPADR
TSOCODS
PADR
Support
Sup
port
Sup
port
MAC
PAC
MPPS
Support
CODS
MAC
PAC
CODS
MPPS
PADRCODS
ELC
MPPS
CVS
FMP
MACPAC
PIRSPODS
KSA
EMAS
Reflec
tions
CADS
CADS
CADS
Sup
port
Sup
port
Support
Support
MAC
PAC
Live
Link
TSO ELC
DM
Program
Office
Eng-Design
Drafter -Centaur
Drafter -Booster
Eng-Structures
Eng-Avionics
Eng -Fluids
Eng-Checking
Eng-Mission Int
Eng-Software
Supplier Data
Eng-Chief
Configuration Management
Admin
Safety
Eng-Systems
Model Control
port
Sup
port
MAC
PAC
MPPS
Support
CODS
MAC
PAC
CODS
MPPS
PADRCODS
ELC
MPPS
CVS
FMP
MACPAC
PIRSPODS
KSA
EMAS
Reflec
tions
CADS
CADS
CADS
Sup
port
Sup
port
Support
Support
MAC
PAC
Live
Link
TSO ELC
DM
Program
Office
Eng-Design
Drafter -Centaur
Drafter -Booster
Eng-Structures
Eng-Avionics
Eng -Fluids
Eng-Checking
Eng-Mission Int
Eng-Software
Supplier Data
Eng-Chief
Configuration Management
Admin
Safety
Eng-Systems
Model Control
ReleaseMission Success
Order Control
Quality
Contracts
Subcontract -AdminMaterial
Planning0
Eng -Production
Process Planning
Eng-QA
Asset SpecialistsPrint Crib
Machinist -
Tool
Eng-Mechanical
Eng -Test
Production Planning
Product Assurance
Reproduction
Repro -
Data Entry
Repro -Lead
Reproduction -
Photographer
Repro -Copy
Repro -Distribution
Receiving
Receiving -Asset Specialist
Receiving -
Data
ReceivingQuality Inspection
Truck Driver
Mission Integration
Cape Receiving
Eutelsat
ReleaseMission Success
Order Control
Quality
Contracts
Subcontract -AdminMaterial
Planning0
Eng -Production
Process Planning
Eng-QA
Asset SpecialistsPrint Crib
Machinist -
Tool
Eng-Mechanical
Eng -Test
Production Planning
Product Assurance
Reproduction
Repro -
Data Entry
Repro -Lead
Reproduction -
Photographer
Repro -Copy
Repro -Distribution
Receiving
Receiving -Asset Specialist
Receiving -
Data
ReceivingQuality Inspection
Truck Driver
Mission Integration
Cape Receiving
Eutelsat
Purchasing -
Planning
Buyer -LabargeEng-
Labarge
CSC Harlingen
Purchasing -
Planning
Buyer -LabargeEng-
Labarge
CSC Harlingen
CODS EDE
ProE
TRMS
CODS
ProE
CODS
CODS CVS PADR
CODSProE
ProEPADR
TSOCODS
PADR
Support
Sup
port
Sup
port
MAC
PAC
MPPS
Support
CODS
MAC
PAC
CODS
MPPS
PADRCODS
ELC
MPPS
CVS
FMP
MACPAC
PIRSPODS
KSA
EMAS
Reflec
tions
CADS
CADS
CADS
Sup
port
Sup
port
Support
Support
MAC
PAC
Live
Link
TSO ELC
RDL
Harlingen
HIBAY
INV
PLFMFG
Harlingen
HIBAY
INV
PLFMFG
San Diego
TABCape Canaveral
LC41VIF
AstrotechITOWhse
ASOCASOC
E&AHangar K
Denver
LaBarge
Berryville, AK
19
25
10
4439
Deer Creek
FAB INVFAB INV
EMF
SSB
EMF
SSB
VTFVTFENG
TSB
PTF
GPL
F
San Diego
Cape CanaveralHarlingen
Denver
Berryville, AKSan DiegoSan Diego
Cape CanaveralCape CanaveralHarlingenHarlingen
Denver
Berryville, AKBerryville, AK
18 12 6 5 4 3 2 1
Customer Configuration Installation
243036424854 Months for Scope
60
Design & Build
18 12 6 5 4 3 2 1
Customer Configuration Installation
243036424854 Months for Scope
60
Design & Build
RDL
Harlingen
HIBAY
INV
PLFMFG
Harlingen
HIBAY
INV
PLFMFG
San Diego
TABCape Canaveral
LC41VIF
AstrotechITOWhse
ASOCASOC
E&AHangar K
Denver
LaBarge
Berryville, AK
19
25
10
4439
Deer Creek
FAB INVFAB INV
EMF
SSB
EMF
SSB
VTFVTFENG
TSB
PTF
GPL
F
San Diego
RDL
Harlingen
HIBAY
INV
PLFMFG
Harlingen
HIBAY
INV
PLFMFG
San Diego
TABCape Canaveral
LC41VIF
AstrotechITOWhse
ASOCASOC
E&AHangar K
Denver
LaBarge
Berryville, AK
19
25
10
4439
Deer Creek
FAB INVFAB INV
EMF
SSB
EMF
SSB
VTFVTFENG
TSB
PTF
GPL
F
San Diego
Cape CanaveralHarlingen
Denver
Berryville, AKSan DiegoSan Diego
Cape CanaveralCape CanaveralHarlingenHarlingen
Denver
Berryville, AKBerryville, AK
18 12 6 5 4 3 2 1
