Imc651 Critical Analysis (Fendi 2010477674) 1

12
FACULTY OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT Bachelor of Information Science (Hons) Information Systems Management EVALUATION OF INFORMATION SERVICES (IMC651) ASSIGNMENT: ARTICLE REVIEWS Sociability and Social Interaction On Social Networking Websites by Andrew Keenan and Ali Shiri Prepared By: NOOR MOHD EFFENDI BIN MOHD RASHID Group : NIMBF10X Prepared for: NORSHILA SHAIFUDDIN May 2015

description

EVALUATION OF INFORMATION SERVICES

Transcript of Imc651 Critical Analysis (Fendi 2010477674) 1

  • FACULTY OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT

    Bachelor of Information Science (Hons)

    Information Systems Management

    EVALUATION OF INFORMATION SERVICES

    (IMC651)

    ASSIGNMENT:

    ARTICLE REVIEWS

    Sociability and Social Interaction On Social Networking Websites

    by

    Andrew Keenan and Ali Shiri

    Prepared By:

    NOOR MOHD EFFENDI BIN MOHD RASHID

    Group : NIMBF10X

    Prepared for:

    NORSHILA SHAIFUDDIN

    May 2015

  • EVALUATION OF INFORMATION SERVICES (IMC651) CRITICAL ANALYSIS

    10

    ABSTRACT

    This paper is focused to research paper which explore sociality by discusses multiple

    type of social interaction and how this social interaction encourages their users to

    communicate and interact. The main objective of discussions is about types of social

    networking application (Facebook, MySpace, LinkedIn and Twitter) including their issues

    and characteristic features through observations and user experiences.

    Keywords: Article review, social networking, definition, Facebook, MySpace, network,

    sociability, Twitter, Linkedln, interaction

  • EVALUATION OF INFORMATION SERVICES (IMC651) CRITICAL ANALYSIS

    10

    1.0 INTRODUCTION

    In the new era of technology, the internet has led to the creation of new

    communication media called social interaction in social networks. According to

    Dictionary.com, a social network is the development of social and professional

    relationships; sharing information and services among people with similar interests.

    Basically, it relates to the use of the website or other technology to communicate with

    others and share information, and other resources.

    Social websites such as are Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, LinkedIn and etc. but for

    this review, we just focused on four important type of social websites which offer a

    variety of features to facilitate interaction on the internet. Users can share their status

    at wall, private message (PM), photos, songs, videos and many standards of

    expressions.

    The number of social websites has also grown exponentially, and offering each

    different focuses, designs and features for their users. These social websites want we

    join their community and get new experience with exploration their social web

    specifically to analyzing how social websites encourage sociability between users.

    This analysis will focus on a four major social networking websites (Facebook,

    MySpace, Twitter and LinkedIn) and explore their features that encourage sociability.

    Therefore, this is article to review their articles regarding to main topic social

    interaction websites and discuss what point of views the author want to deliver to the

    audience based on their research paper "Sociability and Social Interaction on Social

    Networking Websites by Andrew Keenan and Ali Shiri".

  • EVALUATION OF INFORMATION SERVICES (IMC651) CRITICAL ANALYSIS

    10

    2.0 AUTHORS BACKGROUND

    All the authors have a different background such but from the same country. Andrew

    Keenan, Professor at School of Library and Information Studies and Humanities

    Computing Program, University of Alberta, Canada. Ali Shiri is a Professor at School

    of Library and Information Studies, University of Alberta, Canada. Their article about

    type of social websites (Facebook, MySpace, LinkedIn and Twitter) including their

    issues and characteristic features through observations and user experiences.

    3.0 PROBLEM STATEMENT

    This study aimed to determine the ability to interact with others via the social

    networking site with the characteristics of the existing design standards or

    technologies to promote sociability. Before, users interact with letters and telegrams.

    Social network analysis (SNA), examines how the structure of a network affects users

    within the network. Many websites that encourage social interaction through profile-

    based user accounts include Facebook and MySpace.

    Previously users interact very limited and subject to the use of the social networking

    site built. This is because the interaction sites have features and functions that vary

    depending on the needs of the users who use it. But now, the technology has with

    other users. In addition, the blog created by the user reviews also allow developed to

    allow interaction sites online dating profiles and encourage interaction readers to

    respond to the topic with the author and other readers in the future.

    4.0 OBJECTIVES

    The main objectives this article reviews the features of social networking and also to

    explore and identify what the main idea that has been suggested by the authors

    through their research studies which is include with their assumption, contribution,

    solution and literature reviews. In addition, it also to find the similarities and difference

    social networks through different methods and also to examine what is the strongest

    and weakness of the articles regarding to main topic.

