IMBA Managerial Economics Jack Wu. Market Power Definition: ability to influence price monopoly --...
-
Upload
roderick-fitzgerald -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of IMBA Managerial Economics Jack Wu. Market Power Definition: ability to influence price monopoly --...
IMBA Managerial EconomicsJack Wu
Market PowerDefinition: ability to influence pricemonopoly -- single supplier of good or a
service with no close substituteoligopoly -- few suppliersmonopsony -- single buyer oligopsony -- few suppliers
Sources of Market Powerunique resources
human natural
intellectual propertypatentCopyright
economies of scale / scopeproduct differentiationgovernment regulation
-50
50
70
130
150
250
0.4 0.8 1.2 1.4 1.6 2
demand (marginal benefit)
marginal revenue
Quantity (Million units a year)
Pri
ce (
$ p
er
unit
)
Monopoly: Marginal Revenue and Price
infra-marginal units
Price ($)
Sales
Total Revenue
($)
Marginal Revenue
($)
Total Cost ($)
Marginal Cost ($)
Profit ($)
200 0.0 0 50 -50 190 0.2 38 190 52 10 -40 180 0.4 72 170 56 20 16 170 0.6 102 150 62 30 40 160 0.8 128 130 70 40 58 150 1.0 150 110 80 50 70 140 1.2 168 90 92 60 76 130 1.4 182 70 106 70 76 120 1.6 192 50 122 80 70 110 1.8 198 30 140 90 58 100 2.0 200 10 160 100 40 90 2.2 198 -10 182 110 16
Revenue, Cost, and Profit
Monopoly: Profit Maximum, IOperate at scale where marginal revenue = marginal cost
-50
50
70
130
150
250
0.4 0.8 1.2 1.4 1.6 2
demand (marginal benefit)
marginal revenuemarginal cost
Quantity (Million units a year)
Pri
ce (
$ p
er
unit
)
Monopoly: Profit Maximum, II
Monopoly: Profit Maximum, IIIcontribution margin = total revenue less
variable costprofit-maximizing scale: selling additional
unit does not change the contribution margin
Demand ChangeFind new scale where marginal revenue = marginal cost should change price new scale and price depend on both new demand and costs
0
50
100
150
200
250
0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2
marginal cost
new demand
original demand
new marginal revenueQuantity (Million units a year)
Pri
ce (
$ p
er
unit
)
Prozac: Demand Reduction
Cost ChangeFind new scale where marginal revenue = marginal costchange in MC --> should change price (but
less than change in MC)change in fixed cost --> should not change
price or scale
-50
50
100
150
200
0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2
demand
Quantity (Million units a year)
Pri
ce (
$ p
er
unit
)
k
marginal revenue
original marginal cost
new marginal cost
Reduction in Marginal Cost
3G Licensing“There’s good and bad in auctioning off spectrum … it may raise costs for telecoms providers” Anthony Wong, Director-General, OFTA, Hong Kong
� How does one-time license fee affect price and scale of operations?
Advertisingbenefit of advertising -- increment in
contribution marginadvertising elasticity = % increase in demand
from 1% increase in advertising
Advertising: Profit MaximumProfit-maximizing advertising/sales = incremental margin x advertising elasticity
• incremental margin = (price - MC)
Prozac: AdvertisingCompetition from generics wouldreduce incremental marginraise advertising elasticity
Coke vs Pepsi, Nov. 1999Coke
raised prices by 7% increased advertising and other marketing
Pepsi raised price by 6.9%what about advertising?
AnswerPepsi should increase advertising expenditure for
two reasons: price increase --> increase in incremental
margin; Pepsi’s increase in advertising will attract some
marginal consumers -- those who are brand-switchers, relatively less loyal to Pepsi/Coke; so Coke’s demand will be more sensitive to advertising (higher advertising elasticity)
Dollar General“Our customer lives within three to five miles of the store, knows we’re there” cut advertising from 3.8% to 0.2% of revenue sales dropped but profit rose
0
30
300
Quantity (Million units a year)
Pri
ce (
Cents
per
unit
)
0
30
Quantity (Million units a year)
Pri
ce (
Cents
per
unit
)
supply
demand
150
60
marginal revenue
marginalcost
demand
(a) Perfect Competition
(b) Monopoly
Market Structure, I
Market Structure, IIRelative to competitive market, monopoly sets higher price produces less earns higher profit
Competitivenessentry and exit barriersperfectly contestable market -- sellers can
enter and exit at no costLerner Index (incremental margin
percentage) -- measures the degree of actual and potential competition
Monopsonybuyer with market power restricts purchases
to depress pricetrades off
marginal expenditure marginal benefit
0
273
350
400
6 8
marginal expenditure
marginal benefit
supply
Quantity (Thousand tons a year)
Pri
ce (
$ p
er
ton)
Monopsony Scale
Discussion 1Pfizer owns the patent to Viagra, which at the
time of writing, was the only approved drug for erectile dysfunction. Bayer manufactures aspirin, which is not covered by patent and is one of several drugs that relieve the symptoms of the common cold.
Discussion 1: continuedWho has relatively more market power: Pfizer
over Viagra or Bayer over aspirin?How is the difference between price and
marginal revenue related to the price elasticity of demand?
Compare the difference between price and marginal revenue for the two drugs, Viagra and aspirin.
Discussion 2Hong Kong Director-General of
Telecommunications Anthony Wong expressed concern about the effect of license auctions on the price of telecommunications: “There’s good and bad in auctioning off spectrum … it may raise costs for telecoms providers” (“Telecoms chief sees further fall in long-distance tariffs”, South China Morning Post, December 31, 1999, Business 1.)
Discussion 2: continuedTypically, licenses are transferable, but the one-time
license fee, once paid, is not refundable. From an operational standpoint, how does the cost of a license depend on the price, if any, that the owner paid for it?
How does the one-time license fee affect the marginal cost of providing telecommunications service? How does it affect the profit-maximizing scale of operations?
Suppose that the one-time license fee is changed to an annual charge based on the telecommunications provider’s revenue. How would the new policy affect the service provider’s profit-maximizing scale of operations?
Discussion 3Discount retailer Dollar General targets low and
fixed-income families in the midwest and southeast. The majority of the chain’s 3,200 items are priced at $1 or lower. Shoppers spend an average of $8.06 a trip. The average store size is 6,700 square feet. In 1998, Dollar General discontinued most advertising. While financial analysts worried that sales would drop, the company’s profit rose. Chief Executive Cal Turner, Jr., explained: “Our customer lives within three to five miles of the store, knows we’re there, knows who we are and appreciates the everyday low price,” (“Dollar General Sticks to Plan for Prosperity,” Wall Street Journal, August 16, 1999, page B11E).
Discussion 3: continuedHow could the cut in advertising raise profit
while reducing sales?Explain Mr Turner’s comment in terms of the
advertising elasticity of demand.Relate Dollar General’s incremental margin
and advertising elasticity of demand to the new advertising policy.