Customer Configuration Installation
243036424854 Months for Scope
60
Design & Build
18 12 6 5 4 3 2 1
Customer Configuration Installation
24
Cape CanaveralHarlingen
Denver
Berryville, AKSan DiegoSan Diego
Cape CanaveralCape CanaveralHarlingenHarlingen
Denver
Berryville, AKBerryville, AK
18 12 6 5 4 3 2 1
Customer Configuration Installation
243036424854 Months for Scope
60
Design & Build
18 12 6 5 4 3 2 1
Customer Configuration Installation
243036424854 Months for Scope
60
Design & Build
Sample Current State Value Stream Map
Sample Current State Physical Map
Atlas Value Stream Analysis (VSA)
Value Stream Analysis Revealed Significant Opportunity
Improvement Opportunities
Work fragmentation
Multiple hand offs
High volume of change traffic
Redundant processing and approvals
Flexibility at a high cost
Manual data processing
Dispersed resources
Long cycle times
Value-added ActivitiesValue-added Activities
• Activities which, when asked, the customer is willing to pay twice as much if we did it twice as often and
• Activities which change the form, fit or function of the product/service and
• Activities done right the first time.
Value-added ActivitiesValue-added Activities
• Activities which, when asked, the customer is willing to pay twice as much if we did it twice as often and
• Activities which change the form, fit or function of the product/service and
• Activities done right the first time.
Non Value-added – Required ActivitiesNon Value-added – Required Activities• Activities which may be necessary but the Customer will not pay you to do
• cannot be eliminated (due to non-robustness of process) based on current state of technology
• Required (regulatory, customer mandate, legal)
Non Value-added – Required ActivitiesNon Value-added – Required Activities• Activities which may be necessary but the Customer will not pay you to do
• cannot be eliminated (due to non-robustness of process) based on current state of technology
• Required (regulatory, customer mandate, legal)
Non Value-added Activities• Activities that consume resources but create no value in the eyes of the customer
• The customer is not willing to pay • Pure waste
Non Value-added Activities• Activities that consume resources but create no value in the eyes of the customer
• The customer is not willing to pay • Pure waste
Definitions: Value-added
Examples of TransactionalProcess Improvement Events
LM21 Operating ExcellenceResults: Business Processes
Company Project Description $MCompany Project Description $M
Astronautics – Denver Overhead and G&A Restructure 79.0Astronautics – Denver Overhead and G&A Restructure 79.0
Missiles & Fire Control SAP Phase I Implementation 2.7Missiles & Fire Control SAP Phase I Implementation 2.7
Technology Services Airline Travel Discounts 5.0Technology Services Airline Travel Discounts 5.0
LM21 Operating ExcellenceResults: Design and Engineering
Company Project Description $MCompany Project Description $M
EPI – Owego Integration Framework Architecture 16.1EPI – Owego Integration Framework Architecture 16.1
Missiles & Space Standardized Systems Engr Process 23.0Missiles & Space Standardized Systems Engr Process 23.0
Aeronautics Company F-22 Sustaining Engr Reduction 21.4Aeronautics Company F-22 Sustaining Engr Reduction 21.4
ESTABLISH SIGNATURE REQUIREME
NTS
CREATE ER
• HP FILE
• DNA INFO
• BACKUP DATA
• COMPONENTS DATA
• PL
CHECKING IN-BOX
DETERMINE WHERE
CHECKING WILL BE
PERFORMED
Approval Babysitting
Obtain Approvals
CHECKING
CHECKING
COORDINAES
DIRECTLY WITH DESIGN
OR ENGRG
AIDE
APPROVE?