  • EVALUATION OF INFORMATION SERVICES (IMC651) CRITICAL ANALYSIS

    10

    5.0 LITERATURE REVIEW

    The social web and social networking are often used as synonyms, but the two

    concepts have decidedly separate meanings. The social web refers specifically to

    websites and web technologies, while social networking is an existing body of theory

    relating to human interaction. Analysis of the social web to examine people focused

    websites and their strategies to encourage sociability. Currently, analyzing sociability

    on the people focused social websites is a new trend.

    A social network is a social structure comprised of types of interdependency between

    nodes. The configuration of individual nodes into a larger web of interdependency

    beginning in rudimentary stages with Emile Durkheim and Ferdinand Tonnies. While

    traditional social science research focuses on the individual actors, SNA emphasizes

    the relationships between actors within the network. Each community will have its

    own culture, values and norms that develop based on the needs of its users.

    6.0 METHODOLOGY

    Form this reviews, four main social websites (Facebook, MySpace, LinkedIn and

    Twitter) were examined from a user study perspective. After thoroughly participating

    on the websites, a series of observations were recorded from each experience. These

    experiences were then compared to understand the different approaches of each

    website. Evaluation of websites based on experiences and literature about this

    website. This research is exploratory study, so the data gathering process consisted

    of exploring the features of each website.

  • EVALUATION OF INFORMATION SERVICES (IMC651) CRITICAL ANALYSIS

    10

    7.0 FINDINGS

    For this article is discussed about the features of the social networking to the world

    community and stated that the presence of social networking sites has made life

    comfortable and enjoyable. The authors focused on four examples of social

    networking websites such as Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn and MySpace by

    explained with details about all the features and aspects that available on those social

    networking sites. From this exploratory study, the authors has found Facebook and

    MySpace, as the largest social websites, receive the most of good coverage. LinkedIn

    and Twitter represent an application of social websites, focusing on professional

    networks and micro-blogging (quick updates), respectively. These serve as points of

    comparison between the social web giants Facebook and MySpace.

    Sociability on Facebook is an extension of sociability in the public and user personal

    information (or profile page) is accessible by people we have added as friends.

    Facebook encourages sociability by creating a comfortable, private and familiar social

    environment. Facebook restructured as the popular social web by strongly

    encouraging users to use their proper name different with social web, MySpace. But,

    Facebook has restricted profile access area and it is perhaps Facebooks most

    distinguishing feature. Facebook also encourages sociability through its recent

    redesign includes a tabbed window interface to separate categories of users

    information, like photos, videos, events etc.

    Facebook has also integrated an instant messenger chat client into the web redesign.

    This makes Facebook an all-encompassing social web environment. Facebook

    encourages users to focus their computer mediated social interactions in a singular

    web environment. Facebook encourages sociability by representing real world

    social connections in a virtual space and an all-encompassing social web destination

    through networks a safe, private web environment.

    MySpace also encourages sociability with representing a users identity in a public

    web environment. The emphasis in MySpace is providing a public virtual space for

    user public identity accessible to anyone. Sociability on MySpace is same with the

    Facebook is by real world and virtual connections. MySpace also allows users

  • EVALUATION OF INFORMATION SERVICES (IMC651) CRITICAL ANALYSIS

    10

    outside of their network to view users profile pages, although with limited access. All

    information on the profile page, which normally includes whatever information user

    enter when creating user profile is viewable and searchable. Searching power allows

    web users to quickly locate someone on MySpace. By having publicly accessible

    profiles, MySpace users are highly visible, and searchable through popular search

    engines. Sometime has a misleading profile and this is public accessibility feature of

    MySpace.

    MySpace does allow users to submit any amount of content they feel deserves public

    recognition. Privacy settings are offered around uploaded media (photos and video).

    Users may also set their profile to private, restricting profile to view by friends with

    granted profile access. MySpace users very vulnerable to unwanted groups having

    access to their information, and this social web is not safe and no privacy in

    accessible. One of MySpace attraction is users allowed to edit the HTML of their

    profiles and choose their own domain names, MySpace users can create highly

    personal web spaces, unique from other users. We can concludes, MySpace is the

    public space of the internet. Poorly managed privacy settings or personal discretion

    are hazardous on MySpace.

    Differentiate with LinkedIn which encourages sociability through professional

    networking. As a business oriented social networking site, LinkedIn focuses on

    encouraging professional relationships. All services on the website function solely to

    foster professional relationships. While this is decidedly useful for its users, LinkedIn

    an increasing of highly focused social websites. Privacy in the network operates in a

    unique way. This website uses gated access approach where users must get

    permission from the user to view their profile page. LinkedIn also features a pay

    version of the site. The pay version promises to facilitate business relationships and

    new jobs more effectively. At LinkedIn, sociability is also facilitated through payment.

