Immigration in Portugal: recent trends & policy debatesTotal Eastern Europe* PALOP** Brazil Number %...
Transcript of Immigration in Portugal: recent trends & policy debatesTotal Eastern Europe* PALOP** Brazil Number %...
Immigration in Portugal:
recent trends & policy
debates
MetroMed, Milan, 11 December 2003
Maria Lucinda Fonseca
& Meghann Ormond
Centro de Estudos Geográficos, Univ. de Lisboa
With support from FLAD Luso-American Foundation
An overview of immigration in
Portugal - I Like other Southern European countries, Portugal
has its own strong tradition of emigration;
immigration, and social and political responses to it,
are comparably recent
Portugal only became a migration destination in the
1970s, with the fall of the dictatorship & the
independence of its former African colonies (Angola,
Mozambique, Guinea-Bissau, Cape Verde & São
Tomé e Príncipe) that also brought back hundreds of
thousands of Portuguese who were living in the
colonies (retornados)
An overview of immigration in
Portugal - II Like other Southern European countries, Portugal
has its own strong tradition of emigration;
immigration, and social and political responses to it,
are comparably recent
Portugal only became a migration destination in the
1970s, with the fall of the dictatorship & the
independence of its former African colonies (Angola,
Mozambique, Guinea-Bissau, Cape Verde & São
Tomé e Príncipe) that also brought back hundreds of
thousands of Portuguese who were living in the
colonies (retornados)
Most immigrants & retornados ended up
settling in the Lisbon Metro Area, a
trend that continues today for most
immigrants (except EU citizens & those
involved in the agricultural sector), &
other urban areas throughout the
country (though to a lesser extent)
Evolution of legally resident foreign
population in Portugal, by continent of
origin, 1980-99
1980 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94* 95 96 97 98 1999
Years
0
50
100
150
200Thousands
Total Africa North America South America Asia Europe
Source: Fonseca et al., 2002
Documented
foreigners
with a
residence
permit, by
main
countries of
nationality,
2000
LMA as a %
Origin Number % Number % of the country
Total 208198 100 134485 100 64,6
Europe 61653 29,6 27616 20,5 44,8
EU 56783 27,3 25164 18,7 44,3
Africa 99107 47,6 82626 61,4 83,4
Angola 20468 9,8 16659 12,4 81,4
Cape verde 47216 22,7 41335 30,7 87,5
Guinea-Bissau 16006 7,7 12071 9 75,4
Mozambique 4660 2,2 4042 3 86,7
S. Tomé 5488 2,6 4987 3,7 90,9
North America 10259 4,9 5260 3,9 51,3
Canada 2003 1 604 0,4 30,2
USA 8060 3,9 4518 3,4 56,1
Central &
South
America 27638 13,3 12227 9,1 44,2
Brazil 22411 10,8 10841 8,1 48,4
Asia 8734 4,2 6317 4,7 72,3
India 1296 0,6 1094 0,8 84,4
China 3278 1,6 2044 1,5 62,4
Oceania 529 0,3 244 0,2 46,1
Stateless
people 273 0,1 195 0,1 71,4
Unknown 5 0 0 0 0,0
Lisbon Metro Area
(LMA)
Portugal
Source: Fonseca and Esteves, 2002, pp. 258
The new geography of
immigration to Portugal
Since the late 1990s, the geography of immigration to Portugal has undergone truly profound changes, from that which has to do with recruitment to the geographic patterns of immigrant settlement in Portugal
Numerical change in documented
foreigners, by main countries of nationality,
1997-2001
A B C D D-A
Nationality Residence
permit
Residence
permit
Permanent
residence
permit
Residence &
Permanent
residence
permits
%
change
1997 2001 2001 Total (%)
Total 175,263 223,976 126,901 350,877 100.2
EU 46,043 61,732 -- 61,732 34.1
Non-EU 129,22 162,244 126,901 289,145 123.8
PALOP 77,6 101,379 15,624 117,003 50.8
Brazil 19,99 23,439 23,713 47,152 135.9
Other countries 31,63 37,426 87,564 12,499 295.2
PALOP = Portuguese-speaking African countries
Source: Fonseca, 2003 (forthcoming)
New sending countries
Diversification of sending countries
Development of a migratory flow from
Eastern Europe, namely from:
• Ukraine
• Moldova
• Romania
• Russia
Main nationalities of immigrants with
a residence permit in Portugal, 2001
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000
Cape Verde
Brazil
Angola
Guinea-Bissau
UK
Spain
Germany
USA
France
S.Tomé and Prince
Number of immigrants (residence permit)
Total immigrants:223,976 / Top 10 nationalities:175,696 (78.4%)
Main nationalities of immigrants with a
permanence permit in Portugal,
2001 & 2002
Total immigrants: 174,558 / Top 15 nationalities: 163,242 (93.5%)
Source: Fonseca, 2003 (forthcoming)
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000
UkraineBrazil
MoldovaRomania
Cape VerdeAngolaRussia
G.-BissauChinaIndia
PakistanBulgariaS. ToméMoroccoLithuania
New settlement patterns in
Portugal
Despite the fact that the majority resides in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area, it is possible to find them throughout the country, spreading themselves out in relationship to the work opportunities available in each region.