NO
YES Promote Drawing to RELEASE
Distribution
DATAStart= End=
Touch Time = .25 hrsCycle Time= 2 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
TOTALStart= ECR receivedEnd= Released Engineering
Touch Time = 29 hrsCycle Time= 26 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
DATAStart= End=
Touch Time = 5 hrsCycle Time= 2 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
DATAStart= End=
Touch Time = .5 hrsCycle Time= 1 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
DATAStart= End=
Touch Time = 23 hrsCycle Time= 20 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
DATAStart= End=
Touch Time = .1 hrsCycle Time= 1 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
Drawing Number to
Design Requireme
ntPLOT FILE
REQUEST
Notify ER Is ReadySend to DistributionTo
Be
Reduced Handoffs & Redundant Efforts
33 Days 26 Days
New Drawing Release VSM
Design Engineering
Receive HP file from
DesignINC
Parts ListBack-up Info
CompleteCompon
ents in DIACS?
Approved for
program?
Enter Data From
Drawing Number Assignment FormTransfer
Data from
PLIT to DIACS
Load CADIMDrawing
MaskCreate
ER
Determine Where Checking Will Be Perform
edPriority / Order of Release
Approval Babysitti
ngObtain
Approvals
CHECKING Determin
e Action. Re-
Insert where
Required.
Coordinate with
Checking (if
required)
APPROVE?
NO
YES
Send to Release Office.
Release Drawing
Update Parts List
Coordinate with Checkin
g (if required)
Distribution
DATAStart= End= Touch Time
= .25 hrsCycle Time= 2 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
DATAStart= End=
Touch Time = 4 hrsCycle Time= 2 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
DATAStart= End= Touch Time =
1.2 hrsCycle Time= 1 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
DATAStart= End=
Touch Time = 32 hrsCycle Time= 25 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
DATAStart= End= Touch Time =
1.5 hrsCycle Time= 2 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
TOTALStart= ECR receivedEnd= Released Engineering
Touch Time = 40 hrsCycle Time= 33 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
Establish Signatur
e Requirements
DATAStart= End=
Touch Time = 1 hrsCycle Time= 1 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
Drawing Number
to Design Require
mentPLOT FILE
REQUEST
As Is
Change Control
Engineering Aides
Touch Time Savings of Revised Process – New Drawings
29 Hours40 HoursTotal(Rounded Up)
7 Hours9.7 HoursRelease/Eng Aides
20 Hours24 HoursChecking
1.85 Hours6.25 HoursLiaison/Eng
NowWas
29 Hours40 HoursTotal(Rounded Up)
7 Hours9.7 HoursRelease/Eng Aides
20 Hours24 HoursChecking
1.85 Hours6.25 HoursLiaison/Eng
NowWas
Savings Benefit of Work Scope Allocation – New Drawings
• Assumptions• over 1000 Drawings per Year
• Benefits• Liaison Engineering
• 4.4 Hrs/Drwg *Drwgs /Yr• Checking
• 4.0 Hrs/Drwg *Drwgs /Yr• Release/Engineering Aides
• 2.7 Hrs/Drwg *Drwgs /Yr• Total Yearly Benefit: over $ 1M
Engineering Change VSM
Problem Statement with Backup Data
REVIEW PROBLEM
• Verify that a problem exists• Determine cause.• Determine condition of prior
units built.• Establish a need date based
on the production schedule.
COMPLETE ECR
• Define the nature of the changes. • Determine the Design
Configuration.• Determine all affected items.• Determine if change is in scope• Determine if formal Lesson Learned
submittal is appropriate.• Complete Informal Actions
• Initiate Change Order (Form U-5024), If Required
• Initiate Change Order (Form U-5024), If Required
ENGINEERING CHANGE CONTROL
ENGINEERING INPUT * (as required)
DESIGN ENGINEERING
DISTRIBUTE ECR FOR REVIEW /
APPROVAL
PRODUCT DATA CONTROL
ENGINEERING AIDES (HOURLY PEOPLE)
INTEGREATED PRODUCT TEAM (IPT)
(INCLUDES CHECKING AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT)REVIEW / APPROVE ECR *
Obtain:• Technical Approval• Implementation• Cost• CHECKING• Program Management
TRACK REVIEW
COMMENTS
ECP(IF REQUIRED)
CUSTOMER APPROVAL
(IF REQUIRED)
ACTION?
Terminate / Reference
Only
Answer to Originator
PROMOTE ECR; ER; DWG TO
RELEASE
PREPARE ER
REV ITEM CHANGE POSITION
(FORM)
ADD D.I.