    From this articles review, the author also has found Twitter encourages sociability

    through simplicity. Twitter is a service for friends, family and co-workers to

    communicate and stay connected quickly. This social website focus on exclusively on

  • EVALUATION OF INFORMATION SERVICES (IMC651) CRITICAL ANALYSIS

    10

    quick 140 characters or less updates. Twitter is decidedly simple, which makes

    interacting with the interface tremendously easy and intuitive for users familiar with

    social networking websites. Like LinkedIn, Twitter is a niche focused website, but

    instead of focusing on a niche community and technology. Twitter has streamlined

    their technological approach by focusing specifically on SMS-length updates,

    essentially creating web-broadcast micro-blogging. Before becoming friends with

    another Twitter user and subscribing their feed, user must get their permission. From

    a privacy perspective, Twitter has variable privacy options. Users are able to protect

    their Twitter updates by altering their privacy settings, but the default account displays

    Twitter updates publicly. Twitter updates are capped at 140 characters is that SMS

    messages are also capped at 140 characters. Twitter is quick, direct and multi-modal.

    Twitter is the fastest growing social network in the world (Snyder, 2008).

    8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

    From this review, exploratory study is an initial overview of sociability on social

    websites. The authors, state the future research possibilities for sociability online are

    numerous. One possible avenue for further studies in sociability is user studies. User

    studies can document which social features are most frequently used or considered to

    facilitate sociability based on user behavior. Finally, researchers will try developing a

    theoretical social application and testing its effectiveness in encouraging sociability

    amongst a test group of users. This data could be used to develop new social

    applications.

    9.0 SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY

    The result of the study showed that most of user use social web for socializing their

    activities than for academic purposes. In the emergent social web, interaction and

    content has become an immersive experience. Facebooks recent addition of an in-

    browser instant messenger client allows users to chat instantly with any friends

    online. This is both an interactive feature and a content feature, encouraging users to

    socialize through both the technology of the system and the content of the

    conversation. Immersive social features like in-browser instant messaging are

    transforming the social web into an all-encompassing web based social interaction.

  • EVALUATION OF INFORMATION SERVICES (IMC651) CRITICAL ANALYSIS

    10

    10.0 LIMITATION OF STUDY

    No limitations study because a comparison of different models of sociability does not

    yet exist. This study focuses specifically on what makes social websites social. This

    social websites were examined from a user study perspective. After thoroughly

    participating on the websites, a series of observations were recorded from each

    experience. These experiences were then compared to understand the different

    approaches of each website.

  • EVALUATION OF INFORMATION SERVICES (IMC651) CRITICAL ANALYSIS

    10

    11.0 CONCLUSION

    These websites offer users a variety of options for interaction including media sharing,

    blogging, public discussions, events and a host of other features. Facebook and My

    Space have a large user base to facilitate this multitude of features, and also allow

    users to develop their own applications within the meta-social environment. The major

    difference between Facebook and My Space is privacy vs publicity. Their focus is on

    the visibility of their user base. Smaller social websites encourage sociability by

    offering specific types of sociability. While most users flock to either My Space or

    Facebook when joining a social web community, Twitter has created the intriguing

    space of micro-blogging by focusing on a specific technology. From an interactive

    perspective, sociability on social websites is largely determined by the design of the

    website. Perspective, Twitters design quickly articulates the purpose of the site quick

    updates. From a content perspective, sociability on social websites is also largely

    determined by user content. Facebooks attempts to create social desktop have

    manifested as complex, information rich user profiles. Immersive social features like in-

    browser instant messaging are transforming the social web into an all-encompassing

    web based social interaction. This exploratory study is an initial overview of sociability

    on social websites. As a Conclusion, the social networking can give a lot advantages

    to the user if they used for positive reason and not vice versa. In the emergent

    social web, interaction and content has become an immersive experience. This is

    examples an interactive feature and a content feature, encouraging users to

    socialize through both the technology of the system and the content of the

    conversation. Immersive social features like in-browser instant messaging are

    transforming the social web into an all- encompassing web based social interaction.

    It can be consider as basic natural life because its all depends on us on how we

    handle something for own good or bad.

  • EVALUATION OF INFORMATION SERVICES (IMC651) CRITICAL ANALYSIS

    11

    BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Keenan, A., & Ali Shiri (2009). Sociability and social interaction on social networking

    websites. Library Review, Vol.58(6), 438-450.

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00242530910969794

    Social Networking. (n.d.). Dictionary.com Unabridged. Retrieved October 23, 2014, from

    Dictionary.com website: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/social networking

    Top 15 Most Popular Social Networking Sites. (2014, Oct). eBizMBa .Retrieved

    October 123, 2014 from http://www.ebizmba.com/articles/social-networking-websites

  • EVALUATION OF INFORMATION SERVICES (IMC651) CRITICAL ANALYSIS

    12

    APPENDICES