Total Eastern Europe* PALOP** Brazil
Number % Number % Number % Number %
R. Norte 24,005 16.9 15,016 20.2 873 5.1 3024 11.7
R. Centro 19,468 13.7 13,804 18.6 882 5.1 1929 7.4
R. Lisboa V. Tejo 71,254 50.3 28,434 38.2 13,642 79.2 17,172 66.2
R. Alentejo 8056 5.7 4332 5.8 628 3.6 1364 5.3
R. Algarve 18,853 13.3 12,824 17.2 1189 6.9 2451 9.4
Total 141,636 100.0 74,410 100.0 17,214 100.0 25,940 100.0
*Only the four main nationalities are included (Ukraine, Moldova, Romania and Russia)
** Includes only the 3 main nationalities: Cape Verde, Angola and Guinea-Bissau)
Source: Fonseca and Malheiros, 2003
Foreign population with registered work contracts valid for
receiving a permanence permit, by region of origin and region
(NUT II) of settlement in mainland Portugal (31/12/2001)
Residence permits (Stock), 2001 (%)
Permanence permits, 2001 (%)
Source: Fonseca, 2003 (forthcoming)
Settlement patterns of documented immigrants living in Portugal: Stock (residence permits) and permanence permits, 31/12/2001
2001 Distribution of EU
citizens living in
Portugal
Highest concentrations
in the Lisbon Metro
Area & Algarve Region
Retirees settling in the
Algarve from the UK,
Germany & the
Netherlands
2001 Distribution of
PALOP citizens living in
Portugal
Highest concentration in
the Lisbon Metro Area;
general settlement in urban
areas
Arrival began with
independence of the former
colonies in the 1970s
Employed in construction &
office/domestic cleaning
PALOP = Portuguese-speaking African countries
2001 Distribution of
Brazilian citizens
living in Portugal
Highest concentration in the Lisbon Metro Area
Arrival began in the 1970s, with the fall of the dictatorship in PT
Employed in construction & the service sector
2001 Distribution of
(Non-EU) European
citizens living in
Portugal
Highest concentrations in the Lisbon Metro Area & the Algarve Region, but also spread out in rural areas
Arrival began in the late 1990s, with the initiation of large-scale construction projects
Employed in construction & the agricultural sector
Professional level
Eastern European immigrants, although they have relatively high educational and professional qualifications, they are employed in low-paying and socially-undervalued jobs, such as construction (men) and industrial cleaning and domestic work (women).
However, there is a significant percentage of Eastern Europeans working in agriculture, especially in the Alentejo, Ribatejo and Oeste Regions, as well as in some types of more work-intensive industries in the Northern Region.
CAE Ukraine Brazil Moldova Romania Cape Verde Angola Russia
Agriculture and Fishery 5.4 1.6 5.0 6.0 1.5 1.1 4.3 Extractive Industry 1.5 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.6
Manufacturing Industry 24.2 7.8 13.3 8.8 4.2 4.7 28.1 Water, Gas and Electricity 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
Construction 41.3 25.5 54.1 53.4 43.4 33.7 32.3 Commerce 7.0 12.1 5.8 5.5 6.0 8.1 7.3
Restaurants and Hotels 6.0 22.1 6.0 6.6 9.2 14.1 9.6 Transports and Communications 1.5 2.0 2.4 1.2 0.6 0.6 1.4
Services 13.1 28.6 12.8 17.9 34.9 37.7 16.3 Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Source: Portuguese Labour Inspecion (IGT) Report (January 10th – December 31st, 2001)
Work contracts made with immigrants holding
permanence permits, by employment sector and
countries of origin (%)
Policy debates
The recent massive increase of
immigration to Portugal, especially the
new migratory wave coming from
Eastern Europe, has made waves in the
media and has prompted a great
national debate about immigration
policy.
The terms of the policy
debates
The new “immigration law”, published on 25
February 2003, brings some new issues into
the immigration debate.
The coalition government of Social
Democrats and Christian-Democrats that
took office in April 2002 has drawn a more
complex and elaborate law based on three
arguments.
1.The promotion of legal immigration according to the country’s labour market needs;
2.The effective or real integration of immigrants;
3.The fight against illegal immigration.
The terms of the policy
debates - II
Management of migration
The Government establishes a maximum annual limit for entries of third country nationals onto the national territory, and workers coming to Portugal must hold a labour visa or a residence permit.
The term “quota” is not mentioned in the law, but the quota principle is used. A new kind of work visa, for scientific and research activities, was created with the goal of keeping scientists and highly skilled people in Portugal.
Most of the institutions which opinion is taken into account for the elaboration of the report on labour import are closely related to the labour market rather than to the immigrant field.