ADD CHANGE ORDER
(if required)
UPDATE DIACS
PREPARE ER
REV ITEM CHANGE POSITION
(FORM)
ADD D.I.
ADD CHANGE ORDER
(if required)
UPDATE DIACS
ADD PC INFORMATION
DATAStart= End=
Touch Time = 7 hrsCycle Time= 11 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
TOTALStart= ECR receivedEnd= Released Engineering
Touch Time = 17 hrsCycle Time= 29 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
DATAStart= End=
Touch Time = 6.5 hrsCycle Time= 15 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
DATAStart= End=
Touch Time = 3 hrsCycle Time= 2 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
DATAStart= End=
Touch Time = .5 hrsCycle Time= 1 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
APPROVED?
NO ACTION
NO:Determine Action.Reinsert where required
YY
* = APPROVAL BABYSITTING REQUIRED
Problem Statement with Backup Data
FORMULATE AN ANSWER• Define the nature of the changes. • Collect additional information.• Determine the Design
Configuration.• Determine all affected items.• Determine if change is in scope• Determine if formal Lesson Learned
submittal is appropriate.• Complete Informal Actions• Initiate Change Order (Form U-
5024), If Required• Initiate Drawing Revision, If
Required
ENGINEERING CHANGE CONTROL
DESIGN ENGINEERING
DISTRIBUTE ECR FOR REVIEW
PRODUCT DATA CONTROL
ENGINEERING AIDES (HOURLY PEOPLE)
INTEGREATED PRODUCT TEAM (IPT)
(INCLUDES CHECKING)
CHECKING
REVIEW PROBLEM
• Verify that a problem exists• Determine cause.• Determine condition of prior
units built.• Establish a need date based
on the production schedule.
Receive ECR
Assign to Liaison or Design
Log In Access DataBase Review Answer for Completeness
O.K.
YES
NO
ENGINEERING SCREENING
BOARD REVIEW / APPROVAL *
O.K.
YES
NO
Action?
COPY TO ORIGINATOR
YES
NO
CREATE ER
PREPARE NORsCLOSE ECR
IN PDM
ESTABLISH APPROVAL
REQUIREMENTS
TECH REVIEW OF
CHANGE PACKAGE *
RECORD APPROVALS
DISTRIBUTE CHANGE PACKAGE
FOR REVIEW
REVIEW ECR & CHANGE PACKAGE *
Obtain:• Implementation• Cost
“B” BRD APPROVAL
*
“A” BRD APPROVAL
*
UPDATE DATABASE
UPDATE DATABASE
ECP(IF REQUIRED)
UPDATE DATABASE
SEND TO RELEASE OFFICE
COORDINATE
•Prioritize
•Fix Errors
RELEASE IN PDM
REVISE DIACS PARTS LIST
RELEASE IN DIACS
DATAStart= End=
Touch Time = 5 hrsCycle Time= 11 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
DATAStart= End=
Touch Time = 1 hrsCycle Time= 2.5 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
DATAStart= End=
Touch Time = 2 hrsCycle Time= 5 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
CHECKING DATAStart= End=
Touch Time = 5 hrsCycle Time= 21 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
DATAStart= End=
Touch Time = 1.5 hrsCycle Time= 2 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
TOTALStart= ECR receivedEnd= Released Engineering
Touch Time = 21 hrsCycle Time= 37.5 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
DATAStart= End=
Touch Time = 2 hrsCycle Time= 5 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
Terminate / Reference
Only
* = APPROVAL BABYSITTING REQUIRED
If not approved, determine action and reinsert as required.
If not approved, determine action and reinsert as required.
If not approved, determine action and reinsert as required.
If not approved, determine action and reinsert as required.
If not approved, determine action and reinsert as required.
If not approved, determine action and reinsert as required.
Problem Statement with Backup Data
FORMULATE AN ANSWER• Define the nature of the changes. • Collect additional information.• Determine the Design
Configuration.• Determine all affected items.• Determine if change is in scope• Determine if formal Lesson Learned
submittal is appropriate.• Complete Informal Actions• Initiate Change Order (Form U-
5024), If Required• Initiate Drawing Revision, If
Required
ENGINEERING CHANGE CONTROL
DESIGN ENGINEERING
DISTRIBUTE ECR FOR REVIEW
PRODUCT DATA CONTROL
ENGINEERING AIDES (HOURLY PEOPLE)
INTEGREATED PRODUCT TEAM (IPT)
(INCLUDES CHECKING)
CHECKING
REVIEW PROBLEM
• Verify that a problem exists• Determine cause.• Determine condition of prior
units built.• Establish a need date based
on the production schedule.
