IMMIGRATION, EXPANSION, & SECTIONAL CONFLICT (1840-1848)

19
IMMIGRATION, EXPANSION, & SECTIONAL CONFLICT (1840-1848) CHAPTER 13

description

CHAPTER 13. IMMIGRATION, EXPANSION, & SECTIONAL CONFLICT (1840-1848). Expansion brought sectional antagonism to the boiling point, split the Democratic party in the late 1840’s, and set the nation on the path to the Civil War. Explain the following statement with evidence:. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of IMMIGRATION, EXPANSION, & SECTIONAL CONFLICT (1840-1848)

Page 1: IMMIGRATION, EXPANSION, & SECTIONAL CONFLICT (1840-1848)

IMMIGRATION, EXPANSION, & SECTIONAL CONFLICT (1840-1848)

CHAPTER 13

Page 2: IMMIGRATION, EXPANSION, & SECTIONAL CONFLICT (1840-1848)

EXPLAIN THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT WITH EVIDENCE:

Expansion brought sectional antagonism to the boiling point, split the Democratic party in the late 1840’s, and set the nation on the path to the Civil War.

Page 3: IMMIGRATION, EXPANSION, & SECTIONAL CONFLICT (1840-1848)

IMMIGRATION: EXPECTATIONS & REALITIES Causes: Religious freedom for Mormons

& Norwegians; Economic opportunity for Germans, British, & Irish.

Most were Irish & German. Hucksters Harsh voyage Many lacked capital needed to start a

farm. Germans were typically skilled and many

were farmers; settled further inland.

Page 4: IMMIGRATION, EXPANSION, & SECTIONAL CONFLICT (1840-1848)

(CONTINUED)

Famous German immigrants- German neighborhoods, newspapers,

doctors, lawyers, etc….self-sufficient Irish were Catholic, poor & unskilled and

lived in eastern cities to work. (factories, canals, RR)

Irish enemies: free blacks, abolitionists, & nativists. Why?

Page 5: IMMIGRATION, EXPANSION, & SECTIONAL CONFLICT (1840-1848)

ANTI-IMMIGRANT FERVOR Awful Disclosures of the Hotel Dieu

Nunnery Nativism & the Know-Nothing Party

(formerly Order of the Star Spangled Banner)

Labor Protests Commonwealth v. Hunt Immigrants were fully committed to

Democratic Party. Why?

Page 7: IMMIGRATION, EXPANSION, & SECTIONAL CONFLICT (1840-1848)

POLITICAL SUPPORT Democrats

Jackson supporters Immigrants “Common man” Anti-reform

Whigs Old Federalists Anti-Jacksonians Reformers

Page 8: IMMIGRATION, EXPANSION, & SECTIONAL CONFLICT (1840-1848)

THE WEST Adams-Onis Treaty

1819 Oregon claimed by

Russia, Britain, & U.S.

Tejas (Texas) owned by Mexico.

How does the U.S. end up with both?

Page 9: IMMIGRATION, EXPANSION, & SECTIONAL CONFLICT (1840-1848)

1. EVENTS LEADING TO TEXAS REVOLUTION 1836

Causes for Texas migration Why did Mexico close the border to U.S.

immigrants? 1836: 30,000 Americans, 5,000 slaves,

4,000 Mexicans Slavery Causes of Texas Revolution

Page 10: IMMIGRATION, EXPANSION, & SECTIONAL CONFLICT (1840-1848)

2. TEXAS REVOLUTION 1836 (TEXAS INDEPENDENCE)

1836- rebellions suppressed by Santa Anna

Sam Houston Alamo & Goliad Battle of San Jacinto Treaty of Velasco Texas Republic: Should the U.S. annex?

Page 11: IMMIGRATION, EXPANSION, & SECTIONAL CONFLICT (1840-1848)

3. ANNEXATION OF TEXAS, 1845 Yes- manifest

destiny No- could lead to

war with Mexico & there was the issue of slavery

Tyler enters in 1841 after death of William Henry Harrison

Tyler loses election of 1844, but leaves with a legacy: Texas

Page 12: IMMIGRATION, EXPANSION, & SECTIONAL CONFLICT (1840-1848)

(CONTINUED) 1844- dark horse

candidate James K. Polk (Democrat) was an expansionist.

Tyler considered Polk’s win as a signal to push annexation.

Tyler persuaded Congress to pass a joint resolution which only required a simple majority. Texas annexed!

Page 13: IMMIGRATION, EXPANSION, & SECTIONAL CONFLICT (1840-1848)

4. MEXICAN WAR 1846-1848 Causes- $2 million

debt, Alamo & Goliad, Texas Annexation, border dispute

Polk’s decision to start a war (& offer to purchase CA, NM)

Lincoln’s “Spot Resolution”

Major military leaders: Zachary Taylor & Winfield Scott

Page 14: IMMIGRATION, EXPANSION, & SECTIONAL CONFLICT (1840-1848)

5. RESULTS OF THE MEXICAN WAR Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo: U.S. gets

Texas, border settled at Rio Grande, and bought New Mexico & California for $15 million.

Why did we pay for territory? Why didn’t we take all of Mexico? With the vast amount of additional

land, what controversial issue arises? SLAVERY!

Page 15: IMMIGRATION, EXPANSION, & SECTIONAL CONFLICT (1840-1848)

ATTEMPT TO SETTLE ISSUE OF SLAVERY & EXPANSION

Wilmot Proviso David Wilmot of Pennsylvania. Proposed that slavery be prohibited in

newly acquired territories. Southern Dems opposed on basis that it

was south of the Missouri Compromise. Passed in the House, but not the Senate. Caused a split in the Democratic Party

along sectional lines. Could Congress prohibit slavery?

Page 16: IMMIGRATION, EXPANSION, & SECTIONAL CONFLICT (1840-1848)

6. OREGON 1840-1848: 11,500

Americans travelled to Oregon territory.

Oregon issue was significant in election of 1844: “54◦40’ or FIGHT!”

Polk compromised at the 49th parallel.

Angered western Dems.

Page 17: IMMIGRATION, EXPANSION, & SECTIONAL CONFLICT (1840-1848)

UNITED STATES MAP IN 1853

Page 18: IMMIGRATION, EXPANSION, & SECTIONAL CONFLICT (1840-1848)

JAMES K. POLK