Immigrant associations and NGOs are only represented by the ACIME, and in its new and more complex structure, through the Consultative Council for Immigration Issues (COCAI).
Management of migration - II
SEF now has more power and less bureaucratic
procedures to follow when removing
undocumented foreigners from the country.
The reference to the geographical unit “distritos”
as hosting areas is also remarkable because there
had never been a reference to the settlement
regions – until now, immigrants were absolutely
free to choose their areas of residence.
Management of migration - III
Integration Policy: Practices & Partnerships Education & Health
Identification of
specific measures
directed to
immigrants/
foreigners
Identification of
partnerships
(partners)
Geographic
level of
intervention
Preliminary
assessment
Education YES. Entreculturas
Project; Intercultural
mediators w orking in
schools
YES. Ministry of
Education, schools,
municipalities, NGOs
National--
conducted at
local level,
particularly in
LMA
Positive
Health Basically NO. There is
only a specif ic initiative
for asylum seekers,
some health information
campaigns and check-
ups in immigrants'
neighbourhoods
NO. Some local
associations have
developed initiatives
in some immigrants'
neighbourhoods
National and
LMA
municipalities
???
LMA = Lisbon Metropolitan Area Source: Fonseca et al., 2002
Integration Policy: Practices & Partnerships Social Assistance & Culture
Identification of
specific measures
directed to
immigrants/
foreigners
Identification of
partnerships
(partners)
Geographic
level of
intervention
Preliminary
assessment
Social
assistance
YES. Training
programmes aimed
specif ically at ethnic
minorities or immigrants
YES. Ministry of Internal
Affairs (Civil Governor
of Lisbon - f inancial
contribution), Social
Security, Portuguese
Council for Refugees,
NGOs, municipalities. EU
funds support
Programme INTEGRAR
Mainly local ???
Culture YES. Ethnic festivals,
support to cultural
associations - music
and dance w ith African
or Afro-South
American influences
YES. Municipalities,
immigrants'
associations, ACIME
Local Positive
ACIME = High Commissariat on Immigration & Ethnic Minorities
Integration Policy: Practices & Partnerships Information Society & Political Participation
Identification of
specific measures
directed to
immigrants/
foreigners
Identification of
partnerships
(partners)
Geographic
level of
intervention
Preliminary
assessment
Information
society
YES. Digital Cities
Programme, Project
Pelas Minorias
ACIME, IEFP, LMA
municipalities, Ministry of
Science and Technology
Local -
w orldw ide
diffusion due
to the use of
technology
Positive
Political
participation
NO. The extension of
voting rights in local
elections depends on
reciprocality for
Portuguese citizens
NO. Immigrants'
associations, NGOs,
some political parties
and municipal authorities
have campaigned for
the registration of
foreigners in the
electoral census
Local Positive (in
principle), still
very limited
Integration Policy: Practices & Partnerships Housing & Employment
Identification of
specific measures
directed to
immigrants/
foreigners
Identification of
partnerships (partners)
Geographic
level of
intervention
Preliminary
assessment
Housing NO. YES (general housing
policy). Contracts betw een
the municipalities and the
central government
(f inancial contribution).
Limited participation of some
NGOs
Regional (2
metropolitan
areas),
conducted locally
(municipalities)
Positive in terms of
improving housing
conditions. Less
effective in terms of
contributing to the
reduction of social
problems of the
neighbourhoods
Employment YES (but limited).
Agreement betw een
ACIME and IEFP. Training
of cultural mediators
(Programme Education-
Employment). Training
programmes developed
by some immigrants'
associations
YES. ACIME, IEFP,
immigrants' associations,
(exceptionally) municipalities
Regional Positive
Fonseca, Maria Lucinda (2003, forthcoming) - " Dinâmicas de Integração dos imigrantes:
estratégias e protagonistas."
Fonseca, Maria Lucinda; Caldeira, Maria José; Esteves, Alina (2002) - "New Forms
of Migration into the European South: Challenges for Citizenship and Governance. The
Portuguese Case", International Journal of Population Geography, vol. 8 (2), pp. 135-152.
Fonseca, Maria Lucinda; Esteves, Alina (2002) - “Migration and New Religion Townscapes
in Lisbon,“ in Fonseca et al., Immigration and Place in Mediterranean Metropolises, Lisbon,
Luso-American Foundation, pp. 255-289.
Fonseca, Maria Lucinda; Malheiros, Jorge; Esteves, Alina; Caldeira, Maria José (2002) -
Immigrants in Lisbon: Routes of integration, Lisbon, Centro de Estudos Geográficos,
Estudos para o Planeamento Regional e Urbano, nº 56.
Fonseca, Maria Lucinda; Malheiros, J. M. (2003) - "«Nouvelle» Immigration, Marché du
Travail et Competitivité des Régions Portugaises", Géographie, Économie, Societé - Revue
Scientifique Internationale, vol. 4, nº 2.
Sources