Receive ECR
Assign to Liaison or Design
Log In Access DataBase
REVIEW PROBLEM
• Verify that a problem exists• Determine cause.• Determine condition of prior
units built.• Establish a need date based
on the production schedule.
Receive ECR
Assign to Liaison or Design
Log In Access DataBase Review Answer for Completeness
O.K.
YES
NO
ENGINEERING SCREENING
BOARD REVIEW / APPROVAL *
O.K.
YES
NO
Action?
COPY TO ORIGINATOR
YES
NO
CREATE ER
PREPARE NORsCLOSE ECR
IN PDM
ESTABLISH APPROVAL
REQUIREMENTS
TECH REVIEW OF
CHANGE PACKAGE *
RECORD APPROVALS
DISTRIBUTE CHANGE PACKAGE
FOR REVIEW
REVIEW ECR & CHANGE PACKAGE *
Obtain:• Implementation• Cost
“B” BRD APPROVAL
*
“A” BRD APPROVAL
*
UPDATE DATABASE
UPDATE DATABASE
ECP(IF REQUIRED)
UPDATE DATABASE
SEND TO RELEASE OFFICE
COORDINATE
•Prioritize
•Fix Errors
RELEASE IN PDM
REVISE DIACS PARTS LIST
RELEASE IN DIACS
DATAStart= End=
Touch Time = 5 hrsCycle Time= 11 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
DATAStart= End=
Touch Time = 1 hrsCycle Time= 2.5 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
DATAStart= End=
Touch Time = 2 hrsCycle Time= 5 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
CHECKING DATAStart= End=
Touch Time = 5 hrsCycle Time= 21 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
DATAStart= End=
Touch Time = 1.5 hrsCycle Time= 2 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
TOTALStart= ECR receivedEnd= Released Engineering
Touch Time = 21 hrsCycle Time= 37.5 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
DATAStart= End=
Touch Time = 2 hrsCycle Time= 5 DaysFlow Time= Qty.= People=
Terminate / Reference
Only
* = APPROVAL BABYSITTING REQUIRED
If not approved, determine action and reinsert as required.
If not approved, determine action and reinsert as required.
If not approved, determine action and reinsert as required.
If not approved, determine action and reinsert as required.
If not approved, determine action and reinsert as required.
If not approved, determine action and reinsert as required.As-Is:As-Is:
To-Be:To-Be: Reduced Handoffs & Redundant Efforts
37 1/2 Days 29 Days
Design Engineering
Engineering Change Control
Product Data ControlEngineering AidesIntegrated Product Teams
• Cycle Time Reduction – 23%
• Cycle Time Reduction – 8.5 days (37.5 days to 29 days)
• Reduced Tech Ops Labor – 4 hours
• Reallocated effort from engineers to aides – 1.5 hours
• Projected Total Tech Ops Labor Savings – over $1M/ year
Cross Functional Coordination and Buy-in Achieved Through a Process Simulation Event
Process ValidatedProcess Validated
Quality
Quality
Mat
l Acq
& M
gt
Mat
l Acq
& M
gt
Prod O
ps
Prod O
ps
Tech O
ps
Tech O
ps
Each step of the new process was walked through in a simulated manner by a representative SME to ensure all procedural details were effectively addressed
• Design– Frank Delisi– Ed Booth
• Prod Ops / Mfg Engr– Franz Budel
• Quality– Joe Chenette
• Checking– David Brockman
• PP&C– Susan Granacki
• Program Management/IPT– Al Davidoff
• Procurement– Don Hallum– Ted McAfee– Jeff Burnett– Bobby Thompson– Pat Jackson
• PDC– Bill Richardson– Tanne Steen– Rebecca Jaster
• Liaison– Al Mendez– Peter DePaiva– Nathan Smith
And the Results are In…
““Lockheed Martin is one of nine Lockheed Martin is one of nine
Fortune 100 companies that have had a positive Fortune 100 companies that have had a positive
trend three years in a row (increased productivity), trend three years in a row (increased productivity),
only one of the nine in Aerospace industry – 11% only one of the nine in Aerospace industry – 11%
from 2001-2002from 2001-2002.”
Del Jones and Barbara Hansen. USA TODAY. McLean, Va.: Aug 13, 2003. pg. B.01Del Jones and Barbara Hansen. USA TODAY. McLean, Va.: Aug 13, 2003. pg. B.01
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: 303-971-7670
Mail: Lockheed Martin Space Systems CompanyM/S F9902P O Box 179Denver CO 80